Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 136 references

Millisecond optical coherence and strong collective coupling in an integrated telecom rare-earth photonic platform

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single telecom-wavelength device can now combine millisecond erbium coherence, strong collective coupling, and electro-optic spectral tuning, by bonding a coherence-optimized crystal directly onto a lithium niobate microring.

desk verdict Strong paper with a real new combination, but the headline 'simultaneous' claim relies on an unmeasured transfer of coherence between bus- and ring-coupled ions. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08221 v1 pith:XTJNEVDI submitted 2026-08-08 quant-ph physics.optics

Kah Jen Wo , Pavel A. Dmitriev , Karthik Dasigi , Fumiya Hanamura , Steven Touzard This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords erbiumrareearthquantummemorycollectivecooperativitythin-filmlithiumniobatedirectbondingspectraldiffusiontelecomC-band
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a quantum-network node at telecom wavelengths does not have to choose between good erbium coherence and integrated photonics. It bonds a bulk Er$^{3+}$:CaWO$_4$ crystal, a host chosen for its dilute, weakly magnetic nuclear-spin bath, directly onto an electro-optically tuneable thin-film lithium niobate microring, with no adhesive layer. On that single chip it reports an effective homogeneous linewidth of $289\pm34$ Hz (memory time $T_\text{M}=1.10\pm0.13$ ms), a collective cooperativity of $C=6.7\pm0.4$ seen as an avoided crossing, and 5-second optical phase storage at $0.935$ visibility via $^{183}$W superhyperfine shelving. If correct, this combines strong light-matter coupling, millisecond coherence, and in situ spectral tuning in one telecom device, a combination previously split across different platforms.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is adhesive-free direct bonding of an Er$^{3+}$:CaWO$_4$ crystal to a high-$Q$ electro-optically tuneable thin-film lithium niobate microring, which places the ions in the evanescent field while preserving the host's weakly magnetic nuclear-spin environment. Coherence is extracted with the three-pulse photon echo, fitted to the spectral-diffusion model $\Gamma_\mathrm{eff}=\Gamma_0+\tfrac12\Gamma_\mathrm{SD}(R\tau_{12}+1-e^{-R\tau_{23}})$. Strong coupling is quantified with a coupled resonator-ensemble transmission model assuming a Lorentzian inhomogeneous profile and the collective cooperativity definition $C=4G^2/(\kappa_\mathrm{tot}\Gamma_\mathrm{inh})$. Long storage rides on superhyperfine coupling to $^{183}$W nuclear spins, which act as long-lived shelving states in a three-pulse interference protocol.

What would settle it

Run a three-pulse photon echo on the ring-coupled ions themselves, for example by detecting the echo re-emitted into the ring, and compare the effective linewidth with the $289$ Hz measured on the bus; a substantially broader linewidth or a Purcell-broadened value would falsify the claim that one device holds both strong coupling and millisecond coherence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that heterogeneous integration can preserve the coherence of an optimised rare-earth host while inheriting the scalability and tunability of thin-film photonics. In the bonded device, three-pulse photon echoes give a homogeneous linewidth $\Gamma_0=254\pm7$ Hz at 0.2 T, with spectral diffusion rate $R=86\pm18$ Hz saturating at $\Gamma_\mathrm{SD}=1.5\pm0.2$ kHz, yielding an empirical linewidth $\tilde\Gamma_\mathrm{eff}=289\pm34$ Hz. Electro-optically sweeping the ring through the spin-preserving transition resolves an avoided crossing fitted with collective cooperativity $C=6.7\pm0.4$. The same ensemble stores optical phase in spectral gratings for 5 s with visibility $V=0.935\pm0.015$, using the $^{183}$W nuclear-spin bath as shelving states.

Load-bearing premise

The millisecond coherence is measured on erbium ions coupled to the bus waveguide, while the strong coupling is measured on ions coupled to the ring, and the central demonstration assumes those two sub-ensembles share the same coherence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A sub-kilohertz effective linewidth sustained over seconds makes kilohertz tooth spacings plausible in an atomic frequency comb, corresponding to memory delays two orders of magnitude beyond the microsecond range demonstrated in directly doped devices.
  • Operating the device in the overcoupled regime, where $C=1$ suffices, would give a high-efficiency impedance-matched echo memory with on-demand storage around a millisecond.
  • Because the field needed is only 0.2 T, a permanent magnet replaces multi-tesla magnets for comparable coherence, easing deployment as network nodes.
  • Enrichment in $^{167}$Er combined with zero first-order Zeeman points in CaWO$_4$ could lift the roughly one-second hyperfine coherence ceiling seen elsewhere, pointing to minute-scale spin-wave storage.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer the decisive test the paper leaves open: carrying out the three-pulse echo on the ring-coupled sub-ensemble, rather than the bus-coupled one, would confirm that strong coupling and millisecond coherence inhabit the same ions.
  • The observed difference in inhomogeneous broadening between bus- and ring-coupled ions suggests strain variations across the bonded interface; if those variations also broadened the homogeneous linewidth, the quoted coherence would be an overestimate for the strongly coupled mode.
  • The same direct-bonding recipe could plausibly transfer to other coherence-optimised hosts, with electro-optic tuning serving as in situ frequency alignment for multi-node networks; quantifying bonding-induced loss would directly predict how much cooperativity and memory efficiency remain on the table.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the heterogeneous integration of a 50 ppm Er3+:CaWO4 crystal directly bonded to an electro-optically tunable thin-film lithium niobate microring, with no adhesive interlayer. Using three-pulse photon echoes on ions coupled to the bus waveguide at 0.2 T, the authors extract a homogeneous linewidth Γ0 = 254 ± 7 Hz, an effective linewidth of 289 ± 34 Hz (T_M = 1.10 ± 0.13 ms), a spectral diffusion rate R = 86 ± 18 Hz, and a saturated spectral diffusion width ΓSD = 1.5 ± 0.2 kHz. Electro-optically tuning the ring through the erbium transition yields an avoided crossing described by a collective cooperativity C = 6.7 ± 0.4 at zero field, consistent with an independent estimate C = 6.0 ± 0.5 based on simulated mode participation and absorption-derived dipole moment. A 3PPE-based protocol stores optical phase for 5 s with visibility 0.935 ± 0.015. The paper concludes that strong collective coupling, millisecond optical coherence, and in situ spectral tuning are simultaneously available in one integrated device.

Significance. If the combined claim holds, this is a significant step for integrated telecom quantum memories: it would be the first device to combine C > 1 collective coupling with sub-kHz optical linewidth and seconds-scale phase storage in a scalable platform. The paper's independent estimate of the cooperativity from mode simulation and measured oscillator strength is a genuine cross-check rather than a restatement of the fit, and error bars on fitted parameters are reported throughout. The spectral diffusion analysis follows established models and is internally consistent, and the explicit statements about what remains to be demonstrated (high-efficiency AFC on quantum signals, Discussion; extracted G being a lower bound under optical pumping, Supp Note 7) are appropriate. The main weakness is that the coherence and the strong coupling are measured on different erbium sub-ensembles; whether the ring-coupled ions share the millisecond coherence is not established by the data as presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [II.A, II.B and Supplementary Note 8] The central claim that the device simultaneously provides strong coupling and millisecond coherence requires transferring the coherence results from the bus-waveguide sub-ensemble to the ring-coupled sub-ensemble, and this transfer is not demonstrated. Section II.A deliberately probes ions coupled to the bus waveguide to avoid Purcell modification and strong-coupling nonlinearities, while Section II.B measures C = 6.7 on ions coupled to the ring. Supplementary Note 8 shows that the two sub-ensembles have measurably different inhomogeneous broadening (for example, the ring-coupled Γinh at 0 T is about 332 MHz, while the bus-coupled ensemble is broader) and attributes the difference to a spatially varying local environment. Because the avoided-crossing line shapes are dominated by the ~300 MHz inhomogeneous width, they cannot constrain a kHz-scale homogeneous linewidth. I request either a direct coherence measurement on the ring-coupled sub-ensemble (for example, a two-pulse or three-pulse echo through the resonator with excitation weak enough to avoid strong-coupling effects) or a quantitative argument with supporting data that the documented local-environment differences do not affect the homogeneous linewidth. Until this is provided, the headline should be qualified to state that the bus-coupled ions retain millisecond coherence while the ring-coupled ions exhibit strong coupling in the same bonded device.
  2. [II.C and Discussion] The 5 s optical phase-storage visibility of 0.935 is obtained with the same bus-waveguide 3PPE arrangement used in Section II.A, not with the resonator-coupled ensemble. It therefore demonstrates long-lived shelving and phase retention for the bus-coupled ions, but it does not provide evidence that the strongly coupled ring-coupled sub-ensemble can store optical phase for seconds. The Discussion's statement that the platform simultaneously offers strong collective coupling, bulk-level optical coherence and on-chip resonator tuning should be qualified accordingly, or supported by a resonator-coupled storage measurement.
  3. [II.B and Supplementary Table 3] The combined claim is anchored at the field where coherence is optimized (|B| = 0.2 T), but the reported strong-coupling parameters in Supplementary Table 3 are for 0, 0.1, 0.4, and 1.0 T. The text asserts that avoided crossings are observed for all fields between 0 and 1 T; given the emphasis on 0.2 T in the abstract and Fig. 2, the 0.2 T avoided-crossing fit and the corresponding C, G, and Γinh values should be reported explicitly to support operation of the same device at the coherence-optimal field.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section II.A] The abstract calls the 289 ± 34 Hz value the effective homogeneous linewidth, while Section II.A derives it as the empirical linewidth 1/πT_M from the spectral diffusion model; please use consistent terminology (effective linewidth for 1/πT_M and homogeneous linewidth for Γ0).
  2. [Figure 2e] In Fig. 2e, the left and right axes display the same dataset with reciprocal scalings; the caption and text should state this explicitly so readers do not interpret the two curves as independent measurements.
  3. [Supplementary Note 7, Fig. S7b] The mode-volume axis in Supplementary Figure 7b is labeled in µm^2, which is dimensionally inconsistent with a three-dimensional mode volume; please correct the unit or clarify that the simulation is two-dimensional.
  4. [Supplementary Note 3] The main sample accumulated about one month of post-bond annealing while sample b was annealed for approximately 12 hours; the manuscript should state explicitly whether this difference affects the quoted bond strength, Q values, or the comparison between the two samples.
  5. [Supplementary Note 5 and Ref. [44]] The heterodyne detection setup is described in the supplement as based on Ref. [27], which appears to be the same work as Ref. [44] in the main text; please harmonize the citation or add a cross-reference for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor methodological self-citation; no load-bearing circularity in the coherence, cooperativity, or storage claims.

full rationale

No circular step is present. The 3PPE coherence data (Fig. 2c,d) are fitted to the standard spectral-diffusion model Γeff = Γ0 + (1/2)ΓSD(Rτ12 + 1 − exp(−Rτ23)), and T_M and the empirical linewidth are computed from the fitted parameters rather than imposed by an input. The collective cooperativity C = 6.7 ± 0.4 is extracted from complex-transmission fits to Eq. (S7.7), with κtot fixed by independent detuned-resonator measurements and only Γinh and G free; the independent estimate C = 6.0 ± 0.5 in Supplementary Note 7 uses simulated mode participation, dopant density, and an absorption-derived dipole moment, none of which come from the avoided-crossing fit, so the agreement is a genuine cross-check. The 5 s phase-storage visibility is a direct measurement. The only self-citation, Ref. [44] (and Supplementary Ref. [27]) for the heterodyne vector-analysis method, is purely methodological and does not supply any fitted parameter or target result, so it is not load-bearing. A non-circular caveat remains: the millisecond coherence is measured on bus-coupled ions (Sec. II.A) while C is measured on ring-coupled ions (Sec. II.B), and Supplementary Note 8 shows the two sub-ensembles differ in inhomogeneous broadening; transferring the homogeneous linewidth is an assumption, not a circular reduction, and no equation is forced to reproduce the headline values by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on several fitted parameters extracted from spectroscopy data, but these are standard model outputs rather than ad hoc constants. The most important assumptions are the Lorentzian inhomogeneous profile, the transfer of coherence from bus-coupled to ring-coupled ions, and the applicability of the spectral diffusion and spin temperature models. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • Gamma0 (homogeneous linewidth at 0.2 T) = 254 +/- 7 Hz
    Fitted from three-pulse photon echo decay using the spectral diffusion model; central to the millisecond coherence claim.
  • R (spectral diffusion rate) = 86 +/- 18 Hz
    Fitted from the tau23 dependence of the effective linewidth; characterizes the spin bath dynamics.
  • Gamma_SD (spectral diffusion amplitude) = 1.5 +/- 0.2 kHz
    Fitted saturation value of the spectral diffusion contribution.
  • G (collective coupling strength) at 0 T = 331 +/- 6 MHz
    Free parameter in the transmission fit to Eq. S7.7; used to derive cooperativity.
  • Gamma_inh (inhomogeneous linewidth) at 0 T = 332 +/- 21 MHz
    Free parameter in the same transmission fit; assumed Lorentzian profile.
  • Effective spin temperature T = 75 +/- 1 mK
    Obtained from a four-parameter fit to the field dependence of the effective linewidth (Eq. S9.14), not from a direct thermometer.
  • T_W (nuclear spin shelf lifetime) at 0.2 T = 1056 +/- 539 s
    Fitted from inversion-recovery with a stretched exponential; large uncertainty because no clear plateau was observed.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Er3+ ensemble inhomogeneous broadening is Lorentzian (Eq. S7.7).
    Used to extract G, Gamma_inh, and C from transmission spectra; justified by strain from dilute defects and prior REI spectroscopy, and a Gaussian profile gave similar C values.
  • domain assumption The coherence measured on bus-waveguide-coupled ions is representative of the ring-resonator-coupled ions.
    The 3PPE linewidth is measured on bus-coupled ions; the strong coupling is measured on ring-coupled ions. No direct coherence measurement of the ring-coupled ensemble is reported.
  • domain assumption The spectral diffusion model of Boettger et al. (Eq. S9.8) applies to this host.
    Used to extract Gamma0, R, and Gamma_SD; standard for Er3+:Y2SiO5 but assumed transferable to CaWO4 without modification.
  • domain assumption The oscillator strength from bus waveguide absorption and the simulated mode participation apply to the ring-coupled ions.
    Used for the independent cooperativity estimate in Supplement Note 7; assumes the same dipole moment and participation factor for the ring region.
  • domain assumption The spin flip-flop and one-phonon direct process model (Eqs. S9.12-S9.14) with literature g_Z1 = 8.38 describes the field dependence.
    Yields the effective spin temperature of 75 mK; the model and g-factor are taken from prior literature without in situ verification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Millisecond optical coherence and strong collective coupling in an integrated telecom rare-earth photonic platform." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XTJNEVDI

@misc{pith2026260808221,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Millisecond optical coherence and strong collective coupling in an integrated telecom rare-earth photonic platform},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XTJNEVDI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08221}
}
abstract

Long-range quantum network nodes require the combination of strong light-matter coupling, long coherence times and in situ spectral control at telecom wavelengths. The coherence of erbium in integrated devices is held back by its hosts, which do not simultaneously provide the weakly magnetic nuclear-spin environment and the well-defined substitutional sites found in coherence-optimised bulk crystals. Here we bring such an optimised crystal onto a photonic chip, by bonding an Er${^{3+}}$:CaWO${_{4}}$ host without an adhesive interlayer to a high-${Q}$ electro-optically tuneable thin-film lithium niobate microring resonator. At an effective temperature of ${75}$ mK and a field of only ${0.2}$ T, the bonded ensemble retains an effective homogeneous linewidth of ${289\pm34}$ Hz (${T_\text{M}=1.10\pm0.13}$ ms), with spectral diffusion proceeding at ${86\pm18}$ Hz and saturating at ${1.5\pm0.2}$ kHz. Electro-optically tuning the resonator through the erbium optical transition resolves an avoided crossing with a collective cooperativity of ${C=6.7\pm0.4}$. Exploiting superhyperfine coupling to the host's ${^{183}}$W nuclear spins, we store and retrieve optical phase information over ${5}$ s with a visibility of ${0.935\pm0.015}$. Strong collective coupling, millisecond coherence and in situ spectral tuning in a single device thus establish heterogeneous integration leveraging coherence-optimised hosts as a route to scalable telecom quantum networks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08221 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [9]

    Barya, D

    P. Barya, D. Chen, A. Prabhu, L. Heller, E. Chow, H. Kim, J.Akin,V.Niaouris,J.Zhang,A.M.Dibos,P.Wang,andE.A. Goldschmidt,Telecomquantummemoryoveronemicrosecond in nanophotonic lithium niobate (2026)

    2026

  2. [11]

    Weiss, A

    L. Weiss, A. Gritsch, B. Merkel, and A. Reiserer, Erbium dopants in nanophotonic silicon waveguides, Optica 8, 40 (2021)

    2021

  3. [12]

    A.Gritsch,L.Weiss,J.Früh,S.Rinner,andA.Reiserer,Narrow Optical Transitions in Erbium-Implanted Silicon Waveguides, Physical Review X12, 041009 (2022)

    2022

  4. [13]

    S.Rinner,F.Burger,A.Gritsch,J.Schmitt,andA.Reiserer,Er- bium emitters in commercially fabricated nanophotonic silicon waveguides, Nanophotonics12, 3455 (2023)

    2023

  5. [14]

    I. R. Berkman, A. Lyasota, G. G. de Boo, J. G. Bartholomew, S. Q. Lim, B. C. Johnson, J. C. McCallum, B.-B. Xu, S. Xie, N. V. Abrosimov, H.-J. Pohl, R. L. Ahlefeldt, M. J. Sellars, C.Yin,andS.Rogge,Longopticalandelectronspincoherence times for erbium ions in silicon, npj Quantum Information11, 66 (2025)

    2025

  6. [15]

    Lyasota, J

    A. Lyasota, J. Bader, S. Q. Lim, B. C. Johnson, J. C. Mc- Callum, Q. Li, S. Rogge, and S. Castelletto, Narrow magneto- optical transitions of erbium implanted into silicon carbide-on- insulator, Communications Materials7, 10.1038/s43246-026- 01154-5 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s43246-026- 2026

  7. [17]

    S. Wang, L. Yang, R. Cheng, Y. Xu, M. Shen, R. L. Cone, C. W. Thiel, and H. X. Tang, Incorporation of erbium ions into thin-film lithium niobate integrated photonics, Applied Physics Letters116, 10.1063/1.5142631 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5142631 2020

  8. [18]

    Dutta, E

    S. Dutta, E. A. Goldschmidt, S. Barik, U. Saha, and E. Waks, Integrated Photonic Platform for Rare-Earth Ions in Thin Film Lithium Niobate, Nano Letters20, 741 (2020)

    2020

Show all 136 references
  1. [19]

    S. Wang, L. Yang, M. Shen, W. Fu, Y. Xu, R. L. Cone, C. W. Thiel,andH.X.Tang,Er:LiNbO 3withHighOpticalCoherence Enabling Optical Thickness Control, Physical Review Applied Page 6 out of 7 18, 014069 (2022)

    2022

  2. [20]

    S.Kanai,F.J.Heremans,H.Seo,G.Wolfowicz,C.P.Anderson, S. E. Sullivan, M. Onizhuk, G. Galli, D. D. Awschalom, and H. Ohno, Generalized scaling of spin qubit coherence in over 12,000 host materials, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, 10.1073/pnas.2121808119 (2022)

    2022 doi

  3. [21]

    M. Guo, Q. Li, Z. Xu, S. Liu, F. Wang, and M. Zhong, De- coherence characterization and quantum memory design in 167Er3+:Y2SiO5, Frontiers of Physics21, 033201 (2026)

    2026

  4. [22]

    T.Böttger,C.W.Thiel,R.L.Cone,andY.Sun,Effectsofmag- netic field orientation on optical decoherence in Er3+:Y2SiO5, Phys. Rev. B79, 115104 (2009)

    2009

  5. [23]

    M.Rančić,M.P.Hedges,R.L.Ahlefeldt,andM.J.Sellars,Co- herencetimeofoverasecondinatelecom-compatiblequantum memory storage material, Nature Physics14, 50 (2017)

    2017

  6. [24]

    R.Fukumori, Y.Huang, J.Yang, H.Zhang,andT.Zhong,Sub- kilohertzopticalhomogeneouslinewidthanddephasingmecha- nisms in Er3+:Y2O3 ceramics, Physical Review B101, 214202 (2020)

    2020

  7. [25]

    A. M. Ferrenti, N. P. de Leon, J. D. Thompson, and R. J. Cava, Identifyingcandidatehostsforquantumdefectsviadatamining, npj Computational Materials6, 10.1038/s41524-020-00391-7 (2020)

    2020 doi

  8. [27]

    Z. Wang, S. Lin, M. Le Dantec, M. Rančić, P. Goldner, S.Bertaina,T.Chaneliere,R.Liu,D.Esteve,D.Vion,E.Flurin, andP.Bertet,Week-long-lifetimemicrowavespectralholesinan erbium-doped scheelite crystal at millikelvin temperature, Na- tureCommunications 16,10.1038/s41467-025-64087-6(2025)

    2025 doi

  9. [29]

    M. T. Uysal, Ł. Dusanowski, H. Xu, S. P. Horvath, S. Ourari, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and J. D. Thompson, Spin-Photon EntanglementofaSingleEr 3+IonintheTelecomBand,Physical Review X15, 011071 (2025)

    2025

  10. [30]

    L. Yang, M. Shen, Y. Xu, J. Xie, and H. X. Tang, Photonic integration of Er3+:Y2SiO5 with thin-film lithium niobate by flip chip bonding, Optics Express29, 15497 (2021)

    2021

  11. [31]

    A.Kolar,I.Chin,C.Fong,D.M.Lukin,M.A.Guidry,M.Palei, J.Vučković,andT.Zhong,Integratedphoton-memoryentangle- ment generation using dual photonic resonators (2026)

    2026

  12. [32]

    Zhang, G

    J. Zhang, G. D. Grant, I. Masiulionis, M. T. Solomon, J. C. Marcks, J. K. Bindra, J. Niklas, A. M. Dibos, O. G. Poluektov, F. J. Heremans, S. Guha, and D. D. Awschalom, Optical and spin coherence of er spin qubits in epitaxial cerium dioxide on silicon, npj Quantum Information...

    2024 doi

  13. [33]

    Q. Kang, H. Yan, F. Niu, K. Liu, T. Suga, and C. Wang, Inp/linbo3 covalent heterointerface construction via an asym- metricplasmaactivationstrategyforhybridintegratedquantum systems,ACSAppliedMaterials&Interfaces 16,48502(2024), pMID: 39193874

    2024

  14. [34]

    Böttger, C

    T. Böttger, C. W. Thiel, Y. Sun, and R. L. Cone, Optical deco- herenceandspectraldiffusionat1.5 µminEr 3+:Y2SiO5 versus magneticfield,temperature,andEr 3+ concentration,Phys.Rev. B73, 075101 (2006)

    2006

  15. [35]

    M.D.LevensonandS.S.Kano, Introduction to Nonlinear Laser Spectroscopy(Academic Press, New York, 1988)

    1988

  16. [36]

    Probst, G

    S. Probst, G. Zhang, M. Rančić, V. Ranjan, M. Le Dan- tec, Z. Zhang, B. Albanese, A. Doll, R. B. Liu, J. Morton, T.Chanelière,P.Goldner,D.Vion,D.Esteve,andP.Bertet,Hy- perfine spectroscopy in a quantum-limited spectrometer, Mag- netic Resonance1, 315 (2020)

    2020

  17. [37]

    Gupta, Y

    S. Gupta, Y. Huang, S. Liu, Y. Pei, Q. Gao, S. Yang, N. Tomm, R. J. Warburton, and T. Zhong, Dual epitaxial telecom spin- photoninterfaceswithlong-livedcoherence,NatureCommuni- cations16, 9814 (2025)

    2025

  18. [38]

    Rochman, T

    J. Rochman, T. Xie, J. G. Bartholomew, K. C. Schwab, and A. Faraon, Microwave-to-optical transduction with erbium ions coupledtoplanarphotonicandsuperconductingresonators,Na- tureCommunications 14,10.1038/s41467-023-36799-0(2023)

    2023 doi

  19. [39]

    Böttger, Y

    T. Böttger, Y. Sun, C. W. Thiel, and R. L. Cone, Spectroscopy and dynamics of Er3+:Y2SiO5 at 1.5 µm, Phys. Rev. B74, 075107 (2006)

    2006

  20. [41]

    Diniz, S

    I. Diniz, S. Portolan, R. Ferreira, J. M. Gérard, P. Bertet, and A. Auffèves, Strongly coupling a cavity to inhomogeneous en- semblesofemitters: Potentialforlong-livedsolid-statequantum memories, Physical Review A84, 063810 (2011)

    2011

  21. [42]

    A. V. Gorshkov, A. André, M. D. Lukin, and A. S. Sørensen, Photonstoragein Λ-typeopticallydenseatomicmedia.i.cavity model, Physical Review A76, 033804 (2007)

    2007

  22. [43]

    M.AfzeliusandC.Simon,Impedance-matchedcavityquantum memory, Physical Review A82, 022310 (2010)

    2010

  23. [45]

    M. U. Staudt, S. R. Hastings-Simon, M. Nilsson, M. Afzelius, V. Scarani, R. Ricken, H. Suche, W. Sohler, W. Tittel, and N. Gisin, Fidelity of an optical memory based on stimulated photon echoes, Physical Review Letters98, 113601 (2007)

    2007

  24. [46]

    Liu, P.-Y

    D.-C. Liu, P.-Y. Li, T.-X. Zhu, L. Zheng, J.-Y. Huang, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, On-demand storage of photonic qubits at telecom wavelengths, Physical Review Letters129, 210501 (2022)

    2022

  25. [47]

    M.Bonarota,J.Ruggiero,J.L.L.Gouët,andT.Chanelière,Effi- ciencyoptimizationforatomicfrequencycombstorage,Physical Review A81, 033803 (2010)

    2010

  26. [48]

    Afzelius, C

    M. Afzelius, C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Mul- timode quantum memory based on atomic frequency combs, Physical Review A79, 052329 (2009)

    2009

  27. [49]

    Damon, M

    V. Damon, M. Bonarota, A. Louchet-Chauvet, T. Chanelière, andJ.-L.LeGouët,Revivalofsilencedechoandquantummem- ory for light, New Journal of Physics13, 093031 (2011)

    2011

  28. [50]

    A Williamson and J

    L. A Williamson and J. J Longdell, Cavity enhanced rephased amplified spontaneous emission, New Journal of Physics16, 073046 (2014)

    2014

  29. [51]

    S. A. Moiseev, S. N. Andrianov, and F. F. Gubaidullin, Effi- cient multimode quantum memory based on photon echo in an optimal qed cavity, Physical Review A82, 022311 (2010)

    2010

  30. [52]

    Marsh, Y

    L. Marsh, Y. Yikai, C. Mattiroli, M. T. Sayat, Ð. M. Trí, H. M. Rønnow, J. J. Longdell, and J.-R. Soh, Nuclear quadrupole in- teraction and zero first-order zeeman transitions of167Er3+ in CaWO4, Physical Review B113, 10.1103/pg5m-hk2n (2026). Page 7 out of 7 Supplementary Inf...

    2026 doi

  31. [53]

    Deposit 100nm Ti using e-Beam evaporator

  32. [55]

    Fabrication flow

    Wash (Acetone / IPA / DI). Fabrication flow. 3. Ring resonator

  33. [56]

    Wash (Acetone / IPA / DI / MIF319 / DI)

  34. [58]

    Spin coat FOx-16 HSQ resist, 60s, 2500 RPM

  35. [59]

    Bake for 5 min at 80°C

  36. [60]

    Expose, EBL at 2 nA with a total dose of 2000µC/cm2

  37. [61]

    Develop 25% w/w TMAH for17 s

  38. [62]

    Develop MIF319 for 60s

  39. [63]

    EtchusingICPRIE,Argon40sccm,2mTorr,1500W ICP / 150W RF

  40. [64]

    Strip Ti, HSQ and SiO2 in 1% HF for 10 min

  41. [65]

    Cleanusing3:1v/vPiranhasolution(96%Sulphuric Acid : 30% Hydrogen Peroxide) for 30 min, no ex- ternal heating

  42. [66]

    Clean using 2:1:1 v/v/v SC-1 solution (DI : 30% Ammonium Hydroxide : 30% Hydrogen Peroxide) for 60 min, no external heating

  43. [67]

    Fabrication flow

    Anneal at 520°C in a pure Oxygen atmosphere for 1 h. Fabrication flow. 2. Bonding mesa

  44. [70]

    Deposit600nmofSiO 2 usingPECVD,300 °C,N 2O 460sccm, SiH4 3sccm, 20W RF

  45. [71]

    Spin coat AR 300-80 new, 60s, 6000 RPM

  46. [74]

    Expose, 405nm with a dose of 75µC/cm2

  47. [75]

    Develop in MIF319 for 30s at RT

  48. [76]

    Etch SiO2 in 1% w/w Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) for 10 min

  49. [77]

    Fabrication flow

    Strip resist in Remover PG at RT for 24 h. Fabrication flow. 4. Electrodes

  50. [78]

    Wash (Acetone / Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) / De- ionised water (DI))

  51. [79]

    Bake for 5 minutes at 140°C

  52. [80]

    Spin coat LOR-5A, 60s, 4000 RPM

  53. [81]

    Bake for 2 minutes at 180°C

  54. [82]

    Spin coat AZ1512, 60s, 4000 RPM

  55. [83]

    Bake for 60s at 100°C

  56. [84]

    Expose, 405nm with a dose of 50µC/cm2

  57. [85]

    Develop in MIF319 (2.5% TMAH) for 90s at room temperature (RT)

  58. [86]

    Deposit10nmTiand150nmAlusinge-Beamevap- orator

  59. [87]

    Lift-off using Remover PG at RT for 24 h

  60. [88]

    Wash (Acetone / IPA / DI)

  61. [89]

    Bake for 5 minutes at 180°C. Supplementary Table 1.Thin-film lithium niobate nanofabrication flows.Summary of the thin-film lithium niobate fabrication workflow, divided into four modules: alignment mark definition, bonding mesa preparation, ring resonator patterning and elect...

