REVIEW 2 cited by
Lagrangian Decomposition for Neural Network Verification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A fundamental component of neural network verification is the computation of bounds on the values their outputs can take. Previous methods have either used off-the-shelf solvers, discarding the problem structure, or relaxed the problem even further, making the bounds unnecessarily loose. We propose a novel approach based on Lagrangian Decomposition. Our formulation admits an efficient supergradient ascent algorithm, as well as an improved proximal algorithm. Both the algorithms offer three advantages: (i) they yield bounds that are provably at least as tight as previous dual algorithms relying on Lagrangian relaxations; (ii) they are based on operations analogous to forward/backward pass of neural networks layers and are therefore easily parallelizable, amenable to GPU implementation and able to take advantage of the convolutional structure of problems; and (iii) they allow for anytime stopping while still providing valid bounds. Empirically, we show that we obtain bounds comparable with off-the-shelf solvers in a fraction of their running time, and obtain tighter bounds in the same time as previous dual algorithms. This results in an overall speed-up when employing the bounds for formal verification. Code for our algorithms is available at https://github.com/oval-group/decomposition-plnn-bounds.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Model-Driven Discipline for Multi-Agent LLMs: Requirement-to-Verification Generation of Traceable System Models
A requirement-model-driven multi-agent LLM pipeline generates traceable MDE artefacts and formally checks behaviour models, with multi-agent reliably improving syntactic validity but not semantic accuracy across LLMs.
-
Formal Foundations for Controlled Stochastic Activity Networks
A formal extension of stochastic activity networks with explicit control actions, equipped with automata semantics, policy hierarchies, and a claimed reduction to CTMDPs, but with numerous unsupported proofs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.