Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 121 references

The paper claims that the low-energy in situ electron spectrum from a solar flare contains two thermal Maxwellian components, one at 1.4–4.1 MK and one at 12.5–23.1 MK, and that the hotter component is a genuine signature of the flaring sou

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 17:03 UTC pith:XU2UUHQF

load-bearing objection INSPEX is a solid, open-source methodology contribution; the 12-23 MK 'flaring plasma' temperature inference is not yet supported by the fits. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2608.01993 v1 pith:XU2UUHQF submitted 2026-08-03 astro-ph.SR

A new methodology for inferring the plasma conditions in solar flare energetic electron source regions from in situ electron energy spectra

Samuel Carter , Natasha L. S. Jeffrey , Robert T. Wicks , Georgios Nicolaou This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords solar flaresin situ electronsthermal spectraMaxwellian fittingSolar OrbiterEASSTEPparticle acceleration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a new software pipeline, INSPEX, for fitting physical functions to in situ solar electron spectra, and applies it to the 9 October 2021 flare observed by Solar Orbiter. Combining data from the EAS and STEP instruments, the authors find that the spectra below 20 keV can be fitted with two thermal Maxwellian curves: a cool component around 1.4–4.1 MK and a hot component around 12.5–23.1 MK. They argue that the hot component matches the temperature of flaring plasma seen in X-ray studies, suggesting that heliospheric electrons may carry a thermal imprint of the acceleration region. This matters because it would link the outward-accelerated population to the flare source itself and provide a new in situ diagnostic for flare plasma conditions.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper reports the detection of a two-temperature thermal structure in the low-energy (0.5–20 keV) part of in situ flare electron spectra. For the peak flux spectrum, the cool Maxwellian is at 2.51 ± 0.15 MK and the hot one at 20.89 ± 0.29 MK; the fluence spectrum gives 2.45 ± 0.68 MK and 18.33 ± 0.38 MK. Across different rebinning windows and extraction methods, the hot component ranges from 12.5 to 23.1 MK. The authors state that 'we may have found signatures of hot flaring plasma in in situ electron spectra, indicating that in situ electrons may have passed through or been accelerated in such regions.' They are careful to note that the thermal interpretation is not un

What carries the argument

The central instrument is INSPEX, a new Python spectral analysis package that loads Solar Orbiter EAS and STEP data, resamples and background-subtracts time series, aligns the two instruments using a scalar fitting alignment factor (F_AF), and fits combinations of Maxwellian and power-law functions to the resulting peak flux and fluence spectra. The key functional form is the double isothermal Maxwellian, F = A1 E exp(-E/kT1) + A2 E exp(-E/kT2), which captures the low-energy thermal components, supplemented by a broken power law for the non-thermal tail above ~10–20 keV.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy spectrum is assumed to faithfully represent the flare electron population after aligning EAS and STEP data with a single scalar multiplier (F_AF), even though STEP views only 30 degrees of the sky and the cause of the observed vertical offset between the instruments is unknown.

What would settle it

For a sample of flares with simultaneous Solar Orbiter in situ data and STIX hard X-ray observations, compute the INSPEX-fitted hot thermal temperature and compare it with the flare temperature derived from STIX spectral fitting; a lack of correlation or a consistent offset exceeding the fitted uncertainties would indicate that the 12–23 MK component is an alignment artifact. More directly, re-fitting the same event with F_AF fixed to 1 (no alignment) should fail to produce two physically plausible thermal components if the detection depends on the alignment factor.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the hot thermal component is real, in situ electron spectra can be used to estimate the temperature of the flare acceleration region, complementing hard X-ray remote sensing.
  • The consistent high-energy break near 33 keV and a final spectral index of about -3.58 across many fitting forms align with previous in situ and X-ray studies, lending credibility to the spectral construction methodology.
  • The INSPEX pipeline provides a reusable, user-friendly way to build and fit multi-component electron spectra from different instruments, enabling future multi-event studies.
  • The F_AF alignment procedure, while ad hoc, yields spectra that can be fitted with physically plausible parameters, suggesting a path to standardised combined-spectrum analysis.
  • The method's temperature estimates vary with rebinning window and extraction method, so future work must adopt a consistent data-processing protocol before comparing events.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the paper's central claim would be to compare the fitted hot temperature (≈20 MK) for this event with simultaneous STIX-derived flare temperatures; a systematic mismatch would suggest the thermal component is an artifact of the F_AF alignment rather than a source-region signature.
  • The F_AF values vary strongly with resampling time (0.04 to 0.39), indicating a non-simple calibration offset; a proper cross-calibration of EAS and STEP could replace this empirical factor and either strengthen or weaken the thermal detection.
  • Since STEP covers only 30 degrees of sky, the inferred temperatures could be biased by the sampled pitch-angle distribution; a future event with full or better pitch-angle coverage would clarify whether the 12–23 MK component survives.
  • If the thermal signature is confirmed across many events, in situ spectra could offer a new diagnostic of the flare acceleration region, potentially distinguishing whether the same source produces both chromospheric and heliospheric accelerated electrons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces INSPEX, a new open-source Python package for loading, calibrating, resampling, background-subtracting, and fitting in situ solar electron spectra. The package is applied to Solar Orbiter EAS and STEP data for the 2021-10-09 M1.6 flare, constructing peak-flux and fluence spectra over 0.57-78.1 keV. Six combinations of thermal and power-law functions are fitted; the authors highlight a double-thermal + double-power-law form, yielding a cool component T1 ~1.4-4.1 MK and a hot component T2 ~12.5-23.1 MK, together with a spectral break near 32-38 keV. They interpret the hot component as a possible thermal signature of the flaring source region, while explicitly framing the event analysis as preliminary and methodological.

Significance. If the inferred 12-23 MK component were robust, it would provide a novel in situ diagnostic of flare source-region plasma, linking heliospheric electrons to the HXR-emitting population. The INSPEX package is a tangible software contribution, and the paper is unusually transparent about data-reduction choices and limitations, including underestimated uncertainties, BIC non-uniqueness, the STEP field-of-view restriction, and the scalar EAS/STEP alignment. However, the evidence presented does not yet establish the physical interpretation: the thermal models are not statistically preferred over pure power laws, and T2 is determined entirely by the EAS spectral shape whose calibration is adjusted with a scalar factor. The paper's main value at present is methodological.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Tables 1-6, Figs. 5-6] The text states that all BIC values are within 10 of each other except for the triple-thermal fit, and the reduced chi-squared favours the quintuple power law. By the Kass & Raftery threshold the paper itself invokes, the double-thermal model is not statistically preferred over pure power-law forms. Thus 'can be fitted with two distinct thermal curves' demonstrates flexibility, not evidence for hot plasma. To support the central claim, the paper needs a model-selection test that accounts for the underestimated uncertainties (e.g., Poisson maximum likelihood, synthetic injections, or a strict ΔBIC requirement) showing the thermal components are required, or the paper should present itself purely as a methodological benchmark.
  2. [§2.3 and §3.1] T2 ~12-23 MK peaks at E = k_B T ~1-2 keV, entirely in the EAS-only range below the 4-5 keV overlap. The alignment factor F_AF is a single scalar computed from the average ratio in the overlap; multiplying EAS data by a constant cannot correct an energy-dependent calibration error, background distortion, or field-of-view mismatch. §3.1 reports that the EAS background is about 100 times higher than STEP while the flare signal is lower, so EAS background subtraction is critical. The paper should validate the EAS spectral shape against an independent measurement or propagate F_AF/systematic uncertainties into T2; otherwise the hot component may be an artifact of the alignment procedure.
  3. [§3.3, Table 7, Fig. 7] The authors state in §3.3 that the SolO STEP 30-degree field of view 'limits the reliability of the results deduced for this event.' In addition, Table 7 shows T2 changing from 20.91 MK at raw cadence to 12.49 MK at 1-hour resampling, while F_AF varies from 0.04 to 0.39; the hot temperature and the alignment factor track each other. This demonstrates that the inferred T2 is not robust to analysis choices. Please provide an estimate of systematic uncertainty from rebinning and peak-extraction methods, or explicitly restrict the physical claim to a single pre-defined configuration.
  4. [§1, §4, Eq. (3)] The identification of the fitted T2 with the flare source temperature is post-hoc: T2 is a free parameter in Eq. (3), and the interpretation is guided by a transport model co-authored by one of the present authors (Pallister & Jeffrey 2023; Pallister et al. 2025). To make the physical identification credible, the paper should compare the fitted T2 with an independent temperature measurement for the same event (e.g., GOES or STIX) or demonstrate that the predicted spectral signature is uniquely reproduced. Without such a test, 'may have found signatures' remains a plausible but unvalidated suggestion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §2.4] The abstract quotes an energy range of 0.5-80 keV, while the data actually span 0.57-78.1 keV; harmonize the two values.
  2. [Eq. (5)] The formula for reduced chi-squared has a duplicated left-hand side ('χ^2_ν = χ^2_ν = ...'); correct the typographical error.
  3. [§2.3] The description of F_AF says it multiplies by the 'average difference' between EAS and STEP bins; clarify that this is a ratio and specify which bins are used and how the average is computed.
  4. [Table 3] The triple-thermal fits return a third component T3 ~138-149 MK, but this value is not discussed. State whether this component is unphysical, a numerical artifact, or has any intended interpretation.
  5. [§3.3 / Fig. 8] The alternative peak-extraction method using the Weibull time-series fit is described only briefly; give the functional form, the parameter bounds, and the uncertainty treatment for the robust residual calculation used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the hot thermal component T2 is a fitted parameter, not a prediction-by-construction, and the self-cited transport model only motivates the fit, with independent X-ray consistency checks.

full rationale

The paper is an empirical spectral fitting study, not a derivation from first principles. The central result, T2 = 12.5–23.1 MK, is the temperature parameter in the fitted function of Eq. (3), estimated directly from the combined EAS/STEP energy spectra. It is not obtained by first fitting a model to a subset of data and then predicting a closely related quantity, nor is it defined in terms of the spectral result it purportedly explains. The paper explicitly tests multiple competing function forms (quintuple power law, quadruple power law, triple thermal, etc.) and reports that most BIC values lie within 10, acknowledging that the two-thermal-plus-power-law description is not a unique fit. The motivating transport calculations (Pallister & Jeffrey 2023; Pallister et al. 2025) are co-authored by N. L. S. Jeffrey, but they function only as prior theoretical motivation for including Maxwellian components and for interpreting a fitted temperature as flaring plasma temperature; the numerical T2 values are not imported from those papers and are instead checked for consistency with external X-ray-derived flaring temperatures (e.g., Caspi et al. 2014; Jeffrey et al. 2014; Kontar et al. 2015). The F_AF alignment is a scalar normalization computed from the 4–5 keV overlap ratio; a scalar multiplication cannot, by itself, create the 1–2 keV Maxwellian-like curvature that determines T2, so no component of the thermal fit is forced by the alignment constant by construction. The paper's own caveats—STEP's limited 30-degree field of view, single-event analysis, low data uncertainties, and the equivalence of competing fits—weaken the physical interpretation but are limitations on empirical inference, not circularity. The self-citations are therefore not load-bearing in the sense required to demonstrate circularity, and no equation or fitted parameter reduces to another by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its free parameters are the fitted curve parameters and the methodological choices (F AF, resampling, background window, energy selection) that directly influence the inferred temperatures. The main assumptions are the Maxwellian approximation, the validity of the authors' earlier transport model, the scalar alignment of the two instruments, background stationarity, and the representativeness of the limited field of view.

free parameters (6)
  • F AF (fitting alignment factor) = 0.02 to 0.39 depending on resampling and peak extraction method
    Multiplies EAS data to force continuity with STEP; the cause of the instrument mismatch is unknown, and changing F AF changes the thermal component parameters.
  • T1 and T2 (Maxwellian temperatures) = T1 = 2.51 +/- 0.15 MK, T2 = 20.89 +/- 0.29 MK (5-min peak flux); ranges 1.42-5.04 MK and 12.49-23.07 MK across resamplin
    These are the fitted parameters of Eq. (3) and constitute the central claimed inference of corona/active region and flaring plasma temperatures.
  • Power-law indices and break energy = delta_1 = -0.23 +/- 0.13, delta_2 = -3.58 +/- 0.05, E_b = 32.29 +/- 0.62 keV (5-min peak flux)
    Fitted parameters of the double power law that determines the high-energy spectrum shape.
  • Resampling window = raw, 2, 5, 10, 30, 60 minutes
    Choosing the rebinning cadence changes the derived temperatures and spectral indices (Table 7), so it acts as a free methodological parameter.
  • Background and integration intervals = background 01:00-05:00 UTC, integration 07:00-15:00 UTC
    Hand-picked pre-event background and post-onset integration windows; the results depend on these choices, especially for EAS.
  • Energy bin selection for EAS = even-indexed bins only; discard below 0.5 keV
    Adopted to avoid the sawtooth issue and instrument sweep errors; discarding odd bins is a data selection choice that affects the low-energy spectrum.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption A thermal component in the spectrum can be approximated by a single isothermal Maxwellian distribution F = A E exp(-E/(k_B T)), neglecting bulk plasma motions.
    Invoked in Sec. 2.5 as the basis for all thermal fits; a simplified model that may not hold for flare plasma with non-thermal tails.
  • domain assumption Electrons transported through hot, overdense flare regions imprint a Maxwellian component on the in situ spectrum, as predicted by Pallister & Jeffrey (2023) and Pallister et al. (2025).
    Cited in Sec. 1 and used to justify interpreting fitted Maxwellians as source-region plasma; the model is from the authors' own group and is not independently tested here.
  • domain assumption EAS and STEP sample the same electron population and should align in the overlap region, so a scalar alignment factor F AF is a valid correction.
    Stated in Sec. 2.3; the mismatch is unexplained and the assumed scalar form of the correction is not justified.
  • domain assumption The 01:00-05:00 UTC pre-event window is a clean background representative of the non-flare conditions.
    Used in Sec. 2.4 for background subtraction; if background varies, the subtracted spectra and fitted temperatures change.
  • domain assumption CME and transport effects between the Sun and the spacecraft can be neglected for the 10-100 keV range.
    Stated in Sec. 2.2; the authors explicitly decide not to characterise the CME effect on the spectrum.
  • domain assumption Electrons detected within the STEP field of view, and the EAS1 pixels aligned to that field of view, are representative of the full flare-accelerated population.
    The combined spectrum is built only from those directions (Sec. 2.1 and Appendix A); Sec. 3.3 acknowledges this limits reliability.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 22779 in / 13214 out tokens · 141801 ms · 2026-08-04T17:03:00.999321+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The conditions within solar flares that lead to efficient electron acceleration are not well constrained. It is not clear whether the populations accelerated out into the heliosphere and inward into the chromosphere originate in the same regions. By analysing the energy distributions of heliospheric populations, modelling suggests that it should be possible to see evidence of their originating region(s), including the presence of hot, dense flare plasma. By creating and utilising a novel in situ spectral analysis package called INSPEX we have performed this analysis for flare electrons observed in situ on 09/10/2021, constructing both peak flux and fluence spectra from combined Solar Orbiter in situ electron measurements. We compare how differing methodologies for combining the datasets influence the spectral shapes and the retrieved parameters over an energy range of 0.5-80 keV. We fit different functions to the multi-component form of the energy spectra, testing combinations of thermal and/or power law components, comparing the fit statistics. We find that the spectra can be fitted with two distinct thermal curves at energies below 20 keV, corresponding to typical corona/active region and flaring material temperatures, varying between 1.4 - 4.1 MK and 12.5 - 23.1 MK depending on the rebinning window and peak flux extraction method. This study showcases how INSPEX can provide a novel and user-friendly methodology for studying electron spectra with different instrumentation, allowing investigation of multiple spectral types and signatures of acceleration and transport. This first application provides a benchmark case for the analysis of similar flares.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01993 by Georgios Nicolaou, Natasha L. S. Jeffrey, Robert T. Wicks, Samuel Carter.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: An illustration showing the SDO AIA 131 ˚A view, from the direction of Earth, at 06:48 UTC on 09/10/2021 (Lemen et al. 2012). The active region of interest is marked with the red box. Right: An illustration showing the spacecraft positions on the day of the flare, and their Parker spiral curves linking them to the Sun (Gieseler et al. 2023). (a) EAS (b) STEP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: EAS (a) and STEP (b) time series resampled to 5 minute cadence, with background period shown in red and the background intensity levels calculated as an average over the full background period shown in grey. in general, but instead presents our methodology as a demonstration of the differing models that can be used. We discuss here the success of different fits in modelling the spectra of this particular e… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Peak flux spectra, shown without FAF on the left and with FAF on the right. a) and b) show these spectra (with the spectra generated without background subtraction shown in grey), while c) and d) show the fits to those spectra. The total fit is shown in black, with the spectral components added as shown in the legend. These fits have their respective residuals shown below to further illustrate fit quality.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fluence spectra, shown without FAF on the left and with FAF on the right. A) and B) show these spectra, with the spectra generated without background subtraction shown in grey. C) and D) show the fits to those spectra. The total fit is shown in black, with the spectral components added as shown in the legend. These fits have their respective residuals shown below to further illustrate fit quality. is calcu… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of fits to the peak flux spectrum generated using time series resampled to 5 minute cadence. The total fit is shown in black, with the spectral components added as shown in the legend. These fits have their respective residuals shown below to further illustrate fit quality. Panel 5a showing the 2 thermal component, 2 power law fit is replicated from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Examples of fits to the 07:00 to 15:00 UTC fluence spectrum generated using time series resampled to 5 minute cadence. The total fit is shown in black, with the spectral components added as shown in the legend. These fits have their respective residuals shown below to further illustrate fit quality. Panel 6a showing the 2 thermal component, 2 power law fit is replicated from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Showing the effect of resampling on the fit of the double thermal function and double power law function. Each panel shows a peak flux spectrum generated from time series of a different cadence. The total fit is shown in black, with the spectral components added as shown in the legend. These fits have their respective residuals shown below to further illustrate fit quality. The parameters of these fits are… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: By taking fits across the time series of each energy, as shown in 8a for 1.74 keV, we generate a spectrum as shown in 8b by extracting the peak flux from the fit. The total fit is shown in black, with the spectral components added as shown in the legend. The fit has residuals shown below to further illustrate fit quality. gesting that we have successfully interrogated the pa￾rameter space. Fedeli, Annamari… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: On the left, the full view of EAS1 is shown, with each blue dot marking a single pixel. On the right, only the pixels which correspond to the STEP FOV in black are retained. for a period before the event, which is subtracted from the full time series to give a time series to be used in spectrum generation. REFERENCES Alaoui, M., & Holman, G. D. 2017, ApJ, 851, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa98de Aschwanden, … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Understanding Breaks in Flare X-Ray Spectra: Evaluation of a Cospatial Collisional Return-current Model. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa98de , archivePrefix =. 1706.03897 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Reduction of the Downward Energy Flux of Nonthermal Electrons in the Solar Flare Corona due to Cospatial Return-current Losses. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad71cb , archivePrefix =. 2407.17955 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Backscatter, anisotropy, and polarization of solar hard X-rays. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/155830 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/155830

  4. [4]

    Benz, A. O. , title =. Living Rev Sol Phys , volume =. 2008 , type =. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2008-1 , url =

    doi:10.12942/lrsp-2008-1 2008

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    The Deduction of Energy Spectra of Non-Thermal Electrons in Flares from the Observed Dynamic Spectra of Hard X-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF00149070 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1007/bf00149070

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    The Determination and Use of Mean Electron Flux Spectra in Solar Flares. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/378169 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/378169

  7. [7]

    and Martindale, Adrian and Lindsay, Simon and Muinonen, Karri and Rothery, David A

    Bunce, Emma J. and Martindale, Adrian and Lindsay, Simon and Muinonen, Karri and Rothery, David A. and Pearson, Jim and McDonnell, Ivor and Thomas, Chris and Thornhill, Julian and Tikkanen, Tuomo and Feldman, Charly and Huovelin, Juhani and Korpela, Seppo and Esko, Eero and Lehtolainen, Arto and Treis, Johannes and Majewski, Petra and Hilchenbach, Martin ...

  8. [8]

    Claßen, H. T. and Mann, G. and Klassen, A. and Aurass, H. , title =. A&A , volume =. 2003 , type =

    2003

  9. [9]

    Daibog, E. I. and Devicheva, E. A. and Golenetskii, S. V. and Guryan, YuA and Kurt, V. G. and Logachev, YuI and Nogteva, A. V. and Stopovskii, V. G. and Varga, A. , title =. Advances in space research , volume =. doi:info:doi/10.1016/0273-1177(81)90020-X , year =

    work page doi:10.1016/0273-1177(81)90020-x

  10. [10]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume =

    Dresing, Nina and Effenberger, Frederic and Gómez-Herrero, Raúl and Heber, Bernd and Klassen, Andreas and Kollhoff, Alexander and Richardson, Ian and Theesen, Solveig , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab64e5 , year =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab64e5

  11. [11]

    and Rodríguez-García, L

    Dresing, N. and Rodríguez-García, L. and Jebaraj, I. C. and Warmuth, A. and Wallace, S. and Balmaceda, L. and Podladchikova, T. and Strauss, R. D. and Kouloumvakos, A. and Palmroos, C. and Krupar, V. and Gieseler, J. and Xu, Z. and Mitchell, J. G. and Cohen, C. M. S. and de Nolfo, G. A. and Palmerio, E. and Carcaboso, F. and Kilpua, E. K. J. and Trotta, D...

  12. [12]

    and Warmuth, A

    Dresing, N. and Warmuth, A. and Effenberger, F. and Klein, K. L. and Musset, S. and Glesener, L. and Brüdern, M. , title =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141365 , year =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141365

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    An Observational Overview of Solar Flares. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9701-8 , archivePrefix =. 1109.5932 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Fox, N. J. and Velli, M. C. and Bale, S. D. and Decker, R. and Driesman, A. and Howard, R. A. and Kasper, J. C. and Kinnison, J. and Kusterer, M. and Lario, D. and Lockwood, M. K. and McComas, D. J. and Raouafi, N. E. and Szabo, A. , title =. Space Science Reviews , volume =. doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0211-6 , year =

    doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0211-6

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Dynamics of Late-stage Reconnection in the 2017 September 10 Solar Flare. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba94b , archivePrefix =. 2007.13377 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [17]

    and Pacheco, D

    Gómez-Herrero, R. and Pacheco, D. and Kollhoff, A. and Espinosa Lara, F. and Freiherr von Forstner, J. L. and Dresing, N. and Lario, D. and Balmaceda, L. and Krupar, V. and Malandraki, O. E. and Aran, A. and Bučík, R. and Klassen, A. and Klein, K. L. and Cernuda, I. and Eldrum, S. and Reid, H. and Mitchell, J. G. and Mason, G. M. and Ho, G. C. and Rodrígu...

