Atlantes: A system of GPS transformers for global-scale real-time maritime intelligence

Henry Herzog; Joshua Hansen; Patrick Beukema; Yawen Zhang

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 11 references

Atlantes: A system of GPS transformers for global-scale real-time maritime intelligence

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Atlantes classifies the activity of hundreds of thousands of vessels worldwide in real time from AIS GPS messages alone, a capability the paper says is the first of its kind.

desk verdict A candid, practically grounded systems paper whose real contribution is the deployed system and open-sourced code, not the architecture; the evaluation needs baselines and error bars before operational claims hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19036 v1 pith:XTTQWUQW submitted 2025-04-26 cs.LG

Henry Herzog , Joshua Hansen , Yawen Zhang , Patrick Beukema This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.LG

keywords AISGPStrajectorymaritimesurveillancetransformerreal-timeclassificationvesselactivityfishingdetectiondeeplearning

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents Atlantes, a production deep-learning system that purports to deliver the first-ever real-time, global-scale view of vessel behavior, built solely from the continuous stream of AIS GPS messages. The system classifies every message into vessel versus buoy and, for vessels, into transiting, anchored, fishing, moored, or other, using a compact transformer architecture. The authors argue this capability matters because ocean governance, climate adaptation, and enforcement against illegal fishing require timely intelligence: knowing what a vessel is doing now, not after the fact. If the claim holds, Atlantes would turn the AIS feed—already near-comprehensive globally—into an operational decision-making tool without needing satellite imagery or manual review.

What carries the argument

The central object is ATLAS (AIS transformers learning for active subpaths), a transformer encoder with three components: a continuous point embedding layer (CPE) that encodes raw GPS sequences by computing spatiotemporal differences between successive anchor points in a short window (n=9 messages), CNN layers that extract local movement patterns, and multi-head self-attention layers that form global representations of the whole trajectory. The CPE layer is what lets the model consume irregular, noisy AIS messages directly, without interpolation or handcrafted features. Around the model sits a change-point detector that uses time and speed over ground to decide when a vessel's behavior may have shifted, so the three-stage pipeline (pre-processing, inference, post-processing) runs only when needed, keeping the system at roughly 28 classifications per second on 20 CPUs and 5 T4 GPUs.

What would settle it

Compare Atlantes' real-time fishing classifications, on held-out AIS tracks, against an independent ground-truth source such as vessel monitoring system (VMS) records, onboard observer reports, or satellite radar detections of fishing vessels at the same times and positions; if confirmed fishing events are missed or non-fishing vessels are flagged at a rate far below the reported 90% fishing accuracy, the real-time activity claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that real-time, global-scale classification of vessel behavior from raw AIS GPS messages is achievable with a small, efficient transformer. The system's activity classifier was trained by 20 expert analysts on more than 15 million labeled messages spanning 7,500 track-months worldwide, and evaluates each message as it arrives using a speed-based change-point detector that triggers inference. In third-party evaluation on globally stratified random samples, entity classification reached 97.5% accuracy and activity classification reached 71% overall accuracy (90% for fishing vessels, 51% for unknown vessels), while the system processes roughly 28 activity classifications per second on modest hardware. Because no prior model offers real-time global predictions, the authors present these numbers as reflecting user experience rather than as a head-to-head comparison with existing systems.

Load-bearing premise

The system's accuracy rests on the assumption that a vessel's AIS GPS stream alone contains enough signal to determine what it is doing, and that the expert labels used for training and evaluation are reliable ground truth despite only 85% inter-annotator agreement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Real-time decisions become possible: a coast guard or enforcement agency can act on a fishing classification within seconds of the AIS message, rather than after retrospective analysis.
The 90% accuracy on fishing vessels, if it holds in practice, gives fisheries monitoring a tool for targeting patrols and inspections at likely illegal activity.
The full codebase is open-sourced, so the system can be deployed or fine-tuned by other organizations without building the pipeline from scratch.
Because the model only needs GPS messages, it can be applied in regions without satellite imagery coverage or where imagery is too slow or expensive for live monitoring.
The speed-based change-point detector limits inference to behavioral transitions, making continuous global monitoring computationally affordable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step the authors do not develop is fusing the real-time GPS classifications with intermittent satellite imagery: the GPS model can flag candidates for high-resolution imaging, turning the 71% activity accuracy into a triage layer rather than a final verdict.
The 71% activity accuracy versus 85% inter-annotator agreement suggests the ceiling of GPS-only classification is close but not reached; part of the gap is likely due to label noise, so an activity model trained on fully agreed labels might close some of the remaining distance.
The same ATLAS architecture and continuous point embedding should transfer to other irregular spatiotemporal streams with similar properties—for example, terrestrial GPS tracking of vehicles or animals—where real-time behavior classification is also valuable.
A testable extension is to benchmark Atlantes against the prior retrospective global CNN classifier on the same historical tracks; any disagreement would reveal whether the real-time constraint or the GPS-only input is the main source of error.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Atlantes is a genuinely useful systems paper. The authors have built and deployed a real-time global maritime activity classifier that runs on AIS GPS streams, open-sourced the code, and they are candid about the evaluation limits. The architecture itself is not new—it is a Trajformer adaptation with the continuous point embedding and CNN layers—but the packaged system, the two-task entity/activity formulation, and the scale of deployment are real contributions. If you work on AIS or trajectory classification, it is worth reading.

What the paper does well: it is honest. Section 2.3 says outright that they cannot compare to prior work, that inter-annotator agreement is only 85%, and that humans use more than GPS. The system is already used by hundreds of organizations, which is evidence beyond a benchmark that the model has operational value. The training data and active learning loop are described sufficiently for a workshop paper.

The soft spot is the evaluation. The headline numbers—97.5% entity accuracy, 71% activity accuracy—come without confidence intervals, per-class detail beyond fishing and unknown, or any baseline. The activity accuracy is hard to interpret because the labels were produced by experts who had access to more than GPS; the 85% human agreement is not a fair ceiling for a GPS-only model. The stress-test note is right about that apples-to-oranges comparison, though I would not go so far as to call the 71% invalid—it is what it is, but it is not evidence of 'approaching human performance.' The 51% accuracy on unknown vessels is worrying, since that is exactly the category where operators need help. The paper's abstract claims 'successful interventions,' but no evidence of that appears anywhere. For a deployed tool with operational claims, that is a gap.

Where I would push: add a confusion matrix, compare against a simple baseline (e.g., speed/clustering heuristic) on a fixed subset, and report precision/recall for each activity class. Also, clarify how the third-party evaluation was sampled. None of this is fatal; it is standard strengthening for a systems paper that wants to be taken beyond a workshop.

Bottom line: this deserves peer review. The system is real, the code is out, and the authors are honest about limitations. The evaluation needs work before the operational claims are supportable, but as a first disclosure of a deployed system, it is solid. I would bring it to the reading group.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents Atlantes, a production system for real-time classification of Automatic Identification System (AIS) GPS messages into entity type (vessel vs. buoy) and vessel activity (transiting, anchored, fishing, moored, other). The system uses a transformer architecture (ATLAS) with continuous point embeddings, trained on a large expert-annotated dataset (over 15 million messages) and deployed at global scale. Reported results include 97.5% entity classification accuracy and 71% activity classification accuracy, with 90% for fishing and 51% for unknown vessels; inter-annotator agreement is reported at 85%. The authors claim this is the first real-time global vessel behavior monitoring system and that its performance enables operationally relevant decision-making. The codebase is open-sourced.

Significance. If properly supported, Atlantes would be a significant contribution: it would demonstrate a scalable, real-time, global maritime monitoring capability with direct applications to fisheries management, environmental protection, and maritime safety. The open-sourcing of the code and the curation of a large expert-annotated AIS dataset are concrete strengths that enable further research. However, the current evaluation is not sufficient to establish the central accuracy claim: the reported activity accuracy is presented without baselines, confidence intervals, or a confusion matrix, and the label-generation protocol may make the 71% figure an overestimate of the model's GPS-only skill. The paper's own admission that human annotators use additional data sources is a critical caveat that must be addressed.

major comments (5)

[§2.3 (How good is this model really?)] The headline activity accuracy of 71% is reported without confidence intervals, a confusion matrix, or per-class precision/recall/F1 beyond the two mentioned numbers (90% for fishing, 51% for unknown). With five classes and likely class imbalance, a majority-class baseline could already achieve substantial accuracy, and 51% on the 'unknown' class is barely above chance. Please report the full confusion matrix on the third-party globally stratified sample, per-class metrics, class weights, and bootstrap or exact confidence intervals.
[§2.3 (label-generation protocol)] The ground-truth labels may encode information unavailable to the model. The paper explicitly states that human annotators 'typically use many different data sources, in addition to the GPS sequence,' while the model has access only to GPS. The 85% inter-annotator agreement therefore measures agreement under an enriched-labeling protocol, not the ceiling for GPS-only classification. Even an optimal GPS-only model could have a Bayes error well above the implied gap. The paper must estimate the GPS-only Bayes error, for example by having a subset of experts label using only GPS messages or by comparing model performance to human performance on the same GPS-only input. Without this, the 71% figure is not interpretable as the model's skill on the task it is deployed for.
[§2.3 (lack of baselines)] The metrics are uninterpretable without any baseline or comparison to prior work. The stated reason—'there is no other model that offers real-time global predictions'—does not preclude evaluating on the same task with non-real-time models, regional classifiers, or simple baselines such as logistic regression on handcrafted AIS features (speed, heading change, dwell time) or the majority class. At minimum, report a majority-class baseline and a handcrafted-feature baseline on the same third-party evaluation set.
[§2.4 and Table 1 (throughput inconsistency)] The deployment throughput is internally inconsistent: the text says the system processes '28 activity classifications per second,' while Table 1 lists rates that sum to 39.1/sec. Clarify whether these are different measurements (e.g., steady-state vs. peak), what exactly is being counted, and how the daily '5B GPS messages ... inferenced' figure includes context messages. This inconsistency undermines the operational efficiency claim.
[§2.1 and §2.3 (evaluation protocol)] The evaluation protocol is under-specified. The training sample is described as 85% from expert-identified regions and 15% from other areas, with active learning iteratively adding samples informed by model predictions; this can bias the training distribution. The third-party evaluation is described only as 'globally stratified random samples' with no sample size, annotation independence, class distribution, or handling of disagreements. Please provide these details, including how the evaluation set was selected and whether the annotators were blinded to model outputs.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract and §1] The claim of 'first-ever real-time view of vessel behavior at global scale' is strong and unsupported by a survey or comparison; please soften the claim or provide supporting citations.
[§2.1 (dataset statistics)] The numbers '~15B messages' in Figure 1B, '~20B messages' in §2.1, and 'approximately 600,000 vessels' in §1 are inconsistent or at least unclear about which period they refer to; please reconcile or clarify.
[Table 1] Table 1's column and row labels are ambiguous; explicitly state the units (e.g., classifications per second) and clarify whether these are throughput or latency measurements.
[§2.2 (training details)] The sentence 'weights selected based on the minimum validation loss over 4 epochs' is unclear: specify the search procedure, the validation split, and how the weights were chosen.
[Appendix A.1] The changepoint detector description refers to GitHub for full details; please include a complete algorithm summary in the appendix for self-containedness.
[Various] There are minor language issues, such as 'inferenced' in §2.4 (should be 'inferred' or 'processed') and 'geo-fencing' which is more commonly spelled 'geofencing'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the system is an empirical supervised ML pipeline whose accuracy is evaluated against an external expert-label benchmark, not derived from its own inputs.

full rationale

Atlantes is an empirical supervised-learning system, not a formal derivation. The claimed capability is that transformers trained on expert-annotated GPS trajectories classify vessel activity in real time. The paper contains no equation that defines the predicted activity labels from the fitted parameters, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The training and evaluation protocol is standard supervised learning: experts labeled 15 million messages, a model was trained on those labels, and accuracy was assessed via third-party evaluation on globally stratified random samples. The acknowledged fact that expert annotators use additional data sources beyond GPS and reach 85% inter-annotator agreement, while the model reaches 71%, is a validity and measurement limitation rather than circularity; it does not make the 71% figure equivalent to the training input by construction. Active learning did use model predictions to select further training samples, but the reported headline metric is described as an independent third-party evaluation, and no quoted passage indicates the evaluation labels were produced by the model itself. Citations to prior work (Liang et al. for the CPE embedding, Bastani et al. for geo-fencing, Kroodsma et al. for Global Fishing Watch's earlier CNN) are external and not load-bearing in a way that imports the target result. The 'approaching human performance' comparison uses the 85% inter-annotator ceiling as an external benchmark, not as an input to the model's loss or evaluation. No specific reduction of a prediction to its own inputs can be quoted, so no circularity step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The system does not introduce new physical or theoretical entities. The free parameters are standard ML hyperparameters and thresholds, mostly unreported. The key domain assumptions are that AIS alone is sufficient for classification and that expert labels are ground truth, both of which the paper partially acknowledges as limiting.

free parameters (5)

