Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Comparative analysis of diverse methodologies for portfolio optimization leveraging quantum annealing techniques

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.02599 v3 pith:XQOU43DC submitted 2024-03-05 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords annealingportfolioquantumoptimizationalgorithmsschedulesadvantagesalgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Portfolio optimization (PO) is extensively employed in financial services to assist in achieving investment objectives. By providing an optimal asset allocation, PO effectively balances the risk and returns associated with investments. However, it is important to note that as the number of involved assets and constraints increases, the portfolio optimization problem can become increasingly difficult to solve, falling into the category of NP-hard problems. In such scenarios, classical algorithms, such as the Monte Carlo method, exhibit limitations in addressing this challenge when the number of stocks in the portfolio grows. Quantum annealing algorithm holds promise for solving complex portfolio optimization problems in the NISQ era. Many studies have demonstrated the advantages of various quantum annealing algorithm variations over the standard quantum annealing approach. In this work, we conduct a numerical investigation of randomly generated unconstrained single-period discrete mean-variance portfolio optimization instances. We explore the application of a variety of unconventional quantum annealing algorithms, employing both forward annealing and reverse annealing schedules. By comparing the time-to-solution(TTS) and success probabilities of diverse approaches, we show that certain methods exhibit advantages in enhancing the success probability when utilizing conventional forward annealing schedules. Furthermore, we find that the implementation of reverse annealing schedules can significantly improve the performance of select unconventional quantum annealing algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Portfolio Optimization: An Extensive Benchmark

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a new 260-instance real-world benchmark, classical MIP and heuristics clearly outperform quantum annealing and QAOA for a volatility-minimizing portfolio optimization variant.

Pith tools