Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 300 references

Higher-Order Corrections to Higgs Boson Amplitudes with Full Quark Mass Dependence in Quantum Chromodynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This thesis claims that higher-order Higgs-boson amplitudes with full quark-mass dependence can be computed, including elliptic two-loop master integrals for Higgs-plus-jet production via matched series expansions derived from…

desk verdict A thesis with two solid, cross-checked results and one interesting but evidentially incomplete claim about evaluating elliptic master integrals via matched series expansions. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09932 v1 pith:Y7SU7VEV submitted 2019-08-26 hep-ph

Dominik Kara This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords Higgsbosonquantumchromodynamicsheavy-quarkloopsmasterintegralsdifferentialequationsellipticseriesexpansionsHiggs-plus-jetproduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The thesis aims to push perturbative QCD predictions for Higgs-boson processes mediated by heavy-quark loops to higher orders while keeping the full quark mass. It derives the three-loop QCD correction to the form factor for the Higgs coupling to bottom quarks in the massless-quark limit, and it analytically computes the two-loop QCD corrections to the H→Zγ decay with the full internal quark mass, confirming earlier numerical results. Its principal new method reduces multi-scale master integrals to one variable, derives series expansions around the singular points of their differential equations, and matches those expansions so that the planar two-loop master integrals for Higgs-plus-jet production—including elliptic multi-scale cases—can be evaluated numerically across the whole physical phase space. If the method is right, NLO predictions for Higgs-plus-jet production with full top-mass dependence become feasible in the high-transverse-momentum region where the usual infinite-top-mass effective theory is unreliable.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the series-expansion-from-differential-equations method presented in Chapter 6. A multi-scale problem is reduced to a single variable by a one-dimensional parametrization of the phase space; the differential equations for the master integrals are solved as series around their singular points, using homogeneous and particular solutions of second-order ordinary differential equations for the elliptic sectors; and a matching procedure joins these expansions through overlapping convergence regions, with boundary conditions fixed by regularity at pseudo-thresholds. The non-elliptic sectors are handled through canonical differential equations in d-log form, while the planar elliptic sector A6,215 is carried by the second-order equations whose homogeneous solutions are elliptic functions.

What would settle it

Compute one of the planar elliptic master integrals at a dense grid of physical phase-space points using an independent numerical method, such as sector decomposition of the Feynman-parameter representation, and compare with the matched-series evaluation; any disagreement beyond the stated truncation error would falsify the claim of full physical-region coverage.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claimed is that full quark-mass dependence does not block higher-order Higgs amplitudes: the three-loop Hb bbar form factor is obtained in massless QCD with its infrared poles matching the factorization prediction; the two-loop H→Zγ amplitude is obtained analytically in terms of multiple polylogarithms with full quark-mass dependence; and the planar master integrals for two-loop Higgs-plus-jet production, including the elliptic sectors, are evaluated by a one-dimensional parametrization of the phase space, series expansions around singular points of the differential equations, and a matching procedure whose overlapping radii of convergence cover the physical region. The thesis claims the resulting numerical evaluation is fast and reliable, and that the two-loop Higgs-plus-jet scattering amplitude can be expressed in terms of these planar master integrals together with the non-planar ones.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the series expansions around the singular points of the differential equations can be matched so that their combined radii of convergence cover every point of the physical phase space; if some region is left uncovered, the numerical evaluation of the elliptic master integrals and thus of the two-loop Higgs-plus-jet amplitude would be unreliable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The analytic two-loop H→Zγ result confirms the earlier numerical computation and allows a direct study of renormalization-scheme and scale dependence of the decay width.
  • The three-loop Hb bbar form factor supplies a core ingredient for third-order QCD corrections to Higgs production in bottom-quark fusion and to the H→bbar decay rate.
  • The matched-series method evaluates the planar two-loop master integrals for Higgs-plus-jet production with full quark mass dependence in the physical region, including elliptic multi-scale integrals, in a fast and reliable way.
  • Because the quark mass is retained, the two-loop Higgs-plus-jet amplitude can be trusted at high Higgs transverse momentum, where the infinite-top-mass effective theory is not appropriate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • (Editor's inference) If the matching procedure carries over to the non-planar sectors, the full NLO Higgs-plus-jet amplitude with exact top-mass dependence becomes numerically tractable, and the main remaining bottleneck would be computational, not conceptual.
  • (Editor's inference) The one-dimensional parametrization suggests a direct independent test: compare the matched-series values of the elliptic master integrals at selected physical points against a completely different numerical technique; the thesis's internal consistency checks are necessary but not sufficient.
  • (Editor's inference) The single-logarithmic small-mass behaviour of H→Zγ, in contrast to the double logarithms in H→γγ, points to a structural feature of the Z-boson coupling that could be studied separately, since the thesis reports it but does not explain it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This thesis-style manuscript presents three higher-order QCD calculations involving Higgs bosons and heavy-quark loops. Chapter 3 derives the three-loop QCD corrections to the Hb bbar form factor in the massless limit and verifies the infrared pole structure against known factorization formulae. Chapter 5 computes the two-loop QCD corrections to H->Z gamma with full quark mass dependence, analytically confirming earlier purely numerical results obtained with on-shell renormalization. Chapters 6 and 7 develop and apply a method to evaluate planar two-loop master integrals for Higgs-plus-jet production with full quark mass dependence, using series expansions derived from differential equations because the master integrals involve elliptic structures. The abstract claims that these elliptic integrals can be evaluated numerically in a fast and reliable way by matching multiple series expansions over the physical phase space.

Significance. If the matched-series method works as claimed, it represents a significant technical advance: exact top-quark-mass dependence for the two-loop Higgs-plus-jet amplitude is a recognized high-priority target, and a practical method for elliptic multi-scale master integrals would have broader applicability. The H->Z gamma analytic computation and the three-loop form factor provide strong internal consistency checks: the former reproduces known numerics from Ref. [252], and the latter matches the predicted infrared pole structure (Section 3.4, Eqs. (3.17)-(3.19)). The method introduces no fitted parameters; the only free choices are the renormalization scale and the series truncation order. However, the central new claim—the fast and reliable numerical evaluation of the elliptic master integrals—is not verifiable from the text supplied for review, because the numerical validation sections are absent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 7.9.1-7.9.4 (with 6.5-6.6 and 7.5.5, 7.6.5)] The load-bearing claim that the planar two-loop master integrals for Higgs-plus-jet production, including the elliptic sectors A6,215 and A7,247, can be evaluated 'in a fast and reliable way' by matched series expansions is not supported by the evidence in the available manuscript. The table of contents lists the numerical checks (degree of the series expansions, timings, relative deviation, truncation error), but the supplied text truncates before these sections, so no convergence radii, overlap tests, or accuracy numbers are shown. This is not a cosmetic issue: the matching procedure in Sections 6.5-6.6 connects local series solutions only where their convergence disks overlap, and the claimed coverage of the whole physical phase space requires numerical demonstration. Please provide the missing validation or state explicitly that it is deferred to a separate publication.
  2. [Sections 6.6.1 and 7.5.2] The partitioning of the phase space through singular points is asserted to give overlapping intervals covering the full physical region, but the argument is incomplete. A local series around a singular point lambda_0 has radius of convergence limited by the nearest other singularity in the lambda-plane; as the auxiliary kinematic invariants x, z, h defined in Eq. (4.15) approach thresholds, two singular points can coalesce and shrink the convergence disk to zero. The manuscript does not provide a bound on the distances between adjacent expansion centers relative to these radii, nor an explicit scan of the (x, z, h) parameter region near thresholds. I request either a proof of gap-free coverage or a numerical demonstration (for example, a grid scan of relative deviations) for the elliptic sectors.
  3. [Sections 5.4-5.5 and 7.6-7.10] The text supplied for review ends during Section 5.3 and does not include the announced Sections 5.4 (numerical results), 6, 7.6-7.10, or the appendices. Consequently, the claimed computation of the two-loop amplitude in terms of master integrals (Section 7.3.2), the treatment of the elliptic sectors A6,215 and A7,247 (Sections 7.6-7.7), and the numerical checks (Section 7.9) cannot be checked. If this manuscript is intended for journal publication, the complete derivations and validation must be included; a thesis may be a self-contained document, but the submitted excerpt is not.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1.1] The sentence discussing the Lorentz structure of the external momenta contains the duplicated article in 'the the Lorentz structure'; this should be corrected.
  2. [Section 4.4.3] The word 'tapole' appears in the text and should read 'tadpole'.
  3. [Eqs. (3.14)-(3.16)] The three-loop form factor expressions are long; an electronic ancillary file with the Laurent coefficients in machine-readable form would substantially aid verification and reuse.
  4. [References] The bibliography is not included in the supplied text, so citations such as [252] cannot be resolved; please ensure the complete reference list is part of any revised submission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivations are self-contained QCD calculations checked against independent infrared factorization and earlier numerical results.

full rationale

The thesis derives its results from standard QCD Feynman rules, integration-by-parts reduction, and differential equations, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The three-loop H b bbar form factor is obtained by reducing 244 diagrams to 22 known master integrals (Section 3.3.3) and is checked against the universal infrared pole structure predicted from factorization (Section 3.4, Eqs. (3.17)-(3.19)); this is an external consistency check, not an input. The two-loop H to Z gamma amplitude is computed analytically from canonical differential equations and explicitly stated to confirm earlier purely numerical results (Chapter 5 introduction and Section 5.1), providing independent grounding rather than circularity. The Higgs-plus-jet planar master integrals are computed by series expansions derived from differential equations (Chapter 6, Sections 6.4-6.6), with the matching procedure covering phase space via overlapping intervals and subsequently checked through relative deviation and truncation error (Sections 7.9.3-7.9.4). No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it is said to predict, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation chain. The author's prior publications are cited for components of the calculation, but these components are either independently derived in the thesis or checked against external results; this is standard scholarly practice and not circular. The skeptic concern about the convergence of the matched series expansions is a verifiability issue about omitted numerical checks, not a circularity of the derivation chain. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculations rest on the Standard Model plus QCD, dimensional regularization, and the reliability of the new series-expansion method; the latter is the least externally supported assumption. No free parameters are fitted to data; the only hand-chosen numbers are the renormalization scale and the series truncation order.

free parameters (2)
  • Renormalization scale mu = m_H = 125.09 GeV
    Chosen by hand to be the Higgs mass (Section 1, Assumptions and Notation). This is a conventional scale choice, not fitted to data; scale variation would estimate higher-order uncertainty.
  • Series expansion truncation order (number of terms) = not specified in available text (set to achieve target precision)
    The series-expansion method of Chapter 7 requires selecting the expansion degree around each singular point; this is a computational parameter that affects numerical precision, not the physical result.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Standard Model of particle physics with QCD as the gauge theory of strong interactions
    All calculations are carried out within the Standard Model and perturbative QCD (Chapter 2).
  • standard math Dimensional regularization in D = 4 - 2 epsilon dimensions correctly isolates UV and IR divergences
    Used throughout for all loop integrals; poles in epsilon are removed by renormalization (Section 2.1.2).
  • domain assumption Vanishing bottom quark mass in the H b bbar form factor (m_b^2/m_H^2 is about 10^-3)
    Justifies setting m_b = 0 in internal propagators and external states for the three-loop form factor (Section 3.2).
  • domain assumption The top quark contribution dominates H to Z gamma and H plus jet amplitudes; light quarks are neglected or treated separately
    Mass hierarchy; the thesis computes heavy-quark loop contributions (Sections 5.1 and 7.1).
  • ad hoc to paper The series expansions in the one-dimensional parametrization converge and can be matched across singular points to cover the physical phase space
    The method in Sections 6.4 to 6.6 and the numerical checks in Section 7.9 assume this; no rigorous proof of convergence is given.
  • domain assumption The planar master integrals with elliptic structures cannot be expressed in terms of multiple polylogarithms and require the new series-expansion treatment
    Based on the presence of elliptic curves (Section 6.2) and the failure of decoupling for sector A6,215 (Section 4.2.4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Higher-Order Corrections to Higgs Boson Amplitudes with Full Quark Mass Dependence in Quantum Chromodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y7SU7VEV

@misc{pith2026190809932,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Higher-Order Corrections to Higgs Boson Amplitudes with Full Quark Mass Dependence in Quantum Chromodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y7SU7VEV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09932}
}
abstract

In this thesis, higher-order corrections to the perturbative expansions of scattering amplitudes involving the Higgs boson in the framework of Quantum Chromodynamics are evaluated, where we focus on processes that are mediated through heavy-quark loops. First, we derive the third-order corrections to the form factor describing the Yukawa coupling of a Higgs boson to a pair of bottom quarks. Furthermore, we compute the two-loop corrections to the $H\to Z\,\gamma$ decay width by retaining the full dependence on the internal quark mass. Finally, we describe the calculation of the planar Master Integrals relevant to the two-loop amplitude for Higgs-plus-jet production with full quark mass dependence. We accomplish this by establishing a method to derive series expansions from differential equations, since the set of Master Integrals involves elliptic structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09932 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (28 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_2.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_3.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p079_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p084_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p088_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p089_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p090_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p094_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p100_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p104_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p109_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p112_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p125_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p126_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: , in which the result with full top quark mass dependence deviates from the one in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p132_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p135_7.png]
Figure 7.2
Figure 7.2. Figure 7.2: Dalitz plot for the physical region relevant to Higgs-plus-jet produc￾tion in the plane of the independent variables x and z. Blue lines indicate the borders derived in Eq. (7.7), which encircle the physical region denoted by the light blue area. The red line stands …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p137_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p147_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p148_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p149_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p150_7.png]
Figure 7.4
Figure 7.4. Figure 7.4: If we derive the system of coupled first-order differential equations of this basis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p164_7_4.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the corner integrals of all non-planar sectors with at least one MI, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p173_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p174_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [252]

    QCD corrections to the H Z gamma coupling,

    M. Spira, A. Djouadi, and P. M. Zerwas, “QCD corrections to the H Z gamma coupling,” Phys. Lett. B276 (1992) 350–353

    1992

  2. [1]

    Berry, Paul Dirac: The Purest Soul in Physics , vol

    M. Berry, Paul Dirac: The Purest Soul in Physics , vol. 22. Physics World, 1998

    1998

  3. [2]

    The Mysteries of Mass,

    G. Kane, “The Mysteries of Mass,” Scientific American 15 (2006) 32–39

    2006

  4. [3]

    High-Energy Inelastic e−p Scattering at 6◦ and 10◦,

    E. D. Bloom, D. Coward, H. DeStaebler, J. Drees, G. Miller, et al., “High-Energy Inelastic e−p Scattering at 6◦ and 10◦,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 23 (1969) 930–934

    1969

  5. [4]

    Observed Behavior of Highly Inelastic Electron-Proton Scattering,

    M. Breidenbach, J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall, E. D. Bloom, D. Coward, et al., “Observed Behavior of Highly Inelastic Electron-Proton Scattering,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 23 (1969) 935–939

    1969

  6. [5]

    Observation of a Dimuon Resonance at 9.5 GeV in 400 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions,

    S. Herb, D. Hom, L. Lederman, J. Sens, H. Snyder, et al., “Observation of a Dimuon Resonance at 9.5 GeV in 400 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 39 (1977) 252–255

    1977

  7. [6]

    Observation of Top Quark Production in ¯pp Collisions,

    CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., “Observation of Top Quark Production in ¯pp Collisions,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 74 (1995) 2626–2631, arXiv:hep-ex/9503002 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 1995

  8. [7]

    Search for High Mass Top Quark Production in p¯p Collisions at√s = 1.8 TeV,

    D0 Collaboration, S. Abachi et al., “Search for High Mass Top Quark Production in p¯p Collisions at√s = 1.8 TeV,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 74 (1995) 2422–2426, arXiv:hep-ex/9411001 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 1995

Show all 300 references
  1. [8]

    Observation of Tau Neutrino Interactions,

    DONUT Collaboration, K. Kodama et al., “Observation of Tau Neutrino Interactions,” Phys.Lett. B504 (2001) 218–224, arXiv:hep-ex/0012035 [hep-ex]

    2001 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,

    ATLAS, G. Aad et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 1–29, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,

    CMS, S. Chatrchyan et al., “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 30–61, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    Particle Data Group, C. Patrignani et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” Chin. Phys. C40 no. 10, (2016) 100001

    2016

  5. [12]

    Mass singularities of feynman amplitudes,

    T. Kinoshita, “Mass singularities of feynman amplitudes,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 3 no. 4, (1962) 650–677

    1962

  6. [13]

    Degenerate systems and mass singularities,

    T. D. Lee and M. Nauenberg, “Degenerate systems and mass singularities,” Phys. Rev. 133 (1964) B1549–B1562

    1964

  7. [14]

    A new method for real radiation at NNLO,

    C. Anastasiou, K. Melnikov, and F. Petriello, “A new method for real radiation at NNLO,” Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 076010, arXiv:hep-ph/0311311 [hep-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Numerical evaluation of phase space integrals by sector decomposition,

    T. Binoth and G. Heinrich, “Numerical evaluation of phase space integrals by sector decomposition,” Nucl. Phys. B693 (2004) 134–148, arXiv:hep-ph/0402265 [hep-ph]. 195 196 Bibliography

    2004 arXiv

  9. [16]

    An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC,

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, “An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 222002, arXiv:hep-ph/0703012 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Antenna subtraction at NNLO,

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, and E. W. N. Glover, “Antenna subtraction at NNLO,” JHEP 09 (2005) 056, arXiv:hep-ph/0505111 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Gluon-gluon antenna functions from Higgs boson decay,

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, and E. W. N. Glover, “Gluon-gluon antenna functions from Higgs boson decay,” Phys. Lett. B612 (2005) 49–60, arXiv:hep-ph/0502110 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Quark-gluon antenna functions from neutralino decay,

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, and E. W. N. Glover, “Quark-gluon antenna functions from neutralino decay,” Phys. Lett. B612 (2005) 36–48, arXiv:hep-ph/0501291 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Infrared Structure at NNLO Using Antenna Subtraction,

    J. Currie, E. W. N. Glover, and S. Wells, “Infrared Structure at NNLO Using Antenna Subtraction,” JHEP 04 (2013) 066, arXiv:1301.4693 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [21]

    A novel subtraction scheme for double-real radiation at NNLO,

    M. Czakon, “A novel subtraction scheme for double-real radiation at NNLO,” Phys. Lett. B693 (2010) 259–268, arXiv:1005.0274 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  15. [22]

    A subtraction scheme for NNLO computations,

    R. Boughezal, K. Melnikov, and F. Petriello, “A subtraction scheme for NNLO computations,” Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 034025, arXiv:1111.7041 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [23]

    W -boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD,

    R. Boughezal, C. Focke, X. Liu, and F. Petriello, “ W -boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 no. 6, (2015) 062002, arXiv:1504.02131 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [24]

    N-jettiness soft function at next-to-next-to-leading order,

    R. Boughezal, X. Liu, and F. Petriello, “ N-jettiness soft function at next-to-next-to-leading order,” Phys. Rev. D91 no. 9, (2015) 094035, arXiv:1504.02540 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [25]

    N-jettiness Subtractions for NNLO QCD Calculations,

    J. Gaunt, M. Stahlhofen, F. J. Tackmann, and J. R. Walsh, “N-jettiness Subtractions for NNLO QCD Calculations,” JHEP 09 (2015) 058, arXiv:1505.04794 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [26]

    A Subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at NNLO: Integrating the subtraction terms. I.,

    G. Somogyi and Z. Trocsanyi, “A Subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at NNLO: Integrating the subtraction terms. I.,” JHEP 08 (2008) 042, arXiv:0807.0509 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron-positron collisions,

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, A. Kardos, G. Somogyi, Z. Sz˝ or, Z. Tr´ ocs´ anyi, and Z. Tulip´ ant, “Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron-positron collisions,” Phys. Rev. D94 no. 7, (2016) 074019, arXiv:1606.03453 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [28]

    The Hb¯b form factor to three loops in QCD,

    T. Gehrmann and D. Kara, “The Hb¯b form factor to three loops in QCD,” JHEP 09 (2014) 174, arXiv:1407.8114 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [29]

    The rare decay H→Zγ in perturbative QCD,

    T. Gehrmann, S. Guns, and D. Kara, “The rare decay H→Zγ in perturbative QCD,” JHEP 09 (2015) 038, arXiv:1505.00561 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to the decay width H→Zγ ,

    R. Bonciani, V. Del Duca, H. Frellesvig, J. M. Henn, F. Moriello, and V. A. Smirnov, “Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to the decay width H→Zγ ,” JHEP 08 (2015) 108, arXiv:1505.00567 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [31]

    The two-loop helicity amplitudes for qq′→V1V2→ 4 leptons,

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, and L. Tancredi, “The two-loop helicity amplitudes for qq′→V1V2→ 4 leptons,” JHEP 09 (2015) 128, arXiv:1503.04812 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [32]

    The two-loop helicity amplitudes for gg→V1V2→ 4 leptons,

    A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, “The two-loop helicity amplitudes for gg→V1V2→ 4 leptons,” JHEP 06 (2015) 197, arXiv:1503.08835 [hep-ph] . 196 Bibliography 197

    2015 arXiv

  26. [33]

    ZZ production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and D. Rathlev, “ZZ production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,” Phys. Lett. B750 (2015) 407–410, arXiv:1507.06257 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [34]

    W±Z production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev, and M. Wiesemann, “ W±Z production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,” Phys. Lett. B761 (2016) 179–183, arXiv:1604.08576 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [35]

    W +W− production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, S. Pozzorini, D. Rathlev, and M. Wiesemann, “ W +W− production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,” JHEP 08 (2016) 140, arXiv:1605.02716 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [36]

    W±Z production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev, and M. Wiesemann, “ W±Z production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,” JHEP 05 (2017) 139, arXiv:1703.09065 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Two-loop helicity amplitudes for the production of two off-shell electroweak bosons in quark-antiquark collisions,

    F. Caola, J. M. Henn, K. Melnikov, A. V. Smirnov, and V. A. Smirnov, “Two-loop helicity amplitudes for the production of two off-shell electroweak bosons in quark-antiquark collisions,” JHEP 11 (2014) 041, arXiv:1408.6409 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Two-loop helicity amplitudes for the production of two off-shell electroweak bosons in gluon fusion,

    F. Caola, J. M. Henn, K. Melnikov, A. V. Smirnov, and V. A. Smirnov, “Two-loop helicity amplitudes for the production of two off-shell electroweak bosons in gluon fusion,” JHEP 06 (2015) 129, arXiv:1503.08759 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [39]

    QCD corrections to ZZ production in gluon fusion at the LHC,

    F. Caola, K. Melnikov, R. R ¨ontsch, and L. Tancredi, “QCD corrections to ZZ production in gluon fusion at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D92 no. 9, (2015) 094028, arXiv:1509.06734 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [40]

    QCD corrections to W +W− production through gluon fusion,

    F. Caola, K. Melnikov, R. R ¨ontsch, and L. Tancredi, “QCD corrections to W +W− production through gluon fusion,” Phys. Lett. B754 (2016) 275–280, arXiv:1511.08617 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Higgs Boson Pair Production in Gluon Fusion at Next-to-Leading Order with Full Top-Quark Mass Dependence,

    S. Borowka, N. Greiner, G. Heinrich, S. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk, U. Schubert, and T. Zirke, “Higgs Boson Pair Production in Gluon Fusion at Next-to-Leading Order with Full Top-Quark Mass Dependence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 no. 1, (2016) 012001, arXiv:1604.06447 [hep-ph] . [...

    2016 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Full top quark mass dependence in Higgs boson pair production at NLO,

    S. Borowka, N. Greiner, G. Heinrich, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk, and T. Zirke, “Full top quark mass dependence in Higgs boson pair production at NLO,” JHEP 10 (2016) 107, arXiv:1608.04798 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [43]

    NLO QCD corrections to Higgs boson plus jet production with full top-quark mass dependence,

    S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, and G. Luisoni, “NLO QCD corrections to Higgs boson plus jet production with full top-quark mass dependence,” arXiv:1802.00349 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  37. [44]

    Peskin and V

    M. Peskin and V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory . Westview Press, 1995

    1995

  38. [45]

    QCD and collider physics,

    R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling, and B. R. Webber, “QCD and collider physics,” Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 8 (1996) 1–435

    1996

  39. [46]

    Collins, Foundations of perturbative QCD

    J. Collins, Foundations of perturbative QCD. Cambridge University Press, 2013. http://www.cambridge.org/de/knowledge/isbn/item5756723

    2013

  40. [47]

    Dissertori, I

    G. Dissertori, I. Knowles, and M. Schmelling, Quantum Chromodynamics: High Energy Experiments and Theory . International series of monographs on physics. Clarendon Press, 2003. https://books.google.ch/books?id=_rqDQgAACAAJ. 197 198 Bibliography

    2003

  41. [48]

    Symmetries of baryons and mesons,

    M. Gell-Mann, “Symmetries of baryons and mesons,” Phys. Rev. 125 (1962) 1067–1084

    1962

  42. [49]

    The Abelian Higgs-Kibble Model. Unitarity of the S Operator,

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “The Abelian Higgs-Kibble Model. Unitarity of the S Operator,” Phys. Lett. 52B (1974) 344–346

    1974

  43. [50]

    Renormalization of the Abelian Higgs-Kibble Model,

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of the Abelian Higgs-Kibble Model,” Commun. Math. Phys. 42 (1975) 127–162

    1975

  44. [51]

    Renormalization of Gauge Theories,

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of Gauge Theories,” Annals Phys. 98 (1976) 287–321

    1976

  45. [52]

    Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism,

    I. V. Tyutin, “Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism,” arXiv:0812.0580 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  46. [53]

    Ward Identities and Charge Renormalization of the Yang-Mills Field,

    J. C. Taylor, “Ward Identities and Charge Renormalization of the Yang-Mills Field,” Nucl. Phys. B33 (1971) 436–444

    1971

  47. [54]

    Ward Identities in Gauge Theories,

    A. A. Slavnov, “Ward Identities in Gauge Theories,” Theor. Math. Phys. 10 (1972) 99–107. [Teor. Mat. Fiz.10,153(1972)]

    1972

  48. [55]

    The renormalizability of vector meson interactions,

    S. L. Glashow, “The renormalizability of vector meson interactions,” Nucl. Phys. 10 (1959) 107–117

    1959

  49. [56]

    Weak and electromagnetic interactions,

    A. Salam and J. C. Ward, “Weak and electromagnetic interactions,” Nuovo Cim. 11 (1959) 568–577

    1959

  50. [57]

    A Model of Leptons,

    S. Weinberg, “A Model of Leptons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1264–1266

    1967

  51. [58]

    One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower, “One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,” Nucl. Phys. B425 (1994) 217–260, arXiv:hep-ph/9403226 [hep-ph]

    1994 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields,

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, “Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B44 (1972) 189–213

    1972

  53. [60]

    Collins and J

    J. Collins and J. Collins, Renormalization: An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion . AN INTRODUCTION TO RENORMALIZATION, THE RENORMALIZATION GROUP AND THE OPERATOR-PRODUCT EXPANSION. Cambridge University Press, 1984. ht...

    1984

  54. [61]

    Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Modern applications . Cambridge University Press, 2013

    2013

  55. [62]

    Renormalization of the Wilson Loops Beyond the Leading Order,

    G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin, “Renormalization of the Wilson Loops Beyond the Leading Order,” Nucl. Phys. B283 (1987) 342–364

    1987

  56. [63]

    Sudakov Form-factor in QCD,

    G. P. Korchemsky, “Sudakov Form-factor in QCD,” Phys. Lett. B220 (1989) 629–634

    1989

  57. [64]

    On lightlike Wilson loops,

    I. A. Korchemskaya and G. P. Korchemsky, “On lightlike Wilson loops,” Phys. Lett. B287 (1992) 169–175

    1992

  58. [65]

    A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD,

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour, “A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B485 (1997) 291–419, arXiv:hep-ph/9605323 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: Nucl. Phys.B510,503(1998)]

    1997 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Four-Loop Nonplanar Cusp Anomalous Dimension in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,

    R. H. Boels, T. Huber, and G. Yang, “Four-Loop Nonplanar Cusp Anomalous Dimension in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 20, (2017) 201601, arXiv:1705.03444 [hep-th] . 198 Bibliography 199

    2017 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Three-loop corrections to the soft anomalous dimension in multileg scattering,

    O. Almelid, C. Duhr, and E. Gardi, “Three-loop corrections to the soft anomalous dimension in multileg scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 no. 17, (2016) 172002, arXiv:1507.00047 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  61. [68]

    On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,

    T. Becher and M. Neubert, “On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,” JHEP 06 (2009) 081, arXiv:0903.1126 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: JHEP11,024(2013)]

    2009 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Bootstrapping the QCD soft anomalous dimension,

    O. Almelid, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, A. McLeod, and C. D. White, “Bootstrapping the QCD soft anomalous dimension,” JHEP 09 (2017) 073, arXiv:1706.10162 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1343–1346

    1973

  64. [71]

    Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,

    H. D. Politzer, “Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1346–1349

    1973

  65. [72]

    Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to Two Loop Order,

    W. E. Caswell, “Asymptotic Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories to Two Loop Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 244

    1974

  66. [73]

    Two Loop Diagrams in Yang-Mills Theory,

    D. R. T. Jones, “Two Loop Diagrams in Yang-Mills Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B75 (1974) 531

    1974

  67. [74]

    Two Loop Renormalization of the QCD in an Arbitrary Gauge,

    E. Egorian and O. V. Tarasov, “Two Loop Renormalization of the QCD in an Arbitrary Gauge,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 41 (1979) 26–32. [Theor. Math. Phys.41,863(1979)]

    1979

  68. [75]

    The Gell-Mann-Low Function of QCD in the Three Loop Approximation,

    O. V. Tarasov, A. A. Vladimirov, and A. Yu. Zharkov, “The Gell-Mann-Low Function of QCD in the Three Loop Approximation,” Phys. Lett. 93B (1980) 429–432

    1980

  69. [76]

    The Three loop QCD Beta function and anomalous dimensions,

    S. A. Larin and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “The Three loop QCD Beta function and anomalous dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B303 (1993) 334–336, arXiv:hep-ph/9302208 [hep-ph]

    1993 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Dimensional regularization and the renormalization group,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional regularization and the renormalization group,” Nucl. Phys. B61 (1973) 455–468

    1973

  71. [78]

    Deep Inelastic Scattering Beyond the Leading Order in Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories,

    W. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, D. W. Duke, and T. Muta, “Deep Inelastic Scattering Beyond the Leading Order in Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 3998

    1978

  72. [79]

    The four loop quark mass anomalous dimension and the invariant quark mass,

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, S. A. Larin, and T. van Ritbergen, “The four loop quark mass anomalous dimension and the invariant quark mass,” Phys. Lett. B405 (1997) 327–333, arXiv:hep-ph/9703284 [hep-ph]

    1997 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Quark mass anomalous dimension to O (alpha-s**4),

    K. G. Chetyrkin, “Quark mass anomalous dimension to O (alpha-s**4),” Phys. Lett. B404 (1997) 161–165, arXiv:hep-ph/9703278 [hep-ph]

    1997 arXiv

  74. [81]

    The Four-loop QCD beta-function and anomalous dimensions,

    M. Czakon, “The Four-loop QCD beta-function and anomalous dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B710 (2005) 485–498, arXiv:hep-ph/0411261 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Higgs boson production in bottom quark fusion at next-to-next-to leading order,

    R. V. Harlander and W. B. Kilgore, “Higgs boson production in bottom quark fusion at next-to-next-to leading order,” Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 013001, arXiv:hep-ph/0304035 [hep-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Factorization and Momentum-Space Resummation in Deep-Inelastic Scattering,

    T. Becher, M. Neubert, and B. D. Pecjak, “Factorization and Momentum-Space Resummation in Deep-Inelastic Scattering,” JHEP 01 (2007) 076, arXiv:hep-ph/0607228 [hep-ph] . 199 200 Bibliography

    2007 arXiv

  77. [84]

    The Quark form-factor at higher orders,

    S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, “The Quark form-factor at higher orders,” JHEP 08 (2005) 049, arXiv:hep-ph/0507039 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Two-loop QCD corrections to the heavy quark form-factors: The Vector contributions,

    W. Bernreuther, R. Bonciani, T. Gehrmann, R. Heinesch, T. Leineweber, P. Mastrolia, and E. Remiddi, “Two-loop QCD corrections to the heavy quark form-factors: The Vector contributions,” Nucl. Phys. B706 (2005) 245–324, arXiv:hep-ph/0406046 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  79. [86]

    The Three loop relation between the MS-bar and the pole quark masses,

    K. Melnikov and T. v. Ritbergen, “The Three loop relation between the MS-bar and the pole quark masses,” Phys. Lett. B482 (2000) 99–108, arXiv:hep-ph/9912391 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  80. [87]

    The Relation between the MS-bar and the on-shell quark mass at order alpha(s)**3,

    K. G. Chetyrkin and M. Steinhauser, “The Relation between the MS-bar and the on-shell quark mass at order alpha(s)**3,” Nucl. Phys. B573 (2000) 617–651, arXiv:hep-ph/9911434 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Bottom quark mass and alpha-s from the upsilon system,

    M. Jamin and A. Pich, “Bottom quark mass and alpha-s from the upsilon system,” Nucl. Phys. B507 (1997) 334–352, arXiv:hep-ph/9702276 [hep-ph]

    1997 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Low-Energy Manifestations of Heavy Particles: Application to the Neutral Current,

    J. C. Collins, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, “Low-Energy Manifestations of Heavy Particles: Application to the Neutral Current,” Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 242

    1978

  83. [90]

    Helicity Amplitudes for Multiple Bremsstrahlung in Massless Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    Z. Xu, D.-H. Zhang, and L. Chang, “Helicity Amplitudes for Multiple Bremsstrahlung in Massless Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B291 (1987) 392–428

    1987

  84. [91]

    Radiative Corrections to Muon Pair and Quark Pair Production in electron-Positron Collisions in the Z(0) Region,

    F. A. Berends, R. Kleiss, and S. Jadach, “Radiative Corrections to Muon Pair and Quark Pair Production in electron-Positron Collisions in the Z(0) Region,” Nucl. Phys. B202 (1982) 63–88

    1982

  85. [92]

    Multiple Bremsstrahlung in Gauge Theories at High-energies. 3. Finite Mass Effects in Collinear Photon Bremsstrahlung,

    CALKUL, F. A. Berends, R. Kleiss, P. de Causmaecker, R. Gastmans, W. Troost, and T. T. Wu, “Multiple Bremsstrahlung in Gauge Theories at High-energies. 3. Finite Mass Effects in Collinear Photon Bremsstrahlung,” Nucl. Phys. B239 (1984) 382–394

    1984

  86. [93]

    Calculating scattering amplitudes efficiently,

    L. J. Dixon, “Calculating scattering amplitudes efficiently,” in QCD and beyond. Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, TASI-95, Boulder, USA, June 4-30, 1995 , pp. 539–584. 1996. arXiv:hep-ph/9601359 [hep-ph] . http://www-public.slac.s...

    1995 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Two-Loop QCD Corrections to the Helicity Amplitudes for H→ 3 partons,

    T. Gehrmann, M. Jaquier, E. W. N. Glover, and A. Koukoutsakis, “Two-Loop QCD Corrections to the Helicity Amplitudes for H→ 3 partons,” JHEP 02 (2012) 056, arXiv:1112.3554 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  88. [95]

    The Number of Master Integrals Is Finite,

    A. Smirnov and A. Petukhov, “The Number of Master Integrals Is Finite,” Lett.Math.Phys. 97 (2011) 37–44, arXiv:1004.4199 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Feynman Diagrams and Differential Equations,

    M. Argeri and P. Mastrolia, “Feynman Diagrams and Differential Equations,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A22 (2007) 4375–4436, arXiv:0707.4037 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Integration by Parts: The Algorithm to Calculate β Functions in Four Loops,

    K. Chetyrkin and F. Tkachov, “Integration by Parts: The Algorithm to Calculate β Functions in Four Loops,” Nucl.Phys. B192 (1981) 159–204

    1981

  91. [98]

    Applied asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses,

    V. A. Smirnov, “Applied asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses,” Springer Tracts Mod. Phys. 177 (2002) 1–262

    2002

  92. [99]

    Smirnov, Feynman Integral Calculus

    V. Smirnov, Feynman Integral Calculus. Springer, 2006. 200 Bibliography 201

    2006

  93. [100]

    Group structure of the integration-by-part identities and its application to the reduction of multiloop integrals,

    R. N. Lee, “Group structure of the integration-by-part identities and its application to the reduction of multiloop integrals,” JHEP 07 (2008) 031, arXiv:0804.3008 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  94. [101]

    Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction,

    A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus, “Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction,” arXiv:1201.4330 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  95. [102]

    The Analytical value of the electron (g-2) at order alpha**3 in QED,

    S. Laporta and E. Remiddi, “The Analytical value of the electron (g-2) at order alpha**3 in QED,” Phys. Lett. B379 (1996) 283–291, arXiv:hep-ph/9602417 [hep-ph]

    1996 arXiv

  96. [103]

    High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,

    S. Laporta, “High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15 (2000) 5087–5159, arXiv:hep-ph/0102033 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Finding Linear Dependencies in Integration-By-Parts Equations: A Monte Carlo Approach,

    P. Kant, “Finding Linear Dependencies in Integration-By-Parts Equations: A Monte Carlo Approach,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1473–1476, arXiv:1309.7287 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  98. [105]

    A novel approach to integration by parts reduction,

    A. von Manteuffel and R. M. Schabinger, “A novel approach to integration by parts reduction,” Phys. Lett. B744 (2015) 101–104, arXiv:1406.4513 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  99. [106]

    Automatic Feynman graph generation,

    P. Nogueira, “Automatic Feynman graph generation,” J. Comput. Phys. 105 (1993) 279–289

    1993

  100. [107]

    FORM version 4.2,

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. Vermaseren, “FORM version 4.2,” arXiv:1707.06453 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  101. [108]

    LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,

    R. N. Lee, “LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 523 (2014) 012059, arXiv:1310.1145 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  102. [109]

    FIRE5: a C++ implementation of Feynman Integral REduction,

    A. V. Smirnov, “FIRE5: a C++ implementation of Feynman Integral REduction,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 189 (2015) 182–191, arXiv:1408.2372 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  103. [110]

    Kira - A Feynman Integral Reduction Program,

    P. Maierhoefer, J. Usovitsch, and P. Uwer, “Kira - A Feynman Integral Reduction Program,” arXiv:1705.05610 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  104. [111]

    Crusher

    P. Marquard, “Crusher.” Private communication

  105. [112]

    Automatic integral reduction for higher order perturbative calculations,

    C. Anastasiou and A. Lazopoulos, “Automatic integral reduction for higher order perturbative calculations,” JHEP 07 (2004) 046, arXiv:hep-ph/0404258 [hep-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  106. [113]

    Computer Algebra System Fermat

    R. H. Lewis, “Computer Algebra System Fermat.” http://home.bway.net/lewis/

  107. [114]

    JaxoDraw: A Graphical user interface for drawing Feynman diagrams,

    D. Binosi and L. Theussl, “JaxoDraw: A Graphical user interface for drawing Feynman diagrams,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 161 (2004) 76–86, arXiv:hep-ph/0309015 [hep-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  108. [115]

    JaxoDraw: A Graphical user interface for drawing Feynman diagrams. Version 2.0 release notes,

    D. Binosi, J. Collins, C. Kaufhold, and L. Theussl, “JaxoDraw: A Graphical user interface for drawing Feynman diagrams. Version 2.0 release notes,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1709–1715, arXiv:0811.4113 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  109. [116]

    Quark and gluon form factors to three loops,

    P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser, “Quark and gluon form factors to three loops,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 212002, arXiv:0902.3519 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  110. [117]

    Calculation of the quark and gluon form factors to three loops in QCD,

    T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, T. Huber, N. Ikizlerli, and C. Studerus, “Calculation of the quark and gluon form factors to three loops in QCD,” JHEP 06 (2010) 094, arXiv:1004.3653 [hep-ph] . 201 202 Bibliography

    2010 arXiv

  111. [118]

    The quark and gluon form factors to three loops in QCD through to O(ϵ2),

    T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, T. Huber, N. Ikizlerli, and C. Studerus, “The quark and gluon form factors to three loops in QCD through to O(ϵ2),” JHEP 11 (2010) 102, arXiv:1010.4478 [hep-ph]

    2010

  112. [119]

    Measurements of the Higgs boson

    P. Meridiani, “Measurements of the Higgs boson.” Talk given at the EPS Conference on High Energy Physics in Venice, Italy, on July 10, 2017

    2017

  113. [120]

    Fully differential Higgs boson production and the di-photon signal through next-to-next-to-leading order,

    C. Anastasiou, K. Melnikov, and F. Petriello, “Fully differential Higgs boson production and the di-photon signal through next-to-next-to-leading order,” Nucl. Phys. B724 (2005) 197–246, arXiv:hep-ph/0501130 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  114. [121]

    NNLO predictions for the Higgs boson signal in the H — > WW —> lnu lnu and H —> ZZ —> 4l decay channels,

    M. Grazzini, “NNLO predictions for the Higgs boson signal in the H — > WW —> lnu lnu and H —> ZZ —> 4l decay channels,” JHEP 02 (2008) 043, arXiv:0801.3232 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  115. [122]

    The fully differential hadronic production of a Higgs boson via bottom quark fusion at NNLO,

    S. B ¨uhler, F. Herzog, A. Lazopoulos, and R. M ¨uller, “The fully differential hadronic production of a Higgs boson via bottom quark fusion at NNLO,” JHEP 07 (2012) 115, arXiv:1204.4415 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  116. [123]

    Associated WH production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO,

    G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini, and F. Tramontano, “Associated WH production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 152003, arXiv:1107.1164 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  117. [124]

    Higher-order QCD effects for associated WH production and decay at the LHC,

    G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini, and F. Tramontano, “Higher-order QCD effects for associated WH production and decay at the LHC,” JHEP 04 (2014) 039, arXiv:1312.1669 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  118. [125]

    Fully Differential Vector-Boson-Fusion Higgs Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order,

    M. Cacciari, F. A. Dreyer, A. Karlberg, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi, “Fully Differential Vector-Boson-Fusion Higgs Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 no. 8, (2015) 082002, arXiv:1506.02660 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  119. [126]

    Second-order QCD effects in Higgs boson production through vector boson fusion,

    J. Cruz-Martinez, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, and A. Huss, “Second-order QCD effects in Higgs boson production through vector boson fusion,” arXiv:1802.02445 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  120. [127]

    NLO QCD corrections to t anti-t H production in hadron collisions,

    W. Beenakker, S. Dittmaier, M. Kramer, B. Plumper, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas, “NLO QCD corrections to t anti-t H production in hadron collisions,” Nucl. Phys. B653 (2003) 151–203, arXiv:hep-ph/0211352 [hep-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  121. [128]

    Associated Higgs production with top quarks at the large hadron collider: NLO QCD corrections,

    S. Dawson, C. Jackson, L. H. Orr, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth, “Associated Higgs production with top quarks at the large hadron collider: NLO QCD corrections,” Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 034022, arXiv:hep-ph/0305087 [hep-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  122. [129]

    Scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs production in association with a top–antitop pair,

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, R. Pittau, and P. Torrielli, “Scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs production in association with a top–antitop pair,” Phys. Lett. B701 (2011) 427–433, arXiv:1104.5613 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  123. [130]

    Hadronic Higgs decay to order alpha-s**4,

    K. G. Chetyrkin, B. A. Kniehl, and M. Steinhauser, “Hadronic Higgs decay to order alpha-s**4,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 353–356, arXiv:hep-ph/9705240 [hep-ph]

    1997 arXiv

  124. [131]

    Scalar correlator at O(alpha(s)**4), Higgs decay into b-quarks and bounds on the light quark masses,

    P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kuhn, “Scalar correlator at O(alpha(s)**4), Higgs decay into b-quarks and bounds on the light quark masses,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 012003, arXiv:hep-ph/0511063 [hep-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  125. [132]

    The fully differential decay rate of a Higgs boson to bottom-quarks at NNLO in QCD,

    C. Anastasiou, F. Herzog, and A. Lazopoulos, “The fully differential decay rate of a Higgs boson to bottom-quarks at NNLO in QCD,” JHEP 03 (2012) 035, arXiv:1110.2368 [hep-ph] . 202 Bibliography 203

    2012 arXiv

  126. [133]

    Associated ZH production at hadron colliders: the fully differential NNLO QCD calculation,

    G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini, and F. Tramontano, “Associated ZH production at hadron colliders: the fully differential NNLO QCD calculation,” Phys. Lett. B740 (2015) 51–55, arXiv:1407.4747 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  127. [134]

    Associated production of a Higgs boson decaying into bottom quarks at the LHC in full NNLO QCD,

    G. Ferrera, G. Somogyi, and F. Tramontano, “Associated production of a Higgs boson decaying into bottom quarks at the LHC in full NNLO QCD,” arXiv:1705.10304 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  128. [135]

    NNLO QCD corrections to associated WH production and H→b¯b decay,

    F. Caola, G. Luisoni, K. Melnikov, and R. R ¨ontsch, “NNLO QCD corrections to associated WH production and H→b¯b decay,” arXiv:1712.06954 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  129. [136]

    Higgs radiation off bottom quarks at the Tevatron and the CERN LHC,

    S. Dittmaier, M. Kr ¨amer, and M. Spira, “Higgs radiation off bottom quarks at the Tevatron and the CERN LHC,” Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 074010, arXiv:hep-ph/0309204 [hep-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  130. [137]

    Exclusive Higgs boson production with bottom quarks at hadron colliders,

    S. Dawson, C. B. Jackson, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth, “Exclusive Higgs boson production with bottom quarks at hadron colliders,” Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 074027, arXiv:hep-ph/0311067 [hep-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  131. [138]

    Higgs production in association with bottom quarks,

    M. Wiesemann, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, and P. Torrielli, “Higgs production in association with bottom quarks,” JHEP 02 (2015) 132, arXiv:1409.5301 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  132. [139]

    Higgs production in bottom quark annihilation: Transverse momentum distribution at NNLO+NNLL,

    R. V. Harlander, A. Tripathi, and M. Wiesemann, “Higgs production in bottom quark annihilation: Transverse momentum distribution at NNLO+NNLL,” Phys. Rev. D90 no. 1, (2014) 015017, arXiv:1403.7196 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  133. [140]

    Higgs plus jet production in bottom quark annihilation at next-to-leading order,

    R. V. Harlander, K. J. Ozeren, and M. Wiesemann, “Higgs plus jet production in bottom quark annihilation at next-to-leading order,” Phys. Lett. B693 (2010) 269–273, arXiv:1007.5411 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  134. [141]

    Jet-veto in bottom-quark induced Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order,

    R. Harlander and M. Wiesemann, “Jet-veto in bottom-quark induced Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order,” JHEP 04 (2012) 066, arXiv:1111.2182 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  135. [142]

    Higher-order threshold effects to inclusive processes in QCD,

    V. Ravindran, “Higher-order threshold effects to inclusive processes in QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B752 (2006) 173–196, arXiv:hep-ph/0603041 [hep-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  136. [143]

    Decays of scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs bosons into fermions: Two-loop QCD corrections to the Higgs-quark-antiquark amplitude,

    W. Bernreuther, R. Bonciani, T. Gehrmann, R. Heinesch, P. Mastrolia, and E. Remiddi, “Decays of scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs bosons into fermions: Two-loop QCD corrections to the Higgs-quark-antiquark amplitude,” Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 096002, arXiv:hep-ph/0508254 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  137. [144]

    Two-loop QCD corrections to Higgs →b +b +g amplitude,

    T. Ahmed, M. Mahakhud, P. Mathews, N. Rana, and V. Ravindran, “Two-loop QCD corrections to Higgs →b +b +g amplitude,” JHEP 08 (2014) 075, arXiv:1405.2324 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  138. [145]

    The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order,

    S. Catani, “The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order,” Phys. Lett. B427 (1998) 161–171, arXiv:hep-ph/9802439 [hep-ph]

    1998 arXiv

  139. [146]

    Multiloop amplitudes and resummation,

    G. F. Sterman and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, “Multiloop amplitudes and resummation,” Phys. Lett. B552 (2003) 48–56, arXiv:hep-ph/0210130 [hep-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  140. [147]

    Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in perturbative QCD,

    T. Becher and M. Neubert, “Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in perturbative QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 162001, arXiv:0901.0722 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.111,no.19,199905(2013)]

    2009 arXiv

  141. [148]

    Factorization constraints for soft anomalous dimensions in QCD scattering amplitudes,

    E. Gardi and L. Magnea, “Factorization constraints for soft anomalous dimensions in QCD scattering amplitudes,” JHEP 03 (2009) 079, arXiv:0901.1091 [hep-ph] . 203 204 Bibliography

    2009 arXiv

  142. [149]

    Soft triple-real radiation for Higgs production at N3LO,

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and B. Mistlberger, “Soft triple-real radiation for Higgs production at N3LO,” JHEP 07 (2013) 003, arXiv:1302.4379 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  143. [150]

    The two-loop soft current in dimensional regularization,

    C. Duhr and T. Gehrmann, “The two-loop soft current in dimensional regularization,” Phys. Lett. B727 (2013) 452–455, arXiv:1309.4393 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  144. [151]

    Single soft gluon emission at two loops,

    Y. Li and H. X. Zhu, “Single soft gluon emission at two loops,” JHEP 11 (2013) 080, arXiv:1309.4391 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  145. [152]

    Real-virtual contributions to the inclusive Higgs cross-section at N 3LO,

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, F. Herzog, and B. Mistlberger, “Real-virtual contributions to the inclusive Higgs cross-section at N 3LO,” JHEP 12 (2013) 088, arXiv:1311.1425 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  146. [153]

    N 3LO Higgs boson and Drell-Yan production at threshold: The one-loop two-emission contribution,

    Y. Li, A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger, and H. X. Zhu, “N 3LO Higgs boson and Drell-Yan production at threshold: The one-loop two-emission contribution,” Phys. Rev. D90 no. 5, (2014) 053006, arXiv:1404.5839 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  147. [154]

    Adequate bases of phase space master integrals for gg→ h at NNLO and beyond,

    M. H ¨oschele, J. Hoff, and T. Ueda, “Adequate bases of phase space master integrals for gg→ h at NNLO and beyond,” JHEP 09 (2014) 116, arXiv:1407.4049 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  148. [155]

    Higgs boson gluon–fusion production at threshold in N 3LO QCD,

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, T. Gehrmann, F. Herzog, and B. Mistlberger, “Higgs boson gluon–fusion production at threshold in N 3LO QCD,” Phys. Lett. B737 (2014) 325–328, arXiv:1403.4616 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  149. [156]

    Higgs Boson Production at Hadron Colliders at N3LO in QCD,

    B. Mistlberger, “Higgs Boson Production at Hadron Colliders at N3LO in QCD,” arXiv:1802.00833 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  150. [157]

    Drell-Yan Production at Threshold to Third Order in QCD,

    T. Ahmed, M. Mahakhud, N. Rana, and V. Ravindran, “Drell-Yan Production at Threshold to Third Order in QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 no. 11, (2014) 112002, arXiv:1404.0366 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  151. [158]

    Threshold resummation at N 3LL accuracy and soft-virtual cross sections at N 3LO,

    S. Catani, L. Cieri, D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, and M. Grazzini, “Threshold resummation at N 3LL accuracy and soft-virtual cross sections at N 3LO,” Nucl. Phys. B888 (2014) 75–91, arXiv:1405.4827 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  152. [159]

    Higgs boson production through b¯b annihilation at threshold in N 3LO QCD,

    T. Ahmed, N. Rana, and V. Ravindran, “Higgs boson production through b¯b annihilation at threshold in N 3LO QCD,” JHEP 10 (2014) 139, arXiv:1408.0787 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  153. [160]

    Two-loop quark and gluon form-factors in dimensional regularisation,

    T. Gehrmann, T. Huber, and D. Maitre, “Two-loop quark and gluon form-factors in dimensional regularisation,” Phys. Lett. B622 (2005) 295–302, arXiv:hep-ph/0507061 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  154. [161]

    Master integrals for massless three-loop form-factors: One-loop and two-loop insertions,

    T. Gehrmann, G. Heinrich, T. Huber, and C. Studerus, “Master integrals for massless three-loop form-factors: One-loop and two-loop insertions,” Phys. Lett. B640 (2006) 252–259, arXiv:hep-ph/0607185 [hep-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  155. [162]

    Master integrals for fermionic contributions to massless three-loop form-factors,

    G. Heinrich, T. Huber, and D. Maitre, “Master integrals for fermionic contributions to massless three-loop form-factors,” Phys. Lett. B662 (2008) 344–352, arXiv:0711.3590 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  156. [163]

    Nine-Propagator Master Integrals for Massless Three-Loop Form Factors,

    G. Heinrich, T. Huber, D. A. Kosower, and V. A. Smirnov, “Nine-Propagator Master Integrals for Massless Three-Loop Form Factors,” Phys. Lett. B678 (2009) 359–366, arXiv:0902.3512 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  157. [164]

    Analytic Results for Massless Three-Loop Form Factors,

    R. N. Lee, A. V. Smirnov, and V. A. Smirnov, “Analytic Results for Massless Three-Loop Form Factors,” JHEP 04 (2010) 020, arXiv:1001.2887 [hep-ph] . 204 Bibliography 205

    2010 arXiv

  158. [165]

    Loopedia, a Database for Loop Integrals,

    C. Bogner, S. Borowka, T. Hahn, G. Heinrich, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, A. von Manteuffel, M. Michel, E. Panzer, and V. Papara, “Loopedia, a Database for Loop Integrals,” arXiv:1709.01266 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  159. [166]

    Proof of the bogoliubov-parasiuk theorem on renormalization,

    K. Hepp, “Proof of the bogoliubov-parasiuk theorem on renormalization,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 2 no. 1, (Dec, 1966) 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01773358

    1966 doi

  160. [167]

    High-energy approximation of one loop Feynman integrals,

    M. Roth and A. Denner, “High-energy approximation of one loop Feynman integrals,” Nucl. Phys. B479 (1996) 495–514, arXiv:hep-ph/9605420 [hep-ph]

    1996 arXiv

  161. [168]

    An automatized algorithm to compute infrared divergent multiloop integrals,

    T. Binoth and G. Heinrich, “An automatized algorithm to compute infrared divergent multiloop integrals,” Nucl. Phys. B585 (2000) 741–759, arXiv:hep-ph/0004013 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  162. [169]

    Sector Decomposition,

    G. Heinrich, “Sector Decomposition,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A23 (2008) 1457–1486, arXiv:0803.4177 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  163. [170]

    SecDec-3.0: numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals beyond one loop,

    S. Borowka, G. Heinrich, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk, and T. Zirke, “SecDec-3.0: numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals beyond one loop,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 196 (2015) 470–491, arXiv:1502.06595 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  164. [171]

    pySecDec: a toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals,

    S. Borowka, G. Heinrich, S. Jahn, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk, and T. Zirke, “pySecDec: a toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 313–326, arXiv:1703.09692 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  165. [172]

    FIESTA4: Optimized Feynman integral calculations with GPU support,

    A. V. Smirnov, “FIESTA4: Optimized Feynman integral calculations with GPU support,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 204 (2016) 189–199, arXiv:1511.03614 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  166. [173]

    Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders Through O(α 4 S ),

    M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov, “Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders Through O(α 4 S ),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 252004, arXiv:1303.6254 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  167. [174]

    A quasi-finite basis for multi-loop Feynman integrals,

    A. von Manteuffel, E. Panzer, and R. M. Schabinger, “A quasi-finite basis for multi-loop Feynman integrals,” JHEP 02 (2015) 120, arXiv:1411.7392 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  168. [175]

    On the Computation of Form Factors in Massless QCD with Finite Master Integrals,

    A. von Manteuffel, E. Panzer, and R. M. Schabinger, “On the Computation of Form Factors in Massless QCD with Finite Master Integrals,” Phys. Rev. D93 no. 12, (2016) 125014, arXiv:1510.06758 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  169. [176]

    Numerical Multi-Loop Calculations via Finite Integrals and One-Mass EW-QCD Drell-Yan Master Integrals,

    A. von Manteuffel and R. M. Schabinger, “Numerical Multi-Loop Calculations via Finite Integrals and One-Mass EW-QCD Drell-Yan Master Integrals,” JHEP 04 (2017) 129, arXiv:1701.06583 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  170. [177]

    Dispersion Relations for Feynman Graphs,

    E. Remiddi, “Dispersion Relations for Feynman Graphs,” Helv. Phys. Acta 54 (1982) 364

    1982

  171. [178]

    Progress in the analytical evaluation of the electron (g-2) in QED: The Scalar part of the triple cross graphs,

    S. Laporta and E. Remiddi, “Progress in the analytical evaluation of the electron (g-2) in QED: The Scalar part of the triple cross graphs,” Phys. Lett. B356 (1995) 390–397

    1995

  172. [179]

    Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes,

    R. E. Cutkosky, “Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes,” J. Math. Phys. 1 (1960) 429–433

    1960

  173. [180]

    Unitarity and causality in a renormalizable field theory with unstable particles,

    M. J. G. Veltman, “Unitarity and causality in a renormalizable field theory with unstable particles,” Physica 29 (1963) 186–207

    1963

  174. [181]

    Analytical result for dimensionally regularized massless on shell double box,

    V. A. Smirnov, “Analytical result for dimensionally regularized massless on shell double box,” Phys. Lett. B460 (1999) 397–404, arXiv:hep-ph/9905323 [hep-ph] . 205 206 Bibliography

    1999 arXiv

  175. [182]

    Nonplanar massless two loop Feynman diagrams with four on-shell legs,

    J. B. Tausk, “Nonplanar massless two loop Feynman diagrams with four on-shell legs,” Phys. Lett. B469 (1999) 225–234, arXiv:hep-ph/9909506 [hep-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  176. [183]

    Scalar one loop integrals using the negative dimension approach,

    C. Anastasiou, E. W. N. Glover, and C. Oleari, “Scalar one loop integrals using the negative dimension approach,” Nucl. Phys. B572 (2000) 307–360, arXiv:hep-ph/9907494 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  177. [184]

    The Massless higher-loop two-point function,

    F. Brown, “The Massless higher-loop two-point function,” Commun. Math. Phys. 287 (2009) 925–958, arXiv:0804.1660 [math.AG]

    2009 arXiv

  178. [185]

    Three-mass triangle integrals and single-valued polylogarithms,

    F. Chavez and C. Duhr, “Three-mass triangle integrals and single-valued polylogarithms,” JHEP 11 (2012) 114, arXiv:1209.2722 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  179. [186]

    Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithms with applications to Feynman integrals,

    E. Panzer, “Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithms with applications to Feynman integrals,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 188 (2015) 148–166, arXiv:1403.3385 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  180. [187]

    Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,

    A. V. Kotikov, “Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,” Phys. Lett. B254 (1991) 158–164

    1991

  181. [188]

    Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,

    E. Remiddi, “Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,” Nuovo Cim. A110 (1997) 1435–1452, arXiv:hep-th/9711188 [hep-th]

    1997 arXiv

  182. [189]

    Master equations for master amplitudes,

    M. Caffo, H. Czyz, S. Laporta, and E. Remiddi, “Master equations for master amplitudes,” Acta Phys. Polon. B29 (1998) 2627–2635, arXiv:hep-th/9807119 [hep-th]

    1998 arXiv

  183. [190]

    The Master differential equations for the two loop sunrise selfmass amplitudes,

    M. Caffo, H. Czyz, S. Laporta, and E. Remiddi, “The Master differential equations for the two loop sunrise selfmass amplitudes,” Nuovo Cim. A111 (1998) 365–389, arXiv:hep-th/9805118 [hep-th]

    1998 arXiv

  184. [191]

    Differential equations for two loop four point functions,

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, “Differential equations for two loop four point functions,” Nucl. Phys. B580 (2000) 485–518, arXiv:hep-ph/9912329 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  185. [192]

    Two loop master integrals for gamma* — > 3 jets: The Planar topologies,

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, “Two loop master integrals for gamma* — > 3 jets: The Planar topologies,” Nucl. Phys. B601 (2001) 248–286, arXiv:hep-ph/0008287 [hep-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  186. [193]

    Two loop master integrals for gamma* – > 3 jets: The Nonplanar topologies,

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, “Two loop master integrals for gamma* – > 3 jets: The Nonplanar topologies,” Nucl. Phys. B601 (2001) 287–317, arXiv:hep-ph/0101124 [hep-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  187. [194]

    Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension,

    O. V. Tarasov, “Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension,” Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 6479–6490, arXiv:hep-th/9606018 [hep-th]

    1996 arXiv

  188. [195]

    Space-time dimensionality D as complex variable: Calculating loop integrals using dimensional recurrence relation and analytical properties with respect to D,

    R. N. Lee, “Space-time dimensionality D as complex variable: Calculating loop integrals using dimensional recurrence relation and analytical properties with respect to D,” Nucl. Phys. B830 (2010) 474–492, arXiv:0911.0252 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  189. [196]

    V. A. Smirnov, Analytic tools for Feynman integrals , vol. 250. Springer, 2012

    2012

  190. [197]

    The four-loop cusp anomalous dimension in N = 4 super Yang-Mills and analytic integration techniques for Wilson line integrals,

    J. M. Henn and T. Huber, “The four-loop cusp anomalous dimension in N = 4 super Yang-Mills and analytic integration techniques for Wilson line integrals,” JHEP 09 (2013) 147, arXiv:1304.6418 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  191. [198]

    Iterative structure of finite loop integrals,

    S. Caron-Huot and J. M. Henn, “Iterative structure of finite loop integrals,” JHEP 06 (2014) 114, arXiv:1404.2922 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  192. [199]

    Integration by parts identities in integer numbers of dimensions. A criterion for decoupling systems of differential equations,

    L. Tancredi, “Integration by parts identities in integer numbers of dimensions. A criterion for decoupling systems of differential equations,” Nucl. Phys. B901 (2015) 282–317, arXiv:1509.03330 [hep-ph] . 206 Bibliography 207

    2015 arXiv

  193. [200]

    Simplifying Differential Equations for Multiscale Feynman Integrals beyond Multiple Polylogarithms,

    L. Adams, E. Chaubey, and S. Weinzierl, “Simplifying Differential Equations for Multiscale Feynman Integrals beyond Multiple Polylogarithms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 14, (2017) 141602, arXiv:1702.04279 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  194. [201]

    The Property of maximal transcendentality in the N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills,

    A. V. Kotikov, “The Property of maximal transcendentality in the N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills,” in In *Diakonov, D. (ed.): Subtleties in quantum field theory* 150-174, pp. 150–174. 2010. arXiv:1005.5029 [hep-th] . https://inspirehep.net/record/856436/files/arXiv:1005.5029.pdf

    2010 arXiv

  195. [202]

    Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,

    J. M. Henn, “Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251601, arXiv:1304.1806 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  196. [203]

    Iterated path integrals,

    K.-T. Chen, “Iterated path integrals,” Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 83 (1977) 831–879

    1977

  197. [204]

    Normalized Fuchsian form on Riemann sphere and differential equations for multiloop integrals,

    R. N. Lee and A. A. Pomeransky, “Normalized Fuchsian form on Riemann sphere and differential equations for multiloop integrals,” arXiv:1707.07856 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  198. [205]

    Lectures on differential equations for Feynman integrals,

    J. M. Henn, “Lectures on differential equations for Feynman integrals,” J. Phys. A48 (2015) 153001, arXiv:1412.2296 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  199. [206]

    Sharpening The Leading Singularity,

    F. Cachazo, “Sharpening The Leading Singularity,” arXiv:0803.1988 [hep-th]

    1988 arXiv

  200. [207]

    Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, and J. Trnka, “Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,” JHEP 06 (2012) 125, arXiv:1012.6032 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  201. [208]

    Reducing differential equations for multiloop master integrals,

    R. N. Lee, “Reducing differential equations for multiloop master integrals,” JHEP 04 (2015) 108, arXiv:1411.0911 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  202. [209]

    Fuchsia and master integrals for splitting functions from differential equations in QCD,

    O. Gituliar and V. Magerya, “Fuchsia and master integrals for splitting functions from differential equations in QCD,” PoS LL2016 (2016) 030, arXiv:1607.00759 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  203. [210]

    Fuchsia: a tool for reducing differential equations for Feynman master integrals to epsilon form,

    O. Gituliar and V. Magerya, “Fuchsia: a tool for reducing differential equations for Feynman master integrals to epsilon form,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 219 (2017) 329–338, arXiv:1701.04269 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  204. [211]

    epsilon: A tool to find a canonical basis of master integrals,

    M. Prausa, “epsilon: A tool to find a canonical basis of master integrals,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 219 (2017) 361–376, arXiv:1701.00725 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  205. [212]

    Calculating Three Loop Ladder and V-Topologies for Massive Operator Matrix Elements by Computer Algebra,

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl ¨umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, and C. Schneider, “Calculating Three Loop Ladder and V-Topologies for Massive Operator Matrix Elements by Computer Algebra,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 202 (2016) 33–112, arXiv:1509.08324 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  206. [213]

    Transforming differential equations of multi-loop Feynman integrals into canonical form,

    C. Meyer, “Transforming differential equations of multi-loop Feynman integrals into canonical form,” JHEP 04 (2017) 006, arXiv:1611.01087 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  207. [214]

    Algorithmic transformation of multi-loop master integrals to a canonical basis with CANONICA,

    C. Meyer, “Algorithmic transformation of multi-loop master integrals to a canonical basis with CANONICA,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 295–312, arXiv:1705.06252 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  208. [215]

    Magnus and Dyson Series for Master Integrals,

    M. Argeri, S. Di Vita, P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, J. Schlenk, U. Schubert, and L. Tancredi, “Magnus and Dyson Series for Master Integrals,” JHEP 03 (2014) 082, arXiv:1401.2979 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  209. [216]

    The two-loop master integrals for qq→VV ,

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, L. Tancredi, and E. Weihs, “The two-loop master integrals for qq→VV ,” JHEP 06 (2014) 032, arXiv:1404.4853 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  210. [217]

    The ε-form of the differential equations for Feynman integrals in the elliptic case,

    L. Adams and S. Weinzierl, “The ε-form of the differential equations for Feynman integrals in the elliptic case,” arXiv:1802.05020 [hep-ph] . 207 208 Bibliography

    arXiv

  211. [218]

    ¨Uber die Transzendenten, welche aus wiederholten Integrationen rationaler Formeln entstehen,

    E. E. Kummer, “ ¨Uber die Transzendenten, welche aus wiederholten Integrationen rationaler Formeln entstehen,” J. Reine Angew. Math. 21 (1840) 74–90

  212. [219]

    Sur les groupes des ´ equations lin´ eaires,

    H. Poincar´ e, “Sur les groupes des ´ equations lin´ eaires,”Acta Mathematica 4 (1883) 215

  213. [220]

    Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes,

    A. B. Goncharov, “Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes,” Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998) 497–516, arXiv:1105.2076 [math.AG]

    1998 arXiv

  214. [221]

    Der eulersche dilogarithmus und seine verallgemeinerungen: eine monographie,

    N. Nielsen, “Der eulersche dilogarithmus und seine verallgemeinerungen: eine monographie,” Nova Acta. Abh. der Kaiserl. Leop.-Carol. Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher 90 (1909) 121–212

    1909

  215. [222]

    Harmonic polylogarithms,

    E. Remiddi and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “Harmonic polylogarithms,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15 (2000) 725–754, arXiv:hep-ph/9905237 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  216. [223]

    Numerical evaluation of harmonic polylogarithms,

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, “Numerical evaluation of harmonic polylogarithms,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 141 (2001) 296–312, arXiv:hep-ph/0107173 [hep-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  217. [224]

    Numerical evaluation of two-dimensional harmonic polylogarithms,

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, “Numerical evaluation of two-dimensional harmonic polylogarithms,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 144 (2002) 200–223, arXiv:hep-ph/0111255 [hep-ph]

    2002 arXiv

  218. [225]

    Numerical evaluation of multiple polylogarithms,

    J. Vollinga and S. Weinzierl, “Numerical evaluation of multiple polylogarithms,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 177, arXiv:hep-ph/0410259 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  219. [226]

    HPL, a mathematica implementation of the harmonic polylogarithms,

    D. Maitre, “HPL, a mathematica implementation of the harmonic polylogarithms,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 174 (2006) 222–240, arXiv:hep-ph/0507152 [hep-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  220. [227]

    Extension of HPL to complex arguments,

    D. Maitre, “Extension of HPL to complex arguments,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 846, arXiv:hep-ph/0703052 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  221. [228]

    CHAPLIN - Complex Harmonic Polylogarithms in Fortran,

    S. Buehler and C. Duhr, “CHAPLIN - Complex Harmonic Polylogarithms in Fortran,”Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2703–2713, arXiv:1106.5739 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  222. [229]

    Zagier, Polylogarithms, Dedekind Zeta Functions, and the Algebraic K-Theory of Fields

    D. Zagier, Polylogarithms, Dedekind Zeta Functions, and the Algebraic K-Theory of Fields. Birkh ¨auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1991

    1991

  223. [230]

    Geometry of configurations, polylogarithms and motivic cohomology,

    A. Goncharov, “Geometry of configurations, polylogarithms and motivic cohomology,”Adv. Math. 114 (1995) 197–318

    1995

  224. [231]

    Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives,

    A. B. Goncharov, “Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives,” arXiv:math/0103059 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  225. [232]

    Galois symmetries of fundamental groupoids and noncommutative geometry,

    A. B. Goncharov, “Galois symmetries of fundamental groupoids and noncommutative geometry,” Duke Math. J. 128 (2005) 209, arXiv:math/0208144 [math.AG]

    2005 arXiv

  226. [233]

    Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops,

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, “Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 151605, arXiv:1006.5703 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  227. [234]

    From polygons and symbols to polylogarithmic functions,

    C. Duhr, H. Gangl, and J. R. Rhodes, “From polygons and symbols to polylogarithmic functions,” JHEP 10 (2012) 075, arXiv:1110.0458 [math-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  228. [235]

    Hopf algebras, coproducts and symbols: an application to Higgs boson amplitudes,

    C. Duhr, “Hopf algebras, coproducts and symbols: an application to Higgs boson amplitudes,” JHEP 08 (2012) 043, arXiv:1203.0454 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  229. [236]

    On the reduction of generalized polylogarithms to Lin and Li2,2 and on the evaluation thereof,

    H. Frellesvig, D. Tommasini, and C. Wever, “On the reduction of generalized polylogarithms to Lin and Li2,2 and on the evaluation thereof,” JHEP 03 (2016) 189, arXiv:1601.02649 [hep-ph] . 208 Bibliography 209

    2016 arXiv

  230. [237]

    The Complete Two-Loop Integrated Jet Thrust Distribution In Soft-Collinear Effective Theory,

    A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger, and H. X. Zhu, “The Complete Two-Loop Integrated Jet Thrust Distribution In Soft-Collinear Effective Theory,” JHEP 03 (2014) 139, arXiv:1309.3560 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  231. [238]

    Two-loop master integrals for q¯q→VV : the planar topologies,

    T. Gehrmann, L. Tancredi, and E. Weihs, “Two-loop master integrals for q¯q→VV : the planar topologies,” JHEP 08 (2013) 070, arXiv:1306.6344

    2013 arXiv

  232. [239]

    Weihs, Dark Higgs studies and Diboson production at the Large Hadron Collider

    E. Weihs, Dark Higgs studies and Diboson production at the Large Hadron Collider . PhD thesis, University of Zurich, August, 2013

    2013

  233. [240]

    Introduction to the GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language,

    C. W. Bauer, A. Frink, and R. Kreckel, “Introduction to the GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language,” J. Symb. Comput. 33 (2000) 1, arXiv:cs/0004015 [cs-sc]

    2000 arXiv

  234. [241]

    Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold,

    M. Beneke and V. A. Smirnov, “Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold,” Nucl. Phys. B522 (1998) 321–344, arXiv:hep-ph/9711391 [hep-ph]

    1998 arXiv

  235. [242]

    Automatic computation of Feynman diagrams,

    R. Harlander and M. Steinhauser, “Automatic computation of Feynman diagrams,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 43 (1999) 167–228, arXiv:hep-ph/9812357 [hep-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  236. [243]

    Asymptotic expansions: Methods and applications,

    R. Harlander, “Asymptotic expansions: Methods and applications,” Acta Phys. Polon. B30 (1999) 3443–3462, arXiv:hep-ph/9910496 [hep-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  237. [244]

    A Phenomenological Profile of the Higgs Boson,

    J. R. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and D. V. Nanopoulos, “A Phenomenological Profile of the Higgs Boson,” Nucl. Phys. B106 (1976) 292

    1976

  238. [245]

    Higgs Particle Production by Z —> H Gamma,

    R. N. Cahn, M. S. Chanowitz, and N. Fleishon, “Higgs Particle Production by Z —> H Gamma,” Phys. Lett. 82B (1979) 113–116

    1979

  239. [246]

    Induced Higgs Couplings to Neutral Bosons in e+e− Collisions,

    L. Bergstrom and G. Hulth, “Induced Higgs Couplings to Neutral Bosons in e+e− Collisions,” Nucl. Phys. B259 (1985) 137–155. [Erratum: Nucl. Phys.B276,744(1986)]

    1985

  240. [247]

    Measurement of Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

    ATLAS, G. Aad et al., “Measurement of Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev. D90 no. 11, (2014) 112015, arXiv:1408.7084 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  241. [248]

    Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties,

    CMS, V. Khachatryan et al., “Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties,” Eur. Phys. J. C74 no. 10, (2014) 3076, arXiv:1407.0558 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  242. [249]

    Search for Higgs boson decays to a photon and a Z boson in pp collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

    ATLAS, G. Aad et al., “Search for Higgs boson decays to a photon and a Z boson in pp collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Lett. B732 (2014) 8–27, arXiv:1402.3051 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  243. [250]

    Search for a Higgs boson decaying into a Z and a photon in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV,

    CMS, S. Chatrchyan et al., “Search for a Higgs boson decaying into a Z and a photon in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV,” Phys. Lett. B726 (2013) 587–609, arXiv:1307.5515 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  244. [251]

    Higgs Boson Production and Decay: Dalitz Sector,

    G. Passarino, “Higgs Boson Production and Decay: Dalitz Sector,” Phys. Lett. B727 (2013) 424–431, arXiv:1308.0422 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  245. [253]

    Standard Model Higgs-Boson Branching Ratios with Uncertainties,

    A. Denner, S. Heinemeyer, I. Puljak, D. Rebuzzi, and M. Spira, “Standard Model Higgs-Boson Branching Ratios with Uncertainties,” Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1753, arXiv:1107.5909 [hep-ph] . 209 210 Bibliography

    2011 arXiv

  246. [254]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 2. Differential Distributions,

    S. Dittmaier et al., “Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 2. Differential Distributions,” arXiv:1201.3084 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  247. [255]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties,

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, J. R. Andersen et al., “Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties,” arXiv:1307.1347 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  248. [256]

    The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model,

    A. Djouadi, “The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model,” Phys. Rept. 457 (2008) 1–216, arXiv:hep-ph/0503172 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  249. [257]

    Integration of the two-loop Master Integrals to the decay rate H→Zγ in terms of classical polylogarithms

    A. von Manteuffel, “Integration of the two-loop Master Integrals to the decay rate H→Zγ in terms of classical polylogarithms.” Private communication

  250. [258]

    Higgs boson production at the LHC,

    M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P. M. Zerwas, “Higgs boson production at the LHC,” Nucl. Phys. B453 (1995) 17–82, arXiv:hep-ph/9504378 [hep-ph]

    1995 arXiv

  251. [259]

    On the Resummation of large QCD logarithms in Higgs —> gamma gamma decay,

    R. Akhoury, H. Wang, and O. I. Yakovlev, “On the Resummation of large QCD logarithms in Higgs —> gamma gamma decay,” Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 113008, arXiv:hep-ph/0102105 [hep-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  252. [260]

