Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 81 references

A Toy Model for Topological Entanglement Features in 1+1D Integrable Quantum Field Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Federbush-model entanglement entropies are blind to the anyonic coupling, even out of equilibrium.

desk verdict Useful computation, but the equilibrium no-go is conditional: the twist-field VEV τ_n is never computed and the all-order factorization is asserted. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29234 v1 pith:XVRTONCV submitted 2026-07-31 hep-th

Emmalise J. H. Aalbers , Olalla A. Castro-Alvaredo This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords FederbushmodelRényientropybranchpointtwistfieldsformfactorsintegrablequantumfieldtheorytopologicalentanglementanyonicstatisticsquench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the topological, anyon-like coupling $\lambda$ of the Federbush model — a deformation of two free massive Dirac fermions by a current-current interaction — leaves any trace in entanglement measures. Its answer is no, in infinite volume: in the ground state, the Rényi and von Neumann entropies of an interval equal those of two decoupled Dirac fermions, with no $\lambda$-dependence. The mechanism is the factorization of branch-point-twist-field form factors into free-fermion pieces; the $\lambda$-dependent scattering phases cancel against the normalization required by the kinematic residue equation. The paper further shows that after a small global quench of $\lambda$, the first-order correction to the twist-field one-point function vanishes identically on symmetry grounds, so the post-quench entanglement is unchanged. If correct, local entanglement measures in this class of $1+1\mathrm{D}$ integrable theories carry no information about the anyonic phase.

What carries the argument

The branch point twist field $T$ — the symmetry field implementing the cyclic permutation of replicas, whose two-point function gives $\mathrm{Tr}_A \rho_A^n$ — and its form factors. The load-bearing identity is the factorization (25): high-particle BPTF form factors split into products of free-fermion form factors, $F^n_{\bar{1}1...\bar{2}2...} = F^n_{\bar{1}1...} F^n_{\bar{2}2...}$, because the $\lambda$-dependent minimal form factors combine into a phase that the kinematic-residue normalization cancels. A second mechanism is the parity-odd symmetry of the four-particle integral under $(u,v) \to (-u, -v)$, which forces the first-order quench correction to vanish.

What would settle it

Compute $\tau_n(\lambda)$ in the Federbush ground state at two values of $\lambda$ (for example, by placing the $n$-copy theory on a ring and extrapolating the one-point function of $T$ to infinite volume). If $\tau_n(\lambda_2)/\tau_n(\lambda_1) \neq 1$, the additive constant in the Rényi entropy is $\lambda$-dependent and the claim of exact equality with two Dirac fermions fails in its literal form. Separately, compute the six-particle BPTF form factor $F^n_{\bar{1}1\bar{1}1\bar{2}2\bar{2}2}$: if it does not factorize into a product of the corresponding free-fermion form factors, then the all-order factorization (25), and with it the $\lambda$-independence of subl

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that every branch-point-twist-field correlator entering the replica construction of entanglement in the Federbush model is independent of the topological parameter $\lambda$, both at equilibrium and after a quench. Concretely, the paper computes the two- and four-particle form factors and shows that the four-particle one factors as $F^n_{\bar{1}1\bar{2}2} = F^n_{\bar{1}1} F^n_{\bar{2}2}$, each factor being the free-fermion expression; the $\lambda$-dependent phases from the minimal form factors are cancelled by the constants required by the kinematic residue equation. Iterating this ansatz, the paper asserts the same factorization for all particle numbers, so the full correlation-function expansi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the vacuum expectation value $\tau_n$ of the twist field is $\lambda$-independent, and that the factorization (25) holds at all particle orders; the first is assumed without computation and the second is asserted by iteration of an ansatz rather than proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the factorization (25) holds to all orders, the Rényi and von Neumann entropies of an interval in the infinite-volume Federbush ground state are exactly those of two free massive Dirac fermions; no measurement of local entanglement in this model can distinguish the anyonic phase.
  • The same λ-independence extends to other equilibrium measures expressible as BPTF correlators, including entropies of disconnected regions and logarithmic negativity, as the paper notes.
  • After a global quench of λ, the one-point function of the twist field receives no first-order correction, so at leading order the entanglement growth after the quench is identical to the free-fermion result; any topological signal must appear at second order or beyond.
  • The vanishing of δτ_n(t) follows from the kinematic residue equation plus the scattering phases, so the mechanism is generic within the form-factor framework, not a numerical accident.
  • In the conformal (massless) limit the free-fermion and Federbush theories flow to the same c=2 CFT, so the λ-independence is consistent with known ultraviolet behaviour.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the strongest place to look for residual λ-dependence is the vacuum expectation value τ_n(λ), which the paper does not compute; every form factor and the k=0 term of the correlation expansion scale with τ_n, so a λ-dependent τ_n would add a topological, interval-length-independent constant to the entropy.
  • Inference: the all-order factorization (25) is asserted by iterating an ansatz rather than proved; computing the next (six-particle) form factor and checking whether it factorizes would settle whether the claim holds beyond the explicit cases.
  • Inference: the authors' own outlook suggests where λ-dependence should reappear — in finite volume, where anyonic phases enter momentum quantization, and in symmetry-resolved entanglement measures based on composite twist fields. If either calculation shows λ-dependence, the correct picture would be that topology is invisible only in the infinite-volume, U(1)-neutral, single-interval sector.
  • Inference: the quench result is specific to the current-current perturbation; quenching a different field whose form factors depend explicitly on λ could produce non-vanishing first-order corrections, meaning the blindness to topology is not a feature of the model but of the chosen observable and perturbation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Federbush model, a 1+1D integrable deformation of two massive Dirac fermions by a current-current interaction with coupling λ, whose S-matrix elements are λ-dependent phases. The authors compute two-particle and four-particle branch point twist field (BPTF) form factors, argue that they factorize into free-fermion pieces, and use first-order quench perturbation theory to show that the post-quench correction to the one-point function of the BPTF vanishes. The central claim is that both equilibrium Rényi/von Neumann entropies for an interval and the post-quench entanglement dynamics after a small λ-quench are λ-independent, hence identical to those of two decoupled Dirac fermions and insensitive to the anyonic/topological phases.

Significance. If the result is fully established, it is a clean and somewhat surprising no-go statement: the simplest relativistic anyon-like S-matrix in 1+1D leaves no imprint on standard entanglement measures, despite entering the form-factor equations directly. The paper contains genuinely useful derivations: the two- and four-particle form-factor computations are explicit, the cancellation of λ in the four-particle residue is demonstrated in Eqs. (20)–(23), and the vanishing of the first-order quench correction is a neat symmetry argument. There are no fitted parameters; λ is a fixed coupling and the λ-independence is derived, not imposed. However, the advertised conclusion is currently stronger than what is proven: the vacuum expectation value of the twist field is never computed, the all-order factorization is asserted rather than proved, and the quench calculation is restricted to equal masses. These gaps make the central claim conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (16) and (4)] Every non-vanishing two-particle form factor in Eq. (16) is proportional to τ_n, the vacuum expectation value of the branch point twist field. The k=0 term in the correlation-function expansion (4) is |τ_n|^2, and this term contributes an additive, ℓ-independent constant to the Rényi entropy (2). The form-factor equations (10)–(15) fix the normalization of excited-state form factors relative to τ_n, but they do not determine τ_n itself. The paper neither computes τ_n(λ) nor gives an argument that τ_n(λ)=τ_n^{free}(m). Without this, the statement that the entropy is 'exactly the same result as for two Dirac fermions' is established only modulo an uncomputed λ-dependent constant. This is load-bearing for the main equilibrium claim.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (25)] The all-order factorization F^n_{ā1...ā1 ā2...ā2}(θ_1,...,θ_{4k}) = F^n_{ā1...ā1}(...)F^n_{ā2...ā2}(...) is asserted by 'repeated use of the kinematic residue equation and an ansatz of the type (18)'. This is not a proof for general particle number. Since the sum in (4) runs over all k, any violation of factorization at higher particle numbers could reintroduce λ-dependence through terms not considered here. The authors should either provide a proof (e.g., by induction using the residue equations) or explicitly verify the next nontrivial orders, and in the absence of such a proof the conclusion should be phrased as a conjecture that the observed factorization persists.
  3. [Section 4, Eqs. (43)–(48)] The quench calculation is carried out under the assumption m_1=m_2=m, stated before Eq. (43). The abstract and the conclusions, however, present the post-quench λ-independence as a general statement about the Federbush model. Since the symmetry argument for δτ_n(t)=0 is formulated with the energy and momentum written in terms of a single mass m, it does not automatically cover the unequal-mass case. The authors should either extend the argument to m_1≠m_2 or explicitly restrict the quench conclusion to the equal-mass case.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1, Eq. (4)] The product in the expansion runs over i=0 in the displayed formula but the exponential has i=1,…,k. The index in the product should presumably start at i=1.
  2. [Section 3, Eqs. (21)–(22)] There appears to be a sign/normalization mismatch: Eq. (21) gives a factor i in the residue, and the chosen H in Eq. (22) yields a total factor 1 rather than i when combined with Eq. (19). Please check the prefactors.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (42)] The mass m in the form-factor result is introduced implicitly; since the equal-mass assumption is made later, it would be clearer to state m_1=m_2=m before Eq. (42) and keep that notation explicit.
  4. [Abstract and throughout] There are LaTeX rendering issues such as 'Up1q' and 'R´enyi'. These are purely presentational but should be cleaned up.
  5. [Section 4, Eq. (44)] The constant C_T is introduced before it is defined; define it before use, or move the definition to the same line as the equation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: lambda-independence and the vanishing quench correction follow from explicit form-factor residue computations and a parity symmetry; the remaining gaps are unproved extrapolations and an uncomputed VEV, not input-output equivalence.

full rationale

The central lambda-independence claim is derived rather than assumed. The two-particle form factor in Eq. (16) is fixed by the kinematic pole structure and is identical to the free-fermion result. For the four-particle form factor, the paper computes the residue of P in Eq. (21), fixes H in Eq. (22), and the e^{-4 pi i lambda} phase from the minimal form factors cancels via Eq. (23). No parameter is fitted and no quantity is defined in terms of the target result. The quench conclusion delta tau_n(t)=0 in Eq. (48) follows from a genuine symmetry argument: in the integral (46), F(x,y,u,v) changes sign under (u,v)->(-u,-v) while the delta function, energy denominator and phase factor are even, so the integral vanishes. This is not circular. The self-citations ([6], [31], [33]) supply the standard form-factor bootstrap and known free-fermion results; they are used as methodology and background, not as a substitute for the new calculation, and no author-specific uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the answer. Two gaps should not be misread as circularity: the twist-field VEV tau_n entering Eq. (16) and the k=0 term of Eq. (4) is never computed, so the claim that the entropy is exactly that of two Dirac fermions is conditional on tau_n being lambda-independent; and the all-order factorization in Eq. (25) is asserted by 'repeated use of the kinematic residue equation and an ansatz of the type (18)' rather than proved. The quench computation is also restricted to equal masses m1=m2=m by Eq. (43). These are omitted or conditional proofs, but they are not cases where a prediction reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central equilibrium claim rests on unproved premises: all-order factorization (25) and λ-independence of the uncomputed twist-field VEV τ_n; the quench claim carries an explicit equal-mass restriction. No free parameters are fitted (λ is the model coupling), no entities are invented, and the remaining axioms are standard bootstrap assumptions.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The vacuum expectation value τ_n of the branch point twist field is independent of λ (τ_n(λ)=τ_n(0)).
    All form factors in Eq. (16) are proportional to τ_n and the k=0 term of the expansion (4) is |τ_n|^2. The paper never computes τ_n for the Federbush model, yet the exact-equality conclusion requires it to be λ-independent. Entering at Section 3, Eq. (16).
  • ad hoc to paper The all-order factorization F^n_{bar1 1 ... bar2 2 ...}(θ) = F^n_{bar1...1}(...) F^n_{bar2...2}(...) holds for all particle numbers (Eq. 25), with no λ-dependent pieces.
    The paper verifies the two- and four-particle cases but asserts (25) by 'repeated use of the kinematic residue equation and an ansatz of the type (18)' without a proof or uniqueness argument. This is the load-bearing premise for λ-independence at all orders.
  • domain assumption In the quench computation, the two fermion masses are equal, m1=m2=m.
    Stated explicitly in Section 4.2 before Eq. (43) so that particle indices on energies/momenta can be dropped. The abstract's post-quench conclusion is presented without this restriction.
  • domain assumption The standard BPTF form factor bootstrap (Watson's equations, kinematic residue equation, minimal form factors) from [6,33] applies to the Federbush model.
    The whole computation is conducted inside this framework; if the bootstrap axioms do not hold for this model (e.g., due to the parity-breaking S-matrix), the conclusions do not follow.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Toy Model for Topological Entanglement Features in 1+1D Integrable Quantum Field Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XVRTONCV

@misc{pith2026260729234,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Toy Model for Topological Entanglement Features in 1+1D Integrable Quantum Field Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XVRTONCV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29234}
}
abstract

In this paper we investigate an entanglement measure, the R\'enyi entropy, in a 1+1D integrable quantum field theory known as the Federbush model. This is a deformation of the theory of two massive Dirac fermions by means of a bilinear term in the $U(1)$ currents that couples the two fermion species. This deformation gives rise to $S$-matrix elements which are coupling-dependent phases, distinct from $- 1$. These non-trivial phases can be seen as encoding anyon-like statistics. From this viewpoint, the Federbush model is a toy model for topological features of entanglement in one space dimension. In this paper we show that, for an infinite system, these topological features play no role when computing many known measures of entanglement at equilibrium in the ground state. This conclusion applies also to the post-quench dynamics after a small quench of the topological parameter.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 70 linked inside Pith

  1. [41]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo and A. Fring,Form-factors from free fermionic Fock fields, the Federbush model,Nucl. Phys.B618(2001) 437–464 [hep-th/0107015]

    arXiv 2001

  2. [74]

    Piroli and P

    L. Piroli and P. Calabrese,Exact dynamics following an interaction quench in a one-dimensional anyonic gas,Phys. Rev. A96(2017), no. 2 023611 [1705.06470]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [1]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer and M. B. Plenio,Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review, Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010) 277–306 [0808.3773]

    arXiv 2010

  4. [2]

    Bianchi, L

    E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol and L. Vidmar,Volume-Law Entanglement Entropy of Typical Pure Quantum States,PRX Quantum3(2022), no. 3 030201 [2112.06959]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [3]

    Vidal, J

    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico and A. Kitaev,Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena,Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 227902 [quant-ph/0211074]

    arXiv 2003

  6. [4]

    B. Q. Jin and V. E. Korepin,Quantum Spin Chain, Toeplitz Determinants and the Fisher—Hartwig Conjecture,J. Statist. Phys.116(2004), no. 1 79–95 [quant-ph/0304108]

    arXiv 2004

  7. [5]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,J. Stat. Mech.0406(2004) P002 [hep-th/0405152]

    arXiv 2004

  8. [6]

    J. L. Cardy, O. A. Castro-Alvaredo and B. Doyon,Form factors of branch-point twist fields in quantum integrable models and entanglement entropy,J. Statist. Phys.130 (2008) 129–168 [0706.3384]

    arXiv 2008

Show all 81 references
  1. [7]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Quantum Quenches in Extended Systems,J. Stat. Mech.0706 (2007) P06008 [0704.1880]

    2007 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese,Entanglement dynamics after quantum quenches in generic integrable systems,SciPost Phys.4(2018) 017 [1712.07529]. 11

    2018 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Yamashika, F

    S. Yamashika, F. Ares and P. Calabrese,Time evolution of entanglement entropy after quenches in two-dimensional free fermion systems: A dimensional reduction treatment, Phys. Rev. B109(2024), no. 12 125122 [2310.18160]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Rottoli, M

    F. Rottoli, M. Mazzoni, F. Sailis and O. A. Castro-Alvaredo,Time evolution of the symmetry resolved entanglement entropy after a mass quench,J. Phys. A58(2025), no. 28 285001 [2502.06612]

    2025 arXiv

  5. [11]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, M. Lencs´ es, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi and J. Viti,Entanglement Dynamics after a Quench in Ising Field Theory: A Branch Point Twist Field Approach,JHEP12 (2019) 079 [1907.11735]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Maulik and S

    S. Maulik and S. Pari,Entanglement entropy and its linear response following a global quench in holographic Gauss-Bonnet gravity,Nucl. Phys. B1018(2025) 117084 [2503.18090]

    2025 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Rakovszky, C

    T. Rakovszky, C. W. von Keyserlingk and F. Pollmann,Entanglement growth after inhomogenous quenches,Phys. Rev. B100(2019), no. 12 125139 [1907.00869]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Serbyn, Z

    M. Serbyn, Z. Papi´ c and D. A. Abanin,Universal slow growth of entanglement in interacting strongly disordered systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013), no. 26 [1304.4605]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [15]

    D. J. Luitz, N. Laflorencie and F. Alet,Extended slow dynamical regime close to the many-body localization transition,Phys. Rev. B93(2016), no. 6 [1511.05141]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Agarwal, S

    K. Agarwal, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Knap, M. M¨ uller and E. Demler,Anomalous diffusion and griffiths effects near the many-body localization transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015), no. 16 [1408.3413]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Vosk and E

    R. Vosk and E. Altman,Dynamical quantum phase transitions in random spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.112(May, 2014) [1307.3256]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [18]

    B´ acsi and B

    A. B´ acsi and B. D´ ora,Dynamics of entanglement after exceptional quantum quench,Phys. Rev. B103(2021), no. 8 [2011.11979]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill,Topological entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 110404 [hep-th/0510092]

    2006 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen,Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006), no. 11 [cond-mat/0510613]

    2006 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Wen,Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter,Rev

    X.-G. Wen,Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.89(2017), no. 4 [1610.03911]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Affleck and A

    I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig,Universal noninteger ’ground state degeneracy’ in critical quantum systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 161–164

    1991

  17. [23]

    J. L. Cardy,Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula,Nucl. Phys. B324(1989) 581. 12

    1989

  18. [24]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. Haldane,Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States,Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008), no. 1 010504 [0805.0332]

    2008 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topological order,Phys. Rev. B80(2009), no. 15 [0903.1069]

    2009 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Serbyn, A

    M. Serbyn, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin and Z. Papi´ c,Power-Law Entanglement Spectrum in Many-Body Localized Phases,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 160601 [1605.05737]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Lahtinen and J

    V. Lahtinen and J. K. Pachos,A Short Introduction to Topological Quantum Computation,SciPost Phys.3(2017) 021 [1705.04103]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [28]

    J. K. Pachos,Introduction to Topological Quantum Computation. Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  23. [29]

    Federbush,A two-dimensional relativistic field theory,Phys

    P. Federbush,A two-dimensional relativistic field theory,Phys. Rev.121(1961) 1247–1249

    1961

  24. [30]

    Federbush,Operator equations in two field theory models,Prog

    P. Federbush,Operator equations in two field theory models,Prog. of Theo. Phys.26 (1961) 148–150

    1961

  25. [31]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, S. Negro and F. Sailis,Boundary quantum field theories perturbed byT ¯T: Towards a form factor program,Nucl. Phys. B1017(2025) 116924 [2501.11647]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Bianchini and O

    D. Bianchini and O. A. Castro-Alvaredo,Branch Point Twist Field Correlators in the Massive Free Boson Theory,Nucl. Phys.B913(2016) 879–911 [1607.05656]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [33]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo and E. Levi,Higher particle form factors of branch point twist fields in integrable quantum field theories,J. Phys. A44(2011) 255401 [1103.2069]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [34]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, M. Lencs´ es, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi and J. Viti,Entanglement Oscillations near a Quantum Critical Point,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 23 230601 [2001.10007]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [35]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo and D. X. Horv´ ath,Branch point twist field form factors in the sine-Gordon model I: Breather fusion and entanglement dynamics,SciPost Phys.10 (2021), no. 6 132 [2103.08492]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Fring, G

    A. Fring, G. Mussardo and P. Simonetti,Form-factors for integrable Lagrangian field theories, the sinh-Gordon theory,Nucl. Phys. B393(1993) 413–441 [hep-th/9211053]

    1993 arXiv

  31. [37]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Two point correlation function in scaling lee-yang model,Nucl. Phys.B348(1991) 619–641

    1991

  32. [38]

    V. P. Yurov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Correlation functions of integrable 2-D models of relativistic field theory. Ising model,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6(1991) 3419–3440

    1991

  33. [39]

    Fring, G

    A. Fring, G. Mussardo and P. Simonetti,Form-factors of the elementary field in the bullough-dodd model,Phys. Lett.B307(1993) 83–90 [hep-th/9303108]. 13

    1993 arXiv

  34. [40]

    S. L. Lukyanov,Form factors of exponential fields in the sine-gordon model,Mod. Phys. Lett.A12(1997) 2543–2550 [hep-th/9703190]

    1997 arXiv

  35. [42]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo and A. Fring,Identifying the operator content, the homogeneous sine- Gordon models,Nucl. Phys.B604(2001) 367–390 [hep-th/0008044]

    2001 arXiv

  36. [43]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, A. Fring and C. Korff,Form factors of the homogeneous sine-Gordon models,Phys. Lett.B484(2000) 167–176 [hep-th/0004089]

    2000 arXiv

  37. [44]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo and A. Fring,Renormalization group flow with unstable particles, Phys. Rev.D63(2001) 021701 [hep-th/0008208]

    2001 arXiv

  38. [45]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo and A. Fring,Decoupling theSUpNq 2 homogeneous sine-Gordon model,Phys. Rev.D64(2001) 085007 [hep-th/0010262]

    2001 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Takacs,Form-factors of boundary exponential operators in the sinh-Gordon model, Nucl

    G. Takacs,Form-factors of boundary exponential operators in the sinh-Gordon model, Nucl. Phys. B801(2008), no. 3 187–206 [0801.0962]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Karowski and P

    M. Karowski and P. Weisz,Exact s matrices and form-factors in (1+1)-dimensional field theoretic models with soliton behavior,Nucl. Phys.B139(1978) 455–476

    1978

  41. [48]

    Smirnov,Form factors in completely integrable models of quantum field theory,Adv

    F. Smirnov,Form factors in completely integrable models of quantum field theory,Adv. Series in Math. Phys.14(1992) World Scientific, Singapore

    1992

  42. [49]

    Singh and C

    L. Singh and C. Hagen,Current definition and a generalized federbush model,Ann. of Phys.115(1978) 136–152

    1978

  43. [50]

    S. E. Korenblit and V. V. Semenov,Massless pseudoscalar fields and solution of the Federbush model,J. Nonlin. Math. Phys.13(2006) 271–284 [hep-th/0508015]

    2006 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Bostelmann, D

    H. Bostelmann, D. Cadamuro and J. Mandrysch,Quantum Energy Inequalities in Integrable Models with Several Particle Species and Bound States,Ann. Henri Poincare25 (2024), no. 10 4497–4542 [2302.00063]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    C. R. Fernandez-Pousa, M. V. Gallas, T. J. Hollowood and J. L. Miramontes,Solitonic integrable perturbations of parafermionic theories,Nucl. Phys.B499(1997) 673–689 [hep-th/9701109]

    1997 arXiv

  46. [53]

    C. R. Fernandez-Pousa and J. L. Miramontes,Semi-classical spectrum of the homogeneous sine-Gordon theories,Nucl. Phys.B518(1998) 745–769 [hep-th/9706203]

    1998 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Fernandez-Pousa, M

    C. Fernandez-Pousa, M. Gallas, T. Hollowood and J. Miramontes,The symmetric space and homogeneous sine-Gordon theories,Nucl. Phys.B484(1997) 609–630 [hep-th/9606032]

    1997 arXiv

  48. [55]

    H. J. Schulz and B. S. Shastry,A new class of exactly solvable interacting fermion models in one dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998), no. 9 1924–1927. 14

    1998

  49. [56]

    Kundu,Exact solution of double delta function Bose gas through interacting anyon gas, Phys

    A. Kundu,Exact solution of double delta function Bose gas through interacting anyon gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 1275–1278 [hep-th/9811247]

    1999 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Bernard and A

    D. Bernard and A. LeClair,Differential equations for Sine-Gordon correlation functions at the free fermion point,Nucl. Phys. B426(1994) 534–558 [hep-th/9402144]

    1994 arXiv

  51. [58]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo and B. Doyon,Bi-partite entanglement entropy in massive QFT with a boundary: The Ising model,J. Statist. Phys.134(2009) 105–145 [0810.0219]

    2009 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement entropy of two disjoint intervals in conformal field theory,J. Stat. Mech.0911(2009) P11001 [0905.2069]

