Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 8 minor 54 references

The dynamical origin of the magnetic field distributions in compressible turbulence

T0 review · 1 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rare shocks carve power-law tails in turbulent magnetic fields

desk verdict Clean analytical derivation of magnetic field PDF tails from Poisson shocks, but the shock process is decoupled from the velocity field that produces the lognormal core read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07004 v1 pith:YBHQEV42 submitted 2026-07-08 astro-ph.GA physics.flu-dyn

Evangelia Ntormousi , Fabio Del Sordo This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAphysics.flu-dyn
keywords MHDturbulencemagneticfieldPDFstochasticdifferentialequationsintermittencyshockwaveslognormaldistributionpower-lawtailsRankine-Hugoniotconditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks why the magnetic field strength in compressible turbulent plasmas has a distribution that looks lognormal in its core but sprouts long power-law tails — a shape seen in MHD simulations but lacking a dynamical explanation. The authors model the velocity gradient tensor as a Gaussian random process and rewrite the Lagrangian continuity and induction equations as stochastic differential equations. Under purely continuous random forcing, both density and magnetic field strength come out lognormal, matching standard results. The key move is to add intermittent, Poisson-distributed shock events on top of this diffusion-like background. Each shock applies Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions to the gas density and magnetic field. When shocks are rare, the accumulated logarithmic shock increments follow a gamma distribution, and convolving that with the Gaussian background produces exactly the exponential (power-law-in-log) tails seen in simulations. When shocks become frequent, the process reverts to lognormal. The asymmetry of the tails — whether they extend toward high or low field values — is set by the relative abundance of fast shocks (which amplify the transverse magnetic field) versus slow shocks (which reduce it). An excess of slow shocks produces low-value tails; an excess of fast shocks produces high-value tails. The paper thus proposes that the coexistence of a lognormal core with power-law tails is the generic signature of continuous diffusion-like dynamics interrupted by localized, rare, discrete events.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a jump-diffusion stochastic differential equation for ln|B|. The diffusion component comes from modeling the velocity gradient tensor A as a Gaussian random process (with eigenvalues sampled from shifted Gaussians and a random orthogonal eigenbasis). The jump component is a Poisson process injecting Rankine-Hugoniot shock jumps: the shock compression ratio r is drawn from a heavy-tailed distribution r = r0 * U^{-1/alpha}, so that ln r is exponentially distributed with rate alpha. Summing n such exponential increments gives a Gamma(n, alpha) distribution. The conditional PDF of ln|B| given n shocks is the convolution of a Gaussian (from the diffusion) with this gamma,

What would settle it

If simulations of compressible MHD turbulence show that the power-law tails in the magnetic field PDF persist even when intermittent shocks are artificially suppressed or when the velocity gradient statistics are forced to be Gaussian, the jump-diffusion mechanism would not be the origin of the tails. Conversely, if varying the shock frequency in controlled simulations does not produce the predicted transition from power-law tails back to lognormal, the model's core prediction fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reduces the magnetic field PDF to a jump-diffusion process: a continuous stochastic background (producing the lognormal core) plus a Poisson process of intermittent shocks (producing the tails). The tails are analytically predicted to be exponential in log-space because the logarithm of the shock compression ratio, drawn from a power-law distribution, is exponentially distributed, and the sum of exponential increments is gamma-distributed. Convolving this gamma law with the Gaussian background yields the observed power-law tails. The sign of the tail asymmetry is governed by the fast-to-slow shock ratio, which the authors propose as a diagnostic of the shock population in any given

