Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 28 references

Long-term predictive models for mosquito borne diseases: a narrative review

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Temperature is the critical driver in long-term mosquito-borne disease prediction, and socio-demographic factors are the field's biggest missed opportunity.

arxiv 2411.13680 v1 pith:YAJL6WO7 submitted 2024-11-20 q-bio.QM math.DSphysics.bio-ph

Marcio Maciel Bastos , Luiz Max Carvalho , Eduardo Correa Araujo , Flávio Codeço Coelho This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.QMmath.DSphysics.bio-ph MSC 92D3092-02
keywords mosquito-bornediseaseslong-termpredictiontemperature-dependenttransmissionvectorialcapacitybasicreproductionnumberdengueforecastingclimatechangesocio-demographicfactors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review asks what actually drives long-term forecasts of mosquito-borne disease incidence, and it answers that temperature is the most reliable and widely used driver. Across the papers surveyed, temperature enters through mechanistic quantities such as vectorial capacity and temperature-dependent basic reproduction number, and it repeatedly delivers meaningful predictive skill. Rainfall is more ambiguous, because moderate rain creates breeding sites while heavy rain flushes larvae. The review also finds that socio-demographic variables such as population density, mobility, and GDP are rarely integrated, and it argues this omission is the field's largest opportunity for more comprehensive long-term forecasts.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the vectorial capacity equation $VC = \frac{m b c a^2 p^n}{-\ln p}$ and the temperature-dependent basic reproduction number $R_0(T)$, built from a Ross-Macdonald-style model with $R_0(T) = \left[\frac{a(T)^2 b(T) c(T) \exp(-PDR(T)/\mu(T)) \cdot EFD(T) p_{EA}(T) MDR(T)}{N r \mu(T)^3}\right]^{1/2}$. These translate temperature into transmission potential through mosquito biting rate, survival, extrinsic incubation, and egg-to-adult development, and they are what let temperature stand in for the whole transmission cycle in long-term projections. The review uses these quantities as its organizing lens to compare models with prediction horizons beyond two years and to argue that temperature-driven mechanistic structure is the field's current backbone.

What would settle it

A systematic search with explicit screening counts that locates numerous long-term MBD models whose main predictive variables are precipitation, humidity, or socio-demographic factors, and that perform comparably to temperature-only models, would refute the claim that temperature is the field's consistent critical driver.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the long-term predictive literature for mosquito-borne diseases is organized around temperature as the critical climate driver, with mechanistic models expressing temperature-dependent mosquito biology as the workhorses of this literature. It documents vectorial capacity simulations, empirically calibrated temperature-dependent $R_0(T)$ functions, and temperature-driven compartmental models as the dominant approaches. Precipitation appears in several models but its effect is nonlinear and region-dependent, so it enters less consistently. The converse finding is an absence: socio-demographic factors such as population density, human mobility, air travel, and GDP appear in only a minority of models, and the review concludes that integrating them is the clearest path toward more reliable long-term forecasts.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that temperature is the critical driver rests on the premise that the small, subjectively selected set of reviewed papers represents the broader long-term mosquito-borne disease prediction literature; if that sample is unrepresentative, the synthesis is an artifact of the selection.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If temperature is the critical driver, long-term MBD forecasts should prioritize accurate decadal temperature projections, including bias-corrected multi-model ensembles from climate science.
  • Mechanistic quantities such as vectorial capacity and $R_0(T)$ should remain central in next-generation models, because they give climate inputs a biological interpretation.
  • Rainfall must be modeled nonlinearly: moderate precipitation can amplify transmission while excessive rainfall can suppress it, so simple linear rainfall terms are likely to mislead.
  • Socio-demographic variables are currently underrepresented, so models that add population density, mobility, GDP, and urbanization have the greatest room to improve long-term forecasts.
  • Techniques from meteorology and demography, including ensemble averaging, bias correction, Bayesian parameter estimation, and structural-demographic indicators, are transferable to MBD prediction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The temperature-centric synthesis may partly reflect the review's own selection; the authors' inclusion criteria are subjective and no screening counts are given, so a broader corpus might show precipitation-driven or socio-demographic models as more prominent.
  • A testable extension is to code every long-term MBD model in a systematic corpus for which variable classes appear in the final model, then compare predictive skill of temperature-only versus temperature-plus-demography models; this would show whether the identified gap is a modeling gap or a data gap.
  • The paper's decadal horizon implies that static assumptions, such as constant human population and fixed birth and death rates, are the first assumptions to relax, because migration and demographic change accumulate over ten years.
  • Borrowing meteorology's ensemble and bias-correction toolbox points toward replacing point forecasts of MBD incidence with probabilistic multi-scenario forecasts, which is what public-health planning would actually consume.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a narrative review of long-term predictive models for mosquito-borne diseases (MBDs). The authors describe a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar, summarize six long-term modeling studies (Patz, Ryan, Muñoz, Colón-González, Van Wyk, Petrova) plus several short-term and interdisciplinary modeling approaches, and tabulate variables, data sources, strengths and limitations. The review's central claims are that temperature is a critical driver in MBD predictive models with considerable incidence predictive capacity, that rainfall has context-dependent effects, and that socio-demographic factors are often neglected and constitute a research opportunity.

Significance. This review is useful as a compact entry point to a heterogeneous literature, and it makes a reasonable high-level observation that temperature-dependent mechanistic ingredients (vectorial capacity, R0(T)) are widely used in long-term MBD projections. The tables (Tables 1-4) collect study objectives, limitations, variables, and data sources in an accessible form, and the discussion of transferable methods from climate science (e.g., multi-model ensembles, Bayesian linear inverse models, analog forecasting) and from structural-demographic theory is constructive. However, the manuscript does not provide original code or machine-checked analyses; its value rests on the accuracy and representativeness of the narrative synthesis. The main claims would be valuable if properly calibrated to the evidence, but they currently overstate the degree to which the reviewed studies demonstrate predictive skill.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.1 (Tables 1-2)] The abstract's claim that temperature is 'consistently used in multiple reviewed papers with considerable incidence predictive capacity' is not supported by the studies cited. Patz et al. (18) computes epidemic potential from vectorial capacity and GCM temperature with no incidence forecast or validation. Ryan et al. (22) maps temperature-dependent R0(T) and distribution shifts, not incidence predictions. Muñoz et al. (16) is a causality and time-frequency analysis, not a predictive model. Van Wyk et al. (26) is a mechanistic projection with fixed birth/death rates and no predictive skill assessment. Petrova et al. (19) produces long-lead dengue forecasts, but Table 2 itself lists 'lacks detailed predictive accuracy metrics' as a limitation. Only Colón-González et al. (3) reports MAE and blocked cross-validation, and that model includes population density, mobility, air travel, and GDP alongside temperature. The 'considerable incidence predictive capacity' clause is thus inferred from the frequency of temperature in Table 3 rather than from demonstrated predictive performance; no reviewed study reports an ablation or comparison showing that removing temperature degrades forecast skill. Please rephrase the headline claim to distinguish 'frequently used mechanistic driver' from 'demonstrated predictive capacity', or add a systematic appraisal of predictive validity across the reviewed studies.
  2. [Section 2 (Methodology)] The inclusion and exclusion criteria are described only in subjective terms and no screening statistics are reported. The text states that articles with 'significant methodological biases or dubious findings' were excluded, and that studies with prediction periods exceeding two years were included 'due to the limited number of studies', but the reader is given no counts of records identified, screened, excluded, or selected, and no flow diagram. Without these numbers, the set of six long-term studies cannot be assessed for representativeness, and the review's conclusion that temperature is the field's critical driver could be an artifact of sample selection. Please provide a PRISMA-style flow chart or at minimum report the numbers of studies retrieved and excluded at each stage, with reasons.
  3. [Section 7 (Conclusions) and Abstract] The review treats the reviewed studies as providing comparable evidence about drivers, but they differ in target quantity (epidemic potential, R0, causality, incidence forecasts), spatial scale, and validation status. The conclusions that temperature is 'critical' and that socio-demographic factors are 'often not considered' require either a systematic comparison of model performance or an explicit statement that these are frequency-based observations about model choices rather than evidence of predictive importance. Please add a limitations paragraph that acknowledges the uneven evidence base and the absence of a systematic risk-of-bias or quality assessment.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains several grammatical errors: 'Thus, is urgent to comprehend' should be 'Thus, it is urgent to comprehend', 'specially' should be 'especially', and 'highlighting the potential facing challenges' is garbled. Please copyedit throughout.
  2. [References, [24]] Reference [24] lists 'U. Tatem' as the first author; the systematic review of mathematical models of vector-borne diseases is by Andrew J. Tatem et al. (J R Soc Interface 2013). Please correct the citation.
  3. [Section 3.2] The sentence 'The compartmental model, originally conceptualized pioneering byGorgas and Garrison (8) and Macdonald (12), was formally introduced in its seminal form by Kermack and McKendrick (10)' is missing a space and awkwardly credits Kermack-McKendrick after Gorgas-Garrison; please rephrase for clarity and historical accuracy.
  4. [Section 4] In the sentence 'Specific variables such as ... where employed by applied, play vital roles', the phrase 'where employed by applied' is unintelligible; please rewrite.
  5. [Table 3] The note that variables are grouped 'arbitrarily' (Section 4) weakens the table; consider providing an explicit definition for each category or a supplementary table with variable definitions and units.
  6. [Figure 1] If Figure 1 is included in the final version, ensure the histogram has labeled axes and a legend for category colors; the current text does not describe the figure contents beyond 'Frequency of Usage of Variable Categories in Predictive Models'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this is a narrative literature review with no fitted parameters, no predictions derived from them, and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper is a narrative review of long-term predictive models for mosquito-borne diseases. It does not fit parameters to data, make forecasts, or derive a quantity from its own inputs, so the fitted-input-as-prediction and self-definitional patterns do not apply. The central claim that temperature is a critical driver is a synthesis of the reviewed literature, and any concern about it is a question of sample representativeness or evidence strength, not circularity. Equations (1) through (6) are quoted or described from external prior work (e.g., Patz et al., Ryan et al., Petrova et al., Martheswaran et al.) and are used descriptively; the review does not use these equations to generate its own predictions. The reference list contains no self-citations by the authors, and no uniqueness theorem or prior result by the same authors is invoked to force a modeling choice. The skeptical point that 'considerable incidence predictive capacity' goes beyond what the reviewed studies demonstrate is an evidentiary overreach, not a circular reduction. Therefore, on the circularity axis, the paper is self-contained and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is nearly empty because this is a narrative review: no parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated. The central claim rests instead on two domain assumptions about fidelity and representativeness of the cited literature.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The reviewed primary studies are accurately summarized and their claims are trustworthy enough to support general conclusions.
    The review does not independently verify the data, code, or output of the cited models; it relies on the published abstracts and descriptions.
  • domain assumption The selected set of papers is representative of the broader literature on long-term MBD forecasting.
    Section 2 describes a narrative selection process without reporting the number of records screened, excluded, or reasons for exclusion, so representativeness is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-term predictive models for mosquito borne diseases: a narrative review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YAJL6WO7

@misc{pith2026241113680,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-term predictive models for mosquito borne diseases: a narrative review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YAJL6WO7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13680}
}
abstract

In face of climate change and increasing urbanization, the predictive mosquito-borne diseases (MBD) transmission models require constant updates. Thus, is urgent to comprehend the driving forces of this non stationary behavior, observed through spatial and incidence expansion. We observed that temperature is a critical driver in predictive models for MBD transmission, also being consistently used in multiple reviewed papers with considerable incidence predictive capacity. Rainfall, however, have more subtle importance as moderate precipitation creates breeding sites for mosquitoes, but excessive rainfall can reduce larvae populations. We highlight the frequent use of mechanistic models, particularly those that integrate temperature-dependent biological parameters of disease transmission in incidence proxies as the Vectorial Capacity (VC) and temperature-based basic reproduction number $R_0(t)$, for example. These models show the importance of climate variables, but the socio-demographic factors are often not considered. This gap is a significant opportunity for future research to incorporate socio-demographic data into long-term predictive models for more comprehensive and reliable forecasts. With this survey, we outline the most promising paths to be followed by long-term MBD transmission research and highlighting the potential facing challenges. Thus, we offer a valuable foundation for enhancing disease forecasting models and supporting more effective public health interventions, specially in the long term.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13680 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Frequency of Usage of Variable Categories in Predictive Models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hesson, Marcus SC Blagrove, Tom Solomon, Andrew P