  62. [90]

    Bahadori, M

    M. Bahadori, M. Nikdast, Q. Cheng, and K. Bergman, Universal design of waveguide bends in silicon-on-insulator photonics platform, Journal of Lightwave Technology37, 3044 (2019)

    2019

  63. [91]

    Y. Gao, F. Lei, M. Girardi, Z. Ye, R. Van Laer, V. Torres-Company, and J. Schröder, Compact lithium niobate microring resonators in the ultrahigh q/v regime, Optics Letters48, 3949 (2023)

    2023

  64. [92]

    Dai and J

    D. Dai and J. E. Bowers, Novel ultra-short and ultra-broadband polarization beam splitter based on a bent directional coupler, Optics express19, 18614 (2011)

    2011

  65. [93]

    M. Li, J. Ling, Y. He, U. A. Javid, S. Xue, and Q. Lin, Lithium niobate photonic-crystal electro-optic modulator, Nature communications 11, 4123 (2020)

    2020

  66. [94]

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, B. Stern, M. Lipson, and M. Lončar, Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-optic modulators, Optics express26, 1547 (2018)

    2018

  67. [95]

    A.Guarino,G.Poberaj,D.Rezzonico,R.Degl’Innocenti,andP.Günter,Electro–opticallytunablemicroringresonatorsinlithiumniobate, Nature photonics1, 407 (2007)

    2007

  68. [96]

    S. Yu, H. Kang, X. Shen, Y. Xue, W. Wan, C. Zou, B. Chen, and J. Lu, Poling-assisted hydrofluoric acid wet etching of thin-film lithium niobate, Optics Letters49, 854 (2024). Page 16 out of 18

    2024

  69. [97]

    P. B. Deotare,Nanobeam cavities for reconfigurable photonics(Harvard University, 2012)

    2012

  70. [98]

    J. T.-H. Choy,Nanophotonic structures for coupling to quantum emitters in the visible(Harvard University, 2013)

    2013

  71. [99]

    C. Shen, C. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Wu, Y. Chen, Z. Li, K. Huang, X. Zhao, S. Song, J. Zhang,et al., A comparative study of dry-etching nanophotonic devices on a linbo3-on-insulator material platform, in4th Optics Young Scientist Summit (OYSS 2020), Vol. 11781 (SPIE,

    2020

  72. [100]

    Kumar, N

    C. Kumar, N. N. Klimov, and P. S. Kuo, Optimization of waveguide fabrication processes in lithium-niobate-on-insulator platform, AIP advances14(2024)

    2024

  73. [101]

    H.-S. Kim, G. Kim, T. Slusar, J. Kim, J. Park, J. Park, H. Hwang, W. Noh, H. Lee, M.-K. Seo, K. Moon, and J. J. Ju, Fabrication of low-losssymmetricalribwaveguidesbasedonx-cutlithiumniobateoninsulatorforintegratedquantumphotonics,ETRIJournal 46,783 (2024), https://onlinelibrar...

    2024 doi

  74. [102]

    F.Kaufmann,G.Finco,A.Maeder,andR.Grange,Redeposition-freeinductively-coupledplasmaetchingoflithiumniobateforintegrated photonics, Nanophotonics12, 1601 (2023), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0676

    2023 doi

  75. [103]

    S. Yang, Y. Li, J. Xu, M. Wang, L. Wu, X. Quan, M. Liu, L. Fu, and X. Cheng, Low loss ridge-waveguide grating couplers in lithium niobate on insulator, Optical Materials Express11, 1366 (2021)

    2021

  76. [104]

    G.Ulliac,V.Calero,A.Ndao,F.Baida,andM.-P.Bernal,Argonplasmainductivelycoupledplasmareactiveionetchingstudyforsmooth sidewall thin film lithium niobate waveguide application, Optical Materials53, 1 (2016)

    2016

  77. [105]

    J. C. Holzgrafe,Cavity electro-optics in thin-film lithium niobate, PhD Thesis, Harvard University (2022)

    2022

  78. [106]

    Zhuang, J

    R. Zhuang, J. He, Y. Qi, and Y. Li, High-q thin-film lithium niobate microrings fabricated with wet etching, Advanced Materials35, 2208113 (2023)

    2023

  79. [107]

    Shams Ansari,Integrated lithium niobate photonics and applications, Ph.D

    A. Shams Ansari,Integrated lithium niobate photonics and applications, Ph.D. thesis (2022)

    2022

  80. [108]

    Leidinger, K

    M. Leidinger, K. Buse, and I. Breunig, Influence of dry-oxygen-annealing on the residual absorption of lithium niobate crystals in the spectral range from 500 to 2900 nanometers, Opt. Mater. Express6, 264 (2016)

    2016

  81. [109]

    Zhang, T

    A.Shams-Ansari,G.Huang,L.He,Z.Li,J.Holzgrafe,M.Jankowski,M.Churaev,P.Kharel,R.Cheng,D.Zhu,N.Sinclair,B.Desiatov, M. Zhang, T. J. Kippenberg, and M. Lončar, Reduced material loss in thin-film lithium niobate waveguides, APL Photonics7, 081301 (2022)

    2022

  82. [110]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Wang, Y. Hu, A. Shams-Ansari, T. Ren, S. Fan, and M. Lončar, Electronically programmable photonic molecule, Nature Photonics13, 36 (2019)

    2019

  83. [111]

    Desiatov, A

    B. Desiatov, A. Shams-Ansari, M. Zhang, C. Wang, and M. Lončar, Ultra-low-loss integrated visible photonics using thin-film lithium niobate, Optica6, 380 (2019)

    2019

  84. [112]

    Shams-Ansari, M

    A. Shams-Ansari, M. Yu, Z. Chen, C. Reimer, M. Zhang, N. Picquè, and M. Lončar, Thin-film lithium-niobate electro-optic platform for spectrally tailored dual-comb spectroscopy, Communications Physics5, 88 (2022)

    2022

  85. [113]

    A.V.Sosunov,I.V.Petukhov,V.Kichigin,R.S.Ponomarev,A.A.Mololkin,andM.Kuneva,Theimpactofvariousfactorsonthesurface of x-cut lithium niobate and properties of proton-exchanged waveguides, Ferroelectrics618, 1300 (2024)

