Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 71 references

Production of Iodine Isotopes via Ultra-intense Laser Driven Photonuclear Reactions

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Laser-driven bremsstrahlung from a high-charge electron beam produces proton-rich iodine isotopes, including the (γ,8n) channel, with per-shot yields of medical isotopes 124I and 123I.

desk verdict New (γ,6-8n) data at 150 MeV from a credible activation experiment, but the absolute cross sections rest on an unvalidated simulated flux and the (γ,8n) point is marginal. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18146 v1 pith:XSDBSNFY submitted 2025-07-24 nucl-ex

Weifu Yin , Tongjun Xu , Guoqiang Zhang , Putong Wang , Yihang Zhang , Yufeng Dong , Xiangai Deng , Youjing Wang
show 18 more authors
Zhiguo Ma Changbo Fu Kai Zhao Fenghua Qiao Lulin Fan Yingzi Dai Bowen Zhang Hui Zhang Chenyu Qin Dirui Xu Jing Wang Jishao Xu Wanqing Su Lianghong Yu Xiaoyan Liang Liangliang Ji Ruxin Li Yu-Gang Ma
This is my paper
classification nucl-ex PACS 25.20.-x
keywords laser-drivenbremsstrahlungphotonuclearreactionsproton-richiodineisotopesmedicalisotopeproductionflux-weightedaveragecrosssection127I(γxn)laser-plasmaelectronaccelerationastrophysicalgamma-process
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that an ultra-intense laser pulse can accelerate a very high-charge electron beam (tens of nanocoulombs) whose bremsstrahlung photons can drive photonuclear reactions on iodine, producing proton-rich isotopes that are normally made only with large accelerators or reactors. The authors report measured per-shot yields of six iodine isotopes from 127I(γ,xn) reactions with x = 1, 3, 4, 6–8, including the high-multiplicity (γ,8n) channel, and they convert these yields into flux-weighted average cross sections that are compared with a statistical reaction model. The two medically relevant isotopes, 124I and 123I, are produced at about 9.83±0.45×$10^{5}$ and 2.81±0.11×$10^{5}$ atoms per shot, respectively. The significance, if correct, is that compact high-power lasers could become an alternative source for medical isotope production and a laboratory tool for studying photonuclear reactions relevant to explosive stellar nucleosynthesis.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the flux-weighted average cross section, ⟨σ⟩ = ∫ σ(E) ϕ(E) dE / ∫ ϕ(E) dE, which reduces the energy-dependent photonuclear cross section and the broadband bremsstrahlung spectrum to a single number per channel, allowing a direct comparison between measured activation yields and theoretical predictions. The photon flux ϕ(E) is obtained by simulating the laser-accelerated electron spectrum (fit as a two-temperature distribution with temperatures 7.56 MeV and 40.21 MeV) striking the lead converter, and the cross sections σ(E) come from a statistical nuclear reaction model. The maximum of the combined energy window, where the product of photon flux and reaction cross section peaks, plays the role of a Gamow peak in charged-particle astrophysics, and the paper exploits this overlap to justify the source as a stellar-photon-bath analog.

What would settle it

Measure the absolute bremsstrahlung spectrum produced by the lead converter using a stack of activation foils with well-known photonuclear cross sections and compare it with the simulated spectrum used in this paper; a disagreement larger than the quoted uncertainties would show the reported flux-weighted cross sections are systematically wrong. Alternatively, irradiate an identical sodium iodide target with bremsstrahlung from a conventional electron accelerator of known flux and the same endpoint energy and check whether the derived yields reproduce the laser-driven values.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a 47.7 nC electron beam (electrons above 10.4 MeV) accelerated by a single ultra-intense laser pulse, when stopped in a 3.92 mm lead converter, produces a sufficiently intense bremsstrahlung field to activate a sodium iodide target and create the proton-rich iodine isotopes 119I, 120I, 121I, 123I, 124I, and 126I through photoneutron emission (with 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, or 8 neutrons removed), together with 128I from neutron capture on 127I. The paper reports average yields per laser shot for each isotope and derives flux-weighted average cross sections for the six (γ,xn) channels, finding that the measured values fall exponentially with neutron multiplicity (coefficient 0.81 per neutron) and agree with statistical-model predictions for the 3n, 4n, 6n, 7n, and 8n channels within the experimental uncertainties. The identification of the (γ,8n) channel at a nominal endpoint energy near 150 MeV extends the measurable photoneutron multiplicity range for iodine to a channel previously accessible only with much higher-energy electron machines.

Load-bearing premise

The absolute scale of every reported cross section is set by dividing the measured gamma-ray yields by a simulated bremsstrahlung photon flux, so if the simulated flux does not match the flux that actually struck the target, all the quoted average cross sections are shifted by the same factor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single-shot yield of roughly 10^6 atoms of 124I and 3×10^5 atoms of 123I means that a laser operating at even a few hertz could accumulate clinically relevant quantities of these PET and SPECT isotopes in minutes to hours.
  • Measuring the (γ,8n) channel at around 150 MeV endpoint provides a new data point for statistical-model codes, which can refine predictions of multi-neutron emission in photonuclear reactions.
  • The measured exponential decline of flux-weighted cross sections with emitted-neutron number (0.81 per neutron) offers a quantitative benchmark for comparing laser-driven bremsstrahlung sources with conventional accelerators of different endpoint energies.
  • The thermal-like shape of the laser bremsstrahlung spectrum means the same setup can be used to test photodisintegration reaction rates in a laboratory simulation of the astrophysical γ-process.
  • The concurrent production of 128I and 24Na through neutron capture shows the target also emits an ultra-short-pulse photoneutron flux, which could serve as a compact pulsed neutron source.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A key cross-check not performed in the paper: directly measuring the bremsstrahlung photon spectrum with activation foils whose (γ,n) cross sections are well known would validate the simulated flux on which all quoted cross sections rest.
  • The paper's per-shot yields at a 15-minute shot interval imply that scaling to high repetition rates is the missing step for real clinical deployment; the stated numbers are a proof of principle rather than a production rate.
  • The same activation approach could be applied to other target elements, such as tellurium or molybdenum, to produce additional medical isotopes or to measure photodisintegration channels relevant to p-nucleus nucleosynthesis, since only the converter and target material would change.
  • The difference between the measured 0.81 per-neutron exponential slope and the 0.56 per-neutron slope reported at higher endpoint energies suggests the multiplicity dependence is energy-dependent; a systematic endpoint scan with the same method could test that interpretation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experiment at the SULF 10 PW laser facility in which a laser-accelerated electron beam with total charge around 47.7 nC and energy above 10.4 MeV is converted into bremsstrahlung on a lead converter, irradiating a sodium iodide target. From gamma-ray spectrometry of the activated target, the authors identify proton-rich iodine isotopes 119I, 120I, 121I, 123I, 124I, and 126I produced through 127I(γ,xn) reactions with x = 1,3,4,6-8, plus 128I and 24Na from secondary neutron capture. They report average yields per laser shot, most notably 9.83±0.45×10^5/shot for 124I and 2.81±0.11×10^5/shot for 123I, and flux-weighted average cross sections ⟨σ⟩ for the observed channels. The experimental ⟨σ⟩ values are compared with TALYS 2.0 calculations and with previous bremsstrahlung measurements at higher endpoint energies.

Significance. If the quantitative results are valid, the paper would demonstrate a compact laser-driven route to proton-rich medical iodine isotopes and extend photonuclear reaction measurements toward high neutron multiplicity channels with a table-top-scale source. The inclusion of half-life decay-curve checks for most identified nuclides, the use of both Geant4 and PIC simulations, and the comparison with TALYS 2.0 and earlier accelerator data are strengths that make the qualitative demonstration credible. However, the central quantitative quantities—the flux-weighted average cross sections in Table II—are derived by dividing measured photopeak yields by a simulated absolute bremsstrahlung flux, and the quoted uncertainties reflect only photopeak counting statistics. Because no independent validation of the simulated photon flux is provided, and because the claimed (γ,8n) channel rests on a 1.5σ signal, the numerical cross sections and the new-channel claim are not yet firmly established. The paper's qualitative conclusions about isotope production would survive, but the quantitative cross-section claims and the astrophysical implications do not.

major comments (4)
  1. [III.B, Table I] The identification of 119I, and hence the claimed (γ,8n) channel, is not statistically robust: the net counts for the 257.52 keV peak are listed as 63±41, which is consistent with zero at about 1.5σ. The text also states that no reliable half-life analysis was possible for this peak. A full-energy peak at this significance level cannot support a definitive nuclide identification or a quantitative cross-section entry of 0.24±0.15 mb in Table II. The authors should either provide stronger evidence (e.g., a second gamma line, a statistically significant decay curve, or an upper limit) or downgrade the (γ,8n) claim to an upper limit and remove it from the central conclusions.
  2. [III.A and III.B, Eq. (4)] All flux-weighted average cross sections in Table II inherit the absolute normalization of the Geant4-simulated bremsstrahlung spectrum, but the manuscript provides no experimental validation of that photon flux, its angular profile, or its endpoint behavior. Section III.A states that the electron charge carries a 20% systematic uncertainty from the image-plate calibration, and the Geant4 model depends on the bi-exponential fit parameters Te1 and Te2 and on the lead converter geometry. None of these systematic uncertainties are propagated into the quoted ⟨σ⟩ values, which carry only the Gaussian net-area errors. The comparison with TALYS in Table II and Figure 7 is therefore not a meaningful test of the cross-section model until the flux normalization is validated (for example, with an activation foil of known cross section or a direct photon-flux measurement) and the systematic uncertainty is quantified.
  3. [Abstract and III.A] The electron beam charge is quoted as approximately 47.7 nC in the abstract but as 47.4 nC in Section III.A for the same optimal condition. While this may be a rounding or versioning inconsistency, it affects the bremsstrahlung flux normalization through the simulation input. The two values should be reconciled, and the total uncertainty on the charge should be stated in the abstract-level summary as well as in the experimental section.
  4. [III.B, Table I and Section III.B] The reported yield of 126I is about two orders of magnitude larger than that of 124I, and the authors themselves note in Section III.B that the 126I yield could include contributions from Compton-scattered photons in the thick target and from the 127I(n,2n)126I reaction. Since the 126I line is also one of the strongest signals used in the analysis, this possible contamination should be quantified. If a substantial part of the 388.63 keV peak comes from secondary reactions rather than from primary (γ,n) photodisintegration, then the corresponding ⟨σ⟩ for the (γ,n) channel in Table II and the exponential trend in Figure 7 would be biased.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase "focusing a ultra-intense laser pulse" should be corrected to "focusing an ultra-intense laser pulse."
  2. [II.C] The text says "A particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations were performed," which has a subject-verb agreement error and should read "Particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations were performed."
  3. [III.B] The sentence beginning "The greater deviations observed for the longer-lived nuclides, 126I and 124I, can be attributed to the shorter measurement durations employed" is followed by an incomplete contrast; the text seems to break off before explaining the opposite case. This should be rewritten for clarity.
  4. [Fig. 5] The y-axis of the gamma-ray spectrum is not labeled in the description or in the figure caption; the authors should state whether it is counts, counts per channel, or count rate, and whether the displayed spectrum is background-subtracted.
  5. [Table II] The table lists endpoint energy 150.0 MeV for all channels, but the text and Figure 4(a) should clarify whether this is the maximum electron energy from the fitted spectrum or a nominal endpoint of the Geant4 simulation; the distinction matters for the quoted ⟨σ⟩ values.
  6. [III.C] The statement that electrons with energies from 25.8 to 150.0 MeV produced a total charge of 16.18 nC/shot is inconsistent with the total charge of 47.4 nC quoted in Section III.A; the relationship between these two numbers should be explained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: measured gamma yields and the simulated bremsstrahlung flux are independent inputs, and the reported flux-weighted cross sections are standard model-normalized measurements rather than fits to themselves.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is: HPGe-measured photopeak areas are corrected by detector efficiency and decay factors to give per-shot yields (Eq. 3); these yields are divided by the Geant4-simulated absolute bremsstrahlung flux to obtain flux-weighted average cross sections (Eq. 4). The two inputs are independent: the gamma yields come from activation of the NaI(Tl) target, while the photon flux is simulated from the measured electron energy spectrum and charge. No parameter in the derivation is fitted to the quantity it is used to predict. The electron spectrum is fitted (bi-exponential temperatures Te1 = 7.56 MeV, Te2 = 40.21 MeV) to image-plate data, and the bremsstrahlung spectrum is then generated by Geant4 from that spectrum; the measured gamma yields are not used to adjust the flux. Comparisons with TALYS 2.0 and with prior experiments (Naik et al., Jonsson et al.) provide external benchmarks. The paper does contain limitations that affect accuracy but not circularity: the absolute photon-flux normalization is not directly validated, the quoted cross-section uncertainties in Table II propagate only photopeak net-area errors, and the text itself notes possible 126I contamination from Compton-scattered photons and the 127I(n,2n)126I channel. These are systematic-risk concerns, not reductions of a result to its own inputs. Self-citations are limited to supporting technical references (laser commissioning, gamma-beam development, prior photonuclear work) and are not load-bearing for the central derivation. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reported results rest on standard simulation tools (Geant4, TALYS, PIC, CFD) and on assumptions about the electron diagnosis and the simulated gamma flux, but introduce no new physics entities. The free parameters are the electron spectrum fit temperatures, the HPGe efficiency polynomial coefficients, the chosen 150 MeV endpoint, and a derived fit coefficient.

free parameters (4)
  • Electron spectrum fit temperatures Te1 and Te2 = 7.56 MeV and 40.21 MeV
    Bi-exponential fit to the electron stack energy spectrum (Section III.A, Fig. 4(b)) used as input to the Geant4 bremsstrahlung simulation; affects the photon flux normalization and energy shape.
  • HPGe absolute efficiency polynomial coefficients pi = Not listed numerically
    Polynomial fit of Eq. 1 to Geant4 efficiency points for point and volumetric sources (Section II.B); affects absolute yield extraction for all isotopes.
  • Bremsstrahlung endpoint energy Emax = 150 MeV
    Used in Eq. 4 and Table II; taken from the electron stack cutoff rather than from a direct measurement, and affects the flux-weighted cross-section interpretation.
  • Exponential decline coefficient per emitted neutron = 0.81 per neutron
    Fit to the measured flux-weighted average cross sections versus neutron multiplicity (Section III.B, Fig. 7); a derived result, not an input to the yields.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Geant4-simulated bremsstrahlung spectrum accurately represents the absolute photon flux incident on the NaI(Tl) target
    Section III.A and III.B use this flux as the normalization for extracting ⟨σ⟩; inaccuracies in the lead-converter simulation or the electron spectrum shift all cross sections.
  • domain assumption The image-plate electron stack measures the total charge and energy spectrum representatively for each laser shot
    Section II.A and III.A take charge (47.4 nC) and spectrum from one stack measurement and apply them to the irradiation shots; shot-to-shot fluctuations are not included.
  • domain assumption The detector efficiency for volumetric sources is the same for all product isotopes, based on the Geant4-simulated 126I distribution
    Section II.B uses a single volumetric efficiency curve; the spatial distributions of 123I, 124I, and other products in the crystal are not separately simulated.
  • domain assumption TALYS 2.0 default parameters provide reliable theoretical cross sections for comparison
    Section III.B and Table II use TALYS 2.0 as the benchmark; the comparison is informative but not a circular input, and deviations do not invalidate the experimental yields.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Production of Iodine Isotopes via Ultra-intense Laser Driven Photonuclear Reactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XSDBSNFY

@misc{pith2026250718146,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Production of Iodine Isotopes via Ultra-intense Laser Driven Photonuclear Reactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XSDBSNFY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18146}
}
abstract

The investigation and production of proton-rich iodine isotopes predominantly rely on conventional accelerator-based methods, typically requiring prolonged irradiation periods to measure or achieve quantifiable yields for isotopic isolation. Bremsstrahlung radiation sources generated by high-power laser-plasma-accelerated electron beams with ultrahigh charge (tens of nanocoulombs) bombarding high-Z targets demonstrate extraordinary photon flux characteristics. An electron beam with a total charge of approximately 47.7 nC (E$_e$ $\gt$ 10.4 MeV) was generated in our experiment by focusing a ultra-intense laser pulse onto a deuterium gas jet. Laser-driven bremsstrahlung was employed to induce $^{127}I$$(\gamma,xn)$ ($x$ = 1,3,4,6-8), and the product yields and the corresponding flux-weighted average cross sections are reported. Our results demonstrate production of medical isotopes, with average yields of $^{124}$I and $^{123}$I at approximately $9.83\pm0.45\times10^{5}$/shot and $2.81\pm0.11\times10^{5}$/shot, respectively. This method, utilizing high-power lasers to generate bremsstrahlung radiation, shows significant potential for medical applications and opens new avenues for studying photonuclear processes in astrophysical contexts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18146 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Simple schematic of the layout of the experimental setup. (b) Ar density profile at 20 bar back pressure. (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. HPGe detector energy calibration and absolute de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a)Bremsstrahlung spectrum (Geant4 [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Typical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Typical decay curves for the isotopes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The experimentally measured flux-weighted aver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Donna and M

    S. Donna and M. Gerard, Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses, Optics Communications56, 219 (1985)

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    G. A. Mourou, T. Tajima, and S. V. Bulanov, Optics in the relativistic regime, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 309 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    C. N. Danson, C. Haefner, J. Bromage, T. Butcher, J.- C. F. Chanteloup, E. A. Chowdhury, A. Galvanauskas, L. A. Gizzi, J. Hein, D. I. Hillier, andet al., Petawatt and exawatt class lasers worldwide, High Power Laser Science and Engineering 7, e54 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    K. A. Tanaka, K. M. Spohr, D. L. Balabanski, S. Balas- cuta, L. Capponi, M. O. Cernaianu, M. Cuciuc, A. Cu- coanes, I. Dancus, A. Dhal, B. Diaconescu, D. Doria, P. Ghenuche, D. G. Ghita, S. Kisyov, V. Nastasa, J. F. Ong, F. Rotaru, D. Sangwan, P. A. Söderström, D. Stut- man, G. Suliman, O. Tesileanu, L. Tudor, N. Tsoneva, C. A. Ur, D. Ursescu, and N. V. Z...

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Esarey, C

    E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, and W. P. Leemans, Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1229 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    Tajima and J

    T. Tajima and J. M. Dawson, Laser electron accelerator, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 267 (1979)

    1979

  7. [7]

    J. Feng, Y. J. Li, J. H. Tan, W. Z. Wang, Y. F. Li, X. P. Zhang, Y. Meng, X. L. Ge, F. Liu, W. C. Yan, C. B. Fu, L. M. Chen, and J. Zhang, Laser plasma-accelerated ultra-intenseelectronbeamforefficientlyexcitingnuclear isomers, Laser & Photonics Reviews17, 2300514 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Bruhaug, K

    J.L.Shaw, M.A.Romo-Gonzalez, N.Lemos, P.M.King, G. Bruhaug, K. G. Miller, C. Dorrer, B. Kruschwitz, L. Waxer, G. J. Williams, M. V. Ambat, M. M. McKie, M. D. Sinclair, W. B. Mori, C. Joshi, H. Chen, J. P. Palastro, F. Albert, and D. H. Froula, Microcoulomb (0.7± 0.4 0.2 µC) laser plasma accelerator on OMEGA EP, Scientific Reports 11, 7498 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Mirani, D

    F. Mirani, D. Calzolari, A. Formenti, and M. Passoni, Su- perintense laser-driven photon activation analysis, Com- munications Physics 4, 185 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Z. C. Li, H. W. Wang, W. Luo, Y. Yang, Z. W. Cao, X. X. Li, Y. Yuan, Z. Q. Zhao, and G. T. Fan, Effective extraction of photoneutron cross-section distribution us- ing gamma activation and reaction yield ratio method, Nuclear Science and Techniques34, 170 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    L. Fan, T. Xu, S. Li, Z. Xu, J. Xu, J. Zhu, B. Shen, and L. Ji, Collimated gamma beams with high peak flux driven by laser-accelerated electrons, High Power Laser Science and Engineering11, e26 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    S. Li, B. F. Shen, J. C. Xu, T. J. Xu, Y. Yu, J. F. Li, X. M. Lu, C. Wang, X. L. Wang, X. Y. Liang, Y. X. Leng, R. X. Li, and Z. Z. Xu, Ultrafast multi-mev gamma-ray beam produced by laser-accelerated electrons, Physics of Plasmas 24, 093104 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Arnould and S

    M. Arnould and S. Goriely, The p-process of stellar nu- cleosynthesis: astrophysics and nuclear physics status, Physics Reports 384, 1 (2003)

    2003

  6. [14]

    Hayakawa, T

    T. Hayakawa, T. Nakamura, H. Kotaki, M. Kando, and T. Kajino, Explosive nucleosynthesis study using laser driven γ-ray pulses, Quantum Beam Science1 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Zilges, D

    A. Zilges, D. L. Balabanski, J. Isaak, and N. Pietralla, Photonuclear reactions—from basic research to appli- cations, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 122, 103903 (2022). 11

    2022

  8. [16]

    D. Wu, H. Y. Lan, J. Y. Zhang, J. X. Liu, H. G. Lu, J. F. Lv, X. Z. Wu, H. Zhang, J. Cai, Q. Y. Ma, Y. H. Xia, Z. N. Wang, M. Z. Wang, Z. Y. Yang, X. L. Xu, Y. X. Geng, Y. Y. Zhao, C. Lin, W. J. Ma, J. Q. Yu, H. R. Wang, F. L. Liu, C. Y. He, B. Guo, P. Zhu, G. Q. Zhang, N. Y. ...

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    H. Y. Lan, D. Wu, J. X. Liu, J. Y. Zhang, H. G. Lu, J. F. Lv, X. Z. Wu, W. Luo, and X. Q. Yan, Photonu- clear production of nuclear isomers using bremsstrahlung induced by laser-wakefield electrons, Nuclear Science and Techniques 34, 74 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Magill, H

    J. Magill, H. Schwoerer, F. Ewald, J. Galy, R. Schenkel, and R. Sauerbrey, Laser transmutation of iodine-129, Ap- plied Physics B77, 387 (2003)

    2003

  11. [19]

    Takashima, S

    R. Takashima, S. Hasegawa, K. Nemoto, and K. Kato, Possibility of transmutation of 135Cs by ultraintense laser, Applied Physics Letters86, 011501 (2004)

    2004

  12. [20]

    Pomerantz, E

    I. Pomerantz, E. McCary, A. R. Meadows, A. Arefiev, A. C. Bernstein, C. Chester, J. Cortez, M. E. Dono- van, G. Dyer, E. W. Gaul, D. Hamilton, D. Kuk, A. C. Lestrade, C. Wang, T. Ditmire, and B. M. Hegelich, Ul- trashort pulsed neutron source, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 184801 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    M. M. Günther, O. N. Rosmej, P. Tavana, M. Gyrdy- mov, A. Skobliakov, A. Kantsyrev, Ş. Zähter, N. G. Borisenko, A. Pukhov, and N. E. Andreev, Forward- lookinginsightsinlaser-generatedultra-intense γ-rayand neutron sources for nuclear application and science, Na- ture Communica...

    2022

  14. [22]

    Tavana, N

    P. Tavana, N. Bukharskii, M. Gyrdymov, U. Spillmann, Ş. Zähter, J. Cikhardt, N. G. Borisenko, P. Korneev, J. Jacoby, C. Spielmann, N. E. Andreev, M. M. Günther, and O. N. Rosmej, Ultra-high efficiency bremsstrahlung production in the interaction of direct laser-accelerated ele...

    2023

  15. [23]

    K. W. D. Ledingham, I. Spencer, T. McCanny, R. P. Singhal, M. I. K. Santala, E. Clark, I. Watts, F. N. Beg, M. Zepf, K. Krushelnick, M. Tatarakis, A. E. Dangor, P. A. Norreys, R. Allott, D. Neely, R. J. Clark, A. C. Machacek, J. S. Wark, A. J. Cresswell, D. C. W. Sander- son, ...

    2000

  16. [24]

    J. Y. Zhang, D. Wu, H. Y. Lan, H. G. Lu, J. X. Liu, J. F. Lv, M. Z. Wang, and X. Q. Yan, Generation of medical isotopes 47Sc, 67Cu through laser-induced (γ, p) reaction, Nuclear Science and Techniques35, 206 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    R. H. Brazzle, O. V. Pravdivtseva, A. P. Meshik, and C. M. Hohenberg, Verification and interpretation of the i-xe chronometer, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta63, 739 (1999)

    1999

  18. [26]

    R. H. Gary, S. M. Bradley, S. Gopalan, N. G. Jiten- dra, and S. Sandeep, Stellar sources of the short-lived radionuclides in the early solar system, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 73, 4922 (2009), the Chronology of Meteorites and the Early Solar System

    2009

  19. [27]

    X. L. Hou, V. Hansen, A. Aldahan, G. Possnert, O. C. Lind, and G. Lujaniene, A review on speciation of iodine- 129 in the environmental and biological samples, Analyt- ica Chimica Acta632, 181 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    Rault, S

    E. Rault, S. Vandenberghe, R. Van Holen, J. De Been- houwer, S. Staelens, and I. Lemahieu, Comparison of im- age quality of different iodine isotopes (123I, 124I, and 131I), Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals22, 423 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    B. E. Hertz and K. E. Schuller, Saul hertz, md (1905- 1950): A pioneer in the use of radioactive iodine, En- docrine Practice 16, 713 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    Green, J

    M. Green, J. Lowe, M. Kadirvel, A. McMahon, N. West- wood, S. Chua, and G. Brown, Radiosynthesis of no- carrier-added meta-[124I] iodobenzylguanidine for pet imaging of metastatic neuroblastoma, Journal of Radio- analytical and Nuclear Chemistry311, 727 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Herzog, L

    H. Herzog, L. Tellmann, S. M. Qaim, S. Spellerberg, A. Schmid, and H. H. Coenen, PET quantitation and imaging of the non-pure positron-emitting iodine isotope 124I, Applied Radiation and Isotopes56, 673 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Schmitz, The production of [ 124I]iodine and [86Y]yttrium, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging38, 4 (2011)

    J. Schmitz, The production of [ 124I]iodine and [86Y]yttrium, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging38, 4 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Robbins and A

    J. Robbins and A. B. Schneider, Thyroid cancer following exposure to radioactive iodine, Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders 1, 197 (2000)

    2000

  26. [34]

    T.Ferris, L.Carroll, S.Jenner,andE.O.Aboagye,Useof radioiodine in nuclear medicine—a brief overview, Jour- nal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals 64, 92 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    H. M. Park,123I: Almost a designer radioiodine for thy- roid scanning, Journal of Nuclear Medicine43, 77 (2002)

    2002

  28. [36]

    S. K. GERARD and R. R. CAVALIERI, I-123 diagnos- tic thyroid tumor whole-body scanning with imaging at 6, 24, and 48 hours, Clinical Nuclear Medicinee 27, 1 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    S.Qaim,Useofcyclotronsinmedicine,RadiationPhysics and Chemistry 71, 917 (2004)

    2004

  30. [38]

    Artun and H

    O. Artun and H. Aytekin, Calculation of excitation func- tions of proton, alpha and deuteron induced reactions for production of medical radioisotopes122–125I, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms345, 1 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Canbula and B

    D. Canbula and B. Canbula, Cross-section calculations for the production of123I and124I radioisotopes via (p,n) and (p,2n) reactions using collective nuclear level density model, Nuclear Technology209, 895 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Bzowski, D

    P. Bzowski, D. Borys, K. Gorczewski, A. Chmura, K. Daszewska, I. Gorczewska, A. Kastelik-Hryniewiecka, M. Szydło, A. d’Amico, and M. Sokół, Efficiency of124I radioisotope production from natural and enriched tel- lurium dioxide using124Te(p,xn)124I reaction, EJNMMI Physics 9, ...

    2022

  33. [41]

    no carrier added

    Y. Sheh, J. Koziorowski, J. Balatoni, C. Lom, J. R. Dahl, and R. D. Finn, Low energy cyclotron produc- tion and chemical separation of "no carrier added" iodine-124 from a reusable, enriched tellurium-124 diox- ide/aluminum oxide solid solution target, Radiochimica Acta 88, 169 (2000)

    2000

  34. [42]

    H. N. Wellman, V. J. Sodd, and J. F. Mack, Pro- duction and clinical development of a new ideal ra- dioisotope of iodine—iodine-123, Frontiers of Nuclear Medicine/Aktuelle Nuklearmedizin , 19 (1971)

    1971

  35. [43]

    Avetisyan, R

    A. Avetisyan, R. Avagyan, R. Dallakyan, G. Avdalyan, N. Dobrovolsky, V. Gavalyan, I. Kerobyan, and G. Haru- tyunyan, Investigation of123I production using electron 12 accelerator, Nuclear Medicine and Biology47, 44 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    H. Naik, G. Kim, K. Kim, M. Zaman, and T. H. Nguyen, Flux-weighted average cross sections of medical isotopes in the127I(γ, xn) reactions with the bremsstrahlung end- point energies of 50 and 70 MeV, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 156, 108842 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Jonsson and K

    G. Jonsson and K. Lindgren, Pion effects in127I (γ, xn) reactions of high multiplicity, Nuclear Physics A141, 355 (1970)

    1970

  38. [46]

    M. A. Allen, J. K. Boyd, R. S. Callin, H. Deruyter, K. R. Eppley, K. S. Fant, W. R. Fowkes, J. Haimson, H. A. Hoag, D. B. Hopkins, T. Houck, R. F. Koontz, T. L. Lavine, G. A. Loew, B. Mecklenburg, R. H. Miller, R. D. Ruth, R. D. Ryne, A. M. Sessler, A. E. Vlieks, J. W. Wang, G...

    1989

  39. [47]

    Bayram and S

    T. Bayram and S. Akkoyun, Determinations of 171Er half-life and some171Tm transition energies, Nuclear Sci- ence and Techniques29, 39 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    A. X. Li, C. Y. Qin, H. Zhang, S. Li, L. L. Fan, Q. S. Wang, T. J. Xu, N. W. Wang, L. H. Yu, Y. Xu, andet al., Acceleration of 60 MeV proton beams in the commis- sioning experiment of the sulf-10 PW laser, High Power Laser Science and Engineering10, e26 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    ORTEC, Gamma-X (GMX) N-type High Purity Germa- nium (HPGe) Coaxial Radiation Detectors (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    IEEE, IEEE standard test procedures for germanium gamma-ray detectors, IEEE Std 325-1996 (1997)

    1997

  43. [51]

    ORTEC, DSPEC 50/50A and DSPEC 502/502A Digital Signal Processing Gamma Spectrometers (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    ORTEC, GammaVision Gamma Spectroscopy (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Sebastián, S

    S. Sebastián, S. Roque, and B. Tania, Simulation of a hpge detector with geant4, Revista Politécnica 50, 7 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Agostinelli, J

    S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo, P. Arce, M. Asai, D. Axen, S. Banerjee, G. Barrand, F. Behner, L. Bellagamba, J. Boudreau, L. Broglia, A. Brunengo, H. Burkhardt, S. Chauvie, J. Chuma, R. Chytracek, G. Cooperman, G. Cosmo, P. Degtyarenko, A. Del...

    2003

  47. [55]

    Allison, K

    J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo, P. Arce Dubois, M. Asai, G. Barrand, R. Capra, S. Chau- vie, R. Chytracek, G. Cirrone, G. Cooperman, G. Cosmo, G. Cuttone, G. Daquino, M. Donszelmann, M. Dres- sel, G. Folger, F. Foppiano, J. Generowicz, V. Grichine, S. Guatelli...

    2006

  48. [56]

    Supplemental Materials: Production of Iodine Isotopes via Ultra-intense Laser Driven Photonuclear Reactions (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    ANSYS Students 2025r1. (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    J. L. Henares, P. Puyuelo-Valdes, F. Hannachi, T. Cec- cotti, M. Ehret, F. Gobet, L. Lancia, J.-R. Marquès, J. J. Santos, M. Versteegen, and M. Tarisien, Develop- ment of gas jet targets for laser-plasma experiments at near-critical density, Review of Scientific Instruments90,...

    2019

  51. [59]

    Q. S. Liu, B. Guo, B. Z. Zhao, M. J. Ma, X. H. Ma, C. Lv, X. H. Meng, J. Zhang, X. N. Ban, Z. Wang, X. F. Xi, B. X. Tian, and C. Y. He, Effect of multiple parameters on the supersonic gas-jet target characteristics for laser wakefield acceleration, Nuclear Science and Techniqu...

    2021

  52. [60]

    Derouillat, A

    J. Derouillat, A. Beck, F. Pérez, T. Vinci, M. Chiaramello, A. Grassi, M. Flé, G. Bouchard, I. Plotnikov, N. Aunai, J. Dargent, C. Riconda, and M. Grech, Smilei : A collaborative, open-source, multi- purpose particle-in-cell code for plasma simulation, Computer Physics Communi...

    2018

  53. [61]

    A. F. Lifschitz, X. Davoine, E. Lefebvre, J. Faure, C. Rechatin, and V. Malka, Particle-in-cell modelling of laser–plasma interaction using fourier decomposition, Journal of Computational Physics228, 1803 (2009)

    2009

  54. [62]

    Massimo, A

    F. Massimo, A. Beck, J. Derouillat, M. Grech, M. Lobet, F. Pérez, I. Zemzemi, and A. Specka, Efficient start-to- end 3D envelope modeling for two-stage laser wakefield acceleration experiments, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 61, 124001 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Thermophysical Properties of Fluid Systems (2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    S. P. D. Mangles, B. R. Walton, M. Tzoufras, Z. Na- jmudin, R. J. Clarke, A. E. Dangor, R. G. Evans, S. Fritzler, A. Gopal, C. Hernandez-Gomez, W. B. Mori, W. Rozmus, M.Tatarakis, A. G. R.Thomas, F.S.Tsung, M. S. Wei, and K. Krushelnick, Electron acceleration in cavitated chan...

    2005

  57. [65]

    Najmudin, K

    Z. Najmudin, K. Krushelnick, M. Tatarakis, E. L. Clark, C. N. Danson, V. Malka, D. Neely, M. I. K. Santala, and A. E. Dangor, The effect of high intensity laser propa- gation instabilities on channel formation in underdense plasmas, Physics of Plasmas10, 438 (2003)

    2003

  58. [66]

    Boutoux, N

    G. Boutoux, N. Rabhi, D. Batani, A. Binet, J.-E. Ducret, K. Jakubowska, J.-P. Nègre, C. Reverdin, and I. Thfoin, Study of imaging plate detector sensitivity to 5-18 MeV electrons, Review of Scientific Instruments 86, 113304 (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    Koning and D

    A. Koning and D. Rochman, Modern nuclear data evalu- ation with the TALYS code system, Nuclear Data Sheets 113, 2841 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    P. Mohr, K. Vogt, M. Babilon, J. Enders, T. Hart- mann, C. Hutter, T. Rauscher, S. Volz, and A. Zilges, Experimental simulation of a stellar photon bath by bremsstrahlung: the astrophysical γ-process, Physics Letters B 488, 127 (2000)

    2000

  61. [69]

    National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    G. G. Jonsson and B. Forkman, (γ, xn) reactions in127I, Nuclear Physics A107, 52 (1968)

    1968

  63. [71]

    R. J. Debs, J. T. Eisinger, A. W. Fairhall, I. Halpern, and H. G. Richter, Yields of photonuclear reactions with 320-Mev X-rays. I. experimental results, Phys. Rev.97, 1325 (1955)

    1955

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.