pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31721 · v1 · pith:XSUC4EAYnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Boosted Optomechanics with a Fluid of Nonlinear Polaritons

Florent Malabat , Martin Colombano , Titouan L\'ev\^eque , Martina Morassi , Aristide Lema\^itre , Alexandre Le Boit\'e , Ivan Favero This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 05:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords optomechanicspolaritonswhispering gallery resonatorsexciton-polaritonsnonlinearitiessemiconductor disksquantum wells
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polaritons boost optomechanical coupling to a record 22 MHz

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Merging optomechanics with polaritonics in semiconductor disks allows photons and excitons to form polaritons that couple strongly to mechanical vibrations. Experiments show this boosts the single-photon optomechanical coupling g0 by more than ten times over bare photons, reaching 22 MHz, with the boost depending on the polariton composition. The work also identifies three polaritonic nonlinearities in a clear hierarchy that varies with composition, linking earlier disparate observations. This approach prepares resonant polaritonic optomechanics for studying quantum fluids of polaritons.

Core claim

Resonant optical control of polaritonic optomechanical resonators in semiconductor disks embedding quantum wells leads to polaritons that couple to disk vibrations. Modeling with constitutive equations extracts a polariton-modified g0 boosted by more than a decade to 22 MHz and a hierarchy of three polaritonic nonlinearities, both evolving with polariton composition.

What carries the argument

Polariton-modified optomechanical coupling g0 and polariton nonlinearities, extracted via modeling of resonant frequency response experiments using a minimal set of constitutive equations.

If this is right

  • The boost in g0 exceeds a decade and changes with polariton composition
  • Three nonlinearities exhibit a hierarchy analyzed versus polariton composition
  • The results bridge past unconciliated reports in polaritonics
  • Resonant polaritonic optomechanics is ready for exploring quantum fluids of polaritons

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying the exciton-photon detuning could serve as a control knob for optomechanical interaction strength in similar hybrid systems
  • The observed nonlinearities might allow for new regimes of nonlinear optomechanics not accessible with linear photons
  • This platform could facilitate studies of mechanical effects on polariton condensation or superfluidity

Load-bearing premise

The minimal set of constitutive equations introduced in the modeling section accurately captures the resonant frequency response without significant unmodeled losses, detunings, or higher-order effects that would alter the extracted g0 and nonlinearity values.

What would settle it

Experimental data where the measured optomechanical coupling does not reach 22 MHz or fails to show the reported decade boost and composition dependence when the polariton composition is varied.

read the original abstract

Merging optomechanics and polaritonics opens stimulating perspectives like the giant enhancement of optomechanical interaction and the enrichment of optomechanics with effective nonlinear photons. The experimental implementation of these concepts has however remained elusive. Here we report on the resonant optical control of polaritonic optomechanical resonators constituted of semiconductor disks embedding quantum wells. Whispering gallery photons and quantum well excitons strongly couple, leading to the emergence of polaritons that couple to the mechanical vibrations of the disk. We perform resonant optomechanical frequency response experiments on these resonators, modeled introducing a minimal set of constitutive equations, from which we extract the polariton-modified optomechanical coupling $g_0$ and the polariton nonlinearities. We observe a boost of $g_0$ by more than a decade compared to bare photons, reaching to a record $g_0$ for whispering gallery resonators of $22$ MHz, and analyze experimentally and theoretically its evolution as function of the polariton's composition. We also measure a clear hierarchy of three polaritonic nonlinearities, again analyzed as function of polariton composition, establishing a bridge between past unconciliated reports in polaritonics. Grounded on experimental and theoretical foundations, resonant polaritonic optomechanics is set ready for an optomechanical exploration of quantum fluids of polaritons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental realization of polaritonic optomechanics using semiconductor disk resonators embedding quantum wells. Strong coupling between whispering-gallery photons and excitons produces polaritons that interact with the disk mechanical modes. Resonant frequency-response measurements are fitted to a minimal set of constitutive equations to extract the optomechanical coupling g0 (boosted by more than a decade to a record 22 MHz for whispering-gallery resonators) and its dependence on polariton composition; the same data yield a measured hierarchy of three composition-dependent polaritonic nonlinearities.

Significance. If the minimal constitutive model is shown to be adequate, the work supplies the first experimental demonstration of a giant, composition-tunable optomechanical boost arising from polariton formation together with a quantitative bridge between previously unconciliated polariton nonlinearity reports. The record g0 value and the explicit experimental–theoretical analysis of composition dependence constitute clear strengths that position resonant polaritonic optomechanics as a platform for exploring quantum fluids.

major comments (1)
  1. [Modeling section] Modeling section, constitutive equations: the extraction of g0 and the three nonlinear coefficients rests entirely on fits to the minimal model. The manuscript should supply a quantitative validation (e.g., residuals, χ^{2} per degree of freedom, or explicit comparison with an extended model containing additional loss or detuning terms) to confirm that unmodeled effects do not systematically shift the reported decade boost or the nonlinearity hierarchy.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels: several plots of g0 and nonlinearity versus polariton fraction use symbols whose definitions appear only in the main text; self-contained captions would improve readability.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states a 'clear hierarchy of three polaritonic nonlinearities' without naming them; a parenthetical enumeration (e.g., Kerr, two-photon absorption, …) would clarify the claim for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment, the recognition of the record g0 and the composition-dependent analysis, and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Modeling section] Modeling section, constitutive equations: the extraction of g0 and the three nonlinear coefficients rests entirely on fits to the minimal model. The manuscript should supply a quantitative validation (e.g., residuals, χ^{2} per degree of freedom, or explicit comparison with an extended model containing additional loss or detuning terms) to confirm that unmodeled effects do not systematically shift the reported decade boost or the nonlinearity hierarchy.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative validation of the minimal constitutive model is important to substantiate the extracted parameters. In the revised manuscript we will add the χ² per degree of freedom for each frequency-response fit (reported in the main text or methods) together with residual plots (as a new supplementary figure) demonstrating the absence of systematic deviations. These additions will confirm that unmodeled effects do not bias the reported >10× g0 boost or the measured nonlinearity hierarchy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental parameter extraction from fitted model

full rationale

The paper reports resonant frequency-response measurements on polaritonic optomechanical resonators, introduces a minimal set of constitutive equations to model the data, and extracts g0 and nonlinear coefficients via fitting. This is standard parameter estimation from experiment, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in the provided text to justify the central claims. The reported boost in g0 (to 22 MHz) and hierarchy of nonlinearities are presented as direct outcomes of the fits and composition-dependent analysis, with no evidence that any 'prediction' is statistically forced or self-definitional. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks (measured spectra).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that polaritons form via strong coupling in the disks and that a minimal constitutive-equation model suffices to extract g0 and nonlinearities from frequency-response data. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • polariton composition fraction
    Used to parameterize the evolution of g0 and the three nonlinearities; value is varied experimentally and fitted in the model.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Whispering-gallery photons and quantum-well excitons enter the strong-coupling regime to form polaritons that inherit both photonic and excitonic properties.
    Invoked in the abstract to explain the emergence of polaritons that couple to mechanical vibrations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5794 in / 1281 out tokens · 27739 ms · 2026-07-01T05:42:49.875146+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Favero and K

    I. Favero and K. Karrai, Optomechanics of deformable op- tical cavities, Nature Photonics3, 201 (2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cav- ity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    M. J. Weaver, P. Duivestein, A. C. Bernasconi, S. Scharmer, M. Lemang, T. C. van Thiel, F. Hijazi, B. Hensen, S. Gr¨ oblacher, and R. Stockill, An integrated microwave-to-optics interface for scalable quantum com- puting, Nature Nanotechnology19, 166 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    H. Zhao, A. Bozkurt, and M. Mirhosseini, Electro-optic transduction in silicon via gigahertz-frequency nanome- chanics, Optica10, 790 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Sansa, M

    M. Sansa, M. Defoort, A. Brenac, M. Hermouet, L. Ban- niard, A. Fafin, M. Gely, C. Masselon, I. Favero, G. Jour- dan, and S. Hentz, Optomechanical mass spectrometry, Nature Communications11, 3781 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Sbarra, L

    S. Sbarra, L. Waquier, S. Suffit, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, and I. Favero, Optomechanical measurement of single nanodroplet evap- oration with millisecond time-resolution, Nature Commu- nications13, 6462 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    J. J. Slim, C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, J. Del Pino, A. Nunnenkamp, and E. Verhagen, Optomechanical re- alization of the bosonic kitaev chain, Nature627, 767 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Gil-Santos, M