    2024

  86. [114]

    K. Xu, W. Zhang, J. Luo, H. Yu, H. Yuan, B. Wang, and D. Wu, Evolution mechanism of interfacial multi-layer intermetallic compounds and failure behavior in the al–au wire bonding, Journal of Materials Research and Technology32, 2843 (2024)

    2024

  87. [115]

    Q. Kang, H. Yan, F. Niu, K. Liu, T. Suga, and C. Wang, Inp/linbo3 covalent heterointerface construction via an asymmetric plasma activation strategy for hybrid integrated quantum systems, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces16, 48502 (2024), pMID: 39193874

    2024

  88. [116]

    Dasigi, P

    K. Dasigi, P. A. Dmitriev, K. J. Wo, F. Hanamura, L. Kong, and S. Touzard, Quantum-limited optical vector analysis, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , 1 (2026)

    2026

  89. [117]

    Weigel and S

    P. Weigel and S. Mookherjea, Reducing the thermal stress in a heterogeneous material stack for large-area hybrid optical silicon-lithium niobate waveguide micro-chips, Optical Materials66, 605 (2017)

    2017

  90. [118]

    M. A. Hopcroft, W. D. Nix, and T. W. Kenny, What is the young’s modulus of silicon?, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems19, 229 (2010)

    2010

  91. [119]

    J.-H.Zhao, T.Ryan, P.S.Ho, A.J.McKerrow,andW.-Y.Shih,Measurementofelasticmodulus, poissonratio, andcoefficientofthermal expansion of on-wafer submicron films, Journal of Applied Physics85, 6421 (1999)

    1999

  92. [120]

    R. S. Weis and T. K. Gaylord, Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structure, Applied Physics A Solids and Surfaces37, 191 (1985)

    1985

  93. [121]

    V.A.Gorodtsov,V.G.Tkachenko,andD.S.Lisovenko,Extremevaluesofyoung’smodulusoftetragonalcrystals,MechanicsofMaterials 154, 103724 (2021)

    2021

  94. [122]

    C.A.Swenson,Recommendedvaluesforthethermalexpansivityofsiliconfrom0to1000k,JournalofPhysicalandChemicalReference Data12, 179 (1983)

    1983

  95. [123]

    F.Pignatiello,M.DeRosa,P.Ferraro,S.Grilli,P.DeNatale,A.Arie,andS.DeNicola,Measurementofthethermalexpansioncoefficients of ferroelectric crystals by a moiré interferometer, Optics Communications277, 14 (2007)

    2007

  96. [124]

    Senyshyn, M

    A. Senyshyn, M. Hoelzel, T. Hansen, L. Vasylechko, V. Mikhailik, H. Kraus, and H. Ehrenberg, Thermal structural properties of calcium tungstate, Journal of Applied Crystallography44, 319 (2011)

    2011

  97. [125]

    L.Yang,M.Shen,Y.Xu,J.Xie,andH.X.Tang,PhotonicintegrationofEr 3+:Y2SiO5 withthin-filmlithiumniobatebyflipchipbonding, Optics Express29, 15497 (2021)

    2021

  98. [126]

    B. D. Bartolo,Optical interactions in solids(Wiley, New York, 1968)

    1968

  99. [127]

    Henderson and G

    B. Henderson and G. F. Imbusch.,Optical spectroscopy of inorganic solids(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006)

    2006

  100. [128]

    Dolgaleva and R

    K. Dolgaleva and R. W. Boyd, Local-field effects in nanostructured photonic materials, Advances in Optics and Photonics4, 1 (2012)

    2012

  101. [129]

    Liu and B

    G. Liu and B. Jacquier,Spectroscopic Properties of Rare Earths in Optical Materials(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005)

    2005

  102. [130]

    Zhong, J

    T. Zhong, J. M. Kindem, J. G. Bartholomew, J. Rochman, I. Craiciu, V. Verma, S. W. Nam, F. Marsili, M. D. Shaw, A. D. Beyer, and A. Faraon, Optically addressing single rare-earth ions in a nanophotonic cavity, Physical Review Letters121, 183603 (2018)

    2018

  103. [131]

    Böttger, Y

    T. Böttger, Y. Sun, C. W. Thiel, and R. L. Cone, Spectroscopy and dynamics of Er3+:Y2SiO5 at 1.5µm, Phys. Rev. B74, 075107 (2006). Page 17 out of 18

    2006

  104. [132]

    Thiel, T

    C. Thiel, T. Böttger, and R. Cone, Rare-earth-doped materials for applications in quantum information storage and signal processing, Journal of Luminescence131, 353 (2011)

    2011

  105. [133]

    D. L. Orth and J. L. Skinner, Lattice model of inhomogeneous broadening in crystals: Correlation of frequency distributions for different transitions, The Journal of Physical Chemistry98, 7342 (1994)

    1994

  106. [134]

    Diniz, S

    I. Diniz, S. Portolan, R. Ferreira, J. M. Gérard, P. Bertet, and A. Auffèves, Strongly coupling a cavity to inhomogeneous ensembles of emitters: Potential for long-lived solid-state quantum memories, Physical Review A84, 063810 (2011)

    2011

  107. [135]

    Becker, S

    F. Becker, S. KC, L. J. J. Sauerzopf, T. Schneider, L. Risinger, C. Schmid, and K. Müller, Zeeman spectroscopy of vacancy-charge- compensated Er3+ sites in CaWO4 under vector magnetic fields, Physical Review Materials10, 10.1103/mkpd-9r5p (2026)

    2026 doi

  108. [136]

    Böttger, C

    T. Böttger, C. W. Thiel, Y. Sun, and R. L. Cone, Optical decoherence and spectral diffusion at 1.5µm in Er3+:Y2SiO5 versus magnetic field, temperature, and Er3+ concentration, Phys. Rev. B73, 075101 (2006)

    2006

  109. [137]

    Abragam and B

    A. Abragam and B. Bleaney,Electron paramagnetic resonance of transition ions(Oxford University Press, London, 1970)

    1970

  110. [138]

    LeDantec, M

    M. LeDantec, M. Rančić, S.Lin, E. Billaud, V.Ranjan, D. Flanigan, S.Bertaina, T.Chanelière, P. Goldner, A.Erb, R. B.Liu, D. Estève, D.Vion,E.Flurin,andP.Bertet,Twenty-three–millisecondelectronspincoherenceoferbiumionsinanatural-abundancecrystal,Science Advances7, 10.1126/sciad...

    2021 doi

  111. [139]

    Berberan-Santos, E

    M. Berberan-Santos, E. Bodunov, and B. Valeur, Mathematical functions for the analysis of luminescence decays with underlying distributions 1. kohlrausch decay function (stretched exponential), Chemical Physics315, 171 (2005)

    2005

  112. [140]

    Z. Wang, S. Lin, M. Le Dantec, M. Rančić, P. Goldner, S. Bertaina, T. Chaneliere, R. Liu, D. Esteve, D. Vion, E. Flurin, and P. Bertet, Week-long-lifetimemicrowavespectralholesinanerbium-dopedscheelitecrystalatmillikelvintemperature,NatureCommunications 16, 10.1038/s41467-025-...

    2025 doi

  113. [141]

    Kolar, I

    A. Kolar, I. Chin, C. Fong, D. M. Lukin, M. A. Guidry, M. Palei, J. Vučković, and T. Zhong, Integrated photon-memory entanglement generation using dual photonic resonators (2026)

    2026

  114. [142]

    Ourari, Ł

    S. Ourari, Ł. Dusanowski, S. P. Horvath, M. T. Uysal, C. M. Phenicie, P. Stevenson, M. Raha, S. Chen, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and J. D. Thompson, Indistinguishable telecom band photons from a single Er ion in the solid state, Nature620, 977 (2023)

    2023

  115. [143]

    Gupta, R

    S. Gupta, R. M. Pettit, A. Sundaresh, V. Niaouris, S. Deckoff-Jones, D. P. Crowley, L. G. Carpenter, A. M. Dibos, M. K. Singh, and S. E. Sullivan,Erbiumquantummemoryplatformwithlongopticalcoherenceviaback-end-of-linedepositiononfoundry-fabricatedphotonics, Physical Review Appl...

    2025 doi

  116. [144]

    Guha, and D

    J.Zhang,G.D.Grant,I.Masiulionis,M.T.Solomon,J.C.Marcks,J.K.Bindra,J.Niklas,A.M.Dibos,O.G.Poluektov,F.J.Heremans, S. Guha, and D. D. Awschalom, Optical and spin coherence of er spin qubits in epitaxial cerium dioxide on silicon, npj Quantum Information10, 10.1038/s41534-024-009...

    2024 doi

  117. [145]

    Miyazono, I

    E. Miyazono, I. Craiciu, A. Arbabi, T. Zhong, and A. Faraon, Coupling erbium dopants in yttrium orthosilicate to silicon photonic resonators and waveguides, Optics Express25, 2863 (2017)

    2017

  118. [146]

    S. Wang, L. Yang, M. Shen, W. Fu, Y. Xu, R. L. Cone, C. W. Thiel, and H. X. Tang, Er:LiNbO3 with High Optical Coherence Enabling Optical Thickness Control, Physical Review Applied18, 014069 (2022)

    2022

  119. [147]

    Lyasota, J

    A. Lyasota, J. Bader, S. Q. Lim, B. C. Johnson, J. C. McCallum, Q. Li, S. Rogge, and S. Castelletto, Narrow magneto-optical transitions of erbium implanted into silicon carbide-on-insulator, Communications Materials7, 10.1038/s43246-026-01154-5 (2026)

    2026 doi

  120. [148]

    Gritsch, L

    A. Gritsch, L. Weiss, J. Früh, S. Rinner, and A. Reiserer, Narrow Optical Transitions in Erbium-Implanted Silicon Waveguides, Physical Review X12, 041009 (2022)

    2022

  121. [149]

    S.Rinner,F.Burger,A.Gritsch,J.Schmitt,andA.Reiserer,Erbiumemittersincommerciallyfabricatednanophotonicsiliconwaveguides, Nanophotonics12, 3455 (2023)

    2023

  122. [150]

    Barya, D

    P. Barya, D. Chen, A. Prabhu, L. Heller, E. Chow, H. Kim, J. Akin, V. Niaouris, J. Zhang, A. M. Dibos, P. Wang, and E. A. Goldschmidt, Telecom quantum memory over one microsecond in nanophotonic lithium niobate (2026)

    2026

  123. [151]

    C. Yang, H. Guo, Y.-Y. An, Q. He, C. Lu, Z. Jiang, Y.-Q. Lu, S. Zhu, and X.-S. Ma, Programmable cavity-enhanced telecom quantum memory in thin-film lithium niobate (2026)

    2026

  124. [152]

    I. R. Berkman, A. Lyasota, G. G. de Boo, J. G. Bartholomew, S. Q. Lim, B. C. Johnson, J. C. McCallum, B.-B. Xu, S. Xie, N. V. Abrosimov, H.-J. Pohl, R. L. Ahlefeldt, M. J. Sellars, C. Yin, and S. Rogge, Long optical and electron spin coherence times for erbium ions in silicon,...

    2025

  125. [153]

    M. Guo, Q. Li, Z. Xu, S. Liu, F. Wang, and M. Zhong, Decoherence characterization and quantum memory design in167Er3+:Y2SiO5, Frontiers of Physics21, 033201 (2026)

    2026

  126. [154]

    Böttger, C

    T. Böttger, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, and Y. Sun, Effects of magnetic field orientation on optical decoherence in Er3+:Y2SiO5, Phys. Rev. B79, 115104 (2009)

    2009

  127. [155]

    Fukumori, Y

    R. Fukumori, Y. Huang, J. Yang, H. Zhang, and T. Zhong, Subkilohertz optical homogeneous linewidth and dephasing mechanisms in Er3+:Y2O3 ceramics, Physical Review B101, 214202 (2020)

    2020

  128. [156]

    Rasekh, N

    F. Rasekh, N. G. Kamel, M. Bornadel, S. Kumar, E. Saglamyurek, C. Simon, and D. Oblak, Ultra-narrow homogeneous linewidths of erbium-doped silica glass fibers at millikelvin temperatures: magnetic field and temperature dependence, Optica Quantum4, 63 (2026). Page 18 out of 18

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.