Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

The Gibbs state of the mean-field Bose gas

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For the homogeneous mean-field Bose gas at BEC critical temperatures, the interacting grand canonical Gibbs state is approximated in trace norm to N^{-1/48} by an explicit Φ^4-weighted Bogoliubov state.

desk verdict A benchmark proof of Lee-Yang-Bogoliubov theory for the mean-field Bose gas at critical temperature; the main theorems need a small but real repair excluding v≡0 from statements where 1/\hat v(0) appears. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19396 v3 pith:XVFMF2EL submitted 2025-01-31 math-ph math.MP

Andreas Deuchert , Phan Thành Nam , Marcin Napiórkowski This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 82B1082B2681V70 PACS 05.30.-d03.75.Hh05.70.Fh
keywords mean-fieldBosegasBose–EinsteincondensationBogoliubovtheoryGibbsstatetracenormapproximationone-modeΦ^4correlationinequalitiescriticaltemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that for a homogeneous mean-field Bose gas on the unit torus at temperatures of order $N^{{-2/3}}$, the scale of the Bose–Einstein condensation critical temperature, the grand canonical Gibbs state is approximated in trace norm by an explicit reference state. The reference state is a convex combination, weighted by a one-mode $Φ^{4}$ Gibbs distribution, of coherent states for the condensate tensored with Bogoliubov thermal states for the excited modes. This gives a rigorous justification of Lee and Yang's positive-temperature analogue of Bogoliubov theory, and it yields the limiting condensate number distributions, the one- and two-particle density matrices, and a free energy expansion. A reader should care because the result identifies the actual mechanism of the interacting BEC phase transition: the Gibbs state is not quasi-free, and the condensate's particle-number fluctuations are governed by a one-mode $Φ^{4}$ measure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reference state Γ_{β,N} = ∫ |z⟩⟨z| ⊗ G_Bog(z) g_BEC(z) dz, a non-quasi-free convex combination. The coherent state |z⟩ implements the c-number substitution for the condensate; G_Bog(z) is the Gibbs state of the quadratic Bogoliubov Hamiltonian for the excited modes; and g_BEC(z) is a Gibbs distribution of a one-mode $Φ^{4}$ theory describing condensate number fluctuations. The proof is carried by two new abstract correlation inequalities: a second-order bound whose proof uses an infinite-dimensional version of Stahl's theorem to obtain convexity of the Duhamel two-point function, and a higher-order bound for moments that uses a commuting operator X dominating B and [[B,A],B]. These inequalities turn first-order Griffith-type bounds on perturbed Gibbs states into the sharp second- and higher-moment estimates needed to control the terms neglected by Bogoliubov theory.

What would settle it

A numerical computation of the variance of $a_0^*a_0$ in the condensed phase for a finite-$N$ mean-field gas with nonnegative Fourier coefficients would settle the claim: the paper predicts $\mathrm{Var} = N/(\beta \hat v(0)) + O(N^{5/3-1/6})$, and a result with a different $N$-scaling of this variance, or with the Gaussian condensate distribution of Theorem 6 failing, would refute the trace norm approximation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the limit N→∞ with β $N^{{2/3}}$→κ∈(0,∞), the paper establishes the trace norm bound ||G_{β,N} − Γ_{β,N}||_1 ≤ C $N^{{-1/48}}$. When the ideal-gas condensate number N0(β,N) satisfies N0 ≥ $N^{{2/3}}$, Γ_{β,N} = ∫_C |z⟩⟨z| ⊗ G_Bog(z) g_BEC(z) dz, where |z⟩ is a coherent state, G_Bog(z) is the Gibbs state of a temperature-dependent Bogoliubov Hamiltonian with dispersion ε(p) = $\sqrt$($p^{2}$−µ0) $\sqrt$($p^{2}$−µ0 + 2 vhat(0) N0/N), and g_BEC(z) is the Gibbs distribution of the one-mode $Φ^{4}$ theory exp(−β vhat(0)|z|^4/(2N) − β µ_BEC |z|^2). When N0 < $N^{{2/3}}$, the interacting state is instead within the same trace norm of the ideal gas Gibbs state. From this approximation the paper derives the 1- and 2-particle density matrices, the variance and full limiting distribution of the number of condensate particles, and the free energy expansion F = F_Bog + vhat(0)N/2 + F_BEC(N0) + O($N^{{5/8}}$).

