Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Planning under Uncertainty to Goal Distributions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.04782 v3 pith:Y66WDH5X submitted 2020-11-09 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords planningdistributionsgoalgoalsprobabilityproblemsuncertaintyapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Goals for planning problems are typically conceived of as subsets of the state space. However, for many practical planning problems in robotics, we expect the robot to predict goals, e.g. from noisy sensors or by generalizing learned models to novel contexts. In these cases, sets with uncertainty naturally extend to probability distributions. While a few works have used probability distributions as goals for planning, surprisingly no systematic treatment of planning to goal distributions exists in the literature. This article serves to fill that gap. We argue that goal distributions are a more appropriate goal representation than deterministic sets for many robotics applications. We present a novel approach to planning under uncertainty to goal distributions, which we use to highlight several advantages of the goal distribution formulation. We build on previous results in the literature by formally framing our approach as an instance of planning as inference. We additionally derive reductions of several common planning objectives as special cases of our probabilistic planning framework. Our experiments demonstrate the flexibility of probability distributions as a goal representation on a variety of problems including planar navigation among obstacles, intercepting a moving target, rolling a ball to a target location, and a 7-DOF robot arm reaching to grasp an object.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First Plan Then Evaluate: Multi-Target Planning with Post-Planning Success Evaluation Improves Learning-Based Grasping Pipelines

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Planning trajectories to many grasp targets before evaluating them, and scoring the resulting terminal grasps, improves multi-finger grasping success over the standard generate-evaluate-plan order.

Pith tools