The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2406.10059 · v1 · pith:Y53TF3BM · submitted 2024-06-14 · cs.RO

Double-Anonymous Review for Robotics

Justin K. Yim , Paul Nadan , James Zhu , Alexandra Stutt , J. Joe Payne , Catherine Pavlov , Aaron M. Johnson This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:Y53TF3BMrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.RO
keywords reviewpeerresearchroboticsdouble-anonymouspriorattemptedbenefits
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Prior research has investigated the benefits and costs of double-anonymous review (DAR, also known as double-blind review) in comparison to single-anonymous review (SAR) and open review (OR). Several review papers have attempted to compile experimental results in peer review research both broadly and in engineering and computer science. This document summarizes prior research in peer review that may inform decisions about the format of peer review in the field of robotics and makes some recommendations for potential next steps for robotics publication.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.