REVIEW 3 cited by
Top quark decay at next-to-leading order in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider top quark decay in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). We present a calculation of the total decay width and the $W$-boson helicity fractions at next-to-leading order (NLO) in SMEFT. Our result includes the complete set of contributing four-fermion operators in addition to QCD dipole operators and bottom-mass suppressed effects. We show that operators that first appear at NLO in the SMEFT can be bounded by the current data as well as future data from both a high-luminosity LHC and a potential $e^+e^-$ collider, demonstrating the importance of going beyond leading order when studying the SMEFT. We discuss technical aspects of our calculation that we believe will be useful in future higher-order studies of the SMEFT, in particular the treatment of $\gamma_5$ in loop diagrams.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Precision tests of third-generation four-quark operators: $gg \to h$ and $h \to \gamma \gamma$
Two-loop SMEFT corrections from third-generation four-quark operators to gg to h and h to gamma gamma are computed with full mass dependence, including new two-loop anomalous dimensions.
-
Counting b-jets at the FCC-ee as a probe of top-quark flavor physics
FCC-ee at 240 GeV can probe Λ_eff ∼ 7–13 TeV for scalar, vector and tensor eetu/eetc operators by counting b_P-odd single-b-jet multi-jet events.
-
Flavor physics at the EIC with b-jet tagging
Single b-jet counting in charged-current events at the EIC could probe new flavor-changing physics up to Λ_eff ≈ 5 TeV, about 30 times the collider energy, assuming tight b-tagging and polarized beams.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.