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes the interaction is nonnegative in position space with nonnegative Fourier coefficients $\hat v(p)\ge 0$ and a finite weighted sum $\sum_p (1+|p|)\hat v(p)$; if any Fourier mode is negative, the free-energy lower bound and the correlation estimates that carry the approximation no longer follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the condensed phase the interacting Gibbs state is determined to leading order by the Φ^4 condensate measure times Bogoliubov thermal states, and it is not quasi-free because the condensate number fluctuates on scale N^{5/3}.
  • The BEC critical temperature is given to leading order by the ideal-gas value, and the 1-pdm has pointwise formulas for each momentum mode with error N^{-1/96}.
  • The variance of the condensate particle number is N/(β vhat(0)) in the condensed phase, and the full condensate distribution crosses over from Gaussian to exponential to geometric as N0 shrinks across N^{5/6}.
  • The free energy has the expansion F_Bog + vhat(0)N/2 + F_BEC(N0) + O(N^{5/8}), including interaction-dependent N^{2/3} log N and N^{2/3} terms in the condensed phase.
  • In the non-condensed phase the interacting Gibbs state is stable close to the ideal gas Gibbs state despite the added interaction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the approximation is in trace norm, it automatically transfers to all bounded observables; one can read off higher correlation functions beyond the 2-pdm from the reference state, although the paper computes only the 1- and 2-pdm.
  • The abstract correlation inequalities are likely to be the transferable core: any model where a Griffiths-type first-order bound for perturbed Gibbs states is available should admit the same second- and higher-moment control, including lattice or local Φ^4 settings.
  • The N0 ∼ N^{5/6} crossover in the condensate number distribution points to a genuine second fluctuation phase transition in the one-mode Φ^4 measure itself, with the interaction vhat(0) becoming irrelevant below that scale.
  • A natural testable extension is the canonical ensemble, where the condensate number is fixed; the grand canonical formulas here predict the characteristic function of N0 up to order N^{-1/48}, which could be compared with numerics at moderate N.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the homogeneous mean-field Bose gas on the three-dimensional torus with interaction potential v/N at temperatures comparable to the critical temperature, i.e., βN^{2/3} → κ ∈ (0,∞). Its main result (Theorem 1) is a trace norm approximation of the grand canonical Gibbs state G_{β,N} by an explicit reference state Γ_{β,N}: in the condensed regime (N0(β,N) ≥ N^{2/3}) it is a convex combination of coherent states tensored with temperature-dependent Bogoliubov Gibbs states, weighted by a one-mode Φ^4 condensate distribution g_BEC; in the non-condensed regime it is the ideal gas Gibbs state. From this approximation the paper derives pointwise and trace-norm bounds for the one-particle density matrix, formulas for the two-particle density matrix, limiting distributions for the condensate particle number (Gaussian, interpolating, exponential, and geometric regimes), and an asymptotic expansion of the free energy. The proofs develop two new abstract correlation inequalities, one based on an infinite-dimensional version of Stahl's theorem, which are used to control second- and higher-order correlations in the true Gibbs state rather than only in trial states.

Significance. If the results hold as stated, this is a major contribution to the rigorous theory of Bose gases: it provides the first justification of Lee and Yang's positive-temperature extension of Bogoliubov theory in the mean-field regime, including a non-quasi-free reference state with condensate fluctuations described by a one-mode Φ^4 theory. The explicit formulas for the condensate number variance (of order N^{5/3}), the crossover of the limiting distribution at N0 ∼ N^{5/6}, and the free energy expansion are new and physically informative. The two abstract correlation inequalities are of independent interest and have already been used in follow-up work; the proof of the second-order inequality via Stahl's theorem is elegant. The manuscript is very detailed and essentially self-contained, with numerous technical lemmas relegated to appendices; the overall strategy is coherent and the estimates are stated with explicit rates. The only serious defect I found is a gap between the formal hypotheses of the main theorems and the cases actually covered by the proofs, which is fixable and does not affect the correctness of the nonzero-interaction results.

major comments (1)
  1. [Theorem 1 (Section 1.4), Theorem 6 (Section 2.2), Theorem 5(a) (Section 2.1), Corollary 2.7 (Section 2.3)] The formal hypotheses of Theorem 1 admit v ≡ 0 (v nonnegative, even, with nonnegative Fourier coefficients and finite (1+|p|)-weighted ℓ^1 norm), but the interacting-case results are false or singular for v = 0. The Gaussian density g in Theorem 6, Eq. (2.12), contains 1/β v̂(0); for the ideal gas at κ > κ_c the distribution ζ_G(z) = (πN0)^{-1} exp(−|z|^2/N0) makes x = |z|^2 exponential with variance N0^2, not the asserted Gaussian with variance N/(βv̂(0)). Similarly, the first line of Theorem 5(a) and Corollary 2.7, Eq. (2.31), contain 1/v̂(0) or ln(v̂(0)) and are singular for v = 0. The intended restriction v ≠ 0 appears informally in Section 1.2 but does not enter the theorem statements. Since the proofs for the interacting case rely on v̂(0) > 0 in several places (e.g., the Gaussian approximation of g_BEC in Section 9.4.1 and Lemma A.1), the statements are overbroad as written. The fix is to add the hypothesis v̂(0) > 0 (equivalently v not identically zero) to Theorem 1 and, consequently, to Theorems 4–8 and Corollary 2.7, or to state and prove separate v = 0 results.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 1.2] The phrase 'with v, 0' should read 'with v ≠ 0'; this is exactly the hypothesis that is missing from the formal statements of the theorems.
  2. [Section 8.3] The text refers to 'Proposition 5.2' when bounding f^{BEC}(N0, N0^G); the only Proposition in Section 5 is Proposition 5.3, so this citation should be corrected (or the correct lemma, likely Lemma A.4, should be cited).
  3. [Theorem 7(b)] The condition 'N0(β,N) = tN^{5/6} with some fixed t ∈ R' should be t > 0 (since N0 is nonnegative); the same correction applies to the 'some fixed t ∈ R' in the definition of σ.
  4. [Section 2.2, Eq. (2.14)] The random variable N0 in (2.14) shares its symbol with the scalar N0(β,N) used throughout the paper; even though eN0 is later introduced, the notation is confusing and should be changed, e.g., to N_0^{ran} or another symbol.
  5. [Eq. (1.23)] There is a misplaced dz inside the large parentheses after the third term; the measure dz should appear outside the bracket, as is clear from the surrounding terms.
  6. [General] The manuscript contains numerous typos and spacing errors, e.g., 'vaccuum', 'Gri ffi th', 'di fficulties', 'eN0' for 'eN0', and several missing spaces before parentheses. A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the reference state is constructed and then justified by matching upper and lower free-energy bounds, with the lower bound obtained from correlation inequalities for the true Gibbs state.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a variational proof rather than a tautology. The reference state Γβ,N is defined in Theorem 1 with the condensate distribution gBEC fixed by the particle-number constraint ∫|z|^2 gBEC = N − ∑γp. The proof then proceeds by proving a sharp upper bound for the free energy using Γβ,N as a trial state (Section 3, Proposition 3.1) and a matching lower bound (Section 8) that does not assume the ansatz: it uses a c-number substitution, Onsager-type bounds, and two new correlation inequalities applied to the true Gibbs state. The trace-norm approximation follows from the relative-entropy/Pinsker estimate S(Γβ,N,Gβ,N) = β(F(Γβ,N)−F(Gβ,N)) ≤ C N^{5/8} ln N, so the approximation is derived from the free-energy bounds, not assumed. The quantities presented as predictions (1-pdm, 2-pdm, condensate distributions, variances, free energy) are consequences of this trace-norm approximation combined with the correlation inequalities. The chemical potential μBEC is not fitted to the target observables; it is fixed by the normalization Tr[NΓβ,N]=N, and the needed comparison eN0 ≈ N0 is proven in Lemma 3.4. The citation to [20] is only as a source of the trial-state idea; the upper bound used here is proved in Section 3, and the lower bound is independent. The use of Stahl's theorem is an external mathematical result, not a self-citation. The v≡0 scope gap flagged by the skeptic is a statement-hypothesis issue, not a circularity of the derivation for the intended v≠0 regime. Overall the derivation chain is self-contained and the central claim is not equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on three groups of inputs: (i) standard many-body analysis tools (Gibbs variational principle, Berezin-Lieb, Falk-Bruch, Klein, Pinsker, Wick), (ii) the finite-dimensional Stahl/BMV theorem as an external benchmark, and (iii) the model assumptions (nonnegative interaction with nonnegative Fourier coefficients, mean-field scaling, temperature window beta N^{2/3} -> kappa). The three free parameters listed are ansatz or technical parameters fixed by self-consistency or optimization, not fit to target results. No invented physical entities: Gamma_{beta,N} and g_BEC are mathematical constructions, and g_BEC already appeared in [20].

free parameters (3)
  • mu_BEC (condensate chemical potential) = implicit, defined by integral over C of |z|^2 g_BEC(z) dz = N - sum_{p in Lambda^*_+} gamma_p
    Fixes the trial state's expected particle number to exactly N (Eq. (1.30) and the line below it). This is a definitional self-consistency parameter of the ansatz, not a fit to a target result, but it is chosen by hand to make the reference state comparable to the Gibbs state.
  • e-mu (effective chemical potential) = unique solution of sum over p of (e^{beta(p^2 - e-mu)} - 1)^{-1} = (mu - e-mu) eta / v-hat(0), Eq. (5.4)
    Technical parameter introduced in Section 5 to parametrize the grand potential expansion for the perturbed Gibbs states; chosen by hand to make the first-order a priori estimates in Theorem 9 work.
  • delta (interpolation parameter in the lower bound) = delta = N^{-1/6}
    Appears in Eqs. (8.7)-(8.39) to split the variance of the total particle number into condensate and excited parts; optimized to balance the errors N^{2/3} delta and N^{1/3} delta^{-1}.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Stahl's theorem (BMV conjecture): for Hermitian matrices A and B, Tr[exp(-(A+tB))] is the Laplace transform of a nonnegative measure (Theorem 11)
    Input for the infinite-dimensional representation Theorem 10 and for the convexity of Z'' used in Theorem 2; cited to [52,110] as an external, fully proven result.
  • domain assumption Interaction assumptions: v nonnegative, even, periodic, v-hat >= 0, and sum (1+|p|) v-hat(p) < infinity
    Hypothesis of all main theorems; used in Lemma 4.2, (8.3), and (8.5) to discard or control interaction terms, and for summability of momentum sums.
  • domain assumption Mean-field scaling and temperature window: H_N with 1/N interaction on the unit torus, grand canonical ensemble, beta N^{2/3} -> kappa in (0, infinity)
    Defines the regime in which the results hold, with temperatures proportional to the ideal-gas critical temperature; this is the model, not a derived fact.
  • standard math Berezin-Lieb inequality (Lemma 3.6)
    Entropy lower bound for the trial state; cited from [20, Lemma 2.4].
  • standard math Falk-Bruch inequality as formulated in [73, Theorem 7.2], plus Gibbs variational principle, Pinsker's inequality, Klein's inequality, and Wick's rule
    Standard quantum many-body tools used in the proofs of Theorems 2, 3, and the moment bounds; external standard results.
  • standard math Technical claims of Remark 5.2 (expected particle number is M to leading order; condensate expectation is (e^{beta e-mu} - 1)^{-1}) deferred to [42, Proposition 1]
    The paper states these follow from [42] and are not needed in the main analysis; they are cited, not proven in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Gibbs state of the mean-field Bose gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XVFMF2EL

