Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 32 references

Strong hyperboloidal compactification for the spherical DF-GHG formulation of GR

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In spherical symmetry, the paper shows that the DF-GHG formulation of GR can produce self-convergent numerical evolutions that include future null infinity, with the strongest compactification parameter $n=2$, and that the waves extracted…

desk verdict Real technical advance on n=2 hyperboloidal compactification with credible numerics, but the regularity claim rests on a single test of an unproven asymptotic coefficient. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03078 v1 pith:Y6FKFFPS submitted 2025-06-03 gr-qc

Christian Peterson , David Hilditch This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords numericalrelativityhyperboloidalcompactificationfuturenullinfinitygeneralizedharmonicgaugedualfoliationquasinormalmodesPricetailconstraintaddition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the dual-foliation generalized harmonic gauge (DF-GHG) formulation of general relativity can be evolved numerically all the way to future null infinity ($\mathcal{I}^+$) with the strongest allowed hyperboloidal compactification, the parameter value $n=2$ that makes the setup directly analogous to conformal compactification. It answers yes in spherical symmetry, provided three ingredients are chosen together: a specific pair of gauge source functions, a specific constraint addition that converts formally singular terms into regular ones, and reduction fields rescaled with the correct powers of the areal radius. With those choices the dangerous denominator $R'(1-H'C_+)$ is made regular by writing $C_+ = 1 + m_{C_+}/R + \hat C_+/R^2$. The numerical evolutions are self-convergent at second order, and for small scalar-field perturbations of Schwarzschild the field extracted directly at $\mathcal{I}^+$ shows quasinormal ringing followed by a $t^{-2}$ tail, with the Bondi mass decreasing monotonically and settling to a constant. A reader should care because this is evidence that the strongest compactification, previously out of reach in this formulation, can be used in practice, opening a direct comparison with conformal methods.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the hyperboloidal compactification $R(r)=r/(1-r^2/r_I^2)$, the $n=2$ member of the family $R(r)=r/\Omega(r)^{1/(n-1)}$, combined with the height function $H(R)=R-m_{C_+}\ln R - r$ that lifts Cauchy slices so that they intersect future null infinity. What carries the argument is the Jacobian denominator $R'(1-H'C_+)$: it becomes formally singular at $\mathcal{I}^+$ unless $C_+$ is expanded to second order and its incoming null derivative is rescaled with a full power $R^2$. Equally load-bearing are the Good-Bad-Ugly-F decay rates, a model classification of wave equations by their falloff at null infinity, which dictate which fields need which rescaling, and the constraint addition that substitutes regular combinations for formally singular terms in the evolution equations for $\Theta_-$ and $\Delta_-$.

What would settle it

Evolve the identical initial data at $n=2$ while tracking $\hat C_+$ at $\mathcal{I}^+$: if this coefficient grows without bound, or if the Jacobian denominator $R'(1-H'C_+)$ vanishes on the grid, the regularization is only apparent. Independently, if the $n=2$ results do not converge, under resolution increase, to the same extracted waveform obtained with $n<2$ (where formally singular terms have trivial limits), the claim that $n=2$ captures the correct continuum solution would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the $n=2$ compactified hyperboloidal evolution of the DF-GHG system becomes numerically regular when the formally singular terms are eliminated by a specific combination of gauge source functions, constraint addition, and reduction fields. The key novelty relative to the previous spherical work is the rescaling $\Theta_+ \equiv R^2 D_\sigma C_+/\kappa$ and its companion, together with the second-order expansion $C_+ = 1 + m_{C_+}/R + \hat C_+/R^2$, which makes the Jacobian factor $R'(1-H'C_+)$ finite at $\mathcal{I}^+$ instead of formally singular. With this setup the equations still contain a small number of formally singular terms, handled at the single boundary point by l'Hôpital's rule, and the rescaled fields are $O(1)$ at $\mathcal{I}^+$. The paper reports self-convergence factors approaching 2 for both constraint-violating and constraint-satisfying perturbations of Schwarzschild, and extraction of the scalar field at $\mathcal{I}^+$ reproduces the fundamental quasinormal mode and the $t^{-2}$ tail from linear theory.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme rests on the assumption that the asymptotic decay rates derived for a model wave system carry over to the full nonlinear Einstein equations, and in particular that the second-order coefficient $\hat C_+$ in the expansion of $C_+$ stays bounded during the whole evolution; the paper states that the model analysis does not guarantee this bound and that the present run is a test of it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The strongest compactification parameter $n=2$, the only one for which the DF-GHG metric fields admit a conformal-type compactification, is usable in practice rather than only at the continuum level.
  • Radiation can be read off directly at $\mathcal{I}^+$ instead of being extrapolated from finite radius: the extracted scalar field shows the fundamental quasinormal mode followed by a $t^{-2}$ tail.
  • The Bondi mass computed at $\mathcal{I}^+$ is positive, monotonically decreasing, and settles to a constant slightly above the initial mass, consistent with the black hole accreting part of the scalar field.
  • Both constraint-violating and constraint-satisfying initial data evolve stably, with self-convergence factors approaching the expected value 2 for second-order finite differences.
  • The construction is stated to extend to full 3D, where the same formal singularities appear, and the authors identify that extension as the next step.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $\hat C_+$ stays bounded for a wider family of data and gauges, the same regularization should transfer to 3D, because the argument relies on asymptotic decay rates rather than on spherical symmetry; the spherical reduction, however, hides angular derivative terms that could introduce new formally singular combinations.
  • The $n=2$ DF-GHG evolutions are now directly comparable to conformal compactification codes on identical initial data, so a head-to-head waveform or Bondi mass comparison would be a sharper test of both approaches than matching linear theory alone.
  • The paper excludes constraint damping terms because they conflict with the regularizing constraint addition; a smooth blending of damping near the strong-field region with the asymptotically regularizing terms is an obvious extension, and its absence may set the practical accuracy limit at late times.
  • Only the spherically symmetric scalar mode is tested, so recovering the gravitational quasinormal mode spectrum and the corresponding tail for nonspherical perturbations remains an open check that the 3D extension will need to address.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies a spherically symmetric reduction of the Dual-Foliation Generalized Harmonic Gauge (DF-GHG) formulation of general relativity, with the goal of using the strongest hyperboloidal compactification parameter n=2. The authors choose gauge source functions, constraint additions, and field rescalings to minimize formally singular terms, and present numerical evolutions of small perturbations of Schwarzschild with future null infinity included. They report self-convergence with second-order accuracy, and for constraint-satisfying initial data they extract a Bondi mass that decreases monotonically and a scalar field at I+ that exhibits quasinormal ringing followed by a t^{-2} tail, matching linear theory.

Significance. If the n=2 compactification is indeed regular for the DF-GHG system, this is a useful technical advance: it makes the metric-based hyperboloidal approach directly analogous to conformal compactification and opens a path toward extracting radiation at I+ in 3D. The paper is careful in constructing the rescaled system, provides the reduced equations and the reduction constraints, and ships Mathematica notebooks as auxiliary material. The numerical validation is meaningful: the convergence factors trend toward the expected value 2 with resolution, and the extracted physical outputs (quasinormal frequency, Price tail exponent, Bondi-mass monotonicity) are the right targets. However, the headline claim rests on an assumption that the paper itself identifies as not guaranteed by the underlying asymptotic analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III.C (Eqs. 32-33) and Section IV] The central claim that the n=2 system is regular depends on the coefficient \hat{C}_+ in the rescaling (33) remaining bounded, so that the Jacobian factor (32) stays O(1). The paper explicitly states in Section III.C that the Good-Bad-Ugly-F heuristics of [20] do not guarantee this and that the run should be interpreted as a test. As a referee, I flag this as a self-identified missing support: the paper never reports the outcome of that test. No time series of \hat{C}_+ or of the Jacobian denominator is shown, and the global norm (41) used in the convergence study need not expose growth localized at I+. The reported run also uses a single amplitude (10^{-4}), a single r_I=20, and the convergence study covers roughly 500 time units. Please add a diagnostic of \hat{C}_+ (or the Jacobian factor) over the full evolution, or otherwise provide evidence that it remains bounded; without this, the n=2 regularity conclusion is conditional.
  2. [Section III.C] The statement that the rescaling 'should be interpreted as a test of whether \hat{C}_+ remains bounded' is not made operational: no criterion is given for what would constitute failure of the test (e.g., a threshold on |\hat{C}_+| or on the Jacobian factor), and no failure mode is analyzed. Consequently the reader cannot tell whether the reported run would distinguish between a bounded and an unbounded \hat{C}_+. A concrete monitoring prescription and a statement of what was observed in the presented evolution should be added.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section III.B, Eq. (25)] The height function is written as H(R) = R - m_{C+} ln R - r, but r is the compactified coordinate; since H should be a function of R only, this expression mixes the two coordinate systems. Please clarify, presumably by writing r = r(R).
  2. [Figure 1 caption] The symbol '˜C□' appears instead of the tilde-C-minus variable (\tilde{C}_-); please fix.
  3. [Section IV.A] In the text, 'as can bee seen' should read 'as can be seen'.
  4. [Section IV.A] The sentence 'We then computed the norm ... by use of the norm' repeats the word 'norm'; please rephrase.
  5. [Section IV.A, Eq. (41)] The norm notation uses Z generically; please state explicitly that the norm is summed over all evolved fields, or define Z as a vector of fields.
  6. [Section IV.B, Figure 4] The axis label ' at +' should read 'Ψ at I^{+}'; also specify the time intervals used for the quasinormal-mode fit and the tail fit.
  7. [Section IV.B, Figure 3] The y-axis label '1e 5+1' is confusing; it presumably means 1 + 10^{-5} times the plotted quantity. Please relabel.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the compactification scheme is built on explicitly cited analytic results and an explicitly flagged boundedness test, with validation against independent external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central numerical claims are not derived from the quantities they claim to validate. The rescaling choices in Eqs. (28)-(34) and the gauge-source choices in Eqs. (35)-(37) follow from the Good-Bad-Ugly-F classification of [20], which is a parameter-free model-equation analysis with clearly stated decay assumptions; carrying those rates over to the nonlinear DF-GHG rEFEs is an expressed assumption, not a hidden re-use of the numerical output. Section III.C explicitly states that the heuristic results of [20] 'do not guarantee that hat_C+ is bounded during evolution' and labels the n=2 rescaling 'a test' of whether hat_C+ remains bounded. That is an honest conditionality rather than a circular step. The validation targets are external: the scalar quasinormal frequency omega M = 0.11 + 0.10i is taken from the standard reference [30], the t^-2 Price tail from [31], and the Bondi-mass monotonicity is a physical requirement not used to set any free parameter in the scheme. The self-convergence study in Fig. 2 compares numerical solutions at increasing resolution against the continuum limit of the same equations, which is an internal consistency check and not a prediction of the extracted physics. Although the authors cite their own prior work for the GBUF heuristic, the constraint-addition identities of [25], and the earlier spherical DF-GHG implementation of [23], those citations supply analytic constructions and coordinate choices rather than the physical results being reported. I find no equation in the paper that reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no external agreement is manufactured by self-citation. The acknowledged gap, the unproven boundedness of hat_C+, is a correctness and validation caveat, but the paper does not present that bound as a proven result, so it does not constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on asymptotic decay results imported from the authors' earlier papers, on the unproven boundedness of hat_C+, and on numerical setup choices. No new physical entity is introduced. The only hand-chosen numerical parameters reported are the compactification boundary radius r_I=20 and the perturbation amplitude scale; the remaining parameters are either standard numerical choices or fixed by the Kerr-Schild background.

free parameters (2)
  • r_I, the compactification boundary radius = 20
    The outgoing coordinate lightspeed at I+ for n=2 depends on r_I and approaches 1 for larger r_I. The authors state they choose r_I=20 in all reported runs; this is a hand-picked numerical setup value, not determined by the formulation.
  • Perturbation amplitude scale (psi_0, Cp0, Cm0, delta_0, epsilon_0) = 1e-4
    Chosen small so the evolutions remain in the linear regime. The physical validation against quasinormal modes and the Price tail is only established at this amplitude scale.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The GBUF asymptotic decay classification of [20] applies to the nonlinear rEFEs with the chosen constraint addition and gauge, giving C+ and epsilon upsetty-type wave equations with sources S_epsilon ~ R^-3 and S_C+ ~ R^-4.
    The rescalings and the removal of formally singular terms in Sections III.C-III.E depend on these decay rates, which were established for model equations in Minkowski spacetime and are assumed to carry over to the full GR system.
  • domain assumption Constraint addition (38)-(39) enforces the enhanced decay of D_sigma C+ and D_sigma epsilon even under constraint violation.
    The regularization technique relies on the improved R^-2 decay of incoming null derivatives; the paper explicitly invokes [25] for this result.
  • domain assumption The gauge driver f_D, obeying eq. (37), regularizes the leading-order bad asymptotics of C- in the presence of radiation, in analogy to the f field of the Good-Bad-Ugly-F model.
    Section III.D and eq. (37); the f_D field and its source term are taken from the prior GBUF analysis [20] by analogy, not derived from the Einstein equations in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The coefficient hat_C+ in the rescaling (33) remains bounded during evolution.
    The paper states that [20] does not guarantee this and that the rescaling should be interpreted as a test. The regular Jacobian factor in eq. (32) depends on this boundedness.
  • domain assumption The final first-order reduced system with the chosen constraint addition remains symmetric hyperbolic and well posed.
    The paper asserts that the DF technique preserves the symmetric hyperbolicity of GHG, but does not provide an explicit hyperbolicity analysis for the new constraint addition and reduction variables. Numerical convergence is used as evidence.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic flatness and the massless scalar field matter model are the physical setting.
    The whole construction assumes asymptotically flat spacetimes and a minimally coupled massless scalar field, as stated in Section II.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strong hyperboloidal compactification for the spherical DF-GHG formulation of GR." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y6FKFFPS

@misc{pith2026250603078,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strong hyperboloidal compactification for the spherical DF-GHG formulation of GR},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y6FKFFPS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03078}
}
read the original abstract

The use of compactified hyperboloidal coordinates for metric formulations of the Einstein field Equations introduces formally singular terms in the equations of motion whose numerical treatment requires care. In this paper we study a particular choice of constraint addition, choice of gauge and reduction fields in order to minimize the number of these terms in a spherically symmetric reduction of the Dual-Foliation Generalized Harmonic Gauge formulation of General Relativity. We proceed to the numerical implementation of a more aggressive compactification, as compared to our previous work. With the present setup there is a direct analogy with conformal compactification used in other approaches to the use of hyperboloidal coordinates. We present numerical results of constraints violating and satisfying perturbations on top of a Schwarzschild black hole. For small perturbations we recover the expected physics from linear theory, corresponding to quasi normal mode ringing and tail decay for a scalar field, both extracted directly at future null infinity from our numerical data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03078 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. In these plots we show snapshots of the evolved variables [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. In this figure we plot the norm self-convergence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. In this plot we show the rescaled scalar field Ψ at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [20]

    Duarte, J

    M. Duarte, J. C. Feng, E. Gasper ´ ın, and D. Hilditch, Regularizing dual-frame generalized harmonic gauge at null infinity, Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 025011 (2023), arXiv:2206.13661 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity. vii. waves from axi-symmetric isolated systems, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 269, 21 (1962)

    work page 1962

  3. [2]

    Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity VIII

    R. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity VIII. Waves in asymptotically flat space-time, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A270, 103 (1962)

    work page 1962

  4. [3]

    Newman and R

    E. Newman and R. Penrose, An approach to grav- itational radiation by a method of spin coefficients, Journal of Mathematical Physics 3, 566 (1962), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1724257

    doi:10.1063/1.1724257 1962

  5. [4]

    Penrose, Conformal treatment of infinity, in Relativ- ity, Groups, and Topology (Les Houches, France, 1964) , edited by C

    R. Penrose, Conformal treatment of infinity, in Relativ- ity, Groups, and Topology (Les Houches, France, 1964) , edited by C. DeWitt and B. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1964) pp. 565–584

    work page 1964

  6. [5]

    R. M. Wald, General relativity (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984)

    1984

  7. [6]

    Friedrich, On the Regular and the Asymptotic Char- acteristic Initial Value Problem for Einstein’s Vacuum Field Equations, Proc

    H. Friedrich, On the Regular and the Asymptotic Char- acteristic Initial Value Problem for Einstein’s Vacuum Field Equations, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 375, 169 (1981). 10

    work page 1981

  8. [7]

    Fully non-linear gravitational wave simulations from past to future null-infinity

    J. Frauendiener, C. Stevens, and S. Thwala, Fully Non- linear Gravitational Wave Simulations from Past to Fu- ture Null Infinity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161401 (2025), arXiv:2504.02188 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

Show all 32 references
  1. [8]

    Winicour, Characteristic evolution and matching, Liv- ing Rev

    J. Winicour, Characteristic evolution and matching, Liv- ing Rev. Relativity 15, 2 (2012), [Online article]

    2012

  2. [9]

    Ma et al., Fully relativistic three-dimensional Cauchy- characteristic matching for physical degrees of freedom, Phys

    S. Ma et al., Fully relativistic three-dimensional Cauchy- characteristic matching for physical degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. D 109, 124027 (2024), arXiv:2308.10361 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Giannakopoulos, N

    T. Giannakopoulos, N. T. Bishop, D. Hilditch, D. Poll- ney, and M. Zilhao, Gauge structure of the Einstein field equations in Bondi-like coordinates, Phys. Rev. D 105, 084055 (2022), arXiv:2111.14794 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Giannakopoulos, N

    T. Giannakopoulos, N. T. Bishop, D. Hilditch, D. Pollney, and M. Zilh˜ ao, Numerical convergence of model Cauchy-Characteristic Extraction and Matching, arXiv:2306.13010 (2023), arXiv:2306.13010 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Gundlach, Simulations of gravitational collapse in null coordinates: III

    C. Gundlach, Simulations of gravitational collapse in null coordinates: III. Hyperbolicity, (2024), arXiv:2404.16720 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Zengino˘ glu, D

    A. Zengino˘ glu, D. Nunez, and S. Husa, Gravitational per- turbations of Schwarzschild spacetime at null infinity and the hyperboloidal initial value problem, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 035009 (2009), arXiv:0810.1929 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  7. [14]

    R. P. Macedo, Hyperboloidal framework for the kerr spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity 37, 065019 (2020)

    2020

  8. [15]

    Panosso Macedo and A

    R. Panosso Macedo and A. Zengino˘ glu, Hyperboloidal approach to quasinormal modes, Frontiers in Physics 12, 1497601 (2025)

    2025

  9. [16]

    Zenginoglu, Hyperboloidal evolution with the Ein- stein equations, Class

    A. Zenginoglu, Hyperboloidal evolution with the Ein- stein equations, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 195025 (2008), arXiv:0808.0810 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Va˜ n´ o-Vi˜ nuales, S

    A. Va˜ n´ o-Vi˜ nuales, S. Husa, and D. Hilditch, Spher- ical symmetry as a test case for unconstrained hy- perboloidal evolution, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 175010 (2015), arXiv:1412.3827 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Va˜ n´ o-Vi˜ nuales and S

    A. Va˜ n´ o-Vi˜ nuales and S. Husa, Spherical symmetry as a test case for unconstrained hyperboloidal evolution II: gauge conditions, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 045014 (2018), arXiv:1705.06298 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Hilditch, E

    D. Hilditch, E. Harms, M. Bugner, H. R¨ uter, and B. Br¨ ugmann, The evolution of hyperboloidal data with the dual foliation formalism: Mathematical analysis and wave equation tests, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 055003 (2018), arXiv:1609.08949 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Gundlach, J

    C. Gundlach, J. M. Martin-Garcia, G. Calabrese, and I. Hinder, Constraint damping in the Z4 formulation and harmonic gauge, Class. Quantum Grav. 22, 3767 (2005), gr-qc/0504114

    2005 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Peterson, S

    C. Peterson, S. Gautam, I. Rainho, A. Va˜ n´ o Vi˜ nuales, and D. Hilditch, 3D evolution of a semilinear wave model for the Einstein field equations on compactified hyperboloidal slices, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024067 (2023), arXiv:2303.16190 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Peterson, S

    C. Peterson, S. Gautam, A. Va˜ n´ o Vi˜ nuales, and D. Hilditch, Spherical evolution of the generalized har- monic gauge formulation of general relativity on com- pactified hyperboloidal slices, Phys. Rev. D 110, 124033 (2024), arXiv:2409.02994 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. 136, B571 (1964)

    1964

  17. [25]

    Gasper ´ ın and D

    E. Gasper ´ ın and D. Hilditch, The Weak Null Condition in Free-evolution Schemes for Numerical Relativity: Dual Foliation GHG with Constraint Damping, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 195016 (2019), arXiv:1812.06550 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Calabrese, C

    G. Calabrese, C. Gundlach, and D. Hilditch, Asymp- totically null slices in numerical relativity: Mathe- matical analysis and spherical wave equation tests, Class.Quant.Grav. 23, 4829 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512149 [gr-qc]

    2006 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gasper ´ ın, S

    E. Gasper ´ ın, S. Gautam, D. Hilditch, and A. Va˜ n´ o Vi˜ nuales, The Hyperboloidal Numerical Evolution of a Good-Bad-Ugly Wave Equation, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 035006 (2020), arXiv:1909.11749 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Gautam, A

    S. Gautam, A. Va˜ n´ o Vi˜ nuales, D. Hilditch, and S. Bose, Summation by Parts and Truncation Error Matching on Hyperboloidal Slices, Phys. Rev. D 103, 084045 (2021), arXiv:2101.05038 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    H. O. Kreiss and J. Oliger, Methods for the approximate solution of time dependent problems (GARP publication series No. 10, Geneva, 1973)

    1973

  22. [30]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic grav- itational collapse

    R. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic grav- itational collapse. I. Scalar and gravitational perturtba- tions, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2419 (1972)

    1972

  24. [32]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15555358

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.