REVIEW 2 cited by
Bouncing cosmologies via modified gravity in the ADM formalism: Application to Loop Quantum Cosmology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider the ADM formalism as a tool to build bouncing cosmologies. In this approach, the foliation of the spacetime has to be fixed in order to go beyond General Relativity modifying the gravitational sector. Once a preferred slicing, which we choose based on the matter content of the universe following the spirit of Weyl's postulate, has been fixed, $f$ theories depending on the extrinsic and intrinsic curvature of the slicing are covariant for all the reference frames preserving the foliation, i.e., the constraint and dynamical equations have the same form for all these observers. Moreover, choosing multivalued $f$ functions, bouncing backgrounds emerge in a natural way. In fact, the simplest is the one corresponding to holonomy corrected Loop Quantum Cosmology. The final goal of this work is to provide the equations of perturbations which, unlike the full equations, become gauge invariant in this theory, and apply them to the so-called matter bounce scenario.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Analytic Gravitational Wave Spectrum in Next-to-Minimal Bouncing Cosmology
A five-phase bouncing cosmology yields a broken power-law gravitational wave spectrum whose amplitude bound automatically keeps the bounce energy below the Planck scale.
-
Forecast Constraints on Bouncing Cosmology from High Frequency Gravitational Waves Using Superconducting LC Circuits and Resonant Cavities
The paper forecasts that resonant-cavity and superconducting-circuit gravitational wave detectors could constrain the bounce energy scale of a generic bouncing cosmology far more tightly than astrophysical observatori...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.