Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Taylor-Culick retractions and the influence of the surroundings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.13400 v2 pith:Y22XAOKX submitted 2022-02-27 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.soft

classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.soft
keywords filmretractiontaylor-culickvelocitysurroundingsviscousconfigurationmedium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

When a freely suspended liquid film ruptures, it retracts spontaneously under the action of surface tension. If the film is surrounded by air, the retraction velocity is known to approach the constant Taylor-Culick velocity. However, when surrounded by an external viscous medium, the dissipation within that medium dictates the magnitude of the retraction velocity. In the present work, we study the retraction of a liquid (water) film in a viscous oil ambient (\emph{two-phase} Taylor-Culick retractions), and that sandwiched between air and a viscous oil (\emph{three-phase} Taylor-Culick retractions). In the latter case, the experimentally-measured retraction velocity is observed to have a weaker dependence on the viscosity of the oil phase as compared to the configuration where the water film is surrounded completely by oil. Numerical simulations indicate that this weaker dependence arises from the localization of viscous dissipation near the three-phase contact line. The speed of retraction only depends on the viscosity of the surrounding medium and not on that of the film. From the experiments and the numerical simulations, we reveal unprecedented regimes for the scaling of the Weber number $We_f$ of the film (based on its retraction velocity) or the capillary number $Ca_s$ of the surroundings vs. the Ohnesorge number $Oh_s$ of the surroundings in the regime of large viscosity of the surroundings ($Oh_s \gg 1$), namely $We_f \sim Oh_s^{-2}$ and $Ca_s \sim Oh_s^{0}$ for the two-phase Taylor-Culick configuration, and $We_f \sim Oh_s^{-1}$ and $Ca_s \sim Oh_s^{1/2}$ for the three-phase Taylor-Culick configuration.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools