Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Identifying Non-Control Security-Critical Data through Program Dependence Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.12071 v2 pith:XREZJV5C submitted 2021-08-27 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords criticaldataprogramidentifyattacksdata-orientedfeatureslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As control-flow protection gets widely deployed, it is difficult for attackers to corrupt control-data and achieve control-flow hijacking. Instead, data-oriented attacks, which manipulate non-control data, have been demonstrated to be feasible and powerful. In data-oriented attacks, a fundamental step is to identify non-control, security-critical data. However, critical data identification processes are not scalable in previous works, because they mainly rely on tedious human efforts to identify critical data. To address this issue, we propose a novel approach that combines traditional program analysis with deep learning. At a higher level, by examining how analysts identify critical data, we first propose dynamic analysis algorithms to identify the program semantics (and features) that are correlated with the impact of a critical data. Then, motivated by the unique challenges in the critical data identification task, we formalize the distinguishing features and use customized program dependence graphs (PDG) to embed the features. Different from previous works using deep learning to learn basic program semantics, this paper adopts a special neural network architecture that can capture the long dependency paths (in the PDG), through which a critical variable propagates its impact. We have implemented a fully-automatic toolchain and conducted comprehensive evaluations. According to the evaluations, our model can achieve 90% accuracy. The toolchain uncovers 80 potential critical variables in Google FuzzBench. In addition, we demonstrate the harmfulness of the exploits using the identified critical variables by simulating 7 data-oriented attacks through GDB.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools