Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Implicit Neural Representation for Sparse-view Photoacoustic Computed Tomography

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13696 v1 pith:XZSENEJS submitted 2024-09-04 eess.IV

Implicit Neural Representation for Sparse-view Photoacoustic Computed Tomography

classification eess.IV
keywords artefactserrorsimagemethodsreconstructionacquisitioncomputedcoordinates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

High-quality imaging in photoacoustic computed tomography (PACT) usually requires a high-channel count system for dense spatial sampling around the object to avoid aliasing-related artefacts. To reduce system complexity, various image reconstruction approaches, such as model-based (MB) and deep learning based methods, have been explored to mitigate the artefacts associated with sparse-view acquisition. However, the explored methods formulated the reconstruction problem in a discrete framework, making it prone to measurement errors, discretization errors, and the extend of the ill-poseness of the problem scales with the discretization resolution. In this work, an implicit neural representation (INR) framework is proposed for image reconstruction in PACT with ring transducer arrays to address these issues. pecially, the initial heat distribution is represented as a continuous function of spatial coordinates using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP). The weights of the MLP are then determined by a training process in a self-supervised manner, by minimizing the errors between the measured and model predicted PA signals. After training, PA images can be mapped by feeding the coordinates to the network. Simulation and phantom experiments showed that the INR method performed best in preserving image fidelity and in artefacts suppression for the same acquisition condition, compared to universal back-projection and MB methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.