Volume Stability for Hyperbolic Manifolds and Applications to General Relativity

Puskar Mondal; Shing-Tung Yau

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 22 references

Volume Stability for Hyperbolic Manifolds and Applications to General Relativity

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Near-equality in the hyperbolic volume bound forces tensorial C^0 convergence to the hyperbolic metric outside regions of vanishing volume, which in turn yields stability of the reduced Hamiltonian at the Lorentz-cone ground state.

desk verdict Genuinely new volume-stability theorem with a load-bearing gap: the uniform bounded-geometry assumption on completed good tubes is asserted, not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27666 v1 pith:YBNI62JA submitted 2026-07-30 math.DG gr-qcmath.AP

Puskar Mondal , Shing-Tung Yau This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGgr-qcmath.AP MSC 53C4453C2153C8083C05

keywords volumestabilityhyperbolicthree-manifoldscalarcurvaturelowerboundnormalizedRicciflowwithsurgeryscale-invariantentropyreducedHamiltonianCMCvacuumdataLorentzcone

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Closed hyperbolic three-manifolds have a sharp volume lower bound among metrics with scalar curvature at least -6. This paper proves that the bound is quantitatively stable: a sequence of metrics whose volumes approach the hyperbolic volume must, after removing tiny exceptional regions of vanishing volume, converge in C^0 to the hyperbolic metric. Because volume alone is too weak to control geometry, the proof works through normalized Ricci flow, converting the volume deficit into dissipated entropy and scalar-curvature defect, then pulling late-time convergence back to the initial slice. The same statement, after constant-mean-curvature normalization, gives a stability theorem for the reduced Hamiltonian of vacuum general relativity at the Lorentz-cone ground state. If true, it makes precise the asymptotic picture in which near-minimizers of the reduced Hamiltonian are volume-dominated by the hyperbolic metric.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the normalized Ricci flow ∂_t g = -2(Ric_g + 2g), together with the nonnegative quantity Q = R(g)+6, which satisfies a parabolic inequality (∂_t - Δ + 4)Q = 2|Ric_g + 2g|² ≥ 0. The scale-invariant Perelman entropy is monotone along the flow and its deficit is controlled by the volume deficit. The proof's decisive tool is a gradient-flow type inequality near the hyperbolic metric: it upgrades weak entropy dissipation into an L¹-in-time, L²-in-space bound on the deformation tensor. Spacetime tube maps and Jacobian estimates then convert that path-length bound into a bilipschitz comparison between the initial metric and the late-time good metric, allowing the late-time

What would settle it

Construct a sequence of metrics on a closed hyperbolic three-manifold satisfying R ≥ -6 and volume excess going to zero, run the normalized Ricci flow, and check the good completed tubes: if the ratio of maximum curvature to the square of the injectivity radius is unbounded at some intermediate times, then the uniform bounded-geometry hypothesis fails and the pullback step of the proof collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a sharp volume-stability theorem. Let (M,h) be a closed hyperbolic three-manifold normalized by Ric_h = -2h, and let g_i be smooth metrics on M with R(g_i) ≥ -6 and volumes converging to Vol_h(M). Then, after passing to a subsequence, there are sets Z_i of g_i-volume going to zero, compact domains K_i whose complements have h-volume going to zero, and diffeomorphisms ψ_i: K_i → M∖Z_i such that ψ_i^*g_i converges to h in C^0 on K_i. The proof establishes this by evolving each metric by normalized Ricci flow with surgery, showing that the small volume deficit controls both the spacetime integral of the scalar-curvature defect and the dissipation of the scale-invari

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes, rather than proves, that the good pieces of the Ricci flow stay uniformly well-behaved—bounded curvature, a uniform positive injectivity radius, and controlled volume—over the entire long time interval, and that these bounds are what the final pullback step needs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The sharp hyperbolic volume comparison is quantitatively stable: a volume deficit δ controls both the volume of the exceptional set and the C^0 deviation of the metric on the good set.
For vacuum constant-mean-curvature data on a hyperbolic three-manifold, if the reduced Hamiltonian approaches the Lorentz-cone value, then the normalized spatial metrics converge in tensorial C^0 to the hyperbolic metric outside vanishing-volume sets.
Deviations from the hyperbolic scalar-curvature lower bound, measured by the transverse-traceless part of the second fundamental form, must concentrate on regions of vanishing normalized volume whenever the reduced Hamiltonian is near its minimum.
The theorem gives a rigorous volume-dominance formulation of the long-time picture for the reduced Einstein dynamics: the Lorentz cone over the hyperbolic metric is the ground state, and nearby states are hyperbolic on volume-dominating regions without requiring full smooth convergence.
The C^0 conclusion is essentially optimal for the method, since the proof does not control higher-order derivatives of the deformation tensor even on the good sets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural testable extension is to ask whether the exceptional sets can be given quantitative volume or perimeter bounds; the theorem controls only their volume, so thin fingers or small bulbs are not excluded.
If the uniform bounded-geometry gap described below were closed, the same proof would likely upgrade to measured Gromov-Hausdorff convergence under an explicit no-short-circuit condition, which the paper notes as a possible refinement.
The volume-stability mechanism suggests a programmatic route to stability statements in spatially compact general relativity in which the reduced Hamiltonian plays the role of the ADM mass; this is an extension of the paper's own analogy rather than a claim proved here.
The theorem is a compactness and rigidity statement at the bottom of the reduced Hamiltonian, not a large-data global convergence theorem; distinguishing those two scopes is important for interpreting the result in the Einstein evolution context.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the thing you need to know: this paper proves a sharp, quantified C0-stability theorem for the hyperbolic volume inequality in dimension three, with exceptional sets of vanishing volume, and it does that work mostly honestly. The theorem is new — the cited Besson–Courtois–Gallot results are C2-closeness, and Song's entropy stability is a different statement. The Fischer–Moncrief application is a natural byproduct: near-minimizers of the reduced Hamiltonian converge, outside bad sets, to the Lorentz cone geometry. That's a useful statement to have on record.

What the paper does well: the local computations are coherent. The scalar-curvature defect evolution, the volume identities, the entropy monotonicity for the scale-invariant lambda functional, and the CMC rescaling in Theorem 1.2 all check out. The overall strategy is the right one: run normalized Ricci flow with surgery, use entropy and volume-deficit budgets to find a late-time good slice, prove C0 convergence there, then pull back to the initial slice via a Lojasiewicz–Simon gradient-flow estimate. The authors also flag their own limitations honestly: no H2 control on the bad-set boundary, no higher-order estimates, no distance-convergence statement. That candor is rare and credible.

The soft spot is real, and it's load-bearing. Proposition 3.2's pullback argument depends on uniform bounded geometry of the closed completed good tubes over the full time interval — the curvature bound, injectivity-radius lower bound, and volume bounds assembled as hypothesis (99) in Lemma 3.2. Those bounds are exactly what power the Harnack/Schauder step that converts entropy dissipation into the L1_t L2_x path-length estimate. But they are never derived from Theorem 1.1's hypotheses. Scalar curvature lower bound plus a small volume deficit does not by itself bound curvature or injectivity radius; a sequence can concentrate arbitrary curvature on sets of vanishing volume, and the backward-saturated good tube can intersect those sets on the initial slice. So the bridge from late-time convergence back to t=0 is currently an assumption, not a theorem.

The surgery-parameter choices that control entropy jumps and closing-volume errors are also sketched rather than proven in detail. Those look fixable, and the gap might be fixable too, but it needs to be spelled out. Right now the proof is conditional on a missing geometric estimate.

Who gets value: geometric analysts working on scalar-curvature rigidity and anyone using the Fischer–Moncrief picture. The paper deserves a serious referee — this is not a desk-reject. My recommendation: send it out to referees who know Perelman's surgery flow and Lojasiewicz–Simon inequalities, and ask them to pin down where (99) comes from. If it can be established, this is a strong paper.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a sharp volume-stability theorem for closed hyperbolic three-manifolds: any sequence of metrics with scalar curvature at least -6 and volume approaching the hyperbolic volume converges, after passing to a subsequence, in tensorial C^0 on large good domains to the hyperbolic metric, with exceptional sets of vanishing volume. The proof uses normalized Ricci flow with surgery, Perelman entropy monotonicity, a Lojasiewicz–Simon inequality for the entropy, and a pullback argument from late-time good slices to the initial slice. The authors then apply this theorem to the stability of the Fischer–Moncrief reduced Hamiltonian for vacuum CMC data, obtaining convergence of the normalized spatial geometry to the hyperbolic Lorentz-cone geometry outside negligible sets.

Significance. If the proof is completed, the main theorem is a substantial stability result for the sharp hyperbolic volume comparison, in the spirit of the stability of the positive mass theorem. The paper is well organized, the local computations — scalar-curvature defect evolution, volume identities, entropy monotonicity, and the CMC rescaling — are coherent and check out, and the proof has no fitted parameters or ad hoc assumptions beyond the deep external inputs it cites (Perelman surgery, Mostow rigidity, Lojasiewicz–Simon theory). The application to the Fischer–Moncrief reduced Hamiltonian is natural and significant. However, the proof has a load-bearing gap concerning uniform bounded geometry of the closed completed good components, described below.

major comments (2)

[§3, Lemma 3.2 and Proposition 3.2, Eq. (99)–(100)] The uniform bounded-geometry hypothesis (99)—uniform curvature bound, injectivity-radius lower bound, and uniform volume bounds on the closed completed good tubes—is assumed, not derived. Lemma 3.2 begins with 'Assume that there exist constants...' and Proposition 3.2 invokes 'the uniform bounded-geometry estimates for the closed completed good components' without proof. These bounds are load-bearing: they are used to obtain the Harnack/Schauder estimate (89), the estimate (102), and hence the L^1_t L^2_x path-length estimate (92), and also to assert the relative compactness of the class K_{ε0} needed for the gradient-gap Lemma 3.1. The hypotheses of Theorem 1.1 impose only a scalar-curvature lower bound and a volume deficit; they do not preclude curvature concentration on sets of volume δ_i, and the backward-saturated good tube can intersect such sets. Thus (99) is precisely the missing
[§3, Proposition 3.2: backward saturation and surgery avoidance] Proposition 3.2 assumes that, after enlarging the terminal bad set by a set of volume o(1), every point of the terminal good region G^{t,+}_i has a worldline surviving on [0,t_i] and that its backward saturation is disjoint from all surgery regions. This is not proved from the hypotheses or from Proposition 2.6. The construction of the buffered tubes G^±_i(t) and the closed completed good component requires this survival property, and the application of the Lojasiewicz–Simon inequality on the closed component requires the associated metrics to exist and remain under control on the entire interval. Without a proof that the sets of points whose backward worldlines are destroyed by surgery or enter uncontrolled high-curvature regions have negligible volume, the pullback argument does not go through. This is closely tied to the missing bounded-geometry estimates in (99).

minor comments (4)

