Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

JustiLM: Few-shot Justification Generation for Explainable Fact-Checking of Real-world Claims

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.08026 v1 pith:XSJSGNKZ submitted 2024-01-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords justificationunderlinegenerationfact-checkingjustilmclaimfact-checkfew-shot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Justification is an explanation that supports the veracity assigned to a claim in fact-checking. However, the task of justification generation is previously oversimplified as summarization of fact-check article authored by fact-checkers. Therefore, we propose a realistic approach to generate justification based on retrieved evidence. We present a new benchmark dataset called ExClaim for \underline{Ex}plainable fact-checking of real-world \underline{Claim}s, and introduce JustiLM, a novel few-shot \underline{Justi}fication generation based on retrieval-augmented \underline{L}anguage \underline{M}odel by using fact-check articles as auxiliary resource during training only. Experiments show that JustiLM achieves promising performance in justification generation compared to strong baselines, and can also enhance veracity classification with a straightforward extension.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generating Grounded Responses to Counter Misinformation via Learning Efficient Fine-Grained Critiques

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MisMitiFact trains lightweight T5 critique models on fact-checking data to identify errors in numbers, entities, and topics, and uses their short critiques to refine LLM counter-responses at about 5x lower feedback cost.

Pith tools