  17. [18]

    , keywords =

    Implications of X-ray Observations for Electron Acceleration and Propagation in Solar Flares. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9680-9 , archivePrefix =. 1109.6496 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [19]

    , keywords =

    On the Variation of Solar Flare Coronal X-Ray Source Sizes with Energy. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/86 , archivePrefix =. 1404.1962 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1962

  19. [20]

    Jeffrey, Natasha L. S. and Saint-Hilaire, Pascal and Kontar, Eduard P. , title =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume =. 2020 , type =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038626 , url =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038626 2020

  20. [21]

    Kaiser, M. L. and Kucera, T. A. and Davila, J. M. and St. Cyr, O. C. and Guhathakurta, M. and Christian, E. , title =. Space Science Reviews , volume =. doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9277-0 , year =

    doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9277-0

  21. [22]

    , keywords =

    Acceleration and Propagation of Solar Energetic Particles. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0382-4 , archivePrefix =. 1705.07274 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [23]

    , keywords =

    Compton backscattered and primary X-rays from solar flares: angle dependent Green's function correction for photospheric albedo. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053672 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0510167 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [24]

    , keywords =

    Deducing Electron Properties from Hard X-ray Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-011-9804-x , archivePrefix =. 1110.1755 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [25]

    , keywords =

    Collisional Relaxation of Electrons in a Warm Plasma and Accelerated Nonthermal Electron Spectra in Solar Flares. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/35 , archivePrefix =. 1505.03733 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [26]

    , keywords =

    Determination of the Total Accelerated Electron Rate and Power Using Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafad3 , archivePrefix =. 1812.09474 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [27]

    Krucker, Säm and Hurford, G. J. and Grimm, O. and Kögl, S. and Gröbelbauer, H. P. and Etesi, L. and Casadei, D. and Csillaghy, A. and Benz, A. O. and Arnold, N. G. and Molendini, F. and Orleanski, P. and Schori, D. and Xiao, H. and Kuhar, M. and Hochmuth, N. and Felix, S. and Schramka, F. and Marcin, S. and Kobler, S. and Iseli, L. and Dreier, M. and Wieh...

  27. [28]

    Krucker, Säm and Kontar, E. P. and Christe, S. and Lin, R. P. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/519373 , year =

    doi:10.1086/519373

  28. [29]

    , keywords =

    Energetic Solar Electrons in the Interplanetary Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF00158444 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1007/bf00158444

  29. [30]

    Lin, R. P. , title =. Advances in Space Research , volume =. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(93)90489-x , year =

    work page doi:10.1016/0273-1177(93)90489-x

  30. [31]

    Lin, R. P. and Anderson, K. A. and Ashford, S. and Carlson, C. and Curtis, D. and Ergun, R. and Larson, D. and McFadden, J. and McCarthy, M. and Parks, G. K. and Rème, H. and Bosqued, J. M. and Coutelier, J. and Cotin, F. and D'Uston, C. and Wenzel, K. -P. and Sanderson, T. R. and Henrion, J. and Ronnet, J. C. and Paschmann, G. , title =. Space Science Re...

    doi:10.1007/bf00751328 1995

  31. [32]

    and Dennis, Brian R

    Lin, Robert P. and Dennis, Brian R. and Benz, Arnold O. and Smith, D. M. and Lin, R. P. and Turin, P. and Curtis, D. W. and Primbsch, J. H. and Campbell, R. D. and Abiad, R. and Schroeder, P. and Cork, C. P. and Hull, E. L. and Landis, D. A. and Madden, N. W. and Malone, D. and Pehl, R. H. and Raudorf, T. and Sangsingkeow, P. and Boyle, R. , title =. The ...

    doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3452-3_2

  32. [33]

    Luhmann, J. G. and Curtis, D. W. and Schroeder, P. and McCauley, J. and Lin, R. P. and Larson, D. E. and Bale, S. D. and Sauvaud, J. A. and Aoustin, C. and Mewaldt, R. A. and Cummings, A. C. and Stone, E. C. and Davis, A. J. and Cook, W. R. and Kecman, B. and Wiedenbeck, M. E. and von Rosenvinge, T. and Acuna, M. H. and Reichenthal, L. S. and Shuman, S. a...

  33. [34]

    McComas, D. J. and Christian, E. R. and Cohen, C. M. S. and Cummings, A. C. and Davis, A. J. and Desai, M. I. and Giacalone, J. and Hill, M. E. and Joyce, C. J. and Krimigis, S. M. and Labrador, A. W. and Leske, R. A. and Malandraki, O. and Matthaeus, W. H. and McNutt, R. L., Jr. and Mewaldt, R. A. and Mitchell, D. G. and Posner, A. and Rankin, J. S. and ...

    2019

  34. [35]

    Pallister, Ross and Jeffrey, Natasha L. S. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0035 , year =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0035

  35. [36]

    Exploring the Origin of Solar Energetic Electrons. II. Investigating Turbulent Coronal Acceleration. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbaf4 , archivePrefix =. 2502.19105 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [37]

    Pan, Lian-De and Lin, R. P. and Kane, S. R. , title =. Solar Physics , volume =. doi:10.1007/bf00146304 , year =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00146304

  37. [38]

    , keywords =

    Sixty-five years of solar radioastronomy: flares, coronal mass ejections and Sun Earth connection. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-008-0013-x , adsurl =

    doi:10.1007/s00159-008-0013-x

  38. [39]

    Energetic particle instrument suite for the Solar Orbiter mission

    The Energetic Particle Detector. Energetic particle instrument suite for the Solar Orbiter mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935287 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935287

  39. [40]

    Warmuth, Alexander , year =

  40. [42]

    Prospective stereoscopic capabilities of STIX and MiSolFA

    Measuring X-ray anisotropy in solar flares. Prospective stereoscopic capabilities of STIX and MiSolFA. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730629 , archivePrefix =. 1702.08795 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [43]

    Space Science Reviews , author =

    Integrated. Space Science Reviews , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0059-1 , abstract =

    doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0059-1 2016

  42. [44]

    Advances in Space Research , volume=

    The wind spacecraft and its early scientific results , author=. Advances in Space Research , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  43. [45]

    2020 , pages =

    The. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038467 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038467 2020

  44. [46]

    , year = 2010, month = jan, volume =

    BepiColombo Comprehensive exploration of Mercury: Mission overview and science goals. , year = 2010, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2009.09.020 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1016/j.pss.2009.09.020 2010

  45. [47]

    Charles Meegan and Giselher Lichti and P. N. Bhat and Elisabetta Bissaldi and Michael S. Briggs and Valerie Connaughton and Roland Diehl and Gerald Fishman and Jochen Greiner and Andrew S. Hoover and Alexander J. van der Horst and Andreas von Kienlin and R. Marc Kippen and Chryssa Kouveliotou and Sheila McBreen and W. S. Paciesas and Robert Preece and Hel...

    2009

  46. [48]

    Solar Physics , author =

    The. Solar Physics , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8 , abstract =

    doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8 2012

  47. [49]

    Dean and Thompson, B

    Pesnell, W. Dean and Thompson, B. J. and Chamberlin, P. C. , editor =. The. The. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  48. [50]

    , keywords =

    The Solar Orbiter EUI instrument: The Extreme Ultraviolet Imager. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936663 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936663

  49. [51]

    Solar Physics , author =

    Heliophysics. Solar Physics , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9624-2 , abstract =

    doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9624-2 2012

  50. [52]

    Annamaria Fedeli , title =

  51. [53]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , author =

    Solar-. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , author =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2022.1058810 , abstract =

    arXiv 2022

  52. [54]

    OSPEX: Object Spectral Executive

  53. [55]

    Solar Physics , author =

    Kappa. Solar Physics , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9640-2 , abstract =

    doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9640-2 2010

  54. [56]

    and Ingargiola, Antonino , title =

    Newville, Matthew and Stensitzki, Till and Allen, Daniel B. and Ingargiola, Antonino , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.11813 , url =

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.11813

  55. [57]

    1992 , publisher=

    Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77, The Art of Scientific Computing, V , author=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  56. [58]

    Author, Linghua Wang

  57. [59]

    and Cruce, P

    Angelopoulos, V. and Cruce, P. and Drozdov, A. and Grimes, E. W. and Hatzigeorgiu, N. and King, D. A. and Larson, D. and Lewis, J. W. and McTiernan, J. M. and Roberts, D. A. and Russell, C. L. and Hori, T. and Kasahara, Y. and Kumamoto, A. and Matsuoka, A. and Miyashita, Y. and Miyoshi, Y. and Shinohara, I. and Teramoto, M. and Faden, J. B. and Halford, A...

  58. [60]

    Coronal Mass Ejection , url=

    Chulaki, Anna , editor=. Coronal Mass Ejection , url=. Space Weather Database Of Notifications, Knowledge, Information (DONKI) , publisher=. 2021 , month=

    2021

  59. [61]

    STEREO IMPACT/STE Calibration and Measurement Algorithm Document

    Linghua Wang. STEREO IMPACT/STE Calibration and Measurement Algorithm Document. 2021

    2021

  60. [62]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Non-. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/35 , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/35 2017

  61. [63]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , year = 2015, month = dec, volume =

    Energetic electrons generated during solar flares. Journal of Plasma Physics , year = 2015, month = dec, volume =. doi:10.1017/S0022377815001166 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377815001166 2015

  62. [64]

    A. G. Emslie and B. R. Dennis and A. Y. Shih and P. C. Chamberlin and R. A. Mewaldt and C. S. Moore and G. H. Share and A. Vourlidas and B. T. Welsch , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/71 , url =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/1/71 2012

  63. [65]

    Solar Flare , url=

    Alden, Carina , editor=. Solar Flare , url=. Space Weather Database Of Notifications, Knowledge, Information (DONKI) , publisher=. 2021 , month=

    2021

  64. [66]

    , keywords =

    Stereoscopic Electron Spectroscopy of Solar Hard X-Ray Flares with a Single Spacecraft. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/510586 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0611170 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [67]

    AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts , year = 2013, volume =

    Electron Kappa Distributions in Solar Flares and the Earth's Magnetotail. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts , year = 2013, volume =

    2013

  66. [68]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201321973

    The low-high-low trend of type III radio burst starting frequencies and solar flare hard X-rays⋆ , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201321973", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321973", journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321973

  67. [69]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201937259

    The Solar Orbiter Solar Wind Analyser (SWA) suite , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201937259", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937259", journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937259

  68. [70]

    SWA EAS – Caveats to use of Science Data Products. 2021

    2021

  69. [71]

    , keywords =

    RHESSI Data Analysis Software: Rationale and Methods. , keywords =. doi:10.1023/A:1022444531435 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1023/a:1022444531435

  70. [72]

    , keywords =

    Data Analysis with the SolarSoft System. , keywords =. doi:10.1023/A:1005038224881 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1023/a:1005038224881

  71. [73]

    The STEREO Mission , pages=

    The IMPACT solar wind electron analyzer (SWEA) , author=. The STEREO Mission , pages=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  72. [74]

    Lorfing and Hamish A

    Camille Y. Lorfing and Hamish A. S. Reid and Raúl Gómez-Herrero and Milan Maksimovic and Georgios Nicolaou and Christopher J. Owen and Javier Rodriguez-Pacheco and Daniel F. Ryan and Domenico Trotta and Daniel Verscharen , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0be3 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0be3 2023

  73. [75]

    Acton , abstract =

    Charles H. Acton , abstract =. Ancillary data services of NASA's Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility , journal =. 1996 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(95)00107-7 , url =

    doi:10.1016/0032-0633(95)00107-7 1996

  74. [76]

    A look towards the future in the handling of space science mission geometry , journal =

    Charles Acton and Nathaniel Bachman and Boris Semenov and Edward Wright , abstract =. A look towards the future in the handling of space science mission geometry , journal =. 2018 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2017.02.013 , url =

    doi:10.1016/j.pss.2017.02.013 2018

  75. [77]

    , keywords =

    Multiple injections of energetic electrons associated with the flare and CME event on 9 October 2021. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245716 , archivePrefix =. 2301.03650 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  76. [78]

    , keywords =

    The Effect of the Electric Field Induced by Precipitating Electron Beams on Hard X-Ray Photon and Mean Electron Spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/506423 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/506423

  77. [79]

    Graham, G. A. and Rae, I. J. and Owen, C. J. and Walsh, A. P. and Arridge, C. S. and Gilbert, L. and Lewis, G. R. and Jones, G. H. and Forsyth, C. and Coates, A. J. and Waite, J. H. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023656 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002...

    doi:10.1002/2016ja023656

  78. [80]

    Ho and Oleksiy Dudnik and Frederic Effenberger and Hamish Reid and Camille Lorfing , title =

    Alexander Warmuth and Frederic Schuller and Song Tan and Jake Mitchell and Raul Gomez-Herrero and Ignacio Cernuda and Javier Rodriguez-Pacheco and Fernando Carcaboso and Manon Jarry and Alexis Rouillard and Nina Dresing and Annamaria Fedeli and Aleksi Yli-Laurila and Robert F Wimmer-Schweingruber and Alexander Kollhoff and Sebastian Fleth and Glenn M Maso...

    2025

  79. [81]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , volume=

    Introducing GOES-I: The first of a new generation of geostationary operational environmental satellites , author=. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  80. [82]

    2019 , publisher=

    The GOES-R series: a new generation of geostationary environmental satellites , author=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

Showing first 80 references.