Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey on the Robustness of Computer Vision Models against Common Corruptions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.06024 v4 pith:Y23GODNA submitted 2023-05-10 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords robustnessmodelsvisioncomputercorruptionscommondatalearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The performance of computer vision models are susceptible to unexpected changes in input images caused by sensor errors or extreme imaging environments, known as common corruptions (e.g. noise, blur, illumination changes). These corruptions can significantly hinder the reliability of these models when deployed in real-world scenarios, yet they are often overlooked when testing model generalization and robustness. In this survey, we present a comprehensive overview of methods that improve the robustness of computer vision models against common corruptions. We categorize methods into three groups based on the model components and training methods they target: data augmentation, learning strategies, and network components. We release a unified benchmark framework (available at \url{https://github.com/nis-research/CorruptionBenchCV}) to compare robustness performance across several datasets, and we address the inconsistencies of evaluation practices in the literature. Our experimental analysis highlights the base corruption robustness of popular vision backbones, revealing that corruption robustness does not necessarily scale with model size and data size. Large models gain negligible robustness improvements, considering the increased computational requirements. To achieve generalizable and robust computer vision models, we foresee the need of developing new learning strategies that efficiently exploit limited data and mitigate unreliable learning behaviors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RT-VLM: Re-Thinking Vision Language Model with 4-Clues for Real-World Object Recognition Robustness

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning a vision-language model on a synthetic 4-clue dataset and adding a self-critique inference loop improves robustness to domain shifts in object recognition.

  2. Look Within or Look Beyond? A Theoretical Comparison Between Parameter-Efficient and Full Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims PEFT is a strict, less robust, lower-capacity subset of full fine-tuning, but the mathematical proofs contain load-bearing errors and the experiments, while suggestive, cannot repair them.

Pith tools