REVIEW 2 cited by
Do observations prove that cosmological neutrinos are thermally distributed?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
It is usually assumed that relic neutrinos possess a Fermi-Dirac distribution, acquired during thermal equilibrium in the Early Universe. However, various mechanisms could introduce strong distortions in this distribution. We perform a Bayesian likelihood analysis including the first moments of the three active neutrino distributions as free parameters, and show that current cosmological observations of light element abundances, Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies and Large Scale Structures (LSS) are compatible with very large deviations from the standard picture. We also calculate the bounds on non-thermal distortions which can be expected from future observations, and stress that CMB and LSS data alone will not be sensitive enough in order to distinguish between non-thermal distortions in the neutrino sector and extra relativistic degrees of freedom. This degeneracy could be removed by additional constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis or independent neutrino mass scale measurements.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Origin of cosmological neutrino mass bounds: background $\textit{versus}$ perturbations
The CMB bound on the sum of neutrino masses comes mostly from the background energy density of massive neutrinos, not from their free-streaming effects.
-
Are Cosmological Data Excluding Sterile Neutrinos or Only the Fully Thermalized Limit?
Cosmological observations constrain the effective abundance of light sterile neutrinos tightly while allowing non-fully-thermalized realizations to remain viable across LambdaCDM and CPL models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.