    2009 arXiv

  53. [60]

    V. Alba, L. Tagliacozzo and P. Calabrese,Entanglement entropy of two disjoint blocks in critical Ising models,Phys. Rev. B81(2010) 060411 [0910.0706]

    2010 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Caraglio and F

    M. Caraglio and F. Gliozzi,Entanglement Entropy and Twist Fields,JHEP11(2008) 076 [0808.4094]

    2008 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement negativity in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 130502 [1206.3092]

    2012 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement negativity in extended systems: A field theoretical approach,J. Stat. Mech.1302(2013) P02008 [1210.5359]

    2013 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Calabrese, L

    P. Calabrese, L. Tagliacozzo and E. Tonni,Entanglement negativity in the critical Ising chain,J. Stat. Mech.1305(2013) P05002 [1302.1113]

    2013 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Coser, E

    A. Coser, E. Tonni and P. Calabrese,Towards the entanglement negativity of two disjoint intervals for a one dimensional free fermion,J. Stat. Mech.1603(2016), no. 3 033116 [1508.00811]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Blondeau-Fournier, O

    O. Blondeau-Fournier, O. Castro-Alvaredo and B. Doyon,Universal scaling of the logarithmic negativity in massive quantum field theory,J. Phys.A49(2016), no. 12 125401 [1508.04026]

    2016 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Delfino, G

    G. Delfino, G. Mussardo and P. Simonetti,Nonintegrable quantum field theories as perturbations of certain integrable models,Nucl. Phys. B473(1996) 469–508 [hep-th/9603011]

    1996 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Delfino,Quantum quenches with integrable pre-quench dynamics,J

    G. Delfino,Quantum quenches with integrable pre-quench dynamics,J. Phys. A47(2014), no. 40 402001 [1405.6553]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Delfino and J

    G. Delfino and J. Viti,On the theory of quantum quenches in near-critical systems,J. Phys. A50(2017), no. 8 084004 [1608.07612]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Emonts and I

    P. Emonts and I. Kukuljan,Reduced density matrix and entanglement of interacting quantum field theories with Hamiltonian truncation,Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022), no. 3 033039 [2202.11113]

    2022 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Delfino and M

    G. Delfino and M. Sorba,Persistent oscillations after quantum quenches in d dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B974(2022) 115643 [2107.13240]. 15

    2022 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Delfino and M

    G. Delfino and M. Sorba,Quantum quenches from an excited state,Nucl. Phys. B994 (2023) 116312 [2304.02314]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [73]

    M. D. Girardeau,Anyon-fermion mapping and applications to ultracold gases in tight waveguides,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006), no. 10 [cond-mat/0604357]

    2006 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Santachiara, F

    R. Santachiara, F. Stauffer and D. C. Cabra,Entanglement properties and momentum distributions of hard-core anyons on a ring,J. Stat. Mech.2007(2007), no. 05 L05003–L05003 [cond-mat/0610402]

    2007 arXiv

  68. [76]

    H. Guo, Y. Hao and S. Chen,Quantum entanglement of particles on a ring with fractional statistics,Phys. Rev. A80(2009) 052332 [0906.0536]

    2009 arXiv

  69. [77]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, C. De Fazio, B. Doyon and I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi,Entanglement Content of Quasiparticle Excitations,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 17 170602 [1805.04948]

    2018 arXiv

  70. [78]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, C. De Fazio, B. Doyon and I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi,Entanglement content of quantum particle excitations. Part I. Free field theory,JHEP10(2018) 039 [1806.03247]

    2018 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Capizzi, O

    L. Capizzi, O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, C. De Fazio, M. Mazzoni and L. Santamar ´ ıa-Sanz, Symmetry resolved entanglement of excited states in quantum field theory. Part I. Free theories, twist fields and qubits,JHEP12(2022) 127 [2203.12556]

    2022 arXiv

  72. [80]

    A. G. Bytsko and A. Fring,Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz with Haldane statistics,Nucl. Phys. B532(1998) 588–608 [hep-th/9803005]

    1998 arXiv

  73. [81]

    A. G. Bytsko,Haldane-Wu statistics and Rogers dilogarithm,Zap. Nauchn. Semin.291 (2002) 64–77 [math-ph/0211026]. 16

    2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.