Class weights for cross-entropy loss = Selected by minimum validation loss over 4 epochs
The paper states weights were selected based on validation loss, making them fitted to the data.
Context window size for CPE = n=9 messages
Chosen by hand, no sensitivity analysis provided.
Number of transformer layers = 9 for activity, 4 for entity
Architecture hyperparameters chosen by the authors without stated justification.
Confidence threshold for activity post-processing = Not specified
Applied as a post-processing step, but its value is not reported.
Speed filter thresholds = Not specified
Used in post-processing, but the specific threshold values are not given.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption AIS GPS messages contain sufficient information to determine a vessel's activity.
The paper acknowledges humans use additional data sources, so this is a simplifying assumption that underpins the entire activity classification task.
domain assumption Expert annotations are a reliable ground truth for vessel activity.
The model is trained and evaluated against these labels, even though inter-annotator agreement is only 85%.
standard math The transformer architecture with CPE and CNN layers generalizes from Trajformer to AIS data.
The paper relies on the empirical effectiveness of this architecture without a formal proof, which is standard in ML.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Atlantes: A system of GPS transformers for global-scale real-time maritime intelligence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XTTQWUQW

@misc{pith2026250419036,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Atlantes: A system of GPS transformers for global-scale real-time maritime intelligence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XTTQWUQW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19036}
}

read the original abstract

Unsustainable exploitation of the oceans exacerbated by global warming is threatening coastal communities worldwide. Accurate and timely monitoring of maritime activity is an essential step to effective governance and to inform future policy. In support of this complex global-scale effort, we built Atlantes, a deep learning based system that provides the first-ever real-time view of vessel behavior at global scale. Atlantes leverages a series of bespoke transformers to distill a high volume, continuous stream of GPS messages emitted by hundreds of thousands of vessels into easily quantifiable behaviors. The combination of low latency and high performance enables operationally relevant decision-making and successful interventions on the high seas where illegal and exploitative activity is too common. Atlantes is already in use by hundreds of organizations worldwide. Here we provide an overview of the model and infrastructure that enables this system to function efficiently and cost-effectively at global-scale and in real-time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19036 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Examples of activity from each class (A-D). Example buoy (E) and vessel (F). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** ATLAS model architecture (SOG: speed over ground, COG: course over ground). 2.3 HOW GOOD IS THIS MODEL REALLY? While we conducted extensive offline evaluations, our primary evaluation method involved experts reviewing the model’s outputs in an online staging environment (prior to exposing results to all users). After addressing different sources of false positives identified through this feedback process, we conduct… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Example classifications of vessel movement patterns (Indian ocean, February 2025). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: A. Depiction of annotation process. GPS sequences are annotated at message level granu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Geographic distribution of labeled messages used for activity classification. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

11 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[1]

Satlaspretrain: A large-scale dataset for remote sensing image understanding, 2023

Favyen Bastani, Piper Wolters, Ritwik Gupta, Joe Ferdinando, and Aniruddha Kembhavi. Satlaspretrain: A large-scale dataset for remote sensing image understanding, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15660

arXiv 2023
[2]

Towards a trajectory-powered foundation model of mobility

Shushman Choudhury, Abdul Rahman Kreidieh, Ivan Kuznetsov, and Neha Arora. Towards a trajectory-powered foundation model of mobility. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Spatial Big Data and AI for Industrial Applications, GeoIndustry '24, pp.\ 1–4, New York, NY, USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 979840071...

work page arXiv 2024
[3]

Tracking the global footprint of fisheries

David A Kroodsma, Juan Mayorga, Timothy Hochberg, Nathan A Miller, Kristina Boerder, Francesco Ferretti, Alex Wilson, Bjorn Bergman, Timothy D White, Barbara A Block, et al. Tracking the global footprint of fisheries. Science, 359 0 (6378): 0 904--908, 2018

work page 2018
[4]

Trajformer: Efficient trajectory classification with transformers

Yuxuan Liang, Kun Ouyang, Yiwei Wang, Xu Liu, Hongyang Chen, Junbo Zhang, Yu Zheng, and Roger Zimmermann. Trajformer: Efficient trajectory classification with transformers. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, CIKM '22, pp.\ 1229–1237, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. I...

work page arXiv 2022
[5]

Donti, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Hannah Kerner, Claire Monteleoni, Esther Rolf, Milind Tambe, and Adam White

