Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models as Data Preprocessors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.16361 v2 pith:XRGHKCEY submitted 2023-08-30 cs.AI cs.DB

classification cs.AIcs.DB
keywords datallmspreprocessingmodelsapplicationsdatasetsgpt-4language
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs), typified by OpenAI's GPT, have marked a significant advancement in artificial intelligence. Trained on vast amounts of text data, LLMs are capable of understanding and generating human-like text across a diverse range of topics. This study expands on the applications of LLMs, exploring their potential in data preprocessing, a critical stage in data mining and analytics applications. Aiming at tabular data, we delve into the applicability of state-of-the-art LLMs such as GPT-4 and GPT-4o for a series of preprocessing tasks, including error detection, data imputation, schema matching, and entity matching. Alongside showcasing the inherent capabilities of LLMs, we highlight their limitations, particularly in terms of computational expense and inefficiency. We propose an LLM-based framework for data preprocessing, which integrates cutting-edge prompt engineering techniques, coupled with traditional methods like contextualization and feature selection, to improve the performance and efficiency of these models. The effectiveness of LLMs in data preprocessing is evaluated through an experimental study spanning a variety of public datasets. GPT-4 emerged as a standout, achieving 100\% accuracy or F1 score on 4 of these datasets, suggesting LLMs' immense potential in these tasks. Despite certain limitations, our study underscores the promise of LLMs in this domain and anticipates future developments to overcome current hurdles.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Models for Predictive Analysis: How Far Are They?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Existing LLMs perform poorly on predictive analysis, with the best model scoring 24.11/28 and most models failing to generate executable code.

  2. Towards Scalable Schema Mapping using Large Language Models

    cs.DB 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-based schema mapping can be made more scalable and robust through sampled prompts, bidirectional confidence aggregation, and rule chunking, letting a smaller open-source model match GPT-4-based performance on MIMI...

  3. Accelerating Reinforcement Learning Algorithms Convergence using Pre-trained Large Language Models as Tutors With Advice Reusing

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLM tutoring modestly accelerates RL convergence on average, with advice reuse saving wall-clock time but reducing stability.

Pith tools