@misc{pith2026250119396,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Gibbs state of the mean-field Bose gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XVFMF2EL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19396}
}
abstract

We consider the homogeneous mean-field Bose gas at temperatures proportional to the critical temperature of its Bose-Einstein condensation phase transition. We prove a trace norm approximation for the grand canonical Gibbs state in terms of a reference state, which is given by a convex combination of products of coherent states and Gibbs states associated with certain temperature-dependent Bogoliubov Hamiltonians. The convex combination is expressed as an integral over a Gibbs distribution of a one-mode $\Phi^4$-theory describing the condensate. This result justifies an analogue of Lee and Yang's extension of Bogoliubov theory to positive temperatures, and it allows us to derive various limiting distributions for the number of particles in the condensate, as well as precise formulas for the one- and two-particle density matrices of the Gibbs state. Key ingredients of our proof, which are of independent interest, include two novel abstract correlation inequalities. The proof of one of them is based on an application of an infinite-dimensional version of Stahl's theorem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. $\mathcal{P}(\Phi)_2$ Theory from many-body quantum Gibbs states

    math-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Grand-canonical boson Gibbs states with general p-body interactions converge in the simultaneous semiclassical and zero-range limit to the Φ^{2p}_2 field measure, including free energy and correlations.

  2. A note on spontaneous symmetry breaking in the mean-field Bose gas

    math-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the mean-field Bose gas at inverse temperature beta ~ N^{-2/3}, U(1) symmetry breaking occurs if and only if Bose-Einstein condensation occurs, with the quasi-average order parameter equal to the square root of the...

  3. $\Phi^4_2$ theory limit of a many-body bosonic free energy

    math.AP 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    With interaction range ε = λ^η (η < 1/24), the 2D Bose gas relative free energy converges to the Φ⁴₂ free energy as λ → 0.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Abramowitz, I

    M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, eds., Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Applied Mathematics Series. V ol. 55, Washington D.C.; New York: United States Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards; Dover Publications (1972)

    1972

  2. [2]

    J. O. A ndersen, Theory of the weakly interacting Bose gas, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 (2004), 599

    2004

  3. [3]

    Bach, Ionization energies of bosonic Coulomb systems, Lett

    V . Bach, Ionization energies of bosonic Coulomb systems, Lett. Math. Phys. 21 (1991), pp. 139–149

    1991

  4. [4]

    V . Bach, R. Lewis, E. H. Lieb, and H. Siedentop, On the number of bound states of a bosonic N-particle Coulomb system, Math. Z. 214 (1993), pp. 441–459

    1993

  5. [5]

    Balaban, J

    T. Balaban, J. Feldman, H. Kn¨orrer, E. Trubowitz, Complex Bosonic Many-Body Models: Overview of the Small Field Parabolic Flow, Ann. Henri Poincaré 18 (2017), 2873

    2017

  6. [6]

    Basti, S

    G. Basti, S. Cenatiempo, A. Giuliani, A. Olgiati, G. Pasqualetti and B. Schlein, Upper bound for the ground state energy of a dilute Bose gas of hard spheres, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 248 (2024), 100

    2024

  7. [7]

    Basti, S

    G. Basti, S. Cenatiempo, A. Olgiati, G. Pasqualetti, B. Schlein, A Second Order Upper Bound for the Ground State Energy of a Hard-Sphere Gas in the Gross–Pitaevskii Regime, Commun. Math. Phys. 399.1 (2022), pp. 1–55

    2022

  8. [8]

    Basti, S

    G. Basti, S. Cenatiempo and Benjamin Schlein, A new second order upper bound for the ground state energy of dilute Bose gases, Forum Math. Sigma (2021), 9

    2021

Show all 112 references
  1. [9]

    B auer, Measure theory and integration, de Gruyter, Berlin (2001)

    H. B auer, Measure theory and integration, de Gruyter, Berlin (2001)

    2001

  2. [10]

    Ben Arous, K

    G. Ben Arous, K. Kirkpatrick, B. Schlein, Central Limit Theorem in Many-Body Quantum Dynamics, Commun. Math. Phys. 321 (2013), pp. 371–417

    2013

  3. [11]

    Benedikter, M

    N. Benedikter, M. P orta, and B. Schlein. Effective Evolution Equations from Quantum Dynamics . Springer Briefs in Mathematical Physics (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Benguria and E

    R. Benguria and E. H. Lieb, Proof of the Stability of Highly Negative Ions in the Absence of the Pauli Principle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983), pp. 1771–1774

    1983

  5. [13]

    Bekerman, T

    F. Bekerman, T. Lebl´e, S. Serfaty, CLT for Fluctuations ofβ-ensembles with general potential, Electron. J. Probab. 23 (2018), no. 115, 1–31. 96

    2018

  6. [14]

    Berezin, Covariant and contravariant symbols of operators,Izv

    F.A. Berezin, Covariant and contravariant symbols of operators,Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Mat.36, 1134–1167 (1972); English translation: USSR Izv. 6, 1117 (1973). F.A. Berezin, General concept of quantization, Commun. Math. Phys. 40 (1975), 153

    1972

  7. [15]

    v an den Berg, J

    M. v an den Berg, J. T. L ewis, and J. V . Pul`e, The large deviation principle and some models of an interacting boson gas, Commun. Math. Phys. 118 (1988), pp. 61–85

    1988

  8. [16]

    B hatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York (1997)

    R. B hatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York (1997)

    1997

  9. [17]

    Boccato, C

    C. Boccato, C. Brennecke, S. Cenatiempo and B. Schlein, Bogoliubov theory in the Gross–Pitaevskii limit, Acta Math. 222 (2) (2019), 219-335

    2019

  10. [18]

    Boccato, C

    C. Boccato, C. Brennecke, S. Cenatiempo and B. Schlein, Complete Bose-Einstein condensation in the Gross-Pitaevskii regime, Commun. Math. Phys. 359 (2018), 975-1026

    2018

  11. [19]

    Boccato, C

    C. Boccato, C. Brennecke, S. Cenatiempo and B. Schlein, Optimal rate for Bose–Einstein condensation in the Gross–Pitaevskii regime, Commun. Math. Phys. 376 (2) (2020), 1311-1395

    2020

  12. [20]

    Boccato, A

    C. Boccato, A. Deuchert and D. Stocker, Upper bound for the grand canonical free energy of the Bose gas in the Gross–Pitaevskii limit, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 56, no. 2 (2024), 2611-2660

    2024

  13. [21]

    N. N. B ogoliubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys. (USSR), 11 (1947), p. 23

    1947

  14. [22]

    Borot, A

    G. Borot, A. Guionnet, K. K. Kozlowski, Large-N Asymptotic Expansion for Mean Field Models with Coulomb Gas Interaction, Int. Math. Res. Not. V ol. 2015, Issue 20, (2015), p. 10451–10524

    2015

  15. [23]

    S. N. Bose, Plancks Gesetz und Lichtquantenhypothese, Zeitschrift für Physik 26 (1), (1024) 178–181 (in German)

  16. [24]

    Bossmann, N

    L. Bossmann, N. Leopold, D. Mitrouskas, and S. Petrat, A Note on the Binding Energy for Bosons in the Mean-Field Limit, J. Stat. Phys. 191 (2024), 48

    2024

  17. [25]

    B ossmann, S

    L. B ossmann, S. P etrat, R. S eiringer, Asymptotic expansion of low-energy excitations for weakly interacting bosons, Forum Math. Sigma 9 (2021), e28

    2021

  18. [26]

    Bourgade, L

    P. Bourgade, L. Erd¨os, H.-T. Yau, Universality of generalβ-ensembles, Duke Math. J. 163 (6) (2014), 1127 - 1190

    2014

  19. [27]

    Brennecke, M

    C. Brennecke, M. Brooks, C. Caraci, J. Oldenburg, A Short Proof of Bose–Einstein Condensation in the Gross–Pitaevskii Regime and Beyond, Ann. Henri Poincaré (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Brennecke, J

    C. Brennecke, J. Lee and P.T. Nam, Second Order Expansion of Gibbs State Reduced Density Matrices in the Gross–Pitaevskii Regime, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 56 (2024), 5262-5284

    2024

  21. [29]

    Brennecke, B

    C. Brennecke, B. Schlein and S. Schra ven, Bose–Einstein Condensation with Optimal Rate for Trapped Bosons in the Gross–Pitaevskii Regime, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 25 (2022), 12

    2022

  22. [30]

    B rennecke, B

    C. B rennecke, B. S chlein and S. S chra ven, Bogoliubov Theory for Trapped Bosons in the Gross– Pitaevskii Regime, Ann. Henri Poincaré 23 (2022), 1583

    2022

  23. [31]

    Brietzke, S

    B. Brietzke, S. Fournais, and J. P. Solovej, A simple 2nd order lower bound to the energy of dilute Bose gases. Commun. Math. Phys. 376, (2020), pp. 323–351

    2020

  24. [32]

    Brooks, Diagonalizing Bose Gases in the Gross–Pitaevskii Regime and Beyond, Commun

    M. Brooks, Diagonalizing Bose Gases in the Gross–Pitaevskii Regime and Beyond, Commun. Math. Phys. 406 (2025), art. 17. 97

    2025

  25. [33]

    Brooks, R

    M. Brooks, R. Seiringer, Validity of Bogoliubov’s approximation for translation-invariant Bose gases, Prob. Math. Phys. 3 (2022), No. 4, 939–1000

    2022

  26. [34]

    J.-B. Bru, V . A. Zagrebnov, On Condensations in the Bogoliubov Weakly Imperfect Bose Gas,J. Stat. Phys. 99 (2000), 1297

    2000

  27. [35]

    J.-B. Bru, V . A. Zagrebnov, Large Deviations in the Superstable Weakly Imperfect Bose-Gas, J. Stat. Phys. 133 (2008), 379

    2008

  28. [36]

    Buchholz, C

    S. Buchholz, C. Saffirio, and B. Schlein, Multivariate central limit theorem in quantum dynamics, J. Stat. Phys., 154(1-2) (2014):113-152

    2014

  29. [37]

    Buffet, and J

    E. Buffet, and J. V . Pul`e, Fluctuation properties of the imperfect Bose gas J. Math. Phys. 24, 1608 (1983)

    1983

  30. [38]

    Caporaletti and A

    M. Caporaletti and A. Deuchert, Upper bound for the grand canonical free energy of the Bose gas in the Gross-Pitaevskii limit for general interaction potentials, Ann. Henri Poincaré (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Caraci, J

    C. Caraci, J. Oldenburg, B. Schlein, Quantum Fluctuations of Many-Body Dynamics around the Gross- Pitaevskii Equation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Caraci, A

    C. Caraci, A. Olgiati, D. Saint Aubin, B. Schlein, Third order corrections to the ground state energy of a Bose gas in the Gross-Pitaevskii regime, arXiv:2311.07433 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Derezi´nski and M

    J. Derezi´nski and M. Napi´orkowski, Excitation spectrum of interacting bosons in the mean-field infinite- volume limit, Ann. Henri Poincaré, 15 (2014), pp. 2409–2439

    2014

  34. [42]

    Deuchert, M

    A. Deuchert, M. Napi´orkowski and P. T. Nam, A note on spontaneous symmetry breaking in the mean- field Bose gas, arXiv:2501.19402 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Deuchert, S

    A. Deuchert, S. Mayer and R. Seiringer, The free energy of the two-dimensional dilute Bose gas. I. Lower bound, Forum Math. Sigma 8 (2020), e20

    2020

  36. [44]

    Deuchert, R

    A. Deuchert, R. S eiringer and J. Yngv ason, Bose–Einstein condensation in a dilute, trapped gas at positive temperature, Commun. Math. Phys. 368 (2019), 723-776

    2019

  37. [45]

    Deuchert and R

    A. Deuchert and R. Seiringer, Gross–Pitaevskii limit of a homogeneous Bose gas at positive temperature, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 236 (2020), 1217–1271

    2020

  38. [46]

    Deuchert and R

    A. Deuchert and R. Seiringer, Semiclassical approximation and critical temperature shift for weakly interacting trapped bosons, J. Funct. Anal. 281 (2019), Issue 6, 109096

    2019

  39. [47]

    F. J. D yson, Ground-state energy of a hard-sphere gas, Phys. Rev. 106 (1957), pp. 20–26

    1957

  40. [48]

    F. J. Dyson, E. H. L ieb, and B. Simon, Phase transitions in quantum spin systems with isotropic and nonisotropic interactions, J. Stat. Phys. 18 (1978), pp. 335–383

    1978

  41. [49]

    E instein, Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases, Königliche Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte (1924) 261–267 (in German)

    A. E instein, Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases, Königliche Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte (1924) 261–267 (in German)

    1924

  42. [50]

    Einstein, Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1925) 1: 3 (in German)

    A. Einstein, Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1925) 1: 3 (in German)

    1925

  43. [51]

    Erd¨os, B

    L. Erd¨os, B. Schlein, and H.-T. Yau, Ground-state energy of a low-density Bose gas: A second-order upper bound, Phys. Rev. A, 78 (2008), p. 053627. 98

    2008

  44. [52]

    A. È. Eremenko, Herbert Stahl’s proof of the BMV conjecture, Sbornik: Mathematics. 206 (1) (2015).: 87–92

    2015

  45. [53]

    F alk and L

    H. F alk and L. W. Bruch, Susceptibility and fluctuation, Phys. Rev. 180 (1969), pp. 442–444

    1969

  46. [54]

    F ournais and J.P

    S. F ournais and J.P. Solovej, The energy of dilute Bose gases, Ann. Math. 192(3) (2020), 893-976

    2020

  47. [55]

    Fournais and J.P

    S. Fournais and J.P. Solovej, The energy of dilute Bose gases II: The general case, Invent. Math. 232 (2) (2023), 863-994

    2023

  48. [56]

    Fr¨ohlich, A

    J. Fr¨ohlich, A. Knowles, B. Schlein and V . Sohinger, The mean–field limit of quantum Bose gases at positive temperature, J. Amer. Math. Soc.35 (2022), no. 4, 955

    2022

  49. [57]

    Fr¨ohlich, A

    J. Fr¨ohlich, A. Knowles, B. Schlein and V . Sohinger, The Euclidean Φ4 2 theory as a limit of an interacting Bose gas, J. Eur. Math. Soc., to appear. arXiv: 2201.07632

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Giuliani and R

    A. Giuliani and R. Seiringer, The ground state energy of the weakly interacting Bose gas at high density, J. Stat. Phys. 135 (2009), pp. 915–934

    2009

  51. [59]

    Grech and R

    P. Grech and R. Seiringer, The excitation spectrum for weakly interacting bosons in a trap, Commun. Math. Phys. 322 (2013), pp. 559–591

    2013

  52. [60]

    Haberberger, C

    F. Haberberger, C. Hainzl, P.T. Nam, R. Seiringer, and A. Triay, The free energy of dilute Bose gases at low temperatures, arXiv:2304.02405 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Haberberger, C

    F. Haberberger, C. Hainzl, B. Schlein, and A. Triay, Upper Bound for the Free Energy of Dilute Bose Gases at Low Temperature, arXiv:2405.03378 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    H ainzl, Another proof of BEC in the GP-limit, J

