Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.13843 v5 pith:XWSMCQMG submitted 2021-09-28 eess.SP

Deep Neural Network-aided Soft-Demapping in Optical Coherent Systems: Regression versus Classification

classification eess.SP
keywords opticalchannelclassificationcoherentcross-entropylearninglossnonlinear
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We examine here what type of predictive modelling, classification, or regression, using neural networks (NN), fits better the task of soft-demapping based post-processing in coherent optical communications, where the transmission channel is nonlinear and dispersive. For the first time, we present possible drawbacks in using each type of predictive task in a machine learning context, considering the nonlinear coherent optical channel equalization/soft-demapping problem. We study two types of equalizers based on the feed-forward and recurrent NNs, for several transmission scenarios, in linear and nonlinear regimes of the optical channel. We point out that even though from the information theory perspective the cross-entropy loss (classification) is the most suitable option for our problem, the NN models based on the cross-entropy loss function can severely suffer from learning problems. The latter translates into the fact that regression-based learning is typically superior in terms of delivering higher Q-factor and achievable information rates. In short, we show by empirical evidence that loss functions based on cross-entropy may not be necessarily the most suitable option for training communication systems in practical scenarios when overfitting- and vanishing gradients-related problems come into play.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.