pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19425 · v1 · pith:XSGEMS2Rnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · ✦ hep-ph

LeWRON: Agentic Analysis of Electroweak Phase Transitions

Isaac R. Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 20:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords electroweak phase transitionfinite-temperature effective potentialbubble nucleationgravitational wavesagentic frameworkbeyond standard modelthermal history
0
0 comments X

The pith

LeWRON is an agentic framework that orchestrates the full pipeline for electroweak phase transition analysis from an input Lagrangian.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents LeWRON as a system that automates the sequence of calculations needed to study electroweak phase transitions, beginning with an input Lagrangian and proceeding through the finite-temperature effective potential, thermal history tracking, bubble nucleation rates, and gravitational-wave spectra. It combines audited construction of model-specific tools with an Explorer module that performs scans, generates plots, and stores intermediate results as inspectable artifacts. The framework offers a reproduction mode that infers conventions to match published results and a discovery mode that guides users through checkpoints for new models. This approach targets the convention-sensitive and technically demanding nature of connecting collider phenomenology, baryogenesis, and gravitational-wave signals in beyond-Standard-Model scenarios.

Core claim

LeWRON orchestrates the EWPT analysis pipeline starting from an input Lagrangian by combining audited toolbox construction with an Explorer module that uses the generated model-specific code for further analysis, including scans and plots, with intermediate analytic outputs checked by auditor agents and stored as structured artifacts, supporting both a reproduction mode that infers conventions from the literature and a discovery mode that guides users through structured checkpoints for new models.

What carries the argument

LeWRON, the agentic framework that uses audited toolbox construction together with an Explorer module to generate, execute, and validate the sequence of finite-temperature potential, nucleation, and gravitational-wave calculations.

If this is right

  • Published EWPT results can be reproduced by supplying only the Lagrangian and letting the system infer conventions.
  • New models can be analyzed by following structured checkpoints that produce scans, plots, and stored artifacts without manual code rewriting.
  • Intermediate results remain available as human-readable structured outputs for verification or reuse in downstream studies.
  • The same pipeline can connect collider constraints to cosmological observables such as gravitational-wave signals across multiple scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Successful operation would allow systematic comparison of many Lagrangians for first-order transitions without each researcher rebuilding the calculation chain.
  • The stored artifacts could serve as standardized inputs for further studies linking phase-transition strength to baryogenesis efficiency.
  • If the framework scales, it could be tested on Lagrangians with additional fields or symmetries to check consistency across increasingly complex models.

Load-bearing premise

The audited toolbox construction and Explorer module agents can reliably generate, execute, and validate the full sequence of calculations without introducing undetected errors or convention mismatches for arbitrary input Lagrangians.

What would settle it

Run the reproduction mode on a published beyond-Standard-Model Lagrangian whose gravitational-wave spectrum or nucleation rate is already reported in the literature; exact numerical agreement with the original published values would support the claim, while any mismatch in the output spectra or rates would falsify reliable automation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.19425 by Isaac R. Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: summarizes the architecture of LeWRON. The workflow has two components. The first is an audited toolbox-construction pipeline that builds the model￾specific machinery for EWPT calculations. At the start of this pipeline, a bootstrap module parses the input task, checks that it lies within scope, and initializes the run di￾rectory to contain the generated code, reports, logs, and structured artifacts. The s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Reproduction of the right panel of Fig. 1 in Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Tunneling action and parameter space of the ALP-Higgs model. Left: parameter space for a MeV-scale ALP, using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: demonstrates the thermal history of the 2HDM+S model, whose phase transition was first in￾vestigated in Ref. [40]. We choose a benchmark point modified from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The electroweak phase transition (EWPT) is a central topic in particle physics and cosmology, connecting collider phenomenology, baryogenesis, and gravitational-wave observatories. Its analysis requires a technically demanding, convention-sensitive, and model-dependent pipeline, from constructing the finite-temperature effective potential to tracking thermal histories, computing bubble nucleation rates, and predicting gravitational-wave spectra. We present LeWRON (Learning ElectroWeak phase tRansitiON), an agentic framework that orchestrates this pipeline starting from an input Lagrangian. LeWRON combines audited toolbox construction with an Explorer module that uses the generated model-specific code for further analysis, including scans and plots. Intermediate analytic outputs are checked by auditor agents and stored as structured artifacts, enabling reproducible human inspection and downstream use through both a command-line interface and a public Python API. The framework supports a reproduction mode, which infers conventions from the literature and reproduces published results, and a discovery mode, which guides users through structured checkpoints for new models. We demonstrate LeWRON across representative beyond-the-Standard-Model scenarios and release the code on GitHub.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents LeWRON (Learning ElectroWeak phase tRansitiON), an agentic software framework that orchestrates the full electroweak phase transition analysis pipeline from an input Lagrangian. This includes construction of the finite-temperature effective potential, thermal history tracking, bubble nucleation rates, and gravitational-wave spectra predictions. The framework uses audited toolbox construction and an Explorer module, supports a reproduction mode that infers conventions to match published results and a discovery mode with structured checkpoints, stores intermediate analytic outputs as inspectable artifacts, provides both CLI and public Python API access, demonstrates the tool on representative BSM scenarios, and releases the code on GitHub.

Significance. If the described agentic orchestration and auditing mechanisms function reliably, the framework would provide a valuable, reproducible tool for a technically demanding calculation chain that connects collider phenomenology, baryogenesis, and gravitational-wave astronomy. The explicit support for human inspection of artifacts, dual reproduction/discovery modes, and public code release are concrete strengths that align with community needs for verifiable and extensible EWPT analyses.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that LeWRON is demonstrated 'across representative beyond-the-Standard-Model scenarios' but does not name the specific models or list the corresponding reproduction results; adding this information (e.g., in a dedicated demonstration section) would strengthen the reproducibility claim.
  2. The description of the auditor agents and structured artifacts would benefit from a brief example of an intermediate output (such as a checked finite-T potential or nucleation rate) to illustrate how convention mismatches are flagged in practice.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of LeWRON, the recognition of its value for reproducible EWPT analyses, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: framework description only

full rationale

The paper presents LeWRON as an agentic software framework that orchestrates existing EWPT analysis steps (finite-T potential, nucleation, GW spectra) from an input Lagrangian, with reproduction and discovery modes. No derivation chain, first-principles predictions, fitted parameters, or uniqueness theorems are claimed. The central claim is the reliability of the pipeline orchestration itself, which is an empirical/software claim rather than a mathematical reduction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, ansatzes, or renamings of known results appear in the provided text. The derivation is self-contained as a tool description.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a software-framework paper reviewed from the abstract only, no free parameters, domain axioms, or invented physical entities are identified. The work relies on standard existing methods for effective-potential calculations and agentic AI tooling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5714 in / 1217 out tokens · 25854 ms · 2026-06-26T20:05:09.092298+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large Language Model-Assisted Framework for BSM Model Building

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An open-source framework that automates BSM Lagrangian construction, anomaly checks, and mass-matrix derivation from natural-language field specifications by using an LLM only as an orchestration layer over a determin...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A Lattice Monte Carlo study of the hot electroweak phase transition,

    K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “A Lattice Monte Carlo study of the hot electroweak phase transition,”Nucl. Phys. B407 (1993) 356–372,arXiv:hep-ph/9305345

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  2. [2]

    The Electroweak phase transition at m(H) approximately = m(W),

    K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “The Electroweak phase transition at m(H) approximately = m(W),”Phys. Lett. B336 (1994) 494–501,arXiv:hep-ph/9405234

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  3. [3]

    Status of the Finite Temperature Electroweak Phase Transition on the Lattice,

    K. Jansen, “Status of the Finite Temperature Electroweak Phase Transition on the Lattice,”Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements47(1996) 196–211,arXiv:hep-lat/9509018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  4. [4]

    The Electroweak phase transition: A Nonperturbative analysis,

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “The Electroweak phase transition: A Nonperturbative analysis,”Nucl. Phys. B466(1996) 189–258,arXiv:hep-lat/9510020

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  5. [5]

    Finite T Electroweak Phase Transition on the Lattice,

    K. Rummukainen, “Finite T Electroweak Phase Transition on the Lattice,”Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements53(1997) 30–42, arXiv:hep-lat/9608079

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?,

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2887–2890,arXiv:hep-ph/9605288

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  7. [7]

    Where the electroweak phase transition ends,

    M. Gurtler, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, and A. Schiller, “Where the electroweak phase transition ends,”Phys. Rev. D 56(1997) 3888–3895,arXiv:hep-lat/9704013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    Endpoint of the hot electroweak phase transition,

    F. Csikor, Z. Fodor, and J. Heitger, “Endpoint of the hot electroweak phase transition,”Phys. Rev. Lett.82 (1999) 21–24,arXiv:hep-ph/9809291

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    A Strong electroweak phase transition up to m(H) is about 105-GeV,

    M. Laine and K. Rummukainen, “A Strong electroweak phase transition up to m(H) is about 105-GeV,”Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 5259–5262, arXiv:hep-ph/9804255

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    The MSSM Electroweak Phase Transition on the Lattice,

    M. Laine and K. Rummukainen, “The MSSM Electroweak Phase Transition on the Lattice,”Nuclear Physics B535(1998) 423–457, arXiv:hep-lat/9804019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    The Universality class of the electroweak theory,

    K. Rummukainen, M. Tsypin, K. Kajantie, M. Laine, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “The Universality class of the electroweak theory,”Nucl. Phys. B532(1998) 283–314,arXiv:hep-lat/9805013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    Electroweak Phase Transitions,

    Z. Fodor, “Electroweak Phase Transitions,”Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements83–84(2000) 121–125,arXiv:hep-lat/9909162

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  13. [13]

    The Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis,

    G. W. Anderson and L. J. Hall, “The Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis,”Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 2685–2698

    1992

  14. [14]

    The Electroweak phase transition in a nonminimal supersymmetric model,

    M. Pietroni, “The Electroweak phase transition in a nonminimal supersymmetric model,”Nucl. Phys. B 402(1993) 27–45,arXiv:hep-ph/9207227

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  15. [15]

    The Electroweak phase transition with a singlet,

    J. R. Espinosa and M. Quiros, “The Electroweak phase transition with a singlet,”Phys. Lett. B305(1993) 98–105,arXiv:hep-ph/9301285

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  16. [16]

    Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter via a gauge singlet scalar,

    J. McDonald, “Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter via a gauge singlet scalar,”Phys. Lett. B323 (1994) 339–346

    1994

  17. [17]

    Real Higgs singlet and the electroweak phase transition in the Standard Model,

    J. Choi and R. R. Volkas, “Real Higgs singlet and the electroweak phase transition in the Standard Model,” Phys. Lett.B317(1993) 385–391, arXiv:hep-ph/9308234 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  18. [18]

    Efficient electroweak baryogenesis from lepton transport,

    M. Joyce, T. Prokopec, and N. Turok, “Efficient electroweak baryogenesis from lepton transport,”Phys. Lett. B338(1994) 269–275,arXiv:hep-ph/9401352

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  19. [19]

    Dynamics of two Higgs doublet CP violation and baryogenesis at the electroweak phase transition,

    J. M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, and A. P. Vischer, “Dynamics of two Higgs doublet CP violation and baryogenesis at the electroweak phase transition,” Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 2451–2472, arXiv:hep-ph/9506284

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  20. [20]

    Strong First Order Electroweak Phase Transition in the CP-Conserving 2HDM Revisited,

    P. Basler, M. Krause, M. Muhlleitner, J. Wittbrodt, and A. Wlotzka, “Strong First Order Electroweak Phase Transition in the CP-Conserving 2HDM Revisited,”JHEP02(2017) 121,arXiv:1612.04086 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    The CP-Violating 2HDM in Light of a Strong First Order Electroweak Phase Transition and Implications for Higgs Pair Production,

    P. Basler, M. M¨ uhlleitner, and J. Wittbrodt, “The CP-Violating 2HDM in Light of a Strong First Order Electroweak Phase Transition and Implications for Higgs Pair Production,”JHEP03(2018) 061, arXiv:1711.04097 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Adiabatic electroweak baryogenesis driven by an axionlike particle,

    K. S. Jeong, T. H. Jung, and C. S. Shin, “Adiabatic electroweak baryogenesis driven by an axionlike particle,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 3, (2020) 035009, arXiv:1811.03294 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Axionic Electroweak Baryogenesis,

    K. S. Jeong, T. H. Jung, and C. S. Shin, “Axionic Electroweak Baryogenesis,”Phys. Lett. B790(2019) 326–331,arXiv:1806.02591 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Spontaneous CP-Violating Electroweak Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from a Complex Singlet Scalar,

    B. Grzadkowski and D. Huang, “Spontaneous CP-Violating Electroweak Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from a Complex Singlet Scalar,”JHEP08 (2018) 135,arXiv:1807.06987 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Electroweak Phase Transition in Non-Minimal Higgs Sectors,

    P. Basler, M. M¨ uhlleitner, and J. M¨ uller, “Electroweak Phase Transition in Non-Minimal Higgs Sectors,” JHEP05(2020) 016,arXiv:1912.10477 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Electroweak phase transition with spontaneous Z 2-breaking,

    M. Carena, Z. Liu, and Y. Wang, “Electroweak phase transition with spontaneous Z 2-breaking,”JHEP08 (2020) 107,arXiv:1911.10206 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    CP violation in the top-assisted electroweak baryogenesis,

    W. Chao and Y. Liu, “CP violation in the top-assisted electroweak baryogenesis,”arXiv:1910.09303 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 1910

  28. [28]

    Lepton-mediated electroweak baryogenesis, gravitational waves and the 4τfinal state at the collider,

    K.-P. Xie, “Lepton-mediated electroweak baryogenesis, gravitational waves and the 4τfinal state at the collider,”JHEP02(2021) 090,arXiv:2011.04821 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 8, 052 (2022)]

    arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational waves in a composite Higgs model with high dimensional fermion representations,

    K.-P. Xie, L. Bian, and Y. Wu, “Electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational waves in a composite Higgs model with high dimensional fermion representations,”JHEP12(2020) 047, arXiv:2005.13552 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    νelectroweak baryogenesis,

    E. Fern´ andez-Mart´ ınez, J. L´ opez-Pav´ on, T. Ota, and S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, “νelectroweak baryogenesis,” JHEP10(2020) 063,arXiv:2007.11008 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Electroweak baryogenesis in the CP-violating two-Higgs doublet model,

    P. Basler, L. Biermann, M. M¨ uhlleitner, and J. M¨ uller, “Electroweak baryogenesis in the CP-violating two-Higgs doublet model,”Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 1, (2023) 57,arXiv:2108.03580 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Electroweak phase transition in a dark sector with CP violation,

    L. Biermann, M. M¨ uhlleitner, and J. M¨ uller, “Electroweak phase transition in a dark sector with CP violation,”Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 5, (2023) 439, arXiv:2204.13425 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Two Higgs doublets, effective interactions and a strong first-order electroweak phase transition,

    Anisha, L. Biermann, C. Englert, and M. M¨ uhlleitner, “Two Higgs doublets, effective interactions and a strong first-order electroweak phase transition,”JHEP 08(2022) 091,arXiv:2204.06966 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Effective 2HDM Yukawa interactions 7 and a strong first-order electroweak phase transition,

    Anisha, D. Azevedo, L. Biermann, C. Englert, and M. M¨ uhlleitner, “Effective 2HDM Yukawa interactions 7 and a strong first-order electroweak phase transition,” JHEP02(2024) 045,arXiv:2311.06353 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    νElectroweak baryogenesis: the scalar singlet strikes back,

    E. Fern´ andez-Mart´ ınez, J. L´ opez-Pav´ on, J. M. No, T. Ota, and S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, “νElectroweak baryogenesis: the scalar singlet strikes back,”Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 8, (2023) 715,arXiv:2210.16279 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    ALP-assisted strong first-order electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis,

    K. Harigaya and I. R. Wang, “ALP-assisted strong first-order electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis,”JHEP04(2024) 108, arXiv:2309.00587 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    New approach to electroweak symmetry nonrestoration,

    M. Carena, C. Krause, Z. Liu, and Y. Wang, “New approach to electroweak symmetry nonrestoration,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 5, (2021) 055016, arXiv:2104.00638 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Electroweak asymmetric early Universe via a scalar condensate,

    J. H. Chang, M. O. Olea-Romacho, and E. H. Tanin, “Electroweak asymmetric early Universe via a scalar condensate,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 11, (2022) 113003, arXiv:2210.05680 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,

    V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,”Phys. Lett. B155(1985) 36

    1985

  40. [40]

    Possible Appearance of the Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe in an Electroweak Theory,

    M. E. Shaposhnikov, “Possible Appearance of the Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe in an Electroweak Theory,”JETP Lett.44(1986) 465–468

    1986

  41. [41]

    Baryon asymmetry of the universe in the standard electroweak theory,

    G. R. Farrar and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “Baryon asymmetry of the universe in the standard electroweak theory,”Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 774, arXiv:hep-ph/9305275

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  42. [42]

    Baryon asymmetry of the universe in the minimal Standard Model,

    G. R. Farrar and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “Baryon asymmetry of the universe in the minimal Standard Model,”Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 2833–2836, arXiv:hep-ph/9305274. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 71, 210 (1993)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  43. [43]

    Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, and M. S. Turner, “Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,”Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2837–2851, arXiv:astro-ph/9310044

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  44. [44]

    Gravitational wave generation from bubble collisions in first-order phase transitions: An analytic approach,

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer, and G. Servant, “Gravitational wave generation from bubble collisions in first-order phase transitions: An analytic approach,”Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 124015,arXiv:0711.2593 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles,

    S. J. Huber and T. Konstandin, “Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles,”JCAP09 (2008) 022,arXiv:0806.1828 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition,

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, “Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition,”Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 041301,arXiv:1304.2433 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe,

    M. Hindmarsh, “Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe,”Phys. Rev. Lett.120 no. 7, (2018) 071301,arXiv:1608.04735 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Gravitational radiation from cosmological turbulence,

    A. Kosowsky, A. Mack, and T. Kahniashvili, “Gravitational radiation from cosmological turbulence,”Phys. Rev. D66(Jul, 2002) 024030. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.66.024030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.024030 2002

  49. [49]

    Gravitational waves from stochastic relativistic sources: Primordial turbulence and magnetic fields,

    C. Caprini and R. Durrer, “Gravitational waves from stochastic relativistic sources: Primordial turbulence and magnetic fields,”Phys. Rev. D74(Sep, 2006) 063521.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.063521

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.063521 2006

  50. [50]

    The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition,

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer, and G. Servant, “The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition,”JCAP12(2009) 024,arXiv:0909.0622 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields,

    C. L. Wainwright, “CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields,”Comput. Phys. Commun.183(2012) 2006–2013,arXiv:1109.4189 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  52. [52]

    HEPTAPOD: Orchestrating High Energy Physics Workflows Towards Autonomous Agency,

    T. Menzo, A. Roman, S. Gleyzer, K. Matchev, G. T. Fleming, S. H¨ oche, S. Mrenna, and P. Shyamsundar, “HEPTAPOD: Orchestrating High Energy Physics Workflows Towards Autonomous Agency,” arXiv:2512.15867 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  53. [53]

    The FERMIACC: Agents for Particle Theory,

    P. Agrawal, N. Craig, A. Madden, and I. V. Lombera, “The FERMIACC: Agents for Particle Theory,” arXiv:2603.22538 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  54. [54]

    RooAgent: An LLM Agent for Root-Based High Energy Physics Analysis,

    A. Desai, “RooAgent: An LLM Agent for Root-Based High Energy Physics Analysis,”arXiv:2605.17318 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Agentic Diagrammatica: Towards Autonomous Symbolic Computation in High Energy Physics,

    T. Menzo, A. Roman, G. T. Fleming, S. Gleyzer, K. T. Matchev, and S. Mrenna, “Agentic Diagrammatica: Towards Autonomous Symbolic Computation in High Energy Physics,”arXiv:2603.26990 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  56. [56]

    An End-to-end Architecture for Collider Physics and Beyond,

    S. Qiu, Z. Cai, J. Wei, Z. Li, Y. Yin, Q.-H. Cao, C. Liu, M.-x. Luo, X.-B. Yuan, and H. X. Zhu, “An End-to-end Architecture for Collider Physics and Beyond,”arXiv:2603.14553 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  57. [57]

    ArgoLOOM: agentic AI for fundamental physics from quarks to cosmos,

    S. D. Bakshiet al., “ArgoLOOM: agentic AI for fundamental physics from quarks to cosmos,” arXiv:2510.02426 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    MadAgents,

    T. Plehn, D. Schiller, and N. Schmal, “MadAgents,” arXiv:2601.21015 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Collider-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents with Particle Physics Analysis Reproduction,

    D. A. Faroughy, S. Palacios Schweitzer, I. Pang, S. Mishra-Sharma, and D. Shih, “Collider-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents with Particle Physics Analysis Reproduction,”arXiv:2605.13950 [cs.LG]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    DarkAgents,

    M. Lucente, S. Pascoli, F. Sala, and M. Zandi, “DarkAgents,”arXiv:2606.11157 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Towards precise baryogenesis in the 2HDM+a,

    T. Gent, S. Huber, K. Mimasu, and J. M. No, “Towards precise baryogenesis in the 2HDM+a,” arXiv:2512.22081 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  62. [62]

    Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,

    R. R. Parwani, “Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,”Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4695, arXiv:hep-ph/9204216. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 48, 5965 (1993)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  63. [63]

