A massive scalar field under the effects of the Lorentz symmetry violation by a CPT-odd non-minimal coupling

Humberto Belich; Ricardo L. L. Vit\'oria

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 114 references

A massive scalar field under the effects of the Lorentz symmetry violation by a CPT-odd non-minimal coupling

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A CPT-odd non-minimal coupling in the Klein-Gordon equation yields exact analytic bound-state spectra for massive scalar fields in electric and magnetic Lorentz-violating backgrounds.

desk verdict The first background in this paper is fine, but the central result for the second background—Eq. (25)—has a sign error in the angular derivative and is not the spectrum of Eq. (20). read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04176 v1 pith:YCP2KYSZ submitted 2019-08-12 hep-th

Ricardo L. L. Vitória , Humberto Belich This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th PACS 03.65.Vf11.30.Qc11.30.Cp

keywords LorentzsymmetryviolationCPT-oddcouplingKlein-GordonequationboundstatesCoulomb-typepotentiallinearcentralbiconfluentHeunmassivescalarfield

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's aim is to show that a CPT-odd (odd under combined charge, parity, and time reversal), Lorentz-symmetry-violating non-minimal coupling inserted into the Klein-Gordon equation produces analytically solvable bound states for a massive scalar field. Starting from the derivative replacement $\partial_\mu \to \partial_\mu - i g \tilde{F}_{\mu\alpha} v^\alpha$, chosen backgrounds for the electric and magnetic fields convert the Lorentz-violating background vector $v^\alpha$ into effective radial potentials, including a Coulomb-type $1/\rho$ term. Solving the resulting radial equations with confluent hypergeometric and biconfluent Heun functions gives closed energy spectra (Eqs. (18) and (25)) and, for the linear-central-potential case, allowed energies for the lowest radial mode (Eq. (40)). If these spectra are correct, the scalar sector offers exact, parameter-dependent signatures of CPT-odd Lorentz violation, including a shift of the rest energy when both $v_z$ and $B_0$ are present. A sympathetic reader would care because these are exact relativistic bound-state solutions in a Lorentz-violating background, not perturbative estimates.

What carries the argument

The central object is the non-minimal CPT-odd derivative coupling $\partial_\mu - i g \tilde{F}_{\mu\alpha} v^\alpha$, where $\tilde{F}_{\mu\alpha}=\frac12 \varepsilon_{\mu\alpha\beta\gamma}F^{\beta\gamma}$ is the dual electromagnetic tensor and $v^\alpha$ is a constant background vector that breaks Lorentz symmetry. This coupling carries the argument by turning chosen electric and magnetic field configurations into effective potentials: the cross product $\vec v\times\vec E$ generates the $1/\rho$ Coulomb-type term and the $v_z\lambda/\rho^2$ angular coupling, while $v_zB_0$ couples to $\partial_t$ and shifts the energy. The analytical work is done by reducing each radial equation to the confluent hypergeometric equation for the pure Coulomb-type cases and to the biconfluent Heun equation for the linear-central-potential case, with bound states enforced by polynomial truncation of the series solutions.

What would settle it

Numerically solve the full Klein-Gordon equation (5) without dropping the $g^2\tilde{F}_{\mu\alpha}\tilde{F}^{\mu\beta}v^\alpha v_\beta$ term for the same backgrounds and compare the eigenvalues with Eqs. (18), (25), and (40); a discrepancy larger than the expected $g^2$ corrections would show that the analytic spectra are artifacts of the truncation. A cleaner test would be to construct the scalar-field Lagrangian from which Eq. (7) follows and check whether the coupling preserves gauge invariance; if it does not, the bound states are not physical solutions of a consistent theory.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper derives the exact energy spectrum $E_{k,l,n} = \pm \sqrt{m^2 + \left[1 - \frac{g^2 v_\phi^2 \lambda^2}{(n+|l|+1/2)^2}\right] k^2}$ for the background $v^\alpha=(0,0,v_\phi,0)$, $\vec E = (\lambda/\rho)\hat\rho$, $\vec B=0$, where the Lorentz-violating parameters create an effective Coulomb-type potential in the radial equation. For the more general background $v^\alpha=(0,0,v_\phi,v_z)$, $\vec B=B_0\hat z$, it derives $E_{k,l,n} = -gB_0v_z \pm \sqrt{g^2B_0^2v_z^2 + m^2 + \left[1 - \frac{g^2v_\phi^2\lambda^2}{(n+\sqrt{l^2-2glv_z|\lambda|}+1/2)^2}\right] k^2}$, which also shifts the rest energy through $gB_0v_z$. When a linear central potential is included by the mass replacement $m\to m+\eta\rho$, the radial equation becomes a biconfluent Heun equation, and polynomial truncation leads to discrete allowed values of $\eta$ (Eq. (38)) and, for the lowest radial mode $\bar n=1$, allowed energies (Eq. (40)). In the limit $g\to0$, all formulas reduce to the free Klein-Gordon spectrum in Minkowski spacetime.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the non-minimal coupling $\partial_\mu - i g \tilde{F}_{\mu\alpha} v^\alpha$, taken from Dirac-fermion treatments, is the correct CPT-odd coupling for a scalar field and that the quadratic $g^2$ term can be neglected; if either fails, the derived spectra do not describe Lorentz violation for a scalar particle.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A CPT-odd Lorentz-violating background can bind a massive scalar particle through effective $1/\rho$ and linear potentials without any minimal electromagnetic charge, with binding controlled by $g$, $v$, $\lambda$, $B_0$, and the quantum numbers.
Even at zero momentum $k=0$, the second background gives the rest energy $-gB_0v_z \pm \sqrt{g^2B_0^2v_z^2+m^2}$, so the background directly shifts the scalar particle's rest mass.
The coefficient of $k^2$ in both spectra is $1 - g^2v_\phi^2\lambda^2/(n+\cdots+1/2)^2$, so the effective longitudinal mass of the scalar field is quantized and depends on the Lorentz-violating parameters.
Adding a linear central potential changes the character of the solution: instead of a closed energy spectrum, the potential strength $\eta$ itself becomes quantized and depends on the Lorentz-violating parameters and quantum numbers, as in Eq. (38).
Taking $g\to0$ in Eqs. (18), (25), and (40) recovers the standard free Klein-Gordon results, providing a consistency check that the Lorentz-violating effects vanish with the coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper does not address it, but the same operator could be tested on other electric and magnetic configurations; if the quantization pattern persists, spectra of this type could serve as a scalar-sector observable for bounding the product $g v^\alpha$.
The $k$-dependent effective mass implies modified dispersion relations for confined scalar modes; comparing precision spectra of such modes with Eq. (25) would probe the combination $g^2v_\phi^2\lambda^2$.
A natural extension would be to retain the neglected $g^2(\tilde F v)^2$ term; if its first-order correction changes the polynomial truncation conditions, the exactness of Eqs. (18) and (25) would need to be relaxed to leading-order accuracy.
The linear-potential result suggests a general mechanism: when an additional central potential is present, the Lorentz-violating parameters and the potential strength become locked together by the Heun truncation, yielding a quantized parameter rather than a continuous coupling.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take on 1908.04176: the first half is a routine but essentially correct exercise; the second half, which contains the paper's main new results, has a sign error that invalidates Eq. (25) and everything built on it.

What's new: the authors take a CPT-odd non-minimal coupling previously used for Dirac fermions and apply it to the Klein-Gordon scalar. For the first background (a radial electric field with a purely azimuthal background vector), the derivation leading to Eq. (18) is standard confluent hypergeometric quantization and the result looks right. That spectrum, with its g^2 term inside the square root and the dependence on k along the z direction, is a legitimate, if modest, new example of Lorentz-violating spectral modification.

The problem is in Section II B. Equation (20) contains the term -2ig v_z λ/ρ^2 ∂_ϕ φ. With the ansatz (10), φ ∝ e^{+ilϕ}, so ∂_ϕ φ = +il φ and that term becomes +2g l v_z λ/ρ^2 φ. After setting λ = -|λ|, the 1/ρ^2 coefficient is -(l^2 + 2g l v_z |λ|), not the -γ^2 with γ^2 = l^2 - 2g l v_z |λ| given in Eq. (22). The sign flip looks like it came from differentiating e^{ilϕ} as e^{-ilϕ}. As a result, Eq. (25), and also Eq. (38) and Eq. (40) which both contain |γ|, are not spectra of the stated Hamiltonian. The stress-test note is right; the internal algebra fails before you even ask whether the scalar-sector coupling is the correct SME one.

Other soft spots, in proportion: the paper never states the parameter ranges that make the square roots in Eq. (18) and (25) real. For large k the expression under the radical can go negative unless g^2 v_phi^2 λ^2/(n+|l|+1/2)^2 < 1. Section III's 'allowed values' of η are really a tuning condition to terminate the Heun series for a single radial mode, so those are not predictions for a fixed linear potential. And the unstated assumption that the fermionic CPT-odd coupling transfers to the scalar sector without modification is worth an explicit justification.

Who it's for: people working on scalar LSV bound states. The first background alone might be publishable as a short note; the second background needs a corrected γ and a re-derivation of Eqs. (25)-(40). I would not cite this version. I would send it to peer review anyway, because the error is precise and fixable, and the first spectrum is useful enough to warrant referee attention.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript considers a massive Klein-Gordon scalar field in Minkowski spacetime with cylindrical symmetry and a CPT-odd non-minimal coupling ∂_μ − i g \tilde{F}_{μα} v^α taken from earlier fermionic SME studies. It investigates two backgrounds: (i) v = (0,0,v_φ,0), E = (λ/ρ) ρ̂, B = 0, which induces a Coulomb-type term; and (ii) v = (0,0,v_φ,v_z), E = (λ/ρ) ρ̂, B = B_0 ẑ, which adds magnetic-field and angular terms. Using confluent hypergeometric functions and the biconfluent Heun equation, it derives relativistic bound-state energies: Eq. (18) for the first background, Eq. (25) for the second, and Eqs. (38)–(40) for the lowest radial mode in the presence of a linear central potential m → m + ηρ. The paper claims that these spectra are influenced by the LSV parameters g, v, λ, and B_0.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide simple analytic illustrations of CPT-odd Lorentz-violating effects on scalar bound states. The derivations are explicit and transparent, and the first-background spectrum Eq. (18) appears internally consistent. The manuscript is also clear in exposing its main assumptions. However, the central second-background result contains a sign error in the angular coefficient γ², so Eq. (25), and the subsequent Eqs. (38) and (40), do not follow from Eq. (20) as written. The physical significance of the paper therefore depends on a correction that changes the reported spectra.

major comments (3)

[II B, Eqs. (20)–(22)] Equation (22) defines γ² = l² − 2 g l v_z |λ|, but the sign is wrong. In Eq. (20), the term −2 i g v_z λ/ρ² ∂_φ φ acting on φ ∝ e^{i l φ} gives +2 g l v_z λ/ρ² φ; with λ = −|λ| this becomes −2 g l v_z |λ|/ρ² φ. Combined with the usual −l²/ρ² angular term, the 1/ρ² coefficient is −(l² + 2 g l v_z |λ|), so the correct definition is γ² = l² + 2 g l v_z |λ|. This sign error propagates into the square root in Eq. (25) and into |γ| in Eqs. (38) and (40).
[II B, Eq. (25)] After correcting the sign, the manuscript must specify the parameter domain under which γ² ≥ 0 and the square roots in the energy formulas are real. The current text does not discuss this, and the issue is not purely cosmetic: for states with l v_z < 0 and sufficiently large |g λ|, the corrected γ² can become negative, so the claimed bound-state solutions may not exist in that regime.
[II, Eq. (4)] The non-minimal coupling ∂_μ − i g \tilde{F}_{μα} v^α is imported from Dirac-fermion studies (Refs. [87,88]) without a derivation for the scalar sector. Since the physical interpretation of the spectra as Lorentz-violating bound states depends on this operator being the correct scalar-sector SME coupling, the authors should derive it from a scalar Lagrangian or otherwise demonstrate its gauge invariance and consistency with the SME; otherwise the results may not describe Lorentz violation in the scalar sector.

minor comments (3)

[Throughout] There are numerous typos, including 'CPT-old' in the Section II heading, 'calibre sector' in the introduction, and 'scale field' in the text; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
[II B, Eq. (22)] The first relation in Eq. (22) is written as c = m² + k² − E² − 2 g B_0 v_z E, but c is subsequently used as the positive parameter in the change of variable ̺ = 2 c ρ; the relation should read c² = ... or the notation should be made consistent.
[II B, Eq. (20)] The conversion of the cross-product term (v × E)·∇ into the cylindrical-coordinate expression containing ∂_φ in Eq. (20) is not shown; please spell out this step so readers can verify the sign of the angular derivative term.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the spectra are obtained by solving the stated modified Klein-Gordon equation, and the cited prior work supplies an explicit model assumption rather than pre-containing the predicted eigenvalues.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is not circular in the sense of the seven patterns. The CPT-odd non-minimal coupling in Eq. (4) is assumed, following Refs. [87,88], but the energy spectra (18) and (25) are then obtained by solving the resulting radial equations: the confluent-hypergeometric truncation condition |l|+1/2-b=-n, and its analogue |gamma|+1/2-d=-n, are algebraic consistency conditions, not fits to data. In Section III, eta is called an adjustment parameter and is fixed by the biconfluent-Heun polynomiality conditions (37); this is a mathematical requirement for terminating series, and Eq. (40) follows by substituting that eta into sigma=2. No experimental value is used, and no output is defined in terms of the quantity it is said to predict. The cited prior works of the authors are the stated source of the model operator, but they do not contain the calculated spectra, so the self-citation is not load-bearing in a circular way. An apparent sign discrepancy in Eq. (22) would be an internal algebraic correctness issue rather than a circular reduction, and thus does not change this assessment.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical constants or entities. All parameters (g, v_phi, v_z, lambda, B0) are inputs from the SME or chosen field configurations. Only eta is treated as an adjustable 'adjustment parameter' to force the biconfluent Heun polynomial condition, which is a significant modeling choice.

free parameters (5)

eta = determined by truncation condition for each state
Chosen as an adjustment parameter to satisfy the biconfluent Heun polynomial condition in Section III. Not fixed a priori, so the resulting energy values are consistency conditions rather than predictions for a fixed potential.
lambda = not specified
Constant characterizing the linear charge distribution that produces the radial electric field. Chosen to yield a Coulomb-type potential and enable analytic solutions.
B0 = not specified
Uniform magnetic field strength in the second background. Chosen as part of the field configuration to study LSV effects.
g = small, not specified
Non-minimal coupling constant from the SME. Assumed small enough to neglect the g^2 term in Eq. (5).
v_phi, v_z = constants, not specified
Components of the background vector field v^alpha that governs the Lorentz symmetry violation. Inputs from the SME, not derived in this paper.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The non-minimal coupling derivative operator d_mu - i g tilde{F}_{mu alpha} v^alpha is the correct way to introduce CPT-odd LSV in the Klein-Gordon equation.
Taken from Refs. [87,88] where it was applied to Dirac fermions. The paper assumes validity for scalar fields without deriving it from the SME scalar sector. Location: Eq. (4).
ad hoc to paper The g^2 term in Eq. (5) is negligible because g^2 v^alpha v_alpha << 1.
Required to obtain a linear equation in g. If not small, the spectra would change. The paper states this as an approximation but does not quantify it.
domain assumption The background vector v^alpha and the fields E and B are static and prescribed, with no back-reaction.
The scalar field moves in a fixed external background. This is standard in LSV models but is an assumption about the physical setup.
standard math The confluent hypergeometric series terminates when the first parameter is a non-positive integer.
Used to derive the quantized spectra in Eqs. (18) and (25). Standard property of 1F1(a,b;z).
standard math The biconfluent Heun series terminates when sigma = 2n_bar and s_{n_bar+1}=0.
Used in Section III to obtain polynomial solutions. Standard truncation condition for the biconfluent Heun equation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A massive scalar field under the effects of the Lorentz symmetry violation by a CPT-odd non-minimal coupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YCP2KYSZ

@misc{pith2026190804176,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A massive scalar field under the effects of the Lorentz symmetry violation by a CPT-odd non-minimal coupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YCP2KYSZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04176}
}

read the original abstract

In this paper, based on the Standard Model Extended gauge sector, we made a non-minimal coupling in the Klein-Gordon equation which characterizes the Lorentz symmetry violation and, through this nonminimal CPT-odd coupling, we investigate the effects of possible scenarios of Lorentz symmetry violation by electrical and magnetic field configurations on a massive scalar field in this background, where, analytically, we determine solutions of bound states.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

[1]

P. W. Gorham, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 161102 (2018)

2018
[2]

Fox, et al., arXiv:1809.09615[astro-ph.HE]

Derek B. Fox, et al., arXiv:1809.09615[astro-ph.HE]

arXiv
[3]

Pohl et al., Science 353, 669 (2016)

R. Pohl et al., Science 353, 669 (2016)

2016
[4]

Fukuda, et al., Phys

Y. Fukuda, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 8 (1998)

1998
[5]

Songaila, L

A. Songaila, L. L. Cowie, Nature 398, 667 (1999)

1999
[6]

Songaila, L

A. Songaila, L. L. Cowie, Nature 428, 132 (2004)

2004
[7]

Colladay, V

D. Colladay, V. A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997)

1997
[8]

Colladay, V

D. Colladay, V. A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998)

1998

Show all 114 references

[9]

Colladay, V

D. Colladay, V. A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Lett. B 511, 209 (2001)

2001
[10]

Lehnert, Phys

R. Lehnert, Phys. Rev. D 68, 085003 (2003)

2003
[11]

Lehnert, J

R. Lehnert, J. Math. Phys. 45, 3399 (2004)

2004
[12]

Altschul, Phys

B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 70, 056005 (2004) 11

2004
[13]

G. M. Shore, Nucl. Phys. B 717, 86 (2005)

2005
[14]

Aghababaei, M

S. Aghababaei, M. Haghighat, I. Motie, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115028 (2017)

2017
[15]

Bluhm, V

R. Bluhm, V. A. Kosteleck´ y, and C. D. Lane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1098 (2000)

2000
[16]

Bluhm, V

R. Bluhm, V. A. Kosteleck´ y, C. D. Lane, N. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 090801 (2002)

2002
[17]

S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field, R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990)

1990
[18]

A. A. Andrianov, D. Espriu, P. Giacconi, R. Soldati, J. High Energ y Phys. 0909, 057 (2009)

2009
[19]

Alfaro, A

J. Alfaro, A. A. Andrianov, M. Cambiaso, P. Giacconi, R. Soldati, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25, 3271 (2010)

2010
[20]

Y. M. P. Gomes, P. C. Malta, Phys. Rev. D 94, 025031 (2016)

2016
[21]

Mart ´ ın-Ruiz, C

A. Mart ´ ın-Ruiz, C. A. Escobar, Phys. Rev. D 95, 036011 (2017)

2017
[22]

Lehnert, R

R. Lehnert, R. Potting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 110402 (2004)

2004
[23]

Lehnert, R

R. Lehnert, R. Potting, Phys. Rev. D 70, 125010 (2004)

2004
[24]

Kaufhold, F

C. Kaufhold, F. R. Klinkhamer, Nucl. Phys. B 734, 1 (2006)

2006
[25]

Altschul, Phys

B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 75, 105003 (2007)

2007
[28]

Altschul, Nucl

B. Altschul, Nucl. Phys. B 796, 262 (2008)

2008
[29]

C. A. Escobar, M. A. G. Garcia, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025034 (2015)

2015
[30]

Mart ´ ın-Ruiz, C

A. Mart ´ ın-Ruiz, C. A. Escobar, Phys. Rev. D 94, 076010 (2016)

2016
[31]

Altschul, Phys

B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 041603 (2007)

2007
[32]

Kaufhold, F

C. Kaufhold, F. R. Klinkhamer, Phys. Rev. D 76, 025024 (2007)

2007
[33]

F. R. Klinkhamer, M. Risse, Phys. Rev. D 77, 016002 (2008)

2008
[34]

F. R. Klinkhamer, M. Risse, Phys. Rev. D 77, 117901 (2008)

2008
[35]

F. R. Klinkhamer, M. Schreck, Phys. Rev. D 78, 085026 (2008)

2008
[36]

Moyotl, H

A. Moyotl, H. Novales-S´ anchez, J. J. Toscano, E. S. Tututi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1450039 (2014)

2014
[37]

Schreck, Phys

M. Schreck, Phys. Rev. D 86, 065038 (2012)

2012
[38]

Agostini, F

B. Agostini, F. A. Barone, F. E. Barone, P. Gaete, J. A. Helay¨ el-Neto, Phys. Lett. B 708, 212 (2012)

2012
[39]

L. C. T. Brito, H. G. Fargnoli, A. P. Baˆ eta Scarpelli, Phys. Rev. D 87, 125023 (2013)

2013
[40]

Mariz, J

T. Mariz, J. R. Nascimento, E. Passos, R. F. Ribeiro, F. A. Brito , J. High Energy Phys. 0510, 019 (2005)

2005
[41]

J. R. Nascimento, E. Passos, A. Yu. Petrov, F. A. Brito, J. Hig h Energy Phys. 0706, 016 (2007)

2007
[42]