[Abstract and Theorem 1.1] The direction of the maps is stated inconsistently: the abstract says ψ_i: K_i → M\Z_i, while the body states Φ_i: G_i → K_i. Please reconcile the statement and define the image convention clearly.
[Proposition 2.6] The proof says 'by Perelman's long-time analysis, we may choose A_i→∞ so that the thick–thin compactness conclusions used below hold throughout [A_i,2A_i]'. This choice is not justified in detail; a reference or a short argument would help, especially since the flows have surgeries.
[§3.1, Proof of Theorem 1.1] The proof writes the normalized Ricci flow as a smooth flow without mentioning surgery, while Proposition 2.6 and Proposition 3.2 rely on the surgical flow. The presentation should clarify that the proof is using the surgical continuation and the good-component construction from Section 3.
[Remark 11] The no-short-circuit condition is introduced only in a remark and is not part of the formal Theorem 1.1. If the measured Gromov–Hausdorff version is intended, it should be stated with its hypotheses; otherwise the remark should be phrased as an optional extension.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorem is derived from external Ricci-flow, entropy, Lojasiewicz–Simon, and rigidity inputs; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) normalized Ricci flow with surgery preserves R ≥ -6 and converts the volume deficit into spacetime dissipation of Q and the soliton defect; (ii) entropy monotonicity and Proposition 2.4 yield the spacetime estimates (1) and (2); (iii) long-time thick-part compactness, Perelman's geometrization, and Mostow rigidity produce terminal C^0 convergence on good slices (Proposition 2.6); (iv) the externally cited Lojasiewicz–Simon inequality and the entropy/scalar-defect budgets give the L^1_t L^2_x path-length estimate (92); (v) the stopping-time and Jacobian argument pulls the comparison back to the initial slice. Each load-bearing step is either proved from the hypotheses or invokes an external theorem; no parameter is fitted to the target convergence, and no claimed prediction is equivalent by construction to its input. The self-citations [15,22] are classical Harnack/schrödinger-kernel PDE tools and are not the geometric input that forces the theorem. The uniform bounded-geometry hypothesis (99) in Lemma 3.2 is indeed assumed rather than derived, but this is a substantive correctness gap, not a circular reduction: (99) is stronger than, not equivalent to, the theorem's hypotheses or conclusion. Theorem 1.2 reduces to Theorem 1.1 by explicit scaling identities (Lemma 3.3), which is a legitimate reduction rather than a renaming of a known result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters and no new physical or mathematical entities. Its central claim rests on external theorems (Perelman surgery flow, hyperbolic volume comparison, Lojasiewicz–Simon, Mostow rigidity) and on an asserted uniform bounded-geometry hypothesis for the closed completed good tubes that is not fully derived.

assumptions (5)

standard math Perelman's Ricci flow with surgery exists for closed 3-manifolds, preserves R+6 ≥ 0 across surgeries, and has the long-time thick-thin convergence and entropy-jump controls used in §2.
Invoked throughout Proposition 2.6 and Theorem 1.1; external theorem from Perelman, Cao–Zhu, Kleiner–Lott.
standard math The hyperbolic volume comparison theorem for 3-manifolds (Schoen's conjecture): R ≥ -6 implies Vol_g ≥ Vol_h, with equality rigidity.
Used to bound volumes below by Vol_h in Proposition 2.2, Proposition 2.6, and the proof of Theorem 1.1.
domain assumption The Lojasiewicz–Simon inequality for the scale-invariant Perelman entropy near the hyperbolic orbit, stated as Proposition 3.1 and attributed to [11,14].
This inequality is the core of the path-length estimate; it is a nontrivial analytic fact about the gradient flow structure and is not proved in the paper.
standard math Mostow rigidity for closed hyperbolic 3-manifolds: any hyperbolic metric on M is isometric to h.
Used to identify the thick hyperbolic limit with (M,h) in Proposition 2.6.
standard math Closed hyperbolizable 3-manifolds are of negative Yamabe type, so λ[g] ≤ 0 for every metric g.
Used in Proposition 2.3 and Corollary 2.1 to prove monotonicity of the scale-invariant entropy.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Volume Stability for Hyperbolic Manifolds and Applications to General Relativity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YBNI62JA

@misc{pith2026260727666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Volume Stability for Hyperbolic Manifolds and Applications to General Relativity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YBNI62JA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27666}
}

