Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A comparison of two different mechanisms for deterministic spin orbit torque magnetization switching

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.05468 v1 pith:Y3SMMJAK submitted 2020-03-11 cond-mat.mes-hall

classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords switchingmagnetizationbiasdeterministicfieldfield-freeanisotropymechanisms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this article we analyze by modeling two possible mechanisms for magnetization switching using spin orbit torques, which have been reported to cause field-free deterministic switching in experiments. Here we compare the field-free magnetization switching due to a tilt of the anisotropy direction against the use of an antiferromagnetic bias field. Simple results obtained analytically show that a bias field not only causes the magnetization reversal but also reduces the corresponding energy barrier. The critical current required for magnetization switching is analyzed on the basis of a macrospin model. It is shown that although the field-free deterministic switching caused by a tilt of the anisotropy is more robust than the bias field in the development of memory elements, a compromise between requirements has to be adopted when selecting the parameters for specific applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools