Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 38 references

Deformations of OP ensembles in a bulk critical scaling

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For critically deformed orthogonal polynomial ensembles, the bulk correlation kernel converges to a new kernel built from a nonlocal integro-differential equation, which is the correlation kernel of a conditioned thinned Sine point process.

desk verdict A solid, novel RHP computation whose main theorems are plausible but whose load-bearing model-problem existence proof is omitted; referee it seriously and demand the missing proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05622 v1 pith:Y7KJVJYA submitted 2025-06-05 math-ph math.CAmath.MPmath.PR

Caio E. Candido , Victor Alves , Thomas Chouteau , Charles F. Santos , Guilherme L. F. Silva This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.CAmath.MPmath.PR MSC 42C0560B2035Q15
keywords orthogonalpolynomialensemblesbulkcriticalscalingdeformedsinekernelconditionalthinningnonlocalnonlinearintegrableequationrecurrencecoefficientsRiemann–Hilbertproblemone-cutregularequilibriummeasure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a critically sized Fermi-factor deformation of the weight of an orthogonal polynomial ensemble changes the local bulk statistics: in the large-$n$ limit the correlation kernel is no longer the sine kernel but a new kernel $K_\infty$ built from a function $\Phi$ that solves a nonlocal nonlinear integro-differential equation. The deformation factor $\sigma_n(x)=(1+e^{-s-n^2Q(x)})^{-1}$ approaches $1$ pointwise, yet at a regular bulk point it leaves a nontrivial mark, and the paper computes the resulting limit explicitly. The limiting kernel is identified as the correlation kernel of a conditioned thinned version of the Sine point process, and it converges back to the sine kernel exponentially fast as $s\to+\infty$. In addition, the recurrence coefficients of the associated orthogonal polynomials acquire oscillatory corrections of order $1/n$ whose coefficients are expressed through the same function $\Phi$, and these corrections display a nonlinear integrable structure even though the equilibrium measure is one-cut regular and the weight is analytic.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the model Riemann–Hilbert problem (RHP 2.1) — a boundary-value problem specifying analyticity and jump relations on an eight-ray contour — for a $2\times2$ analytic matrix $\Phi$ whose jumps are built from $\lambda(\zeta)=(1+e^{-H(\zeta)})^{-1}$. For the deformed ensemble one takes $H_n(\zeta)=s+n^2H_0(\zeta/n)$ with $H_0(0)=H'_0(0)=0$ and $H''_0(0)/2=u>0$; the distinguished case $H_\infty(\zeta)=s+u\zeta^2$ is the one connected to the finite-temperature sine-kernel problem, and the correspondence sets $T=1/\sqrt{u}$. A conformal map $\varphi_0$ with $\varphi_0'(0)=\pi\phi_V(0)$ transplants this model into the local parametrix at the bulk point, so the natural fluctuation scale is $n\pi\phi_V(0)$. Small-norm theory shows $\Phi_n=\Phi_\infty(I+O(e^{-s}/n^\varepsilon))$, and the first coefficient of $\Phi_\infty$ at infinity encodes the functions that appear in the recurrence-coefficient corrections. Unwrapping the steepest-descent transformations turns the correlation kernel into the $K_\infty$ formula and the recurrence coefficients into the expansions of Theorem 1.4.

What would settle it

Settle the well-posedness of the model problem numerically for a specific admissible symbol, say $H_0(\zeta)=u\zeta^2+c\zeta^3$ with $c\neq0$: solve the eight-ray Riemann–Hilbert problem at moderate $s$ and $n$ by discretizing the jump equations and check that a solution exists, satisfies the jumps to numerical precision, and converges to the quadratic solution at the predicted $O(e^{-s}/n^\varepsilon)$ rate. Alternatively, simulate particles from the orthogonal polynomial ensemble with, e.g., $V(x)=x^2$ and $Q(x)=x^2$ at moderate $n$ and compare the empirical two-point correlation with the predicted $K_\infty$; a mismatch would refute Theorem 1.3.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central result, Theorem 1.3, is the uniform asymptotic formula $$\frac{1}{n\pi\phi_V(0)}K_n\left(\frac{\zeta}{n\pi\phi_V(0)},\frac{\xi}{n\pi\phi_V(0)}\;\middle|\;s\right)=K_\infty(\zeta,\xi|s)+O($n^{{-1+\varepsilon}}$)$$ for every $s\in\mathbb{R}$ and $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$, uniformly for $\zeta,\xi$ in compact subsets of $\mathbb{R}$. The limiting kernel is $$K_\infty(\zeta,\xi|s)=\frac{\sqrt{\lambda_\infty(\zeta|s)}\sqrt{\lambda_\infty(\xi|s)}}{2\pi i(\zeta-\xi)}\left(\Phi\left(\frac{\zeta}{T}\right)\Phi\left(-\frac{\xi}{T}\right)-\Phi\left(-\frac{\zeta}{T}\right)\Phi\left(\frac{\xi}{T}\right)\right),$$ where $\lambda_\infty(\zeta|s)=(1+e^{-s-T^{-2}\zeta^2})^{-1}$, $T=\pi\phi_V(0)\sqrt{t}$, and $\Phi$ is the solution of the nonlocal nonlinear equation $$\partial_T\Phi(\zeta|s,T)=i\zeta\Phi(\zeta|s,T)+\left(\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Phi(\xi|s,T)^2\$\lambda$'_\infty(T\xi|s)\,d\xi\right)\Phi(-\zeta|s,T),$$ with $\Phi(\zeta)\sim e^{iT\zeta}$ as $\zeta\to\pm\infty$. The paper proves that $K_\infty$ converges to the sine kernel $\frac{\sin(\zeta-\xi)}{\zeta-\xi}$ with error $O(e^{-s})$ as $s\to+\infty$, so the large-$n$ and large-$s$ limits commute, and it identifies $K_\infty$ as the correlation kernel of the conditioned thinned Sine point process. Theorem 1.4 gives the companion asymptotics for the recurrence coefficients: $\gamma_n(s)^2=\gamma_n(\infty)^2+\frac{1}{n}\frac{T}{\pi\phi_V(0)}\frac{b-a}{2}\mathcal{Q}(s)\cos(2n\kappa)+O(n^{-2+\varepsilon})$ and a corresponding formula for $\beta_n(s)$ containing $G_0(s)$, $\cos(2n\kappa)$ and $\sin(2n\kappa)$, where $\mathcal{Q}$ is the total integral in (1.16) and itself solves the integrable PDE (1.18).

Load-bearing premise

The whole proof depends on the assumption that the model boundary-value problem with the deformed symbol has a solution for large $n$ and that this solution is close to the quadratic reference problem; the paper states this as Theorem 2.14 but omits the proof of existence, so if that well-posedness fails the local parametrix and both main theorems lose their foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the bulk scaling limit, the deformed ensemble is not asymptotically a sine process; its correlation kernel is the conditioned-thinned Sine kernel $K_\infty$, and the limit $s\to\infty$ recovers the sine kernel.
  • Theorem 1.3 upgrades the known weak convergence of the conditioned thinned process to convergence of correlation kernels, so local statistics of the limiting process are governed by $K_\infty$.
  • The recurrence coefficients $\gamma_n(s)^2$ and $\beta_n(s)$ have the same leading order as the undeformed ones, but their $1/n$ corrections contain $\cos(2n\kappa)$ and $\sin(2n\kappa)$ oscillations, even though the equilibrium measure is one-cut regular and the weight is analytic.
  • The correction term $\mathcal{Q}(s)$ appearing in the recurrence coefficients is the same function that solves the integrable PDE (1.18), so nonlinear integrable equations enter bulk subleading asymptotics without any double-scaling limit.
  • Since $\sigma_n$ is the conditional-thinning factor, Theorem 1.3 implies that conditioning on no particle being thinned changes the local bulk process in an explicit, computable way.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper fixes the bulk point at $p=0$ and assumes one-cut regularity for convenience; a natural extension, consistent with the paper's own framing, is that the same $K_\infty$ with $T=\pi\phi_V(p)\sqrt{t}$ holds at any regular bulk point, with the oscillation frequency becoming $\kappa(p)=\pi\mu_V([p,b])$.
  • Because the leading local effect of the deformation enters only through $s$ and $t=Q''(0)/2$, the limiting kernel is expected to be universal across a large class of symbols $Q$ with the same quadratic profile; testing numerically with a different $Q$ of the form $t x^2 + c x^3$ would clarify that.
  • The appearance of $1/n$ oscillations in the recurrence coefficients suggests that any $n$-dependent perturbation supported on a shrinking neighborhood of a bulk point produces similar oscillations, so this may be a generic phenomenon rather than a special feature of the Fermi factor.
  • The connection to finite-temperature deformations suggests that Fredholm determinant statistics of $K_\infty$ (such as gap probabilities) should satisfy integrable PDEs in $s$ and $T$; the paper does not derive these, but its identification of $\mathcal{Q}$ with (1.18) points in that direction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies orthogonal polynomial ensembles with weight ω_n(x) = σ_n(x) e^{-nV(x)}, where σ_n(x) = (1+e^{-s-n^2Q(x)})^{-1} is a finite-temperature-type deformation concentrated near a regular bulk point. For a one-cut regular potential V with 0 in the bulk, the authors prove a bulk critical scaling limit for the correlation kernel (Theorem 1.3): after scaling by nπφ_V(0), the kernel converges to an explicit kernel K_∞ expressed in terms of a function Φ solving the nonlocal nonlinear equation (1.11)-(1.12), with Φ imported from the Claeys-Tarricone RHP. They further show K_∞ tends to the sine kernel as s→∞ and identify K_∞ as the correlation kernel of a conditioned thinned Sine process. Theorem 1.4 gives asymptotics for the recurrence coefficients γ_n(s) and β_n(s), with oscillatory terms cos(2nκ) and sin(2nκ) and a nonlinear correction Q(s) satisfying the PDE (1.18). The proofs use the Deift-Zhou steepest descent method; the main new ingredient is a local parametrix at the origin built from a model RHP (Section 2). Several technical results are only sketched, most importantly the well-posedness and convergence of the model problem.

Significance. If correct, these results provide a novel bulk scaling limit for deformed OP ensembles, connecting to integrable nonlocal equations and to thinning/conditioning of the Sine point process. The recurrence coefficient asymptotics with oscillations in a one-cut regular analytic setting are surprising and would extend the program of [27] to the bulk. The paper gives explicit formulas and clearly builds on external work [14], which supplies the function Φ and the relevant RHP. The derivation is long but structured. However, the current manuscript omits the proof of the central model-problem theorem (Theorem 2.14) and contains an apparent error in the definition of T in (1.9); these issues must be addressed before the results can be considered established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.4, Theorem 2.14] The proof of Theorem 2.14 is omitted ("We omit the details for brevity"), yet this theorem is the foundation for the local parametrix P_0 in RHP 3.12 and for the replacement of Φ_n by Φ_∞ in the kernel derivation (Section 4.1, via (2.20)) and in the recurrence-coefficient calculation (Section 4.2, via Φ_{n,1} = Φ_{∞,1} + O(e^{-s}/n^ε)). The small-norm argument requires more than the L^1∩L^∞ jump estimate in Theorem 2.13: one must prove that the Cauchy operator I - C_{J_{L_n}} is invertible on L^2(Σ_Φ), which in turn needs uniform (in n and s≥s_0) L^∞ bounds on Φ_{∞,±} and Φ_{∞,±}^{-1} along the infinite contour Σ_Φ, and on the products Φ_{∞,-} E_{ij} Φ_{∞,-}^{-1} appearing in (2.18). These bounds are not stated, and the proof of Lemma 2.3 (the C^∞ extension with the quadratic lower bound) is also skipped. Since the parametrix P_0 and both main theorems rest on this result, the gap is load-bearing and must be filled.
  2. [Equation (1.9)] The definition T = φ_V(0)π√t is inconsistent with the rest of the paper. Section 3.7 sets u = t/φ'_0(0)^2 = t/(πφ_V(0))^2, and Section 2.2 states the correspondence T = 1/√u. These give T = πφ_V(0)/√t, not φ_V(0)π√t. As a consequence, the exponent in λ_∞(ζ|s) = 1/(1+e^{-s-T^{-2}ζ^2}) is T^{-2} = u/t^2 instead of u, and the prefactor T/(πφ_V(0)) in Theorem 1.4 equals √t rather than the 1/√t that follows from the derivation in Section 4.2 (where q = TQ with T = 1/√u). The statements of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 are therefore incorrect as printed; if the intended T is φ_V(0)π/√t, the typo should be corrected throughout, including (1.9), (1.10), (1.13), (1.15), and the definition of λ_∞.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.7] The displayed definition of H_0 appears to have a typo: it reads H_0(ζ) = Q(φ_0^{-1}(ζ/n)), which would make H_n(ζ) = s + n^2 Q(φ_0^{-1}(ζ/n^2)); to obtain H_n(nφ_0(z)) = s + n^2Q(z), one needs H_0(w) = Q(φ_0^{-1}(w)).
  2. [Section 3.2] The sentence fragment "DittoforY_1,Y_2 etc." is incomplete; please replace it with a proper phrase such as "the same holds for Y_1 and Y_2."
  3. [Proposition 3.6 and Lemma 3.17] The proofs are skipped ("we skip its proof" and "we skip details"). These are standard exponential decay estimates, but they underpin Lemma 3.16 and Theorem 3.18; please include at least a concise proof or a precise reference.
  4. [Lemma 2.3] The proof is declared "immediate" and omitted. Because this lemma provides the quadratic lower bound used in Proposition 2.11, please include the short proof.
  5. [Equation (1.13)] The sine kernel S(ζ,ξ) is used but not defined at that point; consider defining it explicitly, e.g., S(ζ,ξ) = sin(ζ-ξ)/(ζ-ξ), just before the display.
  6. [Remark 2.6] The phrase "the author use" should be "the authors use."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the limiting kernel and recurrence asymptotics are derived from an independent external model problem; the self-citations are interpretive only, and the omitted Theorem 2.14 proof is a rigor gap, not circularity.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain (Section 2 model problem, Section 3 steepest descent, Section 4 kernel and recurrence asymptotics), no step reduces, by the paper's own equations or by a self-citation chain, to its own inputs. The limiting object K∞ is built from Φ solving (1.11)-(1.12), and that function together with RHP 2.5 is imported from the independent external work [14] (Claeys-Tarricone), not from the present authors' prior theorems. The genuinely new content is the Deift-Zhou analysis showing that n^{-1}πφ_V(0)K_n(...|s) converges to this expression with rate O(n^{-1+ε}), and that the recurrence coefficients acquire the Q(s)-terms of (1.15). No parameter is fitted to the target asymptotics: T, λ∞, κ and G0(s) are explicit functions of V, Q and φ_V(0), and Q(s) is defined by the independent integral (1.16), not tuned to match (1.10) or (1.15). The self-citations [13] and [27] are used only for the probabilistic interpretation (weak convergence to the conditioned thinned Sine process) and as the soft-edge analogue; neither supplies the kernel expression or the recurrence formulas, so they are not load-bearing. The manuscript does contain a flagged completeness gap: Theorem 2.14, the existence/uniqueness of Φ_n and the uniform convergence (2.20), is stated with proof omitted ('We omit the details for brevity.'), and Lemma 2.3 is declared 'immediate' without proof. Since (2.20) is used in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 to replace Φ_n by Φ_∞, both main theorems inherit this unproved hypothesis. That is a correctness/rigor risk, not circularity: the target results are not assumed anywhere in the construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters are used: s, t, V, Q are model inputs, and T, kappa, G_0 are determined by them. The paper relies on standard equilibrium measure theory, RHP small-norm theory, and the external Claeys-Tarricone RHP. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.1: V is a polynomial of even degree and positive leading coefficient with one-cut regular equilibrium measure supported on [a,b], 0 in (a,b), phi_V(0)>0, and strict Euler-Lagrange inequalities.
    Defines the class of potentials for the RHP analysis; regularity and strictness are used in the lens opening and the conformal map phi_0.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.2: Q extends analytically to a neighborhood of R, Q>0 off 0, Q(0)=Q'(0)=0, Q''(0)/2 = t > 0.
    This makes sigma_n a local n^{-1}-scale deformation at 0 and yields the quadratic model H_infinity = s + u zeta^2.
  • standard math The Claeys-Tarricone RHP (RHP 2.5) has a unique solution Psi with structure Psi_1 = iP(s)sigma_3 + Q(s)sigma_2, and the function Phi solves the nonlocal equation (2.13) with Phi ~ e^{iT zeta} as zeta -> +/- infinity.
    The present paper imports the existence, asymptotic behavior, and integrable equations for Phi from [14, Theorems 2.1, Corollary 5.2, Proposition 5.3], and uses them to identify the limit of its model problem.
  • standard math Standard RHP small-norm theory (Deift [17], Section 7.5) is valid for the jumps constructed in Sections 2-3, allowing the conclusion L_n -> I and R -> I from L^1 intersection L^infinity convergence of jump matrices.
    Invoked for Theorems 2.9, 2.13, 2.14, 3.18 and the error estimates; these are accepted background results.
  • domain assumption The lens contours can be chosen so that phi_0 maps the lens boundaries in U_0 to subsets of the ray system Sigma_Phi, with the correct orientation and with angles matching the model RHP.
    This matching is stated in Section 3.7 ('we assume that the lenses were opened in such a way...') and is required for the local parametrix P_0 to have the jumps of the model problem; no explicit construction is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deformations of OP ensembles in a bulk critical scaling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y7KJVJYA

@misc{pith2026250605622,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deformations of OP ensembles in a bulk critical scaling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y7KJVJYA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05622}
}
read the original abstract

We study orthogonal polynomial ensembles whose weights are deformations of exponential weights, in the limit of a large number of particles. The deformation symbols we consider affect local fluctuations of the ensemble around a bulk point of the limiting spectrum. We identify the limiting kernel in terms of a solution to an integrable non-local differential equation. This novel kernel is the correlation kernel of a conditional thinned process starting from the Sine point process, and it is also related to a finite temperature deformation of the Sine kernel as recently studied by Claeys and Tarricone. We also unravel the effect of the deformation on the recurrence coefficients of the associated orthogonal polynomials, which display oscillatory behavior even in a one-cut regular situation for the limiting spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05622 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The set ΣΦ is the union of the rays Σj , −2 ≤ j ≤ 3. Observe that, this way, Hn(ζ) is defined only in a growing disk Dnδ, and it satisfies Hn(ζ) = s + uζ 2 + O  ζ 3 n  , n → ∞, where this expansion is uniform for, say, |ζ| < δn/2. In particular, for each ζ fixed, we have the pointwise convergence Hn(ζ) → H∞(ζ) . .= s + uζ 2 , n → ∞. (2.3) In particular, we expect that Φn . .= Φ(· | H = Hn) → Φ∞ . .= Φ(· | H = H∞),… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Contours for the opening of lenses. Γ+ S (resp. Γ− S ) is the union of the dashed curves in the upper (resp. lower) half plane . We assume that Γ± S intersect the imaginary axis only at z = 0, and at z = 0 they make an angle π/8 with the real axis. Also, we assume that they do not intersect the rays with angle equal to ± π 4 , ± 7π 4 as represented in the figure by the dotted gray lines. 3.4. Second transformation: … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Claeys and S

    T. Claeys and S. Tarricone. On the integrable structure of deformed sine kernel determinants.Math. Phys. Anal. Geom., 27(1):Paper No. 3, 35, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [27]

    Ghosal and G

    P. Ghosal and G. L. F. Silva. Universality for multiplicative statistics of Hermitian random matrices and the integro- differential Painlev´ e II equation.Comm. Math. Phys., 397(3):1237–1307, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    G. Amir, I. Corwin, and J. Quastel. Probability distribution of the free energy of the continuum directed random polymer in 1 + 1 dimensions.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 64(4):466–537, 2011

    work page 2011

  4. [2]

    Barhoumi

    A. Barhoumi. Asymptotics of polynomials orthogonal with respect to a generalized Freud weight with application to special function solutions of Painlev´ e-IV.Stud. Appl. Math., 153(3):48, 2024. Id/No e12738

    work page 2024

  5. [3]

    Bleher, A

    P. Bleher, A. Dea˜ no, and M. Yattselev. Topological expansion in the complex cubic log-gas model: one-cut case.J. Stat. Phys., 166(3-4):784–827, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [4]

    P. M. Bleher and A. Dea˜ no. Topological expansion in the cubic random matrix model.Int. Math. Res. Not., 2013(12):2699–2755, 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [5]

    P. M. Bleher and A. R. Its. Semiclassical asymptotics of orthogonal polynomials, Riemann-Hilbert problem, and universality in the matrix model.Ann. of Math., 150(1):185–266, 1999

    work page 1999

  8. [6]

    Bothner, M

    T. Bothner, M. Cafasso, and S. Tarricone. Momenta spacing distributions in anharmonic oscillators and the higher order finite temperature Airy kernel.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e, Probab. Stat., 58(3):1505–1546, 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 38 references
  1. [7]

    Bothner and A

    T. Bothner and A. Little. The complex elliptic Ginibre ensemble at weak non-Hermiticity: bulk spacing distributions. J. Phys. A, Math. Theor., 57(25):54, 2024. Id/No 255201

    2024

  2. [8]

    Bothner and A

    T. Bothner and A. Little. The complex elliptic Ginibre ensemble at weak non-Hermiticity: edge spacing distributions. Random Matrices Theory Appl., 13(3):100, 2024. Id/No 2450012

    2024

  3. [9]

    Cafasso, T

    M. Cafasso, T. Claeys, and G. Ruzza. Airy kernel determinant solutions to the kdv equation and integro-differential painlev´ e equations.Comm. Math. Phys., 386(2):1107–1153, 2021

    2021

  4. [10]

    Cafasso and C

    M. Cafasso and C. M. d. S. Pinheiro. Unitary ensembles with a critical edge point, their multiplicative statistics and the Korteweg-de-Vries hierarchy.ArXiv:2504.20721, 2025

    2025

  5. [11]

    Cafasso and G

    M. Cafasso and G. Ruzza. Integrable equations associated with the finite-temperature deformation of the discrete Bessel point process.J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser., 108(1):273–308, 2023

    2023

  6. [12]

    Claeys and G

    T. Claeys and G. Glesner. Determinantal point processes conditioned on randomly incomplete configurations.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat., 59(4):2189–2219, 2023

    2023

  7. [13]

    Claeys and G

    T. Claeys and G. L. F. Silva. Deformations of biorthogonal ensembles and universality.ArXiv:2411.15830, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    P. A. Clarkson, K. Jordaan, and A. Loureiro. Symmetric Sextic Freud Weight.ArXiv:2504.08522, 2025

    2025

  9. [16]

    D. S. Dean, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr. Finite-temperature free fermions and the kardar-parisi- zhang equation at finite time.Phys. Rev. Lett., 114:110402, Mar 2015

    2015

  10. [17]

    Deift.Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann-Hilbert Approach

    P. Deift.Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann-Hilbert Approach. Number 3 in Courant Lecture Notes. American Mathematical Society, 2000

    2000

  11. [18]

    Deift, T

    P. Deift, T. Kriecherbauer, K. T.-R. McLaughlin, S. Venakides, and X. Zhou. Uniform asymptotics for polynomials orthogonal with respect to varying exponential weights and applications to universality questions in random matrix theory.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 52(11):1335–1425, 1999

    1999

  12. [19]

    Deift, K

    P. Deift, K. T.-R. McLaughlin, and T. Kriecherbauer. New results on the equilibrium measure for logarithmic poten- tials in the presence of an external field.J. Approx. Theory, 95:388–475, 1998

    1998

  13. [20]

    Deift, K

    P. Deift, K. T.-R. McLaughlin, T. Kriecherbauer, S. Venakides, and X. Zhou. Strong asymptotics of orthogonal polynomials with respect to exponential weights.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 52:1491–1552, 1999. DEFORMATIONS OF OP ENSEMBLES IN A BULK CRITICAL SCALING 41

    1999

  14. [21]

    Deift and M

    P. Deift and M. Piorkowski. Recurrence coefficients for orthogonal polynomials with a logarithmic weight function. SIGMA, Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl., 20:paper 004, 48, 2024

    2024

  15. [22]

    Deift and X

    P. Deift and X. Zhou. A steepest descent method for oscillatory Riemann-Hilbert problem, Asymptotics for the MKdV equation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 48:277–337, 1993

    1993

  16. [23]

    Erd˝ os and H.-T

    L. Erd˝ os and H.-T. Yau.A dynamical approach to random matrix theory, volume 28 ofCourant Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York; American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017

    2017

  17. [24]

    A. M. Finkelshtein. Equilibrium problems of potential theory in the complex plane. InOrthogonal polynomials and special functions. Computation and applications. Lecture notes of the 5th European summer school, Madrid, Lagan´ es, Spain, July 8–18, 2004, pages 79–117. Berlin: Sp...

    2004

  18. [25]

    A. S. Fokas, A. R. It·s, and A. V. Kitaev. The isomonodromy approach to matrix models in 2D quantum gravity. Comm. Math. Phys., 147(2):395–430, 1992

    1992

  19. [26]

    Foulqui´ e Moreno, A

    A. Foulqui´ e Moreno, A. Mart ´ ınez-Finkelshtein, and V. L. Sousa. Asymptotics of orthogonal polynomials for a weight with a jump on [−1,1].Constr. Approx., 33(2):219–263, 2011

    2011

  20. [28]

    Johansson

    K. Johansson. On fluctuations of eigenvalues of random hermitian matrices.Duke Math. J., 91(1):151–204, 1998

    1998

  21. [29]

    Johansson

    K. Johansson. From Gumbel to Tracy-Widom.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 138(1-2):75–112, 2007

    2007

  22. [30]

    Kimura and X

    T. Kimura and X. Navand. Fredholm Determinants from Schr¨ odinger Type Equations, and Deformation of Tracy- Widom Distribution.ArXiv:2408.06888, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars and G. L. F. Silva. S-curves in polynomial external fields.J. Approx. Theory, 191:1–37, 2015

    2015

  24. [32]

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars and P. M. J. Tibboel. The asymptotic behaviour of recurrence coefficients for orthogonal polynomials with varying exponential weights.J. Comput. Appl. Math., 233(3):775–785, 2009

    2009

  25. [33]

    Liechty and D

    K. Liechty and D. Wang. Asymptotics of free fermions in a quadratic well at finite temperature and the Moshe- Neuberger-Shapiro random matrix model.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat., 56(2):1072–1098, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    Pastur and M

    L. Pastur and M. Shcherbina. Universality of the local eigenvalue statistics for a class of unitary invariant random matrix ensembles.J. Statist. Phys., 86(1-2):109–147, 1997

    1997

  27. [35]

    G. Ruzza. Bessel kernel determinants and integrable equations.ArXiv:2401.11213, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    E. B. Saff and V. Totik.Logarithmic potentials with external fields, volume 316 ofFundamental Principles of Mathe- matical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997. Appendix B by Thomas Bloom

    1997

  29. [37]

    Van Assche.Orthogonal polynomials and Painlev´ e equations, volume 27 ofAust

    W. Van Assche.Orthogonal polynomials and Painlev´ e equations, volume 27 ofAust. Math. Soc. Lect. Ser.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    Van Assche

    W. Van Assche. Orthogonal polynomials, Toda lattices and Painlev´ e equations.Physica D, 434:9, 2022. Id/No 133214. (CC)Instituto de Ci ˆencias Matem´aticas e de Computac ¸˜ao (ICMC), Universidade de S ˜ao Paulo (USP), Brazil. (V A)Instituto de Ci ˆencias Matem´aticas e de Com...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.