Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Disentangling and Mitigating the Impact of Task Similarity for Continual Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.20236 v1 pith:XUEVYS6L submitted 2024-05-30 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords similaritytasktransfercontinualknowledgelearningretentioncatastrophic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Continual learning of partially similar tasks poses a challenge for artificial neural networks, as task similarity presents both an opportunity for knowledge transfer and a risk of interference and catastrophic forgetting. However, it remains unclear how task similarity in input features and readout patterns influences knowledge transfer and forgetting, as well as how they interact with common algorithms for continual learning. Here, we develop a linear teacher-student model with latent structure and show analytically that high input feature similarity coupled with low readout similarity is catastrophic for both knowledge transfer and retention. Conversely, the opposite scenario is relatively benign. Our analysis further reveals that task-dependent activity gating improves knowledge retention at the expense of transfer, while task-dependent plasticity gating does not affect either retention or transfer performance at the over-parameterized limit. In contrast, weight regularization based on the Fisher information metric significantly improves retention, regardless of task similarity, without compromising transfer performance. Nevertheless, its diagonal approximation and regularization in the Euclidean space are much less robust against task similarity. We demonstrate consistent results in a permuted MNIST task with latent variables. Overall, this work provides insights into when continual learning is difficult and how to mitigate it.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling Laws for Forgetting during Finetuning with Pretraining Data Injection

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Finetuning forgetting follows a multiplicative scaling law in model size, finetuning tokens, and injected pretraining fraction, with 1% injection nearly eliminating forgetting.

Pith tools