    Wall speed and shape in singlet-assisted strong electroweak phase transitions,

    A. Friedlander, I. Banta, J. M. Cline, and D. Tucker-Smith, “Wall speed and shape in singlet-assisted strong electroweak phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 5, (2021) 055020, arXiv:2009.14295 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order,

    P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa, “The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order,”Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 3546, arXiv:hep-ph/9212235. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 50, 6662 (1994)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  65. [65]

    First principles determination of bubble wall velocity,

    B. Laurent and J. M. Cline, “First principles determination of bubble wall velocity,”Phys. Rev. D 106no. 2, (2022) 023501,arXiv:2204.13120 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Bubble wall dynamics at the 8 electroweak phase transition,

    S. De Curtis, L. D. Rose, A. Guiggiani, A. G. Muyor, and G. Panico, “Bubble wall dynamics at the 8 electroweak phase transition,”JHEP03(2022) 163, arXiv:2201.08220 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Collision integrals for cosmological phase transitions,

    S. De Curtis, L. Delle Rose, A. Guiggiani, A. Gil Muyor, and G. Panico, “Collision integrals for cosmological phase transitions,”JHEP05(2023) 194, arXiv:2303.05846 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Non-linearities in cosmological bubble wall dynamics,

    S. De Curtis, L. Delle Rose, A. Guiggiani, A. Gil Muyor, and G. Panico, “Non-linearities in cosmological bubble wall dynamics,”JHEP05(2024) 009,arXiv:2401.13522 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Bubble wall velocities in local equilibrium,

    W.-Y. Ai, B. Garbrecht, and C. Tamarit, “Bubble wall velocities in local equilibrium,”JCAP03no. 03, (2022) 015,arXiv:2109.13710 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Model-independent bubble wall velocities in local thermal equilibrium,

    W.-Y. Ai, B. Laurent, and J. van de Vis, “Model-independent bubble wall velocities in local thermal equilibrium,”JCAP07(2023) 002, arXiv:2303.10171 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Criterion for ultra-fast bubble walls: the impact of hydrodynamic obstruction,

    W.-Y. Ai, X. Nagels, and M. Vanvlasselaer, “Criterion for ultra-fast bubble walls: the impact of hydrodynamic obstruction,”JCAP03(2024) 037, arXiv:2401.05911 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Bubble wall velocity from Kadanoff-Baym equations: fluid dynamics and microscopic interactions,

    M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and J. Zhu, “Bubble wall velocity from Kadanoff-Baym equations: fluid dynamics and microscopic interactions,” arXiv:2504.13724 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Bubble wall dynamics from nonequilibrium quantum field theory,

    W.-Y. Ai, M. Carosi, B. Garbrecht, C. Tamarit, and M. Vanvlasselaer, “Bubble wall dynamics from nonequilibrium quantum field theory,”JHEP08 (2025) 077,arXiv:2504.13725 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Bounds on the bubble wall velocity,

    W.-Y. Ai, B. Laurent, and J. van de Vis, “Bounds on the bubble wall velocity,”JHEP02(2025) 119, arXiv:2411.13641 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    The discriminant power of bubble wall velocities: gravitational waves and electroweak baryogenesis,

    M. Carena, A. Ireland, T. Ou, and I. R. Wang, “The discriminant power of bubble wall velocities: gravitational waves and electroweak baryogenesis,” JHEP09(2025) 175,arXiv:2504.17841 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Bubble-wall velocity in local thermal equilibrium: hydrodynamical simulations vs analytical treatment,

    T. Krajewski, M. Lewicki, and M. Zych, “Bubble-wall velocity in local thermal equilibrium: hydrodynamical simulations vs analytical treatment,”JHEP05(2024) 011,arXiv:2402.15408 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Steady-state bubbles beyond local thermal equilibrium,

    T. Krajewski, M. Lewicki, I. Nalecz, and M. Zych, “Steady-state bubbles beyond local thermal equilibrium,”JHEP06(2025) 118,arXiv:2411.16580 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Entropy production at electroweak bubble walls from scalar field fluctuations,

    M. Eriksson and M. Laine, “Entropy production at electroweak bubble walls from scalar field fluctuations,”JCAP09(2025) 027,arXiv:2507.07755 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    First Order and Second Order Phase Transitions in Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature,

    P. H. Ginsparg, “First Order and Second Order Phase Transitions in Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature,” Nucl. Phys. B170(1980) 388–408

    1980

  80. [80]

    High-Temperature Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,

    T. Appelquist and R. D. Pisarski, “High-Temperature Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2305

    1981

Showing first 80 references.