Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 64 references

Enhanced Curie temperature and room-temperature 50-nm skyrmions achieved in hexagonal ferromagnet Mn5Ge3+x synthesized via a high-pressure method

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read High-pressure synthesis raises the Curie temperature of the hexagonal ferromagnet Mn5Ge3+x from 294 K to 350 K, and the same crystals host stable ~50-nm skyrmions at room temperature.

desk verdict Solid Lorentz-TEM and transport package showing 50-nm room-temperature dipolar skyrmions in HP-grown Mn5Ge3+x, with a plausible but not yet fully proven Tc-enhancement mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21891 v1 pith:Y77MJXJJ submitted 2026-07-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yongsen Zhang , Wei Liu , Meng Shi , Shuisen Zhang , Sheng Qiu , Yaodong Wu , Jialiang Jiang , Huanhuan Zhang
show 9 more authors
Hui Han Kang Wang Dingfu Shao Zhenfa Zi Chao Ma Haifeng Du Mingliang Tian Shouguo Wang Jin Tang
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Mn5Ge3+xCurietemperaturedipolarskyrmionshigh-pressuresynthesisroom-temperatureLorentz-TEMmagnetoresistancespin-transfertorque
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a centrosymmetric hexagonal ferromagnet, Mn5Ge3+x, can be made to host ultrasmall skyrmions at room temperature by pushing its magnetic ordering temperature above ambient through high-pressure synthesis. The authors report that the Curie temperature rises from 294 K to 350 K and that real-space imaging reveals dipolar skyrmions about 50 nanometers across, stable at room temperature. They also show that a single skyrmion can be electrically written and erased in a confined nanostructure, and that magnetoresistance can distinguish a skyrmion chain from a uniform magnetic state. If correct, this would open a new material platform for skyrmion-based spintronic devices without relying on chiral Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dipolar skyrmion: a vortex-like magnetic texture stabilized not by chiral Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions but by the competition between uniaxial magnetic anisotropy, exchange stiffness, and magnetic dipole-dipole interactions. Because the material is centrosymmetric, skyrmions of both helicities can coexist. The key physical lever is the high-pressure synthesis, which contracts the lattice and adds excess Ge, increasing the exchange stiffness and raising the Curie temperature above room temperature; the authors support this with DFT-derived exchange interactions and micromagnetic simulations that reproduce the observed field-driven textural evolution.

What would settle it

Detailed magnetization, heat-capacity, or neutron-diffraction measurements on the high-pressure Mn5Ge3+x sample that explicitly separate contributions from the Mn5Ge3+x phase and any Ge-rich impurity phase: if the 350-K transition disappears once the impurity phases are removed, or if the transition is shown to originate from a distinct Ge-rich compound, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that synthesizing Mn5Ge3+x under high pressure (8 GPa, 1000°C) changes the lattice and composition enough to strengthen magnetic exchange: the lattice contracts by about 4.6% in the a-b plane and the Ge content rises slightly to Mn5Ge3.2. These changes, supported by density-functional calculations of exchange interactions, elevate the Curie temperature from 294 K to 350 K. In thin lamellae of this material, the combination of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and dipole-dipole interactions stabilizes stripe domains that transform into dipolar skyrmions under an out-of-plane magnetic field; in a 50-nm-thick lamella these skyrmions have diameters around 50 nm at room tempe

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the 350-K magnetic transition is intrinsic to a single-phase Mn5Ge3+x solid solution; the paper itself notes that the high-pressure crystals can contain composition fluctuations and Ge-rich phases, so if the dominant magnetic transition comes from a Ge-rich secondary phase, the claim about Mn5Ge3+x itself would be weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Room-temperature, ~50-nm skyrmions in a centrosymmetric ferromagnet offer a new material route for high-density magnetic storage without requiring non-centrosymmetric crystals or multilayer stacks.
  • Electrical creation and deletion of individual skyrmions with nanosecond current pulses in confined nanostructures demonstrates a write-erase capability needed for memory or logic devices.
  • Magnetoresistance distinguishes a single-skyrmion-chain state from a uniformly magnetized state, providing a readout mechanism for skyrmion-based devices.
  • The scaling of stripe-domain and skyrmion size with film thickness follows Kittel's law, confirming the dipolar origin and allowing size tuning by thickness control.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Tc enhancement is truly intrinsic, high-pressure synthesis could be applied to other Mn-Ge or related hexagonal magnets to push their magnetic ordering temperatures into the room-temperature range while preserving small skyrmion sizes.
  • The combination of lattice contraction and off-stoichiometric Ge content suggests a tunable parameter space: varying pressure, annealing temperature, or starting composition may allow even smaller skyrmion diameters or a wider stability window at room temperature.
  • Because the skyrmions are dipolar rather than chiral, they are topologically equivalent to magnetic bubbles; this raises the question of whether the same electrical manipulation could be extended to other centrosymmetric uniaxial ferromagnets, not just the Mn-Ge family.
  • The observation that skyrmions persist at zero field after field cycling in thin lamellae hints that zero-field stable bits could be achieved in device geometries, though the paper does not directly demonstrate this in the confined cell geometry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports that high-pressure (HP) synthesis of hexagonal Mn5Ge3+x raises the Curie temperature from 294 K (Ge-self-flux growth) to approximately 350 K, and that this enhancement is attributed to lattice contraction and increased Ge content, supported by DFT calculations of the exchange stiffness. Lorentz-TEM imaging in 150-nm and 50-nm lamellae reveals field-driven stripe domains and dipolar skyrmions at room temperature, with skyrmion diameters down to about 50 nm in the 50-nm lamella; micromagnetic simulations with measured/DFT parameters reproduce the observed textures. Magnetotransport measurements show a field-history-dependent resistance that is linked to distinct domain states, and 5-ns current pulses in a 250-nm nano-cell are used to create and delete a single skyrmion deterministically at room temperature.

Significance. If the phase attribution is confirmed, this would be a notable advance: a centrosymmetric hexagonal ferromagnet hosting room-temperature, ~50-nm dipolar skyrmions that can be imaged, electrically detected, and locally written/erased with nanosecond current pulses. The direct Lorentz-TEM observations, the TIE analysis, and the reproducible current-pulse cycling of a single skyrmion are significant experimental assets. The micromagnetic simulations use measured Ms and Ku and a DFT-derived Aex, making the texture reproduction a meaningful consistency check. The main weakness is that the 350-K transition is not convincingly assigned to the Mn5Ge3+x phase itself, because the HP crystals are acknowledged to contain Ge-rich compositional fluctuations and no composition-matched control is provided. The DFT support is also qualitative (Aex trend, not a computed Tc). These issues are fixable with additional characterization, so the work merits revision rather than rejection.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Fig. 1e; Experimental Section (Sample preparation)] The claim that the 350-K transition belongs to the Mn5Ge3+x phase is not established. The text acknowledges that HP crystals 'can accommodate a certain degree of compositional fluctuations... exhibiting the presence of Ge-rich phases.' The M-T data in Fig. 1e are from a bulk HP crystal, while EDS composition is from TEM lamellae (Figs. S1/S2); no composition-matched control (e.g., Mn5Ge3.2 grown by self-flux) is measured, and no powder XRD or spatially resolved magnetic measurement shows that the 350-K signal is intrinsic to the Mn5Ge3+x matrix rather than to a Ge-rich secondary phase. Because the entire room-temperature skyrmion platform is identified with Mn5Ge3+x, this attribution is load-bearing. Please add phase-purity characterization of the same bulk sample used for M-T, a composition-matched non-HP control, or local magnetic imaging around 350 K to resolve the phase assignment.
  2. [Section 2.1, Fig. 1f and Fig. S4] The DFT calculation is presented as support for 'the combined effects of lattice contraction and increased Ge content,' but it computes only the exchange stiffness Aex as a function of lattice parameter and Ge content. Aex is not Tc; overlaying the two experimental Tc values on the Aex curve does not constitute a derivation of a 56-K Tc shift. A quantitative claim requires either a computed Tc from the exchange parameters (mean-field/RPA or similar) or a clear scaling argument connecting ΔAex to ΔTc. In addition, the GGA+U value is not stated even though the result depends on U. Please specify U and either provide a computed Tc or soften the claim to state that the trend is consistent with an enhanced exchange stiffness.
  3. [Section 2.4, Fig. 6 and Fig. S15] The write/delete mechanism is attributed to STT at jc1 and Joule heating at jc2. The supporting thermal experiment (Fig. S15d-e) uses a dc temperature cycle, not the transient heating during a 5-ns pulse; no temperature excursion is calculated or measured. The critical-current densities in Fig. 6c appear to be single measurements without error bars or device-to-device statistics. Since deterministic electrical manipulation is a central claim, please provide reproducibility statistics (multiple cycles/devices) and either a transient thermal estimate or a direct measurement of the pulse-induced temperature rise. If the manipulation itself is robust, a more cautious mechanistic statement would also be acceptable.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] Reference [15] is GaV4S8, not 'GaV4S'; reference [16] is Gd2PdSi3, not 'Gd2PdSi'. Please correct the formulas.
  2. [Section 2.1] The phrase 'the (000) position of the hexagonal network' is unclear; presumably the interstitial 2b site is meant. Please rephrase.
  3. [Section 3 (First-principles calculations)] The GGA+U calculation does not state the Hubbard U value. Also, 'k-point density of 12 Angstrom' should be expressed in reciprocal units (e.g., points per Å^-1).
  4. [Section 3 (Micromagnetic simulation)] The DFT exchange stiffness is quoted in meV·Å² in Fig. 1f, while the simulation uses J/m. Please state the conversion used.
  5. [Conclusion] Typo: 'Futhermore' should be 'Furthermore'.
  6. [Figure 4 caption] The caption says 'the temperature dependence of the maximum magnetoresistance (MRmax) at fixed temperatures,' which is ambiguous; presumably MRmax is plotted as a function of temperature. Please clarify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central claims rest on direct measurements and independent simulations.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are direct experimental observations rather than derived predictions. The Curie-temperature enhancement (294 K vs 350 K) is obtained from measured magnetization-temperature curves (Fig. 1e), and the room-temperature ~50-nm skyrmions are imaged directly by Lorentz-TEM with TIE analysis. The attribution of the Tc increase to lattice contraction and increased Ge content is presented as a qualitative DFT-supported explanation: the DFT section computes exchange stiffness from Heisenberg exchange parameters using a standard formula, and the comparison in Fig. 1f overlays experimental Tc values with calculated exchange trends. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the DFT does not take the measured Tc as an input. The micromagnetic simulations use independently specified material parameters (Aex from DFT, Ms and Ku from magnetization measurements) and reproduce the observed textures; this is a consistency check rather than a self-fulfilling prediction. Self-citations appear in the context of dipolar skyrmions in centrosymmetric uniaxial magnets, skyrmion bags, and manipulation, but they are contextual background and are not load-bearing for the paper's own measurements; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported by self-citation to force the conclusion. The concern that the 350-K transition might be influenced by Ge-rich secondary phases is an external-validity/phase-attribution issue, not a circularity of the derivation chain. Overall, no equation or fitted value reduces a claimed prediction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The counts here show the paper's central claims rest mostly on direct experimental measurements; the main loaded inputs are the DFT approximations, a single-phase assumption for the HP sample, and measured/DFT micromagnetic parameters (Aex, Ku, Ms). No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • Exchange stiffness Aex in micromagnetics = 2.30 × 10^-11 J/m
    Used in MuMax3 simulations (Experimental Section); origin not stated in main text — presumably from DFT or literature; no direct measurement or fitting shown.
  • Uniaxial anisotropy Ku = 1.14 × 10^5 J/m³ at 300 K
    Determined from M-H curves (Section 2.1); used in simulations.
  • Saturation magnetization Ms = 7.58 × 10^5 A/m at 300 K
    Determined from M-H curves; used in simulations.
  • GGA+U Hubbard U for Mn = not stated
    DFT calculations include GGA+U (ref [65]) but no U value is given; U affects the computed exchange stiffness used to support the Tc mechanism.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT with PBE functional and PseudoDojo pseudopotentials yields reliable exchange parameters for Mn5Ge3+x
    Used to compute Aex vs lattice constant/Ge content (Experimental Section; Figure 1f, S4).
  • standard math Magnetic dipole-dipole interactions alone, in a centrosymmetric uniaxial ferromagnet, stabilize the observed topological spin textures
    Framework for interpreting stripe domains and dipolar skyrmions (Section 2.2).
  • domain assumption The HP-synthesized sample is a single-phase Mn5Ge3+x solid solution
    Needed for the claim that Tc≈350K is intrinsic to Mn5Ge3+x; text admits 'Ge-rich phases' and compositional fluctuations (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption Micromagnetic parameters (Aex, Ms, Ku) measured/set at 300 K are appropriate for reproducing the zero-temperature simulated textures
    Simulations reproducing textures are zero-temperature; temperature-dependent phase diagrams are experimental. Aex provenance is not fully specified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced Curie temperature and room-temperature 50-nm skyrmions achieved in hexagonal ferromagnet Mn5Ge3+x synthesized via a high-pressure method." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y77MJXJJ

@misc{pith2026260721891,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced Curie temperature and room-temperature 50-nm skyrmions achieved in hexagonal ferromagnet Mn5Ge3+x synthesized via a high-pressure method},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y77MJXJJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21891}
}
read the original abstract

The development of new high-temperature ultrasmall-size skyrmion materials holds immense significance for the promising applications of topological spintronic devices. In this study, we demonstrate that a high-pressure synthesis technique can significantly elevate the Curie temperature of Mn5Ge3+x crystals, from 294 K to 350 K. This enhancement is attributed to the combined effects of lattice contraction and increased Ge content, the conclusion supported by Density Functional Theory calculations. Additionally, our real-space magnetic imaging reveals the stability of dipolar skyrmions with diameters of approximately 50 nm at room temperature. Our micromagnetic simulations closely replicate the diverse experimental topological magnetic textures observed. Furthermore, magnetotransport measurements indicate the potential for the electrical distinction between various topological magnetic textures in skyrmion-based devices. We also report deterministic manipulations on single dipolar skyrmions in confined nanostructures by using in-plane currents. The observation, electrical manipulation, and electrical detection of room-temperature ultrasmall topological magnetic textures underscore the potential of Mn5Ge3+x as a promising platform for spintronic device applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21891 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) The crystal structure of Mn5Ge3, with top-view and cross-sectional views along the c-axis and b-axis. b) - d) The high-resolution STEM images of the (001) and (010) planes for simulated Mn5Ge3, Mn5Ge3+x grown by the Ge self-flux method, and Mn5Ge3+x synthesized by the HP method, along with the corresponding selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns. e) M-T curves of Mn5Ge3+x (growth by the Ge self-flux m… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Observation of dipolar skyrmions above room temperature. a) Magnetic evolutions from zero-field stripe domains driven by an out-of-plane magnetic field at room temperature. b) and c) Representative in-plane magnetization mappings of stripe domains and dipolar skyrmions retrieved from TIE analysis, correspond to the red and yellow dashed rectangles in a), respectively. d) and e) The in-plane magnetization mappings of… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Diameter of the dipolar skyrmion as a function of the field at room temperature (black line) and stripe period as a function of temperature T during zero-field warming (red line) in 150-nm a) and 50-nm c) thick Mn5Ge3+x lamella. b) and d) Magnetic phase diagrams of 150- nm and 50-nm thick Mn5Ge3+x plate as a function of temperature and magnetic field. e) Field￾driven magnetic evolutions in 50-nm thick Mn5Ge3+x lamel… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Magnetotransport properties related to the magnetic texture evolution. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) MR as a function of the magnetic field at 100 K. The magnetic field range sweeps from 1 T to −1 T (black line) and back to 1 T (red line). The arrow denotes the direction of the applied magnetic field. (b) The longitudinal resistance-time dependence acquired accord…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Current-induced creation and deletion of a single skyrmion at room temperature. (a) Schematic diagram of the Mn5Ge3+x nanostructured cell sample with a (001) plane. (b) Defocused images of different magnetic states in the nanostructured cell after applying pulsed curre…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references

  1. [1]

    A. Fert, V . Cros, J. Sampaio, Nat. Nanotechnol 2013, 8 (3), 152-156

    2013

  2. [2]

    Vakili, J.-W

    H. Vakili, J.-W. Xu, W. Zhou, M. N. Sakib, M. G. Morshed, T. Hartnett, Y . Quessab, K. Litzius, C. T. Ma, S. Ganguly, M. R. Stan, P. V . Balachandran, G. S. D. Beach, S. J. Poon, A. D. Kent, A. W. Ghosh, J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 130 (7), 070908

    2021

  3. [3]

    Dieny, I

    B. Dieny, I. L. Prejbeanu, K. Garello, P. Gambardella, P. Freitas, R. Lehndorff, W. Raberg, U. Ebels, S. O. Demokritov, J. Akerman, A. Deac, P. Pirro, C. Adelmann, A. Anane, A. V . Chumak, A. Hirohata, S. Mangin, S. O. Valenzuela, M. C. Onbaşlı, M. d’Aquino, G. Prenat, G. Finocchio, L. Lopez -Diaz, R. Chantrell, O. Chubykalo - Fesenko, P. Bortolotti, Nat....

    2020

  4. [4]

    Tokura, N

    Y . Tokura, N. Kanazawa, Chem. Rev. 2021, 121 (5), 2857-2897

    2021

  5. [5]

    C. Back, V . Cros, H. Ebert, K. Everschor -Sitte, A. Fert, M. Garst, T. P. Ma, S. Mankovsky, T. L. Monchesky, M. Mostovoy, N. Nagaosa, S. S. P. Parkin, C. Pfleiderer, N. Reyren, A. Rosch, Y . Taguchi, Y . Tokura, K. von Bergmann, J. D. Zang, J. Phys. D- Appl. Phys. 2020, 53 (36), 37

    2020

  6. [6]

    W. Wang, D. Song, W. Wei, P. Nan, S. Zhang, B. Ge, M. Tian, J. Zang, H. Du, Nat. Commun 2022, 13 (1), 1593. 29

    2022

  7. [7]

    J. Tang, Y . Wu, W. Wang, L. Kong, B. Lv, W. Wei, J. Zang, M. Tian, H. Du, Nat. Nanotechnol 2021, 16 (10), 1086-1091

    2021

  8. [8]

    Zhang, J

    Y . Zhang, J. Tang, Y . Wu, M. Shi, X. Xu, S. Wang, M. Tian, H. Du, Nat. Commun 2024, 15 (1), 3391

    2024

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    S. Chen, J. Lourembam, P. Ho, A. K. J. Toh, J. Huang, X. Chen, H. K. Tan, S. L. K. Yap, R. J. J. Lim, H. R. Tan, T. S. Suraj, M. I. Sim, Y . T. Toh, I. Lim, N. C. B. Lim, J. Zhou, H. J. Chung, S. T. Lim, A. Soumyanarayanan, Nature 2024, 627 (8004), 522- 527

    2024

  2. [10]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, V . Cros, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2 (7), 17031

    2017

  3. [11]

    Zhang, Y

    H. Zhang, Y . Zhang, Z. Hou, M. Qin, X. Gao, J. Liu, Materials Futures 2023, 2 (3), 032201

    2023

  4. [12]

    X. Z. Yu, N. Kanazawa, Y . Onose, K. Kimoto, W. Z. Zhang, S. Ishiwata, Y . Matsui, Y . Tokura, Nat. Mater. 2011, 10 (2), 106-109

    2011

  5. [13]

    Mühlbauer, B

    S. Mühlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, P. Böni, Science 2009, 323 (5916), 915-919

    2009

  6. [14]

    M. T. Birch, L. Powalla, S. Wintz, O. Hovorka, K. Litzius, J. C. Loudon, L. A. Turnbull, V . Nehruji, K. Son, C. Bubeck, T. G. Rauch, M. Weigand, E. Goering, M. Burghard, G. Schütz, Nat. Commun 2022, 13 (1), 3035

    2022

  7. [15]

    Kézsmárki, S

    I. Kézsmárki, S. Bordács, P. Milde, E. Neuber, L. M. Eng, J. S. White, H. M. Rønnow, C. D. Dewhurst, M. Mochizuki, K. Yanai, H. Nakamura, D. Ehlers, V . Tsurkan, A. Loidl, Nat. Mater. 2015, 14 (11), 1116-1122

    2015

  8. [16]

    M. T. Birch, I. Belopolski, Y . Fujishiro, M. Kawamura, A. Kikkawa, Y . Taguchi, M. Hirschberger, N. Nagaosa, Y . Tokura, Nature 2024, 633 (8030), 554-559

    2024

  9. [17]

    Heinze, K

    S. Heinze, K. von Bergmann, M. Menzel, J. Brede, A. Kubetzka, R. Wiesendanger, G. Bihlmayer, S. Blügel, Nat. Phys. 2011, 7 (9), 713-718

    2011

  10. [18]

    Tokunaga, X

    Y . Tokunaga, X. Z. Yu, J. S. White, H. M. Rønnow, D. Morikawa, Y . Taguchi, Y . Tokura, Nat. Commun 2015, 6 (1), 7638

    2015

  11. [19]

    A. K. Nayak, V . Kumar, T. Ma, P. Werner, E. Pippel, R. Sahoo, F. Damay, U. K. Rößler, C. Felser, S. S. P. Parkin, Nature 2017, 548 (7669), 561-566. 30

    2017

  12. [20]

    Karube, L

    K. Karube, L. Peng, J. Masell, X. Yu, F. Kagawa, Y . Tokura, Y . Taguchi, Nat. Mater. 2021, 20 (3), 335-340

    2021

  13. [21]

    Moreau-Luchaire, C

    C. Moreau-Luchaire, C. Moutafis, N. Reyren, J. Sampaio, C. A. F. Vaz, N. Van Horne, K. Bouzehouane, K. Garcia, C. Deranlot, P. Warnicke, P. Wohlhüter, J. M. George, M. Weigand, J. Raabe, V . Cros, A. Fert, Nat. Nanotechnol 2016, 11 (5), 444- 448

    2016

  14. [22]

    B. Ding, Z. Li, G. Xu, H. Li, Z. Hou, E. Liu, X. Xi, F. Xu, Y . Yao, W. Wang, Nano Lett. 2020, 20 (2), 868-873

    2020

  15. [23]

    Z. Li, Q. Yin, W. Lv, J. Shen, S. Wang, T. Zhao, J. Cai, H. Lei, S.-Z. Lin, Y . Zhang, B. Shen, Adv. Mater. 2024, 36 (19), 2309538

    2024

  16. [24]

    Y . Wu, J. Tang, B. Lyu, L. Kong, Y . Wang, J. Li, Y . Soh, Y . Xiong, M. Tian, H. Du, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 119 (1), 012402

    2021

  17. [25]

    Repicky, P.-K

    J. Repicky, P.-K. Wu, T. Liu, J. P. Corbett, T. Zhu, S. Cheng, A. S. Ahmed, N. Takeuchi, J. Guerrero-Sanchez, M. Randeria, R. K. Kawakami, J. A. Gupta, Science 2021, 374 (6574), 1484-1487

    2021

  18. [26]

    Fujishiro, N

    Y . Fujishiro, N. Kanazawa, T. Shimojima, A. Nakamura, K. Ishizaka, T. Koretsune, R. Arita, A. Miyake, H. Mitamura, K. Akiba, M. Tokunaga, J. Shiogai, S. Kimura, S. Awaji, A. Tsukazaki, A. Kikkawa, Y . Taguchi, Y . Tokura, Nat. Commun 2018, 9 (1), 408

    2018

  19. [27]

    Shibata, X

    K. Shibata, X. Z. Yu, T. Hara, D. Morikawa, N. Kanazawa, K. Kimoto, S. Ishiwata, Y . Matsui, Y . Tokura, Nat. Nanotechnol 2013, 8 (10), 723-728

    2013

  20. [28]

    Rathi, Pardeep, A

    Lalita, A. Rathi, Pardeep, A. K. Verma, B. Gahtori, A. Gautam, R. P. Pant, P. D. Babu, G. A. Basheed, J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 876, 159908

    2021

  21. [29]

    Stroppa, M

    A. Stroppa, M. Peressi, Phys. Status Solidi A-Appl. Mat. 2007, 204 (1), 44-52

    2007

  22. [30]

    dos Santos Dias, N

    M. dos Santos Dias, N. Biniskos, F. J. dos Santos, K. Schmalzl, J. Persson, F. Bourdarot, N. Marzari, S. Blügel, T. Brückel, S. Lounis, Nat. Commun 2023, 14 (1), 7321

    2023

  23. [31]

    V . G. Guk, Inorg. Mater. 2017, 53 (7), 697-700

    2017

  24. [32]

    T. Yang, W. He, F. Chen, C. He, J MAGN MAGN MATER 2022, 559, 169539

    2022

  25. [33]

    Ohoyama, J

    T. Ohoyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1961, 16 (10), 1995-2002. 31

    1961

  26. [34]

    Tawara, K

    Y . Tawara, K. Sato, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1963, 18 (6), 773-777

    1963

  27. [35]

    J. B. Forsyth, P. J. Brown, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 1990, 2 (11), 2713-2720

    1990

  28. [36]

    Maraytta, J

    N. Maraytta, J. V oigt, C. Salazar Mejía, K. Friese, Y . Skourski, J. Perßon, S. M. Salman, T. Brückel, J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128 (10), 103903

    2020

  29. [37]

    Q. He, A. Li, B. Yao, W. Zhou, C. J. Kiely, in (Eds.: I. E. Wachs, M. A. Bañares), Springer International Publishing, Cham 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Zhang, W

    Y . Zhang, W. Zhang, Y . Sun, H. Yu, J. Lu, N. Lin, Z. Wang, N. Pan, X. Wang, C. Ma, MICRON 2020, 133, 102862

    2020

  31. [39]

    J. P. Clancy, H. Gretarsson, J. A. Sears, Y . Singh, S. Desgreniers, K. Mehlawat, S. Layek, G. K. Rozenberg, Y . Ding, M. H. Upton, D. Casa, N. Chen, J. Im, Y . Lee, R. Yadav, L. Hozoi, D. Efremov, J. van den Brink, Y .-J. Kim, npj Quantum Mater. 2018, 3 (1), 35

    2018

  32. [40]

    J. Yang, Z. Li, X. Zhang, B. Yang, H. Yan, D. Cong, X. Zhao, L. Zuo, Acta Mater. 2023, 246, 118694

    2023

  33. [41]

    Roychowdhury, K

    S. Roychowdhury, K. Samanta, S. Singh, W. Schnelle, Y . Zhang, J. Noky, M. G. Vergniory, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2024, 121 (30), e2401970121

    2024

  34. [42]

    Z. Hou, W. Ren, B. Ding, G. Xu, Y . Wang, B. Yang, Q. Zhang, Y . Zhang, E. Liu, F. Xu, W. Wang, G. Wu, X. Zhang, B. Shen, Z. Zhang, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (7), 1706306

    2018

  35. [43]

    X. Z. Yu, Y . Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y . Matsui, N. Nagaosa, Y . Tokura, Nature 2010, 465 (7300), 901-904

    2010

  36. [44]

    Boulle, J

    O. Boulle, J. V ogel, H. Yang, S. Pizzini, D. de Souza Chaves, A. Locatelli, T. O. Menteş, A. Sala, L. D. Buda -Prejbeanu, O. Klein, M. Belmeguenai, Y . Roussigné, A. Stashkevich, S. M. Chérif, L. Aballe, M. Foerster, M. Chshiev, S. Auffret, I. M. Miron, G. Gaudin, Nat. Nanote...

    2016

  37. [45]

    X. Zhao, C. Jin, C. Wang, H. Du, J. Zang, M. Tian, R. Che, Y . Zhang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2016, 113 (18), 4918-4923

    2016

  38. [46]

    X.-D. Chi, Y . Hu, ACTA PHYS SIN-CH ED 2018, 67 (13), 137502-137502

    2018

  39. [47]

    Kittel, Physical Review 1946, 70 (11-12), 965-971

    C. Kittel, Physical Review 1946, 70 (11-12), 965-971. 32

    1946

  40. [48]

    Catalan, J

    G. Catalan, J. Seidel, R. Ramesh, J. F. Scott, Rev.Mod.Phys. 2012, 84 (1), 119-156

    2012

  41. [49]

    S. Jin, Y . Wang, H. Zheng, S. Dong, K. Han, Z. Wang, G. Wang, X. Jiang, X. Wang, J. Hong, H. Huang, Y . Zhang, T.-L. Xia, X. Wang, Nano Lett. 2024, 24 (18), 5467-5473

    2024

  42. [50]

    Chakraborty, A

    A. Chakraborty, A. K. Srivastava, A. K. Sharma, A. K. Gopi, K. Mohseni, A. Ernst, H. Deniz, B. K. Hazra, S. Das, P. Sessi, I. Kostanovskiy, T. Ma, H. L. Meyerheim, S. S. P. Parkin, Adv. Mater. 2022, 34 (11), 2108637

    2022

  43. [51]

    T. Ma, A. K. Sharma, R. Saha, A. K. Srivastava, P. Werner, P. Vir, V . Kumar, C. Felser, S. S. P. Parkin, Adv. Mater. 2020, 32 (28), 2002043

    2020

  44. [52]

    J. Tang, Y . Wu, J. Jiang, L. Kong, S. Wang, M. Tian, H. Du, Adv. Mater. 2023, 35 (47), 2306117

    2023

  45. [53]

    Jiang, Y

    J. Jiang, Y . Wu, L. Kong, Y . Zhang, S. Qiu, H. Zhang, Y . Ke, S. Wang, M. Tian, J. Tang, Nano Lett. 2025, 25 (8), 3282-3290

    2025

  46. [54]

    Goychuk, P

    I. Goychuk, P. Jung, S. Kohler, G. Schmid, P. Talkner, Chem. Phys. 2010, 375 (2- 3), 131-132

    2010

  47. [55]

    J. Tang, J. Jiang, Y . Wu, L. Kong, Y . Wang, J. Li, Y . Soh, Y . Xiong, S. Wang, M. Tian, H. Du, Nano Lett. 2025, 25 (1), 121-128. [56]F. Büttner, I. Lemesh, M. Schneider, B. Pfau, C. M. Günther, P. Hessing, J. Geilhufe, L. Caretta, D. Engel, B. Krüger, J. Viefhaus, S. Eisebi...

    2025

  48. [57]

    M. E. S. H. Okamoto, E.M. Mueller, Alloy Phase Diagrams , ASM International, 2016

    2016

  49. [58]

    Pajda, J

    M. Pajda, J. Kudrnovský, I. Turek, V . Drchal, P. Bruno, Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64 (17), 174402

    2001

  50. [59]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, V . P. Antropov, V . A. Gubanov, J MAGN MAGN MATER 1987, 67 (1), 65-74

    1987

  51. [60]

    Terasawa, M

    A. Terasawa, M. Matsumoto, T. Ozaki, Y . Gohda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 88 (11), 114706

    2019

  52. [61]

    X. He, N. Helbig, M. J. Verstraete, E. Bousquet, Comput. Phys. Commun 2021, 264, 107938. 33 [62]S. Smidstrup, T. Markussen, P. Vancraeyveld, J. Wellendorff, J. Schneider, T. Gunst, B. Verstichel, D. Stradi, P. A. Khomyakov, U. G. Vej-Hansen, M. E. Lee, S. T. Chill, F. Rasmusse...

    2021

  53. [63]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78 (7), 1396-1396

    1997

  54. [64]

    M. J. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, G. M. Rignanese, Comput. Phys. Commun 2018, 226, 39-54

    2018

  55. [65]

    V . I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 1991, 44 (3), 943-954. 1 Supporting Information Enhanced Curie temperature and room-temperature 50-nm skyrmions achieved in hexagonal ferromagnet Mn5Ge3+x synthesized via a high-pressure method Yongsen Zhang, Wei Liu, Me...

    1991

  56. [66]

    Okamoto, M.E

    H. Okamoto, M.E. Schlesinger, E.M. Mueller, Alloy Phase Diagrams, ASM International, 2016

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.