David Rolnick, Alan Aspuru-Guzik, Sara Beery, Bistra Dilkina, Priya L. Donti, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Hannah Kerner, Claire Monteleoni, Esther Rolf, Milind Tambe, and Adam White. Application-driven innovation in machine learning, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17381

arXiv 2024
[6]

Anomaly detection in maritime ais tracks: A review of recent approaches

Konrad Wolsing, Linus Roepert, Jan Bauer, and Klaus Wehrle. Anomaly detection in maritime ais tracks: A review of recent approaches. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10 0 (1), 2022. ISSN 2077-1312. doi:10.3390/jmse10010112. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/1/112

doi:10.3390/jmse10010112 2022
[7]

Harnessing the power of machine learning for ais data-driven maritime research: A comprehensive review

Ying Yang, Yang Liu, Guorong Li, Zekun Zhang, and Yanbin Liu. Harnessing the power of machine learning for ais data-driven maritime research: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 183: 0 103426, 2024. ISSN 1366-5545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103426. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/scie...

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION format.date year duplicate empty "emp...

Show all 11 references

[9]

@esa (Ref

\@ifxundefined[1] #1\@undefined \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo \@ifnum[1] #1 \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo \@ifx[1] #1 \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo [2] @ #1 \@temptokena #2 #1 @ \@temptokena \@ifclassloaded agu2001 natbib The agu2001 class already includes natbib coding, so you should ...
[10]

\@lbibitem[] @bibitem@first@sw\@secondoftwo \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 @tmp #1 NAT@b@open@#2 NAT@b@shut@#2 \@ifnum @merge>\@ne @bibitem@firs...
[11]

h5j[q8qs. X,jk9- =E S yBd=F[ K ' 2C-;P ( 0p ă

@open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifxundefined @sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifxundefined @heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel @NAT@ctr \@bibset...

1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Satlaspretrain: A large-scale dataset for remote sensing image understanding, 2023

Favyen Bastani, Piper Wolters, Ritwik Gupta, Joe Ferdinando, and Aniruddha Kembhavi. Satlaspretrain: A large-scale dataset for remote sensing image understanding, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15660

arXiv 2023

[2] [2]

Towards a trajectory-powered foundation model of mobility

Shushman Choudhury, Abdul Rahman Kreidieh, Ivan Kuznetsov, and Neha Arora. Towards a trajectory-powered foundation model of mobility. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Spatial Big Data and AI for Industrial Applications, GeoIndustry '24, pp.\ 1–4, New York, NY, USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 979840071...

work page arXiv 2024

[3] [3]

Tracking the global footprint of fisheries

David A Kroodsma, Juan Mayorga, Timothy Hochberg, Nathan A Miller, Kristina Boerder, Francesco Ferretti, Alex Wilson, Bjorn Bergman, Timothy D White, Barbara A Block, et al. Tracking the global footprint of fisheries. Science, 359 0 (6378): 0 904--908, 2018

work page 2018

[4] [4]

Trajformer: Efficient trajectory classification with transformers

Yuxuan Liang, Kun Ouyang, Yiwei Wang, Xu Liu, Hongyang Chen, Junbo Zhang, Yu Zheng, and Roger Zimmermann. Trajformer: Efficient trajectory classification with transformers. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, CIKM '22, pp.\ 1229–1237, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. I...

work page arXiv 2022

[5] [5]

Donti, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Hannah Kerner, Claire Monteleoni, Esther Rolf, Milind Tambe, and Adam White

David Rolnick, Alan Aspuru-Guzik, Sara Beery, Bistra Dilkina, Priya L. Donti, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Hannah Kerner, Claire Monteleoni, Esther Rolf, Milind Tambe, and Adam White. Application-driven innovation in machine learning, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17381

arXiv 2024

[6] [6]

Anomaly detection in maritime ais tracks: A review of recent approaches

Konrad Wolsing, Linus Roepert, Jan Bauer, and Klaus Wehrle. Anomaly detection in maritime ais tracks: A review of recent approaches. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10 0 (1), 2022. ISSN 2077-1312. doi:10.3390/jmse10010112. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/1/112

doi:10.3390/jmse10010112 2022

[7] [7]

Harnessing the power of machine learning for ais data-driven maritime research: A comprehensive review

Ying Yang, Yang Liu, Guorong Li, Zekun Zhang, and Yanbin Liu. Harnessing the power of machine learning for ais data-driven maritime research: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 183: 0 103426, 2024. ISSN 1366-5545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103426. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/scie...

work page arXiv 2024

[8] [8]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION format.date year duplicate empty "emp...