    Cyril Caminade, Joanne Turner, Soeren Metelmann, Jenny C. Hesson, Marcus SC Blagrove, Tom Solomon, Andrew P. Morse, and Matthew Baylis. Global risk model for vector-borne transmission of zika virus reveals the role of El Ni˜ no 2015.Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences , 114(1):119–124, 2017. 21

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Seasonal-to-decadal prediction of el ni˜ no–southern oscillation and pacific decadal oscillation

    Jung Choi and Seok-Woo Son. Seasonal-to-decadal prediction of el ni˜ no–southern oscillation and pacific decadal oscillation. NPJ Climate and Atmospheric Science , 5 (1):29, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Col´ on-Gonz´ alez, Rory Gibb, Kamran Khan, Alexander Watts, Rachel Lowe, and Oliver J

    Felipe J. Col´ on-Gonz´ alez, Rory Gibb, Kamran Khan, Alexander Watts, Rachel Lowe, and Oliver J. Brady. Projecting the future incidence and burden of dengue in South- east Asia. Nature Communications, 14(1):5439, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    E. C. de Perez, E. Stephens, M. van Aalst, J. Bazo, E. Fournier-Tombs, S. Funk, J. J. Hess, N. Ranger, and R. Lowe. Epidemiological versus meteorological forecasts: Best practice for linking models to policymaking. International Journal of Forecasting , 38(2):521–526, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio r 0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations

    Odo Diekmann, Johan Andre Peter Heesterbeek, and Johan Anton Jacob Metz. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio r 0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology , 28:365–382, 1990

    work page 1990

  6. [6]

    Dallas Foster, Darin Comeau, and Nathan M. Urban. A bayesian approach to re- gional decadal predictability: Sparse parameter estimation in high-dimensional lin- ear inverse models of high-latitude sea surface temperature variability. Journal of Climate, 33(14):6065–6081, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    `Alex Gim´ enez-Romero, Rosa Flaquer-Galm´ es, and Manuel A. Mat ´ ı. Vector-borne diseases with nonstationary vector populations: The case of growing and decaying populations. Physical Review E , 106(5):054402, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Gorgas and Fielding H

    William C. Gorgas and Fielding H. Garrison. Ronald Ross and the prevention of malarial fever. The Scientific Monthly , 3(2):132–150, 1916

    work page 1916

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    I. Kaur, A. K. Sandhu, and Y. Kumar. Artificial intelligence techniques for predictive modeling of vector-borne diseases and its pathogens: A systematic review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering , 29(6):3741–3771, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    McKendrick

    William Ogilvy Kermack and Anderson G. McKendrick. A contribution to the math- ematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character , 115(772):700–721, 1927

    1927

  3. [11]

    Vectorial capacity of Aedes aegypti : Effects of temperature and implications for global dengue epidemic potential

    Jing Liu-Helmersson, Hans Stenlund, Annelies Wilder-Smith, and Joacim Rockl¨ ov. Vectorial capacity of Aedes aegypti : Effects of temperature and implications for global dengue epidemic potential. PloS One , 9(3):e89783, 2014

    2014

  4. [12]

    The Epidemiology and Control of Malaria

    George Macdonald. The Epidemiology and Control of Malaria . Oxford University Press, London, 1957

    1957

  5. [13]

    Prediction of dengue fever outbreaks using climate variability and markov chain Monte Carlo techniques in a stochastic susceptible-infected-removed model

    Tarun Kumar Martheswaran, Hamida Hamdi, Amal Al-Barty, Abeer Abu Zaid, and Biswadeep Das. Prediction of dengue fever outbreaks using climate variability and markov chain Monte Carlo techniques in a stochastic susceptible-infected-removed model. Scientific Reports, 12(1):5459, 2022. 22

    2022

  6. [14]

    Mordecai, Jeremy M

    Erin A. Mordecai, Jeremy M. Cohen, Michelle V. Evans, Prithvi Gudapati, Leah R. Johnson, Catherine A. Lippi, Kerri Miazgowicz, Courtney C. Murdock, Jason R. Rohr, Sadie J. Ryan, et al. Detecting the impact of temperature on transmission of zika, dengue, and chikungunya using m...

    2017

  7. [15]

    Simon Moulds, L. J. Slater, N. J. Dunstone, and D. M. Smith. Skillful decadal flood prediction. Geophysical Research Letters, 50(3):e2022GL100650, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Patricia Arbel´ aez, and Iv´ an D

    Estefan ´ ıa Mu˜ noz, Germ´ an Poveda, M. Patricia Arbel´ aez, and Iv´ an D. V´ elez. Spa- tiotemporal dynamics of dengue in Colombia in relation to the combined effects of local climate and ENSO. Acta Tropica, 224:106136, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    ´A. G. Mu˜ noz, X. Chourio, A. Rivi` ere-Cinnamond, M. A. Diuk-Wasser, P. A. Kache, E. A. Mordecai, L. Harrington, and M. C. Thomson. Ae des: a next-generation mon- itoring and forecasting system for environmental suitability of aedes-borne disease transmission. Scientific Rep...

    2020

  10. [18]

    Jonathan A. Patz, W. J. Martens, Dana A. Focks, and Theo H. Jetten. Dengue fever epidemic potential as projected by general circulation models of global climate change. Environmental Health Perspectives, 106(3):147–153, 1998

    1998

  11. [19]

    Sensitivity of large dengue epidemics in Ecuador to long-lead predictions of El Ni˜ no.Climate Services, 15:100096, 2019

    Desislava Petrova, Rachel Lowe, Anna Stewart-Ibarra, Joan Ballester, Siem Jan Koopman, and Xavier Rod´ o. Sensitivity of large dengue epidemics in Ecuador to long-lead predictions of El Ni˜ no.Climate Services, 15:100096, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Luvall, and Rebecca C

    V ´ ıctor Hugo Pe˜ na-Garc ´ ıa, Jeffrey C. Luvall, and Rebecca C. Christofferson. Ar- bovirus transmission predictions are affected by both temperature data source and modeling methodologies across cities in Colombia. Microorganisms, 11(5):1249, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Rader and Elizabeth A

    Jamin K. Rader and Elizabeth A. Barnes. Optimizing seasonal-to-decadal analog forecasts with a learned spatially-weighted mask. Geophysical Research Letters, 50 (23):e2023GL104983, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Ryan, Colin J

    Sadie J. Ryan, Colin J. Carlson, Erin A. Mordecai, and Leah R. Johnson. Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus transmission risk with climate change. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 13(3):e0007213, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Soriano-Pa˜ nos, J

    D. Soriano-Pa˜ nos, J. H. Arias-Castro, A. Reyna-Lara, H. J. Mart ´ ınez, S. Meloni, and J. G´ omez-Garde˜ nes. Vector-borne epidemics driven by human mobility. Physical Review Research, 2(1):013312, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    Tatem, U

    U. Tatem, U. Kitron, S. I. Hay, T. W. Scott, D. L. Smith, A. M. Ellis, D. B. George, A. Le Menach, J. R. C. Pulliam, D. Bisanzio, Jr. Reiner, C. R., et al. A systematic review of mathematical models of vector-borne diseases. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 10(81):20120...

    2013

  17. [25]

    The 2010 structural-demographic forecast for the 2010–2020 decade: A retrospective assessment

    Peter Turchin and Andrey Korotayev. The 2010 structural-demographic forecast for the 2010–2020 decade: A retrospective assessment. PLoS One, 15(8):e0237458, 2020. 23

    2010

  18. [26]

    Hannah Van Wyk, Joseph NS Eisenberg, and Andrew F. Brouwer. Long-term pro- jections of the impacts of warming temperatures on zika and dengue risk in four Brazilian cities using a temperature-dependent basic reproduction number. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 17(4):e0010839, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Villena, Sadie J

    Oswaldo C. Villena, Sadie J. Ryan, Courtney C. Murdock, and Leah R. John- son. Temperature impacts the environmental suitability for malaria transmission by Anopheles gambiae and anopheles stephensi. Ecology, 103(8):e3685, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Vector-borne diseases, 2020

    World Health Organization. Vector-borne diseases, 2020. URL https://www. who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/vector-borne-diseases . Accessed: 18/01/2024. 24

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.