    C. H ainzl, Another proof of BEC in the GP-limit, J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021), 051901

    2021

  55. [63]

    Hainzl, B

    C. Hainzl, B. S chlein and A. Triay, Bogoliubov theory in the Gross–Pitaevskii limit: a simplified approach, Forum Math. Sigma, (2022), V ol. 10 e90 1-39

    2022

  56. [64]

    M. K.-H. Kiessling, The Hartree limit of Born’s ensemble for the ground state of a bosonic atom or ion, J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012), p. 095223

    2012

  57. [65]

    Kirkpatrick, S

    K. Kirkpatrick, S. Rademacher, and B. Schlein, A large deviation principle for many–body quantum dynamics, Ann. Henri Poincaré 22 (2021), pp. 2595–2618

    2021

  58. [66]

    Klauder and B.-S

    J. Klauder and B.-S. Skagerstam, Coherent states, applications in physics and mathematical physics. World Scientific (1985)

    1985

  59. [67]

    Lambert, Poisson statistics for Gibbs measures at high temperature, Ann

    G. Lambert, Poisson statistics for Gibbs measures at high temperature, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare (B) Probab. Stat. V ol. 57, No. 1 (2021), 326–350

    2021

  60. [68]

    Deleporte, G

    A. Deleporte, G. L ambert, Universality for free fermions and the local Weyl law for semiclassical Schrödinger operators, J. Eur. Math. Soc.(2024), published online first

    2024

  61. [69]

    Lebl´e, S

    T. Lebl´e, S. Serfaty, Large Deviation Principle for Empirical Fields of Log and Riesz Gases, Inventiones Math. 210 (2017), No 3, 645-757

    2017

  62. [70]

    T. D. Lee, K. Huang, and C. N. Yang, Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a Bose system of hard spheres and its low-temperature properties, Phys. Rev. 106 (6) (1957), pp. 1135–1145. 99

    1957

  63. [71]

    T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Low-Temperature Behavior of a Dilute Bose System of Hard Spheres. I. Equilibrium Properties, Phy. Rev.112 (5) (1958), pp. 1419–1429

    1958

  64. [72]

    Lewin, P

    M. Lewin, P. T. Nam, N. Rougerie, Derivation of Hartree’s theory for generic mean-field Bose systems, Adv. Math. 254 (2014), 570

    2014

  65. [73]

    Lewin, P

    M. Lewin, P. T. Nam and N. Rougerie, Classical field theory limit of many-body quantum Gibbs states in 2D and 3D, Invent. Math. 224 (2021), 315-444

    2021

  66. [74]

    Lewin, P

    M. Lewin, P. T. Nam, S. Serfaty and J. P. Solovej, Bogoliubov spectrum of interacting Bose gases, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68 (2015), pp. 413–471

    2015

  67. [75]

    E. H. L ieb, The classical limit of quantum spin systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973), 327

    1973

  68. [76]

    E. H. Lieb and W. Liniger, Exact analysis of an interacting Bose gas. I. The general solution and the ground state, Phys. Rev. (2), 130 (1963), pp. 1605–1616

    1963

  69. [77]

    L ieb, M

    E.H. L ieb, M. Loss, Analysis, 2nd Ed., AMS, Providence, Rhode Island (2010)

    2010

  70. [78]

    E. H. Lieb and R. Seiringer, Proof of Bose-Einstein Condensation for Dilute Trapped Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), p. 170409

    2002

  71. [79]

    E. H. Lieb and R. Seiringer, Derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation for rotating Bose gases,Commun. Math. Phys. 264 (2006), pp. 505–537

    2006

  72. [80]

    E.H. Lieb, R. Seiringer, J. Yngv ason, Bosons in a trap: A rigorous derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii energy functional, Phys. Rev. A 61, (2000) 043602

    2000

  73. [81]

    E. H. Lieb, R. Seiringer and J. Yngv ason, Justification of c-Number Substitutions in Bosonic Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005), p. 080401

    2005

  74. [82]

    E. H. Lieb, R. Seiringer, J.P. Solovej and J. Yngv ason, Mathematics of Bose gas and its condensation, Oberwolfach Seminar Series, V ol. 34, Birkhaeuser (2005)

    2005

  75. [83]

    E. H. Lieb and H.-T. Yau, The Chandrasekhar theory of stellar collapse as the limit of quantum mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 112 (1987), pp. 147–174

    1987

  76. [84]

    E. H. Lieb and J. Yngv ason, Ground state energy of the low density Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998), pp. 2504–2507

    1998

  77. [85]

    Mayer and R

    S. Mayer and R. Seiringer The free energy of the two-dimensional dilute Bose gas. II. Upper bound, J. Math. Phys. 61 (2020), 061901

    2020

  78. [86]

    Mitrouskas and P

    D. Mitrouskas and P. Pickl. Exponential decay of the number of excitations in the weakly interacting Bose gas. J. Math. Phys. 64 (2023), 121901

    2023

  79. [87]

    P. T. Nam, M. Napi´orkowski and J.P. Solovej, Diagonalization of bosonic quadratic Hamiltonians by Bogoliubov transformations, J. Funct. Anal. 270 (11) (2016), 4340-4368

    2016

  80. [88]

    P. T. Nam and M. Napi´orkowski, Two-term expansion of the ground state one-body density matrix of a mean-field Bose gas, Calc. Var. PDE60 (3) (2016), 1-30