abstract

We prove a sharp volume-stability theorem for closed hyperbolic three-manifolds. Let $(M,h)$ be closed hyperbolic with $\operatorname{Ric}_h=-2h$, and let $g_i$ be smooth metrics on $M$ satisfying $R(g_i)\geq -6, \operatorname{Vol}_{g_i}(M)\longrightarrow \operatorname{Vol}_h(M)$. After passing to a subsequence, there exist $Z_i\subset M$, smooth domains $K_i\subset M$, and diffeomorphisms $\psi_i:K_i\longrightarrow M\setminus Z_i $ such that $\operatorname{Vol}_{g_i}(Z_i)\longrightarrow0, \operatorname{Vol}_h(M\setminus K_i)\longrightarrow0, $ and $ \|\psi_i^*g_i-h\|_{C^0(K_i,h)}\longrightarrow0. $ Thus near-equality in the sharp hyperbolic volume bound forces tensorial $C^0$-convergence to the hyperbolic metric outside regions of vanishing volume. As an application, we establish stability of the Fischer--Moncrief reduced Hamiltonian at the Lorentz-cone ground state: after CMC normalization, near-minimizing compact vacuum data in the hyperbolic topological class converge, modulo sets of vanishing volume, to the hyperbolic Lorentz-cone geometry in tensorial $C^0$. This provides a rigorous volume-dominance formulation of the Fischer--Moncrief asymptotic picture.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27666 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The schematics of the main theorem 1.1. The exceptional set Zi consists of thin fingers and tiny bulbs, indicating regions with negligible ¯gi-volume. On the complement Gi = M \ Zi , the maps ψi : Ki → Gi identify ¯gi with h in tensorial C 0 -topology. Chebyshev’s inequality gives Volgi (0) B E i (0; ηi) ≤ e κi L 2 i η 2 i → 0. Therefore, on the final initial good set G 0,∗ i := G 0,Q i \ BE i (0; ηi), the accumu… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Schematic representation of reduced-Hamiltonian stability for an expanding CMC Einstein development. Assuming global existence of the CMC evolution, for instance through verification of an appropriate Klainerman–Rodnianski continuation criterion, the normalized large-time slices decompose into good domains G 1 i and G 2 i and exceptional regions Z 1 i and Z 2 i . On the good domains, the normalized geometry converge… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

[1]

I. Agol, P. Storm, W. Thurston, Lower bounds on volumes of hyperbolic Haken 3-manifolds, Journal of the American Mathe- matical Society, Vol. 20, 1053-1077, 2007

2007
[2]

Anderson, On Long-Time Evolution in General Relativity and Geometrization of 3-Manifolds, Communications in Math- ematical Physics, vol

M.T. Anderson, On Long-Time Evolution in General Relativity and Geometrization of 3-Manifolds, Communications in Math- ematical Physics, vol. 222, 533-567, 2001

2001
[3]

Besson, G

G. Besson, G. Courtois, S. Gallot, Volume et entropie minimale des espaces localement sym’etriques, Inventiones mathematicae, Vol. 103, 417-445, 1991

1991
[4]

Besson, G

G. Besson, G. Courtois, S. Gallot, Entropies et rigidit’es des espaces localement sym’etriques de courbure strictement n’egative, Geometric & Functional Analysis, Vol. 5, 731-799, 1995

1995
[5]

H. Cao, X. Zhu, A complete proof of the Poincar’e and geometrization conjectures-application of the Hamilton-Perelman theory of the Ricci flow, Asian Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 10, 165-492, 2006

2006
[6]

C. Dong, A. Song, Stability of Euclidean 3-space for the positive mass theorem, Inventiones mathematicae, Vol. 239, 287-319, 2025

2025
[7]

Fischer, V

A. Fischer, V. Moncrief, The reduced Hamiltonian of general relativity and theσ-constant of conformal geometry, Mathematical and Quantum Aspects of Relativity and Cosmology: Proceeding of the Second Samos Meeting on Cosmology, Geometry and Relativity Held at Pythagoreon, Samos, Greece, 31 August–4 September 1998, 70-101, 2000

1998
[8]

Fischer, V

A. Fischer, V. Moncrief, The reduced Einstein equations and the conformal volume collapse of 3-manifolds, Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, 4493-4516, 2001

2001

Show all 22 references

[9]

Hamilton, Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature,Journal of Differential Geometry, vol

R.S. Hamilton, Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature,Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 17, 255-306, 1982

1982
[10]

Hamilton, Non-singular solutions of the Ricci flow on three-manifolds, Comm

R. Hamilton, Non-singular solutions of the Ricci flow on three-manifolds, Comm. Anal. Geom., Vol. 7, 695-729, 1999

1999
[11]

Haslhofer, Perelman’s lambda-functional and the stability of Ricci-flat metrics,Calc

R. Haslhofer, Perelman’s lambda-functional and the stability of Ricci-flat metrics,Calc. Var. PDE, Vol. 45, 481-504, 2012

2012
[12]

Kleiner, J

B. Kleiner, J. Lott, Notes on Perelman’s papers, Geometry and Topology, Vol. 12, 2587-2855, 2008

2008
[13]

Klainerman, I

S. Klainerman, I. Rodnianski, On the breakdown criterion in general relativity, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 23, 345-382, 2010

2010
[14]

Kr"oncke, Stability of Einstein metrics under Ricci flow,Comm

K. Kr"oncke, Stability of Einstein metrics under Ricci flow,Comm. Anal. Geom., Vol. 28, 351-394, 2020

2020
[15]

Li, S.-T

P. Li, S.-T. Yau, On the parabolic kernel of the Schr"odinger operator, Acta Mathematica, 1986

1986
[16]

Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications, arXiv preprint math/0211159, 2002

G. Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications, arXiv preprint math/0211159, 2002

2002 arXiv
[17]

Perelman, Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds, arXiv preprint math/0303109, 2003

G. Perelman, Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds, arXiv preprint math/0303109, 2003

2003 arXiv
[18]

Schoen, S.-T

R. Schoen, S.-T. Yau, On the Structure of Manifolds with Positive Scalar Curvature,Manuscripta Mathematica, vol. 28, 159–183, 1979

1979
[19]

Schoen, S.-T

R. Schoen, S.-T. Yau, Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three-dimensional manifolds with non-negative scalar curvature,Annals of Mathematics, vol. 110, 127-142, 1979

1979
[20]

Shi, Deforming the metric on complete Riemannian manifolds, Vol

W.-X. Shi, Deforming the metric on complete Riemannian manifolds, Vol. 30, 223-301, 1989

1989
[21]

Song, Entropy and stability of hyperbolic manifolds,Geom

A. Song, Entropy and stability of hyperbolic manifolds,Geom. Funct. Anal., Vol. 35, 877-914
[22]

Yau, On the Harnack inequalities of partial differential equations, Comm

S.-T. Yau, On the Harnack inequalities of partial differential equations, Comm. Anal. Geom., Vol. 2, 431-450, 1994. 36

1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

I. Agol, P. Storm, W. Thurston, Lower bounds on volumes of hyperbolic Haken 3-manifolds, Journal of the American Mathe- matical Society, Vol. 20, 1053-1077, 2007

2007

[2] [2]

Anderson, On Long-Time Evolution in General Relativity and Geometrization of 3-Manifolds, Communications in Math- ematical Physics, vol

M.T. Anderson, On Long-Time Evolution in General Relativity and Geometrization of 3-Manifolds, Communications in Math- ematical Physics, vol. 222, 533-567, 2001

2001

[3] [3]

Besson, G

G. Besson, G. Courtois, S. Gallot, Volume et entropie minimale des espaces localement sym’etriques, Inventiones mathematicae, Vol. 103, 417-445, 1991

1991

[4] [4]

Besson, G

G. Besson, G. Courtois, S. Gallot, Entropies et rigidit’es des espaces localement sym’etriques de courbure strictement n’egative, Geometric & Functional Analysis, Vol. 5, 731-799, 1995

1995

[5] [5]

H. Cao, X. Zhu, A complete proof of the Poincar’e and geometrization conjectures-application of the Hamilton-Perelman theory of the Ricci flow, Asian Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 10, 165-492, 2006

2006

[6] [6]

C. Dong, A. Song, Stability of Euclidean 3-space for the positive mass theorem, Inventiones mathematicae, Vol. 239, 287-319, 2025

2025

[7] [7]

Fischer, V

A. Fischer, V. Moncrief, The reduced Hamiltonian of general relativity and theσ-constant of conformal geometry, Mathematical and Quantum Aspects of Relativity and Cosmology: Proceeding of the Second Samos Meeting on Cosmology, Geometry and Relativity Held at Pythagoreon, Samos, Greece, 31 August–4 September 1998, 70-101, 2000

1998

[8] [8]

Fischer, V

A. Fischer, V. Moncrief, The reduced Einstein equations and the conformal volume collapse of 3-manifolds, Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, 4493-4516, 2001

2001