    Scalar One-Loop Integrals,

    G. ’t Hooft and M. Veltman, “Scalar One-Loop Integrals,” Nucl.Phys. B153 (1979) 365–401

    1979

  253. [261]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    Particle Data Group, K. A. Olive et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” Chin. Phys. C38 (2014) 090001

    2014

  254. [262]

    RunDec: A Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses,

    K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, “RunDec: A Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 133 (2000) 43–65, arXiv:hep-ph/0004189 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  255. [263]

    Integration of a planar two-loop box appearing in Higgs-plus-jet production with full quark mass dependence in terms of classical polylogarithms

    A. von Manteuffel, “Integration of a planar two-loop box appearing in Higgs-plus-jet production with full quark mass dependence in terms of classical polylogarithms.” Private communication

  256. [264]

    Two-loop planar master integrals for Higgs→ 3 partons with full heavy-quark mass dependence,

    R. Bonciani, V. Del Duca, H. Frellesvig, J. M. Henn, F. Moriello, and V. A. Smirnov, “Two-loop planar master integrals for Higgs→ 3 partons with full heavy-quark mass dependence,” JHEP 12 (2016) 096, arXiv:1609.06685 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  257. [265]

    ¨Uber die numerische Aufl ¨osung von Differentialgleichungen,

    C. Runge, “ ¨Uber die numerische Aufl ¨osung von Differentialgleichungen,” Mathematische Annalen 46 no. 2, (June, 1895) 167–178

  258. [266]

    Beitrag zur n ¨aherungsweisen Integration totaler Differentialgleichungen,

    M. W. Kutta, “Beitrag zur n ¨aherungsweisen Integration totaler Differentialgleichungen,”Zeitschrift f¨ur Mathematik und Physik 46 (1901) 435–453

    1901

  259. [267]

    Virtual amplitudes and threshold behaviour of hadronic top-quark pair-production cross sections,

    P. B ¨arnreuther, M. Czakon, and P. Fiedler, “Virtual amplitudes and threshold behaviour of hadronic top-quark pair-production cross sections,” JHEP 02 (2014) 078, arXiv:1312.6279 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  260. [268]

    Numerical integration of planar two-loop Master Integrals required for the NLO corrections to Higgs-plus-jet production with full quark mass dependence through Runge-Kutta methods

    J. Hoff and P. Marquard, “Numerical integration of planar two-loop Master Integrals required for the NLO corrections to Higgs-plus-jet production with full quark mass dependence through Runge-Kutta methods.” Private communication

  261. [269]

    The Master two loop two point function: The General case,

    D. Kreimer, “The Master two loop two point function: The General case,” Phys. Lett. B273 (1991) 277–281

    1991

  262. [270]

    Closed expressions for specific massive multiloop selfenergy integrals,

    F. A. Berends, M. Buza, M. Bohm, and R. Scharf, “Closed expressions for specific massive multiloop selfenergy integrals,” Z. Phys. C63 (1994) 227–234

    1994

  263. [271]

    On the numerical evaluation of scalar two loop selfenergy diagrams,

    F. A. Berends and J. B. Tausk, “On the numerical evaluation of scalar two loop selfenergy diagrams,” Nucl. Phys. B421 (1994) 456–470. 210 Bibliography 211

    1994

  264. [272]

    Calculation of two-loop self-energies in the electroweak Standard Model,

    S. Bauberger, M. B ¨ohm, G. Weiglein, F. A. Berends, and M. Buza, “Calculation of two-loop self-energies in the electroweak Standard Model,” Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 37B no. 2, (1994) 95–114, arXiv:hep-ph/9406404 [hep-ph]

    1994 arXiv

  265. [273]

    Analytical and numerical methods for massive two loop selfenergy diagrams,

    S. Bauberger, F. A. Berends, M. Bohm, and M. Buza, “Analytical and numerical methods for massive two loop selfenergy diagrams,” Nucl. Phys. B434 (1995) 383–407, arXiv:hep-ph/9409388 [hep-ph]

    1995 arXiv

  266. [274]

    Analytic treatment of the two loop equal mass sunrise graph,

    S. Laporta and E. Remiddi, “Analytic treatment of the two loop equal mass sunrise graph,” Nucl. Phys. B704 (2005) 349–386, arXiv:hep-ph/0406160 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  267. [275]

    Hypergeometric representation of the two-loop equal mass sunrise diagram,

    O. V. Tarasov, “Hypergeometric representation of the two-loop equal mass sunrise diagram,” Phys. Lett. B638 (2006) 195–201, arXiv:hep-ph/0603227 [hep-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  268. [276]

    The two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses,

    L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, “The two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses,” J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 052303, arXiv:1302.7004 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  269. [277]

    Schouten identities for Feynman graph amplitudes; The Master Integrals for the two-loop massive sunrise graph,

    E. Remiddi and L. Tancredi, “Schouten identities for Feynman graph amplitudes; The Master Integrals for the two-loop massive sunrise graph,” Nucl. Phys. B880 (2014) 343–377, arXiv:1311.3342 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  270. [278]

    A Second-Order Differential Equation for the Two-Loop Sunrise Graph with Arbitrary Masses,

    S. M ¨uller-Stach, S. Weinzierl, and R. Zayadeh, “A Second-Order Differential Equation for the Two-Loop Sunrise Graph with Arbitrary Masses,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 6 (2012) 203–222, arXiv:1112.4360 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  271. [279]

    The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph,

    S. Bloch and P. Vanhove, “The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph,” J. Number Theor. 148 (2015) 328–364, arXiv:1309.5865 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  272. [280]

    The two-loop sunrise graph in two space-time dimensions with arbitrary masses in terms of elliptic dilogarithms,

    L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, “The two-loop sunrise graph in two space-time dimensions with arbitrary masses in terms of elliptic dilogarithms,” J. Math. Phys. 55 no. 10, (2014) 102301, arXiv:1405.5640 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  273. [281]

    Differential equations and dispersion relations for Feynman amplitudes. The two-loop massive sunrise and the kite integral,

    E. Remiddi and L. Tancredi, “Differential equations and dispersion relations for Feynman amplitudes. The two-loop massive sunrise and the kite integral,” Nucl. Phys. B907 (2016) 400–444, arXiv:1602.01481 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  274. [282]

    The kite integral to all orders in terms of elliptic polylogarithms,

    L. Adams, C. Bogner, A. Schweitzer, and S. Weinzierl, “The kite integral to all orders in terms of elliptic polylogarithms,” J. Math. Phys. 57 no. 12, (2016) 122302, arXiv:1607.01571 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  275. [283]

    Multiple Elliptic Polylogarithms,

    F. C. Brown and A. Levin, “Multiple Elliptic Polylogarithms,” arXiv:arXiv:1110.6917 [math]

    arXiv

  276. [284]

    The two-loop sunrise integral around four space-time dimensions and generalisations of the Clausen and Glaisher functions towards the elliptic case,

    L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, “The two-loop sunrise integral around four space-time dimensions and generalisations of the Clausen and Glaisher functions towards the elliptic case,” J. Math. Phys. 56 no. 7, (2015) 072303, arXiv:1504.03255 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  277. [285]

    The iterated structure of the all-order result for the two-loop sunrise integral,

    L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, “The iterated structure of the all-order result for the two-loop sunrise integral,” J. Math. Phys. 57 no. 3, (2016) 032304, arXiv:1512.05630 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  278. [286]

    An Elliptic Generalization of Multiple Polylogarithms,

    E. Remiddi and L. Tancredi, “An Elliptic Generalization of Multiple Polylogarithms,” Nucl. Phys. B925 (2017) 212–251, arXiv:1709.03622 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  279. [287]

    Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves I: general formalism,

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and L. Tancredi, “Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves I: general formalism,” arXiv:1712.07089 [hep-th]. 211 212 Bibliography

    arXiv

  280. [288]

    Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves II: an application to the sunrise integral,

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and L. Tancredi, “Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves II: an application to the sunrise integral,” arXiv:1712.07095 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  281. [289]

    Elliptic multiple zeta values and one-loop superstring amplitudes,

    J. Broedel, C. R. Mafra, N. Matthes, and O. Schlotterer, “Elliptic multiple zeta values and one-loop superstring amplitudes,” JHEP 07 (2015) 112, arXiv:1412.5535 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  282. [290]

    Relations between elliptic multiple zeta values and a special derivation algebra,

    J. Broedel, N. Matthes, and O. Schlotterer, “Relations between elliptic multiple zeta values and a special derivation algebra,” J. Phys. A49 no. 15, (2016) 155203, arXiv:1507.02254 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  283. [291]

    Twisted elliptic multiple zeta values and non-planar one-loop open-string amplitudes,

    J. Broedel, N. Matthes, G. Richter, and O. Schlotterer, “Twisted elliptic multiple zeta values and non-planar one-loop open-string amplitudes,” arXiv:1704.03449 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  284. [292]

    Feynman integrals and iterated integrals of modular forms,

    L. Adams and S. Weinzierl, “Feynman integrals and iterated integrals of modular forms,” arXiv:1704.08895 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  285. [293]

    On the maximal cut of Feynman integrals and the solution of their differential equations,

    A. Primo and L. Tancredi, “On the maximal cut of Feynman integrals and the solution of their differential equations,” Nucl. Phys. B916 (2017) 94–116, arXiv:1610.08397 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  286. [294]

    Maximal cuts and differential equations for Feynman integrals. An application to the three-loop massive banana graph,

    A. Primo and L. Tancredi, “Maximal cuts and differential equations for Feynman integrals. An application to the three-loop massive banana graph,” Nucl. Phys. B921 (2017) 316–356, arXiv:1704.05465 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  287. [295]

    Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Baikov representation,

    H. Frellesvig and C. G. Papadopoulos, “Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Baikov representation,” JHEP 04 (2017) 083, arXiv:1701.07356 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  288. [296]

    Baikov-Lee Representations Of Cut Feynman Integrals,

    M. Harley, F. Moriello, and R. M. Schabinger, “Baikov-Lee Representations Of Cut Feynman Integrals,” JHEP 06 (2017) 049, arXiv:1705.03478 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  289. [297]

    All orders structure and efficient computation of linearly reducible elliptic Feynman integrals,

    M. Hidding and F. Moriello, “All orders structure and efficient computation of linearly reducible elliptic Feynman integrals,” arXiv:1712.04441 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  290. [298]

    Analytic continuation and numerical evaluation of the kite integral and the equal mass sunrise integral,

    C. Bogner, A. Schweitzer, and S. Weinzierl, “Analytic continuation and numerical evaluation of the kite integral and the equal mass sunrise integral,” Nucl. Phys. B922 (2017) 528–550, arXiv:1705.08952 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  291. [299]

    A non-planar two-loop three-point function beyond multiple polylogarithms,

    A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, “A non-planar two-loop three-point function beyond multiple polylogarithms,” JHEP 06 (2017) 127, arXiv:1701.05905 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  292. [300]

    Analytic continuation of massless two loop four point functions,

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, “Analytic continuation of massless two loop four point functions,” Nucl. Phys. B640 (2002) 379–411, arXiv:hep-ph/0207020 [hep-ph]

    2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.