    2016

  81. [89]

    P. T. Nam, M. Napi´orkowski, J. Ricaud and A. Triay , Optimal rate of condensation for trapped bosons in the Gross–Pitaevskii regime, Anal. PDE 15 (6) (2022), 1585–1616. 100

    2022

  82. [90]

    Nam and S

    P.T. Nam and S. Rademacher, Exponential bounds of the condensation for dilute Bose gases. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (2025) in press

    2025

  83. [91]

    P. T. Nam, N. Rougerie, and R. Seiringer, Ground states of large bosonic systems: The Gross–Pitaevskii limit revisited, Anal. PDE 9 (2016), no. 2, 459–485

    2016

  84. [92]

    P. T. Nam and A. Triay, Bogoliubov excitation spectrum of trapped Bose gases in the Gross-Pitaevskii regime, J. Math. Pures Appl. 176 (2023), 18-101

    2023

  85. [93]

    Nam and R

    P.T. Nam and R. Seiringer, Collective excitations of Bose gases in the mean-field regime, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 215 (2) (2015), 381-417

    2015

  86. [94]

    P.T. Nam, R. Z hu and X. Z hu, Φ4 3 theory from many-body quantum Gibbs states, Preprint 2025, arXiv:2502.04884

    2025 arXiv

  87. [95]

    M. Napi´orkowski, Dynamics of interacting bosons: a compact review, In: Density Functionals for Many-Particle Systems - Mathematical Theory and Physical Applications of Effective Equations, World Scientific (2023)

    2023

  88. [96]

    Ohy a andD

    M. Ohy a andD. Petz, Quantum entropy and its use, Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1993)

    1993

  89. [97]

    Rademacher, B

    S. Rademacher, B. Schlein, Central limit theorem for Bose-Einstein condensates, J. Math. Phys. 60(7) (2019):071902

    2019

  90. [98]

    Rademacher and R

    S. Rademacher and R. Seiringer, Large deviation estimates for weakly interacting bosons, J. Stat. Phys. 188 (9) (2022)

    2022

  91. [99]

    G. A. Raggio and R. F. Werner, Quantum statistical mechanics of general mean field systems, Helv. Phys. Acta, 62 (1989), pp. 980–1003

    1989

  92. [100]

    M. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I. Functional Analysis, Academic Press, San Diego (1980)

    1980

  93. [101]

    M. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. II. Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness, Academic Press, San Diego (1975)

    1975

  94. [102]

    R. L. Schilling, R. Song, Z. Vondraˇcek, Bernstein Functions, Theory and Applications, DeGruyter, Berlin (2012)

    2012

  95. [103]

    Seiringer, The Thermodynamic Pressure of a Dilute Fermi Gas, Commun

    R. Seiringer, The Thermodynamic Pressure of a Dilute Fermi Gas, Commun. Math. Phys. 261 (2006), 729

    2006

  96. [104]

    Seiringer, Free Energy of a Dilute Bose Gas: Lower Bound, Commun

    R. Seiringer, Free Energy of a Dilute Bose Gas: Lower Bound, Commun. Math. Phys. 279 (2008), p. 595–636

    2008

  97. [105]

    Seiringer, The excitation spectrum for weakly interacting bosons, Commun

    R. Seiringer, The excitation spectrum for weakly interacting bosons, Commun. Math. Phys. 306 (2011), pp. 565–578

    2011

  98. [106]

    Seiringer, J

    R. Seiringer, J. Yngv ason, and V . A. Zagrebnov, Disordered Bose-Einstein condensates with interaction in one dimension, J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp. (2012), p. P11007

    2012

  99. [107]

    S erfaty, Systems of points with Coulomb interactions, Proceedings of the 2018 International Congress of Mathematicians, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    S. S erfaty, Systems of points with Coulomb interactions, Proceedings of the 2018 International Congress of Mathematicians, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 101

    2018

  100. [108]

    Serfaty, Gaussian Fluctuations and Free Energy Expansion for 2D and 3D Coulomb Gases at Any Temperature, to appear in Annales IHP , Probabilités et Statistiques

    S. Serfaty, Gaussian Fluctuations and Free Energy Expansion for 2D and 3D Coulomb Gases at Any Temperature, to appear in Annales IHP , Probabilités et Statistiques

  101. [109]

    J. P. S olovej, Asymptotics for bosonic atoms, Lett. Math. Phys. 20 (1990), pp. 165–172

    1990

  102. [110]

    H. R. S tahl, Proof of the BMV conjecture, Acta Math. 211 (2) (2013), 255–290

    2013

  103. [111]

    Yau nad J

    H.-T. Yau nad J. Yin, The second order upper bound for the ground state energy of a Bose gas, J. Stat. Phys. 136 (3) (2009), 453-503

    2009

  104. [112]

    Y in, Free Energies of Dilute Bose Gases: Upper Bound, J

    J. Y in, Free Energies of Dilute Bose Gases: Upper Bound, J. Stat. Phys. 141 (2010), p. 683–726. (Andreas Deuchert) Department of Mathematics, Virginia Tech 225 Stanger Street, Blacksburg, V A 24060-1026, USA E-mail address: andreas.deuchert@vt.edu (Phan Thành Nam) Department ...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.