    E. Gil-Santos, M. Labousse, C. Baker, A. Goetschy, W. Hease, C. Gomez, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, G. Leo, C. Ciuti, and I. Favero, Light-mediated cascaded locking of multi- ple nano-optomechanical oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 063605 (2017)

    2017

  9. [9]

    Rabl, Photon blockade effect in optomechanical sys- tems, Physical Review Letters107, 063601 (2011)

    P. Rabl, Photon blockade effect in optomechanical sys- tems, Physical Review Letters107, 063601 (2011)

    2011

  10. [10]

    C. K. Law, Interaction between a moving mirror and ra- diation pressure: A hamiltonian formulation, Phys.Rev. A 51, 2537 (1995)

    1995

  11. [11]

    Rakich, P

    P. Rakich, P. Davids, and Z. Wang, Tailoring optical forces in waveguides through radiation pressure and electrostric- tive forces, Optics Express18, 14439 (2010)

    2010

  12. [12]

    J. Chan, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, S. Meenehan, and O. Painter, Optimized optomechanical crystal cavity with acoustic radiation shield, Applied Physics Letters 101, 081115 (2012), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4747726/14263790/081115 1 online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4747726/14263790/081115 2012

  13. [13]

    Baker, W

    C. Baker, W. Hease, N. Dac-Trung, A. Andronico, S. Ducci, G. Leo, and I. Favero, Photoelastic coupling in gallium arsenide optomechanical disk resonators, Optics Express22, 14072 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    Feldman and D

    A. Feldman and D. Horowitz, Dispersion of the piezobire- fringence of gaas, Physical Review B39, 5597 (1968)

    1968

  15. [15]

    Metzger, I

    C. Metzger, I. Favero, A. Ortlieb, and K. Karrai, Opti- cal self cooling of a deformable fabry-perot cavity in the classical limit, Physical Review B78, 035309 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    Restrepo, J

    J. Restrepo, J. Gabelli, C. Ciuti, and I. Favero, Classical and quantum theory of photothermal cavity cooling of a mechanical oscillator, Comptes Rendus Physique12, 860 (2011)

    2011

  17. [17]

    Okamoto, D

    H. Okamoto, D. Ito, K. Onomitsu, H. Sanada, H. Go- toh, T. Sogawa, and H. Yamaguchi, Vibration amplifi- cation, damping, and self-oscillations in micromechanical resonators induced by optomechanical coupling through carrier excitation, Physical Review Letters106, 036801 (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    A. Barg, L. Midolo, G. Kirˇ sansk˙ e, P. Tighineanu, T. Preg- nolato, A. m. c. ˙Imamoˇ glu, P. Lodahl, A. Schliesser, S. Stobbe, and E. S. Polzik, Carrier-mediated optomechan- ical forces in semiconductor nanomembranes with coupled quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B98, 155316 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    Rozas, A

    G. Rozas, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. Fainstein, B. Jusserand, and A. Lemaˆ ıtre, Polariton path to fully resonant disper- sive coupling in optomechanical resonators, Physical Re- view B90, 201302 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    Kasprzak, M

    J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szyma´ nska, R. Andr´ e, J. L. Staehli, V. Savona, P. B. Lit- tlewood, B. Deveaud, and L. S. Dang, Bose–einstein con- densation of exciton polaritons, Nature , 409 (2006)

    2006

  21. [21]

    Ciuti and I

    C. Ciuti and I. Carusotto, Quantum fluids of light, Reviews of Modern Physics85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  22. [22]

    Klaers, F

    J. Klaers, F. Vewinger, and M. Weitz, Thermalization of a two-dimensional photonic gas in a ‘white wall’ photon box, Nature Physics7, 512 (2010)

    2010

  23. [23]

    Bloch, I

    J. Bloch, I. Carusotto, and M. Wouters, Non-equilibrium bose–einstein condensation in photonic systems, Nature Physics , 470 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Jusserand, A

    B. Jusserand, A. N. Poddubny, A. V. Poshakinskiy, A. Fainstein, and A. Lemaitre, Polariton resonances for ultrastrong coupling cavity optomechanics in GaAs/AlAs multiple quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 267402 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    Sesin, A

    P. Sesin, A. S. Kuznetsov, G. Rozas, S. Anguiano, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, K. Biermann, P. V. Santos, and A. Fainstein, Giant optomechanical coupling and de- phasing protection with cavity exciton-polaritons, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L042035 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Restrepo, C

    J. Restrepo, C. Ciuti, and I. Favero, Single-polariton op- tomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 013601 (2014)

    2014

  27. [27]

    T. C. H. L. O. Kyriienko and I. A. Shelykh, Single- polariton optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 076402 (2014)

    2014

  28. [28]

    Carlon Zambon, Z

    N. Carlon Zambon, Z. Denis, R. De Oliveira, S. Ravets, C. Ciuti, I. Favero, and J. Bloch, Enhanced cavity optome- chanics with quantum-well exciton polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 093603 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    D. L. Chafatinos, A. S. Kuznetsov, A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, P. Sesin, I. Papuccio, A. E. Bruchhausen, K. Bier- mann, P. V. Santos, and A. Fainstein, Asynchronous lock- ing in metamaterials of fluids of light and sound, Nature Communications14, 3485 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    A. S. Kuznetsovs, K. Biermann, A. A. Reynoso, A. Fainstein, and P. V. Santos, Microcavity phonoritons – a coherent optical-to-microwave interface, Nature Com- munications14, 5470 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    A. Amo, J. Lefr` ere, S. Pigeon, C. Adrados, C. Ciuti, I. Carusotto, R. Houdr´ e, E. Giacobino, and A. Bramati, Superfluidity of polaritons in semiconductor microcavities, Nature , 805 (2009)

    2009

  32. [32]

    Maˆ ıtre, G

    A. Maˆ ıtre, G. Lerario, A. Medeiros, F. Claude, Q. Glo- rieux, E. Giacobino, S. Pigeon, and A. Bramati, Dark- soliton molecules in an exciton-polariton superfluid, Phys. Rev. X10, 041028 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Nardin, G

    G. Nardin, G. Grosso, Y. L´ eger, B. Pi¸ etka, F. Morier- Genoud, and B. Deveaud-Pl´ edran, Hydrodynamic nucle- ation of quantized vortex pairs in a polariton quantum fluid, Nature Phys7, 635 (2011)

    2011

  34. [34]

    X. Ma, D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, S. Schumacher, and A. Kavokin, Vortices and solitons in polariton superfluids and condensates, Nat Rev Phys , 1 (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    de Oliveira, M

    R. de Oliveira, M. Colombano, F. Malabat, M. Morassi, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, and I. Favero, Whispering-gallery quantum- well exciton polaritons in an indium gallium arsenide mi- crodisk cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 126901 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    S. Weis, R. Rivi` ere, S. Del´ eglise, E. Gavartin, O. Ar- cizet, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechan- ically induced transparency, Science330, 1520 (2010), arXiv:1812.10184

    work page arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    A. H. Safavi-Naeini, T. P. Alegre, J. Chan, M. Eichenfield, M. Winger, Q. Lin, J. T. Hill, D. E. Chang, and O. Painter, Electromagnetically induced transparency and slow light with optomechanics, Nature472, 69 (2011)

    2011

  38. [38]

    J. J. Hopfield, Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals, Phys. Rev.112, 8 1555 (1958)

    1958

  39. [39]

    Wouters and I

    M. Wouters and I. Carusotto, Excitations in a nonequilib- rium bose-einstein condensate of exciton polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 140402 (2007)

    2007

  40. [40]

    Stepanov, I

    P. Stepanov, I. Amelio, J.-G. Rousset, J. Bloch, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Amo, A. Minguzzi, I. Carusotto, and M. Richard, Dispersion relation of the collective excita- tions in a resonantly driven polariton fluid, Nat Commun 10, 3869 (2019)

    2019

  41. [41]

    B. Guha, S. Mariani, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, S. Combri´ e, G. Leo, and I. Favero, High frequency optomechanical disk resonators in iii-v ternary semiconductors, Opt. Express25, 24639 (2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    De Oliveira,Hybrid Quantum Well Polariton Optome- chanics, PhD thesis, Universit´ e Paris Cit´ e (2022)

    R. De Oliveira,Hybrid Quantum Well Polariton Optome- chanics, PhD thesis, Universit´ e Paris Cit´ e (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    Pautrel, F

    S. Pautrel, F. Malabat, L. Waquier, M. Colombano, M. Morassi, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, and I. Favero, Efficient and sta- ble coupling to nanophotonic waveguides and resonators in stringent environments, Opt. Express32, 26954 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    D. T. Nguyen, C. Baker, W. Hease, S. Sejil, P. Senellart, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, S. Ducci, G. Leo, and I. Favero, Ultrahigh q- frequency product for optomechanical disk resonators with a mechanical shield, Appl. Phys. Lett103, 241112 (2013)

    2013

  45. [45]

    Sbarra, P

    S. Sbarra, P. E. Allain, S. Suffit, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, and I. Favero, A multiphysics model for ultra-high fre- quency optomechanical resonators optically actuated and detected in the oscillating mode, APL Photonics 6, 086111 (2021), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/app/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0050061/8976839/086111 1 online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0050061/8976839/086111 2021

  46. [46]

    Estrecho, T

    E. Estrecho, T. Gao, N. Bobrovska, D. Comber-Todd, M. D. Fraser, M. Steger, K. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, J. Levin- sen, M. M. Parish, T. C. H. Liew, M. Matuszewski, D. W. Snoke, A. G. Truscott, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Direct mea- surement of polariton-polariton interaction strength in the Thomas-Fermi regime of exciton-polariton condensation, Phys. Rev. B100, ...

    2019

  47. [47]

    Schn¨ uriger, M

    G.-M. Schn¨ uriger, M. Kroner, E. Togan, P. Kn¨ uppel, A. Delteil, S. F¨ alt, W. Wegscheider, and A. Imamoglu, Quantum correlations and dissipative blockade of polari- tons in a tunable fiber cavity (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    G. M. Schn¨ uriger,Quantum Correlations Of Exciton- Polaritons, PhD thesis, ETH Z¨ urich (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Richard, I

    M. Richard, I. Fr´ erot, S. Ravets, J. Bloch, C. Anton- Solanas, F. Claude, Y. Zhou, M. Morassi, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, I. Carusotto, and A. Minguzzi, Excitonic oscillator- strength saturation dominates polariton-polariton interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Res.8, L012039 (2026)

    2026

  50. [50]

    E. R. Christensen, A. Camacho-Guardian, O. Cotlet, A. Imamoglu, M. Wouters, G. M. Bruun, and I. Caru- sotto, Microscopic theory of polariton-polariton interac- tions, Phys. Rev. B110, 195435 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    L. Ding, C. Baker, P. Senellart, A. Lemaitre, S. Ducci, G. Leo, and I. Favero, Wavelength-sized gaas optomechan- ical resonators with gigahertz frequency, App. Phys. Lett. 98, 11 (2011)

    2011

  52. [52]

    Feldman and D

    A. Feldman and D. Horowitz, Dispersion of the Piezo- birefringence of GaAs, Journal of Applied Physics 39, 5597 (1968), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/39/12/5597/18348387/5597 1 online.pdf

    1968

  53. [53]

    Renosi, J

    P. Renosi, J. Sapriel, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Resonant acousto-optic effects in inp and gaas and related devices, in 1993 (5th) International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials(1993) pp. 592–595

    1993

  54. [54]

    Vurgaftman, J

    I. Vurgaftman, J. R. Meyer, and L. R. Ram-Mohan, Band parameters for III–V compound semiconduc- tors and their alloys, Journal of Applied Physics 89, 5815 (2001), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/89/11/5815/18979269/5815 1 online.pdf

    2001

  55. [55]

    Nunnenkamp, K

    A. Nunnenkamp, K. Børkje, and S. M. Girvin, Single- photon optomechanics, Physical Review Letters , 063602 (2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    Zoepfl, M

    D. Zoepfl, M. L. Juan, N. Diaz-Naufal, C. M. F. Schneider, L. F. Deeg, A. Sharafiev, A. Metelmann, and G. Kirch- mair, Kerr enhanced backaction cooling in magnetome- chanics, Physical Review Letters3, 033601 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Diaz-Naufal, L

    N. Diaz-Naufal, L. Deeg, D. Zoepfl, C. M. F. Schnei- der, M. L. Juan, G. Kirchmair, and A. Metelmann, Kerr-enhanced optomechanical cooling in the unresolved- sideband regime, Physical Review A111, 053505 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    Larr´ e and I

    P.-E. Larr´ e and I. Carusotto, Optomechanical signature of a frictionless flow of superfluid light, Physical Review A5, 053809 (2015)

    2015