Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 103 references

Milnor metric for Morse--Smale flows from field theory

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The axial-gauge partition function of Abelian BF theory recovers the Milnor metric for Morse–Smale flows.

desk verdict Solid axial-gauge computation of the Milnor metric for MS flows via two-step BV pushforward; the det'(ι_V)=1 step is the only real soft joint and is load-bearing for the strongest claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24238 v1 pith:XXIY5Z5K submitted 2026-07-27 math-ph math.ATmath.DGmath.MP

Giovanni Molinari , Michele Schiavina This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.ATmath.DGmath.MP MSC 58J5237C3081T7057Q1037D15
keywords AbelianBFtheoryBatalin-VilkoviskyformalismMilnormetricMorse-SmaleflowsRuellezetafunctionanalytictorsionFriedconjectureBVpushforward
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that quantizing Abelian BF theory with a Morse–Smale vector field as axial gauge fixing produces, as its partition function, the Milnor metric on the determinant line of the twisted cohomology. The calculation uses the Batalin–Vilkovisky formalism and proceeds by a two-step pushforward to cohomology: the first step integrates out non-zero modes and recovers the Ruelle dynamical zeta function at zero; the second step integrates the residual zero-resonant states and recovers the combinatorial torsion of the Thom–Smale complex. Those two factors together are precisely the Milnor metric, the natural extension of the Ruelle zeta to flows that possess both closed orbits and critical points. Because the same theory in the metric (Lorenz) gauge is already known to yield the Ray–Singer analytic torsion, the equality of the two gauge-fixed partition functions supplies a field-theoretic reading of Fried’s conjecture, which holds for Morse–Smale flows. A reader who cares about the link between dynamics and topology therefore obtains a single quadratic path integral whose gauge choices interchange spectral and dynamical invariants.

What carries the argument

The two-step BV pushforward built on the chain-homotopy identity I = π_0 + d_∇ ∘ h_V + h_V ∘ d_∇ for the Lie derivative along the Morse–Smale field. The first pushforward extracts the Ruelle factor as a flat superdeterminant of the restricted Lie derivative; the second, after an isometric identification with the Thom–Smale complex, extracts its combinatorial torsion.

What would settle it

An independent flat-trace computation of the determinant of the interior product on the fluctuation sector that returns a value other than 1, or a direct evaluation of the axial partition function that differs from the known Milnor metric by a non-trivial multiplicative dynamical factor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

After a double BV pushforward onto cohomology, the absolute value of the axial-gauge partition function of twisted Abelian BF theory equals the Milnor metric on the determinant line of the twisted de Rham cohomology: |Z^V_BF| = ∥μ_H∥_{M,V}. The dynamical factor is the Ruelle zeta evaluated at zero; the fixed-point factor is the torsion of the Thom–Smale complex.

Load-bearing premise

After the Morse–Smale vector field is normalised to unit length, the regularised determinant of the interior-product operator that defines the axial gauge can be set identically to one.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gauge-fixing independence of the Abelian BF partition function is equivalent to equality of the Ray–Singer and Milnor metrics for Morse–Smale flows.
  • The Milnor metric is the natural generalisation of the Ruelle zeta at zero once fixed points are admitted.
  • The same double-pushforward strategy realises the Fukaya–Morse A_∞ structure in the non-Abelian theory.
  • Analytic torsion and dynamical zeta functions become interchangeable outputs of one quadratic field theory under different Lagrangian choices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The axial-gauge construction should extend, with suitable anisotropic spaces, to any flow class for which Pollicott–Ruelle resonances are defined.
  • Triviality of the interior-product Jacobian is the field-theoretic counterpart of the fact that contraction vanishes on the zero-resonant complex.
  • Both gauges can be evaluated numerically on a low-dimensional manifold carrying an explicit Morse–Smale flow, giving a direct numerical check of the metric equality.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies Abelian BF theory on a closed oriented manifold with a flat unitary twist, in the BV formalism, under two gauge fixings. In the Lorenz/metric gauge it recovers (after a first BV pushforward onto harmonic fields) the Ray–Singer torsion, following Schwarz and [HKS20]. In the axial gauge defined by contraction with a C^∞-linearisable, non-aligned Morse–Smale vector field V, it uses the Dang–Rivière anisotropic Sobolev framework: the chain homotopy I = π_0 + d_∇h_V + h_Vd_∇ splits the field space into zero-resonant states plus fluctuations, a first BV pushforward yields R_{V,ρ}(0)^{(−1)^n} times a Jacobian factor |det′(ι_V)|^{−1}, and a second pushforward onto the cohomology of the resonant complex yields the Thom–Smale torsion via an isometric isomorphism Φ between the resonant and Thom–Smale complexes. After arguing in §8.1 that det′(ι_V)=1 by normalising V to V̂ = V/‖V‖, the main claim (Corollary 8.15) is that the absolute value of the axial partition function equals the Milnor metric ∥μ_H∥_{M,V} = |τ(C^•_TS)|·|R_{V,ρ}(0)|^{−1}, thereby reinterpreting the Shen–Yu proof of Fried's conjecture for Morse–Smale flows as gauge-fixing independence of the BF partition function.

Significance. If the argument is completed, the paper gives a conceptually appealing field-theoretic interpretation of the equality of the Ray–Singer and Milnor metrics for Morse–Smale flows (proved analytically by Shen–Yu [SY21]) as gauge-fixing independence of Abelian BF theory, extending the Anosov/Reeb results of [HKS20, SS24] to the non-acyclic setting with zero modes. Strengths worth naming: the derivation is parameter-free (the only non-standard input is the normalisation claim det'(ι_V)=1); the intermediate results — the isometric isomorphism of the resonant and Thom–Smale complexes (Thms 4.9–4.10), the spectral realisation of R_{V,ρ}(0) via flat determinants (Thm 5.21), and the double BV pushforward isolating closed-orbit and fixed-point contributions separately — are explicit and independently checkable; and the central identity |Z^V_BF| = ∥μ_H∥_{M,V} is a concrete, falsifiable statement that can be tested against [SY21]. The paper is careful not to claim a new proof of Fried's conjecture, framing the result as a reinterpretation conditional on gauge-fixing independence in infinite dimensions, which is the appropriate posture.

major comments (3)
  1. [§8.1, Prop. 8.21, Lemmas 8.18–8.19, Eq. (120)] Section 8.1, Proposition 8.21 and Lemmas 8.18–8.19 (the step det'(i_V)=1, load-bearing for Theorem 8.10 and Corollary 8.15). The argument has three gaps. (a) The 'removable singularity' claim after Eq. (113) conflates the norm with the direction: near a hyperbolic fixed point V(x)=Ax+O(x^2), so \hat V = V/\|V\|_g has no continuous limit at the fixed point unless A is scalar. Consequently f=1/\|V\|_g fails the smooth strictly-positive hypothesis of Lemma 8.18 globally, the reparametrisation of integral curves is justified only on M minus the critical set, and the statement in the proof of Proposition 8.21 that g(\hat V,\hat V)=1 'everywhere on M' is literally false at the fixed points — precisely the locus supporting the zero-resonant currents U_{a,j} (Remark 3.8). (b) The key identity |det'(i_V)| = |det'(i_{\hat V})| (Eq. 120) is justified only by the sentence 'the formal expression of t
  2. [Cor. 8.15 vs. Thm 5.21, Cor. 8.8, Def. 8.14] There is an unresolved parity/sign discrepancy in the central identification. Theorem 5.21 gives R_{V,rho}(0) = prod_k det^flat(eL^{(k)})^{(-1)^{n+k}}, and Definition 8.6/Corollary 8.8/Theorem 8.10 therefore yield Z ~ R_{V,rho}(0)^{(-1)^n} (Eqs. 101 and 107). But Definition 8.14 defines the Milnor metric with the factor |R_{V,rho}(0)|^{-1}. Corollary 8.15 (|Z^V_BF| = ||mu_H||_{M,V}) thus follows from the manuscript's own equations only when n is odd. No parity hypothesis on dim M appears anywhere in the geometric setup (Section 3 conventions or Appendix A), and even-dimensional manifolds admitting Morse–Smale flows with closed orbits exist, in which case |Z| = |tau(C_TS)|·|R(0)|^{+1} ≠ ||mu_H||_{M,V} generically. The odd-dimensional case subsumes the contact/Anosov setting of [HKS20], which may explain how the sign was inherited unnoticed. The authors must either restrict the main theore
  3. [Def. 8.6, Eq. (99), Def. 8.20] The quantity det'(i_V) appears in Definition 8.6 (Eq. 99) and in Theorem 8.10 but is never defined: Definition 8.20 defines only det'(i_{\hat V}) for the normalised field, and the bridge is the unproved invariance (120). Independently of the regularisation issue in the first comment, the manuscript should give a standalone definition of det'(i_V) (domain, target, regularisation, and the subspace on which the determinant is taken — note i_V is not an endomorphism of a fixed space, so the analogy with det(d_nabla) in Eq. (89) requires care: det(d_nabla) maps between different form degrees but is treated via d^dagger d; an analogous self-map for i_V is i_V o (V^flat wedge), which is multiplication by \|V\|^2, not the identity, off the gauge-fixing subspace).
minor comments (7)
  1. [Prop. 8.5, proof] The proof states 'noting that eta^{(k+1)} can be chosen such that d_nabla eta^{(k+1)}=0' in order to replace d_nabla i_V eta by L_{V,nabla} eta. The primitive eta of A = i_V eta is defined only modulo ker(i_V), and it is not obvious a d_nabla-closed representative exists in Im(I - pi_0); alternatively, show directly that the extra term B wedge i_V d_nabla eta integrates to zero for B in the axial Lagrangian. A sentence of justification is needed since this identity produces the quadratic form (98) on which the first pushforward relies.
  2. [Cor. 7.9, proof] The proof invokes 'Equation (90)' to substitute sdet^flat(d_nabla^dagger) = |sdet^flat(d_nabla^dagger d_nabla)|^{1/2}, but Equation (90) is the restricted action functional; the intended reference is presumably Equation (89).
  3. [Diagram after Cor. 8.8] The commutative diagram following Corollary 8.8 is introduced without labels on the arrows or a caption; the identification of eF^{(1)}_BF with Ker(eDelta) is only explained afterwards. Please label the maps (BV pushforwards vs. isomorphisms) and state in which category the diagram commutes.
  4. [Thm 8.10 / Cor. 8.15 hypotheses] The hypotheses 'non-aligned' (Proposition 3.7) and 'C^infty-linearisable' (Definition A.7) are used throughout Sections 4–8 but are not restated in the statements of Theorem 8.10 or Corollary 8.15; the main results should be self-contained about their assumptions. Relatedly, Remark 3.9 covers the non-singular case, but the standing hypotheses when closed orbits are absent (pure gradient-like flows) versus present could be stated once, globally.
  5. [Def. 8.20 notation] Definition 8.20 should specify the graded subspace on which det' is computed and whether the superdeterminant or the ordinary determinant is intended; as written the notation det' conflicts with the use of det' in Appendix C (product of nonzero eigenvalues of a finite-dimensional Laplacian).
  6. [Passim: typography] Numerous typographical artifacts appear throughout (likely from text extraction): 'GIOV ANNI MOLINARI AND MICHELE SCHIA VINA' in the running head, 'heuristically though of' (Section 2.1), 'rests at the foudation' (Section 2.3), 'AbelianBF' (abstract and elsewhere), 'e eta' / 'e F' spacing in Section 8.1. Reference [Se26] is dated 2026 and cited for the canonical BV Laplacian; if it is not yet publicly available, a stable alternative citation should be added.
  7. [Abstract / Remark 8.17] The framing around Fried's conjecture (Remark 8.17 and the abstract) is appropriately hedged ('reinterpreted', 'suggests'), but the abstract's phrase 'provides a field-theoretic realisation of Fried's conjecture, which is true for Morse–Smale flows' could be misread as a new proof; consider adding half a sentence noting that gauge-fixing independence of the infinite-dimensional BF partition function is the conjectural ingredient, with the equality of metrics itself already established in [SY21].

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: axial computation independently targets the Milnor metric; Fried equality is imported as external theorem, not fed back into the axioms.

  1. self citation load bearing [§1 Introduction; Remark 8.17; citations HKS20/SS24]
    "This field-theoretic perspective on Fried’s conjecture was first precisely formulated in the context of Anosov flows in [HKS20]... our findings suggest that this correspondence can be reinterpreted as the requirement for the partition function of the theory to be independent of the choice of gauge-fixing condition."

    Minor only: the Anosov axial-gauge programme and BV language are taken from prior work coauthored by Schiavina. Those citations frame the question but do not supply the Morse–Smale zero-mode computation, the Thom–Smale identification, or the value of the partition function; the MS-specific derivation is independent. Not load-bearing for Corollary 8.15.

full rationale

The paper’s central computational claim (Corollary 8.15) is that the absolute value of the axial-gauge BF partition function equals the Milnor metric. That claim is obtained by an explicit two-stage BV pushforward: the first stage produces the Ruelle factor R_{V,ρ}(0) from flat determinants of the restricted Lie derivative (Theorem 5.21, via Guillemin/Dang–Rivière trace formulae), and the second stage produces the Thom–Smale torsion after an isometric identification of the zero-resonant complex with the Thom–Smale complex (Theorems 4.9–4.10 and 8.10). Neither factor is defined in terms of the Milnor metric, nor fitted to it. Fried’s equality Ray–Singer = Milnor is cited from the external theorem of Shen–Yu [SY21] only after both gauge computations are finished, and only to reinterpret the known equality as gauge-fixing independence (Remark 8.17); the paper does not use that equality as an input to either computation. Self-citations (HKS20, SS24) supply the Anosov/BV framework but are not load-bearing for the Morse–Smale zero-mode analysis, which rests on Dang–Rivière spectral theory. The potentially delicate step det'(ι_V)=1 (§8.1) is an independent (and contestable) regularisation argument, not a definitional loop or a fitted-input-as-prediction. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives. Score 1 reflects only routine framework self-citation, not circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The result rests on standard differential geometry, the spectral theory of Morse–Smale flows developed in DR17a–c, the definition of Milnor metric in SY21, and the BV formalism. No free parameters are fitted. The only domain-specific hypotheses are the non-aligned C^∞-linearisable Morse–Smale condition and the conventional normalisation that sets the interior-product Jacobian to 1.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption V is a C^∞-linearisable non-aligned Morse–Smale vector field (so zero is a resonance of finite multiplicity equal to the number of critical points of given index).
    Invoked from Appendix A and Prop. 3.7 onward; guarantees dim C^k_V,∇(0)=N·c_k(V) and vanishing of ι_V on the resonant complex.
  • domain assumption The chain-homotopy equation I=π_0 + d_∇∘h_V + h_V∘d_∇ holds on anisotropic Sobolev spaces (Thm 3.1 / DR17c).
    Primary mechanism that splits fields into residual resonant modes and fluctuations; without it the axial Lagrangian and the first pushforward are undefined.
  • domain assumption Flat-regularised superdeterminants of the restricted Lie derivative equal the Ruelle factors (Thm 5.21).
    Taken from Guillemin trace formula + DR17c; converts the Gaussian integral over fluctuations into R_{V,ρ}(0).
  • ad hoc to paper det'(ι_V)=1 after normalisation of V (Prop. 8.21).
    Justified in §8.1 by reparametrisation invariance and the identity ι_bV∘(bV^♭∧)=Id on the gauge-fixing subspace; if false an extra constant would appear.
  • standard math BV pushforward of a quadratic action satisfying the QME yields an effective action on residual fields whose partition function is the flat superdeterminant (Def. 2.17, §2.7).
    Standard finite-dimensional BV fact extended formally to flat determinants; used for both pushforwards.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Milnor metric for Morse--Smale flows from field theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XXIY5Z5K

@misc{pith2026260724238,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Milnor metric for Morse--Smale flows from field theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XXIY5Z5K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24238}
}
abstract

We study the partition function of Abelian $BF$ theory with an axial gauge fixing condition given by a Morse--Smale vector field, and we show that it recovers the Milnor metric on the determinant line on the twisted cohomology of the manifold. To do this we use the Batalin--Vilkovisky formalism and, in particular, a BV pushforward to cohomology in two steps. In this context, the Milnor metric serves as the generalisation of the Ruelle dynamical zeta function evaluated at zero for systems containing both closed orbits and critical points. This, together with a classic result due to Schwarz on the partition function of $BF$ theory in the Lorenz gauge, provides a field-theoretic realisation of Fried's conjecture, which is true for Morse--Smale flows.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 10 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Morse homotopy and Chern-Simons perturbation theory , volume =

    Fukaya, Kenji , journal =. Morse homotopy and Chern-Simons perturbation theory , volume =

  2. [2]

    , journal =

    Chekeres, Olga and Losev, Andrey and Mnev, Pavel and Youmans, Donald R. , journal =. Two field-theoretic viewpoints on the Fukaya-Morse

  3. [3]

    2026 , eprint=

    Forms, half-densities, and the quantum odd symplectic category in the BV formalism , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  4. [4]

    2009 , journal=

    Notes on simplicial BF theory , author=. 2009 , journal=

    2009

  5. [5]

    BV formalism and quantum homotopical structures, Lectures at GAP3, Perugia

    Losev, A. BV formalism and quantum homotopical structures, Lectures at GAP3, Perugia. 2006

    2006

  6. [6]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , number =

    Wilson Surfaces and Higher Dimensional Knot Invariants , volume =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , number =. 2005 , author =

    2005

  7. [7]

    2011 , author =

    Topological BF field theory description of topological insulators , journal =. 2011 , author =

    2011

  8. [8]

    , journal =

    Witten, E. , journal =. Topological quantum field theory , volume =

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    and Bott, R

    Atiyah, M.F. and Bott, R. , title =. 1964 , publisher =

    1964

  2. [10]

    and Bott, R

    Atiyah, M.F. and Bott, R. , title =. Annals of Mathematics , pages =

  3. [11]

    , title =

    Baladi, V. , title =. 2018 , publisher =

    2018

  4. [12]

    , title =

    Berezin, F.A. , title =. 1983 , publisher =

    1983

  5. [13]

    and Vilkovisky, G.A

    Batalin, I.A. and Vilkovisky, G.A. , title =. Physical Review D , volume =

  6. [14]

    and Vilkovisky, G.A

    Batalin, I.A. and Vilkovisky, G.A. , title =. Quantum Gravity , pages =. 1984 , publisher =

    1984

  7. [15]

    and Fiorenza, D

    Cattaneo, A.S. and Fiorenza, D. and Longoni, R. , title =. Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics , pages =. 2006 , publisher =

    2006

  8. [16]

    Cattaneo, A. S. and Mnev, P. and Reshetikhin, N. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  9. [17]

    and Mnev, P

    Cattaneo, A.S. and Mnev, P. and Reshetikhin, N. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  10. [18]

    and Rossi, C.A

    Cattaneo, A.S. and Rossi, C.A. , title =. Communications in Mathematical physics , volume =

  11. [19]

    Cattaneo, A.S. and Sch. Introduction to supergeometry , journal =

  12. [20]

    and Zworski, M

    Dyatlov, S. and Zworski, M. , title =. Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Sup

  13. [21]

    and Zworski, M

    Dyatlov, S. and Zworski, M. , title =. Inventiones mathematicae , volume =

  14. [22]

    , title =

    Fried, D. , title =. Inventiones mathematicae , volume =

  15. [23]

    , title =

    Fried, D. , title =. Contemporary Mathematics , volume =

  16. [24]

    , title =

    Fried, D. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  17. [25]

    , title =

    Guillemin, V. , title =. Duke Mathematical Journal , volume =

  18. [26]

    , title =

    Mnev, P. , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.3705 , year =

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    , title =

    Mnev, P. , title =. 2019 , publisher =

    2019

  20. [28]

    and Singer, I.M

    Ray, D.B. and Singer, I.M. , title =. Advances in Mathematics , volume =

  21. [29]

    , title =

    Ruelle, D. , title =. Inventiones mathematicae , volume =

  22. [30]

    , title =

    Ruelle, D. , title =. Physical review letters , volume =

  23. [31]

    , title =

    Schwarz, A.S. , title =. Letters in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  24. [32]

    , title =

    Schwarz, A.S. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  25. [33]

    , title =

    Shen, S. , title =. Analysis & PDE , volume =

  26. [34]

    Dang, N. V. and Rivi. Topology of. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.08037 , year =

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Dang, N. V. and Rivi. Spectral analysis of. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.05516 , year =

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Dang, N. V. and Rivi. Spectral analysis of. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.08038 , year =

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Dang, N. V. and Rivi. Spectral analysis of. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.08040 , year =

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    and Kandel, S

    Hadfield, C. and Kandel, S. and Schiavina, M. , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.03952 , year =

    2002 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Lee, J. M. , title =. 2012 , edition =

    2012

  32. [40]

    Lee, J. M. , title =. 2011 , edition =

    2011

  33. [41]

    , title =

    Shen, S. , title =. Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis: Israel Seminar (GAFA) 2017-2019 , editor =

    2017

  34. [42]

    1995 , publisher=

    Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems , author=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  35. [43]

    , title =

    Perko, L. , title =. 2001 , address =

    2001

  36. [44]

    Warner, F. W. , title =. 1983 , address =

    1983

  37. [45]

    and Wu, S

    Mathai, V. and Wu, S. , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:0810.4204v6 , year =

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    , title =

    Hatcher, A. , title =. 2002 , address =

    2002

  39. [47]

    Munkres, J. R. , title =. 2000 , edition =

    2000

  40. [48]

    Lee, J. M. , title =. 2009 , address =

    2009

  41. [49]

    and Zabzine, M

    Qiu, J. and Zabzine, M. , title =. Archivum Mathematicum , volume =. 2011 , note =

    2011

  42. [50]

    , title =

    Mnev, P. , title =. 2017 , note =

    2017

  43. [51]

    Dang, N. V. and Rivi. Pollicott-. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , volume =. 2021 , note =

    2021

  44. [52]

    and Yu, J

    Shen, S. and Yu, J. , title =. Journal de l'\'. 2021 , note =

    2021

  45. [53]

    Cattaneo, A. S. and Mnev, P. and Schiavina, M. , title =. Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics , editor =. 2025 , publisher =

    2025

  46. [54]

    and Stucker, T

    Schiavina, M. and Stucker, T. , journal =. Perturbative BF Theory in Axial, Anosov Gauge , volume =

  47. [55]

    and Stucker, T

    Schiavina, M. and Stucker, T. , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03404 , year =

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    , title =

    Hutchings, M. , title =. 2002 , note =

    2002

  49. [57]

    and Tu, L

    Bott, R. and Tu, L. W. , title =. 1982 , publisher =

    1982

  50. [58]

    Brendon, G. E. , title =. 1997 , publisher =

    1997

  51. [59]

    , title =

    de Rham, G. , title =. 1984 , publisher =

    1984

  52. [60]

    and Harris, J

    Fulton, W. and Harris, J. , title =. 1991 , publisher =

    1991

  53. [61]

    and de Melo, W

    Palis, J. and de Melo, W. , title =. 1982 , publisher =

    1982

  54. [62]

    and Katok, A

    Hasselblatt, B. and Katok, A. , title =. 2003 , publisher =

    2003

  55. [63]

    Marsden, J. E. and Ratiu, T. S. , title =. 1988 , publisher =

    1988

  56. [64]

    , title =

    Hutchings, M. , title =. Forum Mathematicum , volume =. 2002 , note =

    2002

  57. [65]

    and Lee, Y

    Hutchings, M. and Lee, Y. J. , title =. Topology , volume =. 1999 , note =

    1999

  58. [66]

    Bismut, J. M. and Zhang, W. , title =. Geometric and Functional Analysis , volume =

  59. [67]

    Bismut, J. M. and Zhang, W. , title =. 1992 , publisher =

    1992

  60. [68]

    Spectre du flot g

    Gou. Spectre du flot g. S. 2015 , publisher =

    2015

  61. [69]

    and Sternberg, S

    Guillemin, V. and Sternberg, S. , title =. 1990 , edition =

    1990

  62. [70]

    , title =

    Turaev, V. , title =. 2001 , address =

    2001

  63. [71]

    Nicolaescu, L. I. , title =. 2003 , note =

    2003

  64. [72]

    and Carey, A

    Bouwknegt, P. and Carey, A. and Mathai, V. and Murray, M. and Stevenson, D. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =. 2002 , archivePrefix =

    2002

  65. [73]

    , title =

    Smale, S. , title =. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , volume =. 1967 , publisher =

    1967

  66. [74]

    Seeley, R. T. , title =. Singular Integrals (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Chicago, Ill., 1966) , volume =

    1966

  67. [75]

    , title =

    Cheeger, J. , title =. Annals of Mathematics , volume =

  68. [76]

    Analytic torsion and

    M. Analytic torsion and. Advances in Mathematics , volume =

  69. [77]

    Apostol, T. M. , title =. 1976 , address =

    1976

  70. [78]

    Franks, J. M. , title =. 1982 , address =

    1982

  71. [79]

    Faure, F. and Sj. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  72. [80]

    , title =

    Khudaverdian, H. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  73. [81]

    da Silva, A. C. , title =. 2008 , address =

    2008

  74. [82]

    Nicolaescu, L. I. , title =. 2012 , note =

    2012

  75. [83]

    Cattaneo, A. S. and Menger, L. and Schiavina, M. , title =. Journal of High Energy Physics , volume =. 2021 , note =

    2021

  76. [84]

    Cattaneo, A. S. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  77. [85]

    Cattaneo, A. S. and Rossi, C. A. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =. 2001 , note =

    2001

  78. [86]

    Cattaneo, A. S. and Cotta-Ramusino, P. and Martellini, M. , title =. Nuclear Physics B , volume =. 1996 , note =

    1996

  79. [87]

    Phillips, P. W. , title =. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume =. 2020 , note =

    2020

  80. [88]

    Cattaneo, A. S. and Schiavina, M. and Selliah, I. , title =. Letters in Mathematical Physics , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  81. [89]

    Anderson, I. M. , title =. Contemporary Mathematics , volume =

  82. [90]

    and Freed, D

    Deligne, P. and Freed, D. S. , title =. Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians , publisher =

  83. [91]

    , title =

    Henneaux, M. , title =. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements , volume =

  84. [92]

    , title =

    Stasheff, J. , title =. Contemporary Mathematics , volume =

  85. [93]

    Delgado, N. L. , title =

  86. [94]

    and Rejzner, K

    Fredenhagen, K. and Rejzner, K. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  87. [95]

    , title =

    Schwarz, A. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  88. [96]

    Letters in Mathematical Physics , volume =

    On the origin of the. Letters in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  89. [97]

    and Schnitzer, J

    Schiavina, M. and Schnitzer, J. , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00133 , year =

    arXiv

  90. [98]

    , title =

    Blohmann, C. , title =

  91. [99]

    2007 , eprint=

    Renormalisation and the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism , author=. 2007 , eprint=

    2007

  92. [100]

    , title =

    Costello, K. , title =

  93. [101]

    , title =

    Witten, E. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume =

  94. [102]

    Journal of Functional Analysis , volume=

    Hilbert complexes , author=. Journal of Functional Analysis , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  95. [103]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.16719 , year =

    Molinari, Giovanni , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.16719 , year =. 2607.16719 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.