Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Bias-Variance Tradeoff of Doubly Robust Estimator with Targeted L₁ regularized Neural Networks Predictions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.00990 v1 pith:Y5RAS2IX submitted 2021-08-02 stat.ME stat.APstat.ML

The Bias-Variance Tradeoff of Doubly Robust Estimator with Targeted L₁ regularized Neural Networks Predictions

classification stat.ME stat.APstat.ML
keywords algorithmspredictionstreatmentconfoundersestimatormodelstepbias-variance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Doubly Robust (DR) estimation of ATE can be carried out in 2 steps, where in the first step, the treatment and outcome are modeled, and in the second step the predictions are inserted into the DR estimator. The model misspecification in the first step has led researchers to utilize Machine Learning algorithms instead of parametric algorithms. However, existence of strong confounders and/or Instrumental Variables (IVs) can lead the complex ML algorithms to provide perfect predictions for the treatment model which can violate the positivity assumption and elevate the variance of DR estimators. Thus the ML algorithms must be controlled to avoid perfect predictions for the treatment model while still learn the relationship between the confounders and the treatment and outcome. We use two Neural network architectures and investigate how their hyperparameters should be tuned in the presence of confounders and IVs to achieve a low bias-variance tradeoff for ATE estimators such as DR estimator. Through simulation results, we will provide recommendations as to how NNs can be employed for ATE estimation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.