Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cited Text Spans for Citation Text Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.06365 v2 pith:XZXQK26C submitted 2023-09-12 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords citedcitationtextgenerationabstractproposescientificsystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An automatic citation generation system aims to concisely and accurately describe the relationship between two scientific articles. To do so, such a system must ground its outputs to the content of the cited paper to avoid non-factual hallucinations. Due to the length of scientific documents, existing abstractive approaches have conditioned only on cited paper abstracts. We demonstrate empirically that the abstract is not always the most appropriate input for citation generation and that models trained in this way learn to hallucinate. We propose to condition instead on the cited text span (CTS) as an alternative to the abstract. Because manual CTS annotation is extremely time- and labor-intensive, we experiment with distant labeling of candidate CTS sentences, achieving sufficiently strong performance to substitute for expensive human annotations in model training, and we propose a human-in-the-loop, keyword-based CTS retrieval approach that makes generating citation texts grounded in the full text of cited papers both promising and practical.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Select, Read, and Write: A Multi-Agent Framework of Full-Text-based Related Work Generation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-agent reader-selector-writer framework improves generated related-work sections by reading full texts in a graph-guided order and compressing key information into shared memory.

Pith tools