Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On Background Bias in Deep Metric Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.01615 v1 pith:XZYGAAY3 submitted 2022-10-04 cs.CV cs.IR

classification cs.CVcs.IR
keywords backgroundimageimagesmetricretrievaldeeplearningitems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Metric Learning trains a neural network to map input images to a lower-dimensional embedding space such that similar images are closer together than dissimilar images. When used for item retrieval, a query image is embedded using the trained model and the closest items from a database storing their respective embeddings are returned as the most similar items for the query. Especially in product retrieval, where a user searches for a certain product by taking a photo of it, the image background is usually not important and thus should not influence the embedding process. Ideally, the retrieval process always returns fitting items for the photographed object, regardless of the environment the photo was taken in. In this paper, we analyze the influence of the image background on Deep Metric Learning models by utilizing five common loss functions and three common datasets. We find that Deep Metric Learning networks are prone to so-called background bias, which can lead to a severe decrease in retrieval performance when changing the image background during inference. We also show that replacing the background of images during training with random background images alleviates this issue. Since we use an automatic background removal method to do this background replacement, no additional manual labeling work and model changes are required while inference time stays the same. Qualitative and quantitative analyses, for which we introduce a new evaluation metric, confirm that models trained with replaced backgrounds attend more to the main object in the image, benefitting item retrieval systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools