REVIEW 1 cited by
JustiLM: Few-shot Justification Generation for Explainable Fact-Checking of Real-world Claims
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Justification is an explanation that supports the veracity assigned to a claim in fact-checking. However, the task of justification generation is previously oversimplified as summarization of fact-check article authored by fact-checkers. Therefore, we propose a realistic approach to generate justification based on retrieved evidence. We present a new benchmark dataset called ExClaim for \underline{Ex}plainable fact-checking of real-world \underline{Claim}s, and introduce JustiLM, a novel few-shot \underline{Justi}fication generation based on retrieval-augmented \underline{L}anguage \underline{M}odel by using fact-check articles as auxiliary resource during training only. Experiments show that JustiLM achieves promising performance in justification generation compared to strong baselines, and can also enhance veracity classification with a straightforward extension.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Generating Grounded Responses to Counter Misinformation via Learning Efficient Fine-Grained Critiques
MisMitiFact trains lightweight T5 critique models on fact-checking data to identify errors in numbers, entities, and topics, and uses their short critiques to refine LLM counter-responses at about 5x lower feedback cost.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.