Load-bearing premise

The model treats the velocity gradient tensor as a Gaussian random process with independently sampled eigenvalues and assumes statistical steadiness. Real turbulent velocity gradients have non-Gaussian statistics, temporal correlations, and coherent structures. If the tails in simulations arise from coherent flow structures rather than from the Poisson shock process modeled here, the central claim would be undermined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The fast-to-slow shock ratio in a turbulent flow can be inferred from the asymmetry of the magnetic field PDF, making the PDF shape a diagnostic for the shock population without directly identifying individual shocks.
  • If the model is correct, the slope of the power-law tail in ln|B| should be set by the parameter alpha governing the shock strength distribution, which is in principle measurable from shock statistics in simulations.
  • The same jump-diffusion mechanism should apply to any turbulent quantity governed by a multiplicative equation with intermittent multiplicative jumps, suggesting that power-law tails around lognormal cores may be a generic signature of intermittency across different turbulent variables.
  • Decaying (unforced) turbulence, where the velocity gradient statistics are not statistically steady, should produce time-dependent PDF shapes that deviate from the stationary predictions of this model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the power-law tails indeed arise from Poisson-distributed shocks, then in simulations the tail slope and volume fraction should be insensitive to numerical resolution and physical diffusivity — which the paper's appendix supports with FLASH and RAMSES data, but the prediction could be tested more systematically across codes and Reynolds numbers.
  • The model predicts that increasing the shock frequency should eventually wash out the tails and restore a pure lognormal, creating a non-monotonic relationship between intermittency strength and tail prominence that could be tested by varying the driving scale or compressibility of the forcing.
  • The gamma-conditioning argument is mathematically general: any multiplicative process with rare, power-law-distributed jumps should exhibit the same lognormal-plus-exponential-tail structure, which could connect magnetic field statistics to other intermittent phenomena in fluid turbulence and beyond.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 8 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a semi-analytical model for the probability density functions (PDFs) of density and magnetic field strength in compressible MHD turbulence. The authors model the Lagrangian continuity and induction equations as stochastic differential equations (SDEs) driven by a random velocity gradient tensor. Without intermittent shocks, the model recovers lognormal PDFs for both density and magnetic field strength. The key analytical result (Sec. 4) is that adding intermittent shocks modeled as a Poisson process with exponentially distributed magnitudes produces gamma-conditioned lognormals, yielding power-law tails in log-space. The asymmetry of these tails (high- vs. low-value) is controlled by the relative abundance of fast vs. slow MHD shocks (parameter q). The model predictions are compared qualitatively to driven MHD turbulence simulations (Appendix A).

Significance. The paper provides a clean, parameter-free analytical derivation (Sec. 4, Eqs. 11–16) showing that Poisson-distributed shocks with exponential magnitudes, when superposed on a Gaussian diffusion process, naturally produce power-law tails around a lognormal core. This is a genuine mathematical insight that connects the functional form of turbulent PDF tails to the statistics of intermittent events. The prediction that tail asymmetry diagnoses the relative abundance of fast vs. slow shocks is falsifiable and physically motivated. The demonstration that increasing shock frequency recovers lognormal behavior (Table 1, p_shock = 0.05–0.1) is a non-trivial result. The appendix comparison to FLASH and RAMSES simulations, including the finding that tails are insensitive to numerical or Ohmic diffusivity, adds empirical grounding.

major comments (1)
  1. Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 4: The intermittent shocks are introduced as an exogenous Poisson process whose properties (compression ratio r drawn from a power law, fast/slow classification via parameter q) are completely decoupled from the continuous velocity gradient tensor A that drives the diffusive component. In real MHD turbulence, shocks emerge from the velocity field's own non-Gaussian statistics and spatial correlations, not as independent events pasted onto a Gaussian background. The paper would be substantially strengthened if the authors discussed whether and how the shock parameters (p_shock, α, q) could in principle be connected to the statistical properties of the turbulent velocity field. As it stands, the model has eight free parameters (C_bg, σ_λ, p_shock, α, r_0, κ, q, r_truncation), and without such a connection, the predictive power is limited to qualitative trends. The authors
minor comments (8)
  1. Sec. 1, first paragraph of Sec. 2: The paper states that 'the log-normality of the density PDF is a direct consequence of the turbulence driving method, which is in effect time-correlated noise (Scannapieco et al. 2024),' but then models ∇·v as a Wiener process (white noise). Time-correlated noise is not the same as white noise, and this apparent inconsistency should be clarified.
  2. Sec. 3.1, Eq. (9): The variance of θ is given as Var(θ) = C_bg (v_rms/ℓ_int)^2, but the well-known relation σ² ~ b²M² for the density variance is not explicitly connected to this expression. Showing this connection would help readers relate the model parameters to established results.
  3. Table 1: For the q = 1 row (M = 2, α = 2, p_shock = 0.01), the λ_L and F_L columns show dashes, presumably because no low-value tail is present. This should be stated explicitly in the table caption or a footnote.
  4. Sec. 5, Eq. (17): The tail is defined as ln P(b) = c + λ_L b, but it is not specified whether this is a left tail (b < b_L) or could also apply to right tails. The text mentions 'low-field tail' but the high-value tails for q ≳ 0.5 are not fit. The paper should clarify whether the same functional form applies to high-value tails and why they are not characterized.
  5. Appendix A, Fig. A.1: The density PDFs in the top panels appear to show deviations from lognormality at high M_A, but the text only briefly mentions this. A more quantitative characterization of these deviations would be useful for comparison with the model.
  6. Sec. 3.1: The phenomenological alignment term is mentioned but its mathematical form is not given. The statement that 'changes in this alignment do not alter the resulting PDFs' is important but should be justified more explicitly, perhaps with a brief sensitivity test.
  7. The paper uses both 'power-law tails' and 'exponential tails' somewhat interchangeably. Since the tails are exponential in ln P(b) vs. b (i.e., power-law in P(B) vs. B), the terminology should be used consistently.
  8. Sec. 6: The statement 'the magnetic field distribution is always slightly wider than that of the density' is made without quantitative comparison. Reporting the ratio σ_B/σ_ρ as a function of Mach number would strengthen this claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; analytical results are genuine mathematical consequences of stated assumptions

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction. (1) The lognormal density PDF (Sec. 2, Eqs. 1-4) follows from modeling ∇·v as a Wiener process via standard Itô calculus — the input is 'velocity divergence is random' and the output is 'density is lognormal,' which are not equivalent statements. (2) The power-law tail result (Sec. 4, Eqs. 11-16) is a genuine mathematical derivation: Poisson shocks with power-law-distributed magnitudes r ~ r₀U^{-1/α} yield exponentially distributed log-decrements D = c + Y, Y ~ Exp(α); their sum is Gamma-distributed; convolving with the Gaussian core gives a gamma-conditioned lognormal with exponential tails. While the exponential tail in the output is related to the exponential distribution in the input, the full functional form (gamma-conditioned lognormal, including the convolution with the Gaussian core and the marginalization over shock counts) is a non-trivial derived result, not a renaming. (3) The asymmetry result (fast vs. slow shocks producing high- vs. low-value tails) follows from the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions applied to B_t, which is an independent physical input, not a definition of the output. (4) Model parameters (p_shock, α, q, M) are varied freely, not fitted to simulation data; the simulation comparison in Appendix A uses externally published data from Beattie et al. (2020, 2022). The skeptic's concern that shocks are exogenous to the velocity gradient field is a validity/modeling-adequacy concern, not circularity: the paper is transparent that it adds shocks phenomenologically and derives their consequences, rather than claiming to derive the existence of shocks from first principles and then recovering them. The one self-citation (Ntormousi et al. 2024) is supporting context for the existence of tails in simulations, not load-bearing for the derivation. Score 2 reflects this minor self-citation with no impact on the central analytical chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has 8 free parameters, several of which (kappa, r_0, r_truncation) are set by hand without independent physical justification. The key parameters p_shock, alpha, and q are varied freely rather than derived from first principles or constrained by independent measurements. The axioms are a mix of standard domain assumptions (Gaussian velocity gradients, Poisson shocks) and ad-hoc modeling choices (fixed rarefaction ratio, power-law shock distribution). No new physical entities are invented; the model uses standard MHD quantities (density, magnetic field, velocity gradient, shocks).

free parameters (8)
  • C_bg = 1
    Dimensionless scaling constant relating to turbulence driving scale, set to unity by assumption (Sec. 3.1, Eq. 9).
  • sigma_lambda
    Variance of strain eigenvalue Gaussian sampling; implicitly set through the divergence variance (Eq. 9) but the partition among eigenvalues is not fully specified.
  • p_shock = 0.001-0.1
    Probability of shock encounter per timestep; treated as free parameter and varied across runs (Sec. 3.2, Table 1).
  • alpha = 0.01-100
    Controls the slope of the shock compression ratio distribution; fiducial value 2 from Smith et al. (2000) but varied widely (Sec. 3.2, Eq. 10).
  • r_0
    Scale parameter in the shock compression ratio distribution r = r_0 * U^(-1/alpha); value not explicitly stated in the text.
  • kappa = 0.25
    Ratio of rarefaction to compression magnitude; set by hand (Sec. 3.2).
  • q = 0-1
    Fraction of fast shocks; treated as free because 'the relative abundance of slow and fast shocks in MHD turbulence is far from understood' (Sec. 3.2).
  • r_truncation
    Upper truncation on compression ratio to avoid unphysically large variance; mentioned but value not given (Sec. 3.2).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The velocity gradient tensor A can be modeled as a Gaussian random process with independently sampled eigenvalues and Haar-distributed eigenvectors.
    Sec. 3.1. This is a strong simplification of real turbulent velocity gradient statistics, which are known to be non-Gaussian and intermittent even without discrete shocks.
  • domain assumption The flow is statistically steady so that A maintains the same statistical behavior on timescales of interest.
    Sec. 3.1. Explicitly stated as equivalent to driven turbulence; excludes decaying turbulence.
  • ad hoc to paper Shock encounters along a trajectory are a Poisson process with fixed probability per timestep.
    Sec. 3.2. The Poisson assumption is standard for rare events but the constant rate is an idealization; real shock encounter rates may depend on local flow conditions.
  • domain assumption The shock compression ratio follows a power-law distribution r ~ r_0 * U^(-1/alpha).
    Sec. 3.2, Eq. 10. Based on Smith et al. (2000) finding alpha ~ 2 in hydrodynamic simulations; the functional form is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper Post-shock rarefaction follows each compressive jump with fixed ratio kappa.
    Sec. 3.2. The 1:4 ratio of rarefaction to compression is phenomenological and not derived from MHD shock physics.
  • domain assumption Magnetic field alignment with strain eigenvectors does not affect the resulting PDFs.
    Sec. 3.1. Stated without showing the null result; the alignment term is included but its effect is dismissed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The dynamical origin of the magnetic field distributions in compressible turbulence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YBHQEV42

@misc{pith2026260707004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The dynamical origin of the magnetic field distributions in compressible turbulence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YBHQEV42}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07004}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) simulations of isothermal compressible turbulence report that the density distribution is well described by a lognormal with a variance proportional to the flow's Mach number. The distribution of magnetic field strength also has a lognormal component, but includes long, power-law-like tails. In this work, we use semi-analytical arguments to predict the distributions of density and magnetic field strength in compressible turbulent flows. Specifically, in the Lagrangian description of the continuity and the induction equations, we model the velocity gradients of the turbulent flow as a simple random process, essentially turning these equations into stochastic differential equations. Integrating them leads to a lognormal distribution for the density field and the strength of the magnetic field. The power-law tails in the magnetic field PDF appear when we introduce intermittent shocks due to sampling rare events. Gradually increasing the frequency of these events, essentially going closer to a continuous process, leads to lognormal-like distributions again. The asymmetry is connected to the relative abundance of slow and fast shocks. An overabundance of fast MHD shocks produces a high-value tail, while the contrary produces low-value tails. We propose that the appearance of power-law tails along lognormals in turbulent flows is the signature of the co-existence of continuous, diffusion-like propagation combined with localized, intermittent events.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07004 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Magnetic field and density PDFs in the absence of shocks [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. PDFs of the magnetic field strength and the density, top and bottom panels, respectively. Columns from left to right show the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Magnetic Field versus Density relation in Star-Forming Molecular Clouds

    The Magnetic Field versus Density Relation in Star-forming Molecular Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5a5a , archivePrefix =. 2201.05620 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5a5a

  2. [2]

    The density distribution and physical origins of intermittency in supersonic, highly magnetised turbulence with diverse modes of driving

    The density distribution and physical origins of intermittency in supersonic, highly magnetized turbulence with diverse modes of driving. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3005 , archivePrefix =. 2109.10470 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3005

  3. [3]

    Magnetic field fluctuations in anisotropic, supersonic turbulence

    Magnetic field fluctuations in anisotropic, supersonic turbulence. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2257 , archivePrefix =. 2007.13937 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2257 2007

  4. [4]

    On the small-scale statistics of Lagrangian turbulence

    On the small-scale statistics of Lagrangian turbulence. Physics Letters A , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(01)00483-2 , archivePrefix =. physics/0105058 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00483-2

  5. [5]

    Dynamical foundations of nonextensive statistical mechanics

    Dynamical Foundations of Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.180601 , archivePrefix =. cond-mat/0105374 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.180601

  6. [6]

    Dynamo effect in unstirred self-gravitating turbulence

    Dynamo effect in unstirred self-gravitating turbulence. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac982 , archivePrefix =. 2112.03838 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stac982

  7. [7]

    The Catalogue for Astrophysical Turbulence Simulations (CATS)

    The Catalogue for Astrophysical Turbulence Simulations (CATS). , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc484 , archivePrefix =. 2010.11227 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc484 2010

  8. [8]

    Density Studies of MHD Interstellar Turbulence: Statistical Moments, Correlations and Bispectrum

    Density Studies of MHD Interstellar Turbulence: Statistical Moments, Correlations and Bispectrum. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/250 , archivePrefix =. 0811.0822 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/1/250

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    , keywords =

    Compressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: mode coupling, scaling relations, anisotropy, viscosity-damped regime and astrophysical implications. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06941.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301062 , primaryClass =

    2003 doi

  2. [10]

    , year = 2012, month = sep, volume =

    Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds. , year = 2012, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514 , adsurl =

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    , keywords =

    A lognormal model for the cosmological mass distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/248.1.1 , adsurl =

    doi

  4. [12]

    , keywords =

    Interstellar Turbulence I: Observations and Processes. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094859 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0404451 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    , keywords =

    The Density Probability Distribution in Compressible Isothermal Turbulence: Solenoidal versus Compressive Forcing. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/595280 , archivePrefix =. 0808.0605 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    Solenoidal versus compressive turbulence forcing

    Comparing the statistics of interstellar turbulence in simulations and observations. Solenoidal versus compressive turbulence forcing. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912437 , archivePrefix =. 0905.1060 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    The legacy of A.N

    Turbulence. The legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139170666 , adsurl =

    doi

  8. [16]

    , keywords =

    A high order Godunov scheme with constrained transport and adaptive mesh refinement for astrophysical magnetohydrodynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065371 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0607230 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    , keywords =

    FLASH: An Adaptive Mesh Hydrodynamics Code for Modeling Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/317361 , adsurl =

    doi

  10. [18]

    Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences

  11. [19]

    Physics of Fluids A , keywords =

    A diffusion model for velocity gradients in turbulence. Physics of Fluids A , keywords =. doi:10.1063/1.857773 , adsurl =

    doi

  12. [20]

    , keywords =

    Physical Processes in Star Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00693-8 , archivePrefix =. 2005.06472 , primaryClass =

    2005 doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    Simulating the Formation of Molecular Clouds. II. Rapid Formation from Turbulent Initial Conditions. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/512227 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0605121 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

    The role of magnetic field in molecular cloud formation and evolution. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00005 , archivePrefix =. 1902.00798 , primaryClass =

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    , keywords =

    Turbulent molecular clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-012-0055-y , archivePrefix =. 1211.0637 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    , keywords =

    A model for (non-lognormal) density distributions in isothermal turbulence. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt010 , archivePrefix =. 1211.3119 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    , keywords =

    Time evolution of the galactic B - relation: The impact of the magnetic field morphology. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347606 , archivePrefix =. 2402.10268 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    , keywords =

    Density Fluctuations in MHD Turbulence: Spectra, Intermittency, and Topology. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/511515 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0608051 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    , keywords =

    Velocity structure functions, scaling, and transitions in high-Reynolds-number Couette-Taylor flow. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.59.5457 , adsurl =

    doi

  20. [28]

    , keywords =

    SHOCKFIND - an algorithm to identify magnetohydrodynamic shock waves in turbulent clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2015 , archivePrefix =. 1608.02050 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    The Distribution of Pressures in a Supernova-driven Interstellar Medium. I. Magnetized Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/430122 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0410734 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =

    Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence. Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.125 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301093 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    , keywords =

    Incorporating Ambipolar and Ohmic Diffusion in the AMR MHD Code RAMSES. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/24 , archivePrefix =. 1206.2476 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    , year = 1965, month = jun, volume =

    Problems of Star Formation - I. , year = 1965, month = jun, volume =

    1965

  25. [33]

    , keywords =

    A Markov Model for Non-lognormal Density Distributions in Compressive Isothermal Turbulence. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab48f6 , archivePrefix =. 1908.00544 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    , keywords =

    Note on the collapse of magnetic interstellar clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/154835 , adsurl =

    doi

  27. [35]

    , keywords =

    Strong turbulence and magnetic coherent structures in the interstellar medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450710 , archivePrefix =. 2409.16699 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    , keywords =

    Density probability distribution in one-dimensional polytropic gas dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.58.4501 , archivePrefix =. physics/9802019 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    , keywords =

    Supersonic Turbulence in the Interstellar Medium: Stellar Extinction Determinations as Probes of the Structure and Dynamics of Dark Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/303482 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9603061 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    , keywords =

    The Star Formation Rate of Supersonic Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/40 , archivePrefix =. 0907.0248 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Magnetic Fields in Star Formation: from Clouds to Cores. Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.11179 , archivePrefix =. 2203.11179 , primaryClass =

    2023 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    , keywords =

    Density and velocity correlations in isothermal supersonic turbulence. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2195 , archivePrefix =. 2307.04876 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    Science Advances , keywords =

    Understanding density fluctuations in supersonic, isothermal turbulence. Science Advances , keywords =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado3958 , archivePrefix =. 2410.22408 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    , keywords =

    Modeling Star Formation as a Markov Process in a Supersonic Gravoturbulent Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aae1f9 , archivePrefix =. 1809.07780 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    , keywords =

    Simulations of the Small-Scale Turbulent Dynamo. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/422547 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0312046 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Physical Review Fluids , keywords =

    Saturation mechanism of the fluctuation dynamo at Pr _ M 1. Physical Review Fluids , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.043702 , archivePrefix =. 2003.07997 , primaryClass =

    2003 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    Physical Review Fluids , keywords =

    Saturation mechanism of the fluctuation dynamo in supersonic turbulent plasmas. Physical Review Fluids , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.103701 , archivePrefix =. 2109.11698 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    , keywords =

    The distribution of shock waves in driven supersonic turbulence. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008125 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0008125 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    , keywords =

    The distribution of density in supersonic turbulence. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1817 , archivePrefix =. 1702.07731 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    , keywords =

    Turbulent dynamo in the two-phase interstellar medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1400 , archivePrefix =. 2202.08324 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    A new high resolution code called RAMSES

    Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement. A new high resolution code called RAMSES. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011817 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0111367 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    Journal of Statistical Physics , keywords =

    Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF01016429 , adsurl =

    doi

  43. [51]

    , keywords =

    Magnetic field-gas density relation and observational implications revisited. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1133 , archivePrefix =. 1505.05508 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    , biburl =

    van Kampen, N.G. , biburl =

  45. [53]

    , keywords =

    Hierarchical Structure in Nearly Pressureless Flows as a Consequence of Self-similar Statistics. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/173847 , adsurl =

    doi

  46. [54]

    , keywords =

    On the relation between magnetic field strength and gas density in the interstellar medium: a multiscale analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf901 , archivePrefix =. 2407.18293 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.