A. P. B. Scarpelli, M. Sampaio, M. C. Nemes, B. Hiller, Eur. Phys. J . C 56, 571 (2008)

2008
[43]

F. A. Brito, J. R. Nascimento, E. Passos, A. Yu. Petrov, Phys . Lett. B 664, 112 (2008)

2008
[44]

F. A. Brito, L. S. Grigorio, M. S. Guimaraes, E. Passos, C. Wotz asek, Phys. Rev. D 78, 125023 (2008)

2008
[45]

O. M. Del Cima, J. M. Fonseca, D. H. T. Franco, O. Piguet, Phys . Lett. B 688, 258 (2010)

2010
[46]

V. A. Kosteleck´ y, M. Mewes, Phys. Rev. D 80, 015020 (2009)

2009
[47]

Mewes, Phys

M. Mewes, Phys. Rev. D 85, 116012 (2012) 12

2012
[48]

Schreck, Phys

M. Schreck, Phys. Rev. D 89, 105019 (2014)

2014
[49]

V. A. Kosteleck´ y and M. Mewes, Phys. Rev. D 88, 096006 (2013)

2013
[50]

Schreck, Phys

M. Schreck, Phys. Rev. D 90, 085025 (2014)

2014
[51]

R. C. Myers, M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 211601 (2003)

2003
[52]

C. M. Reyes, L. F. Urrutia, J. D. Vergara, Phys. Rev. D 78, 125011 (2008)

2008
[53]

Lopez-Sarrion, C

J. Lopez-Sarrion, C. M. Reyes, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2150 (2012)

2012
[54]

C. M. Reyes, L. F. Urrutia, J. D. Vergara, Phys. Lett. B 675, 336 (2009)

2009
[55]

C. M. Reyes, Phys. Rev. D 82, 125036 (2010)

2010
[56]

C. M. Reyes, Phys. Rev. D 87, 125028 (2013)

2013
[57]

E. V. B. Leite, H. Belich, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1843006 (2018)

2018
[58]

Khosropour, Indian J

B. Khosropour, Indian J. Phys. 92(1), 43 (2018)

2018
[59]

Magueijo, L

J. Magueijo, L. Smolin, Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 1725 (2004)

2004
[60]

V. B. Bezerra, H. R. Christiansen, M. S. Cunha, C. R. Muniz, Ph ys. Rev. D 96, 024018 (2017)

2017
[61]

Z. W. Feng, H. L. Li, X. T. Zu, S. Z. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 212 (2016)

2016
[62]

Z. W. Feng, S. Z. Yang, Phys. Lett. B 772, 737 (2017)

2017
[63]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, Eur. Phys. J Plus 127, 102 (2012)

2012
[64]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 39, 085001 (2012)

2012
[65]

Bakke, E

K. Bakke, E. O. Silva, H. Belich, J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 39, 055004 (2012)

2012
[66]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 526, 1 (2013)

2013
[67]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 40, 065002 (2013)

2013
[68]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 42, 095001 (2015)

2015
[69]

Belich, K

H. Belich, K. Bakke, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1550136 (2015)

2015
[70]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, Ann. Phys. 354, 1 (2015)

2015
[71]

Belich, E

H. Belich, E. O. Silva, M. M. Ferreira Jr., M. T. D. Orlando, Phys. R ev. D 83, 125025 (2011)

2011
[72]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, E. O. Silva, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 523, 1 (2011)

2011
[73]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, E. O. Silva, J. Math. Phys. 52, 063505 (2011)

2011
[74]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, Ann. Phys. 333, 272 (2013)

2013
[75]

Belich, K

H. Belich, K. Bakke, Phys. Rev. D 90, 112 (2014)

2014
[76]

Belich, C

H. Belich, C. Furtado, K. Bakke, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 410 (2015)

2015
[77]

Bakke, C

K. Bakke, C. Furtado, H. Belich, Ann. Phys. 372, 544 (2016)

2016
[78]

H. F. Mota, K. Bakke, H. Belich, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1750140 (2017)

2017
[79]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, Spontaneous Lorentz Symmetry Violation and Low Energy Scen arios (LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saarbr¨ ucken, (2015)

2015
[80]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, Ann. Phys. 360, 596 (2015)

2015
[81]

Bakke, H

K. Bakke, H. Belich, Ann. Phys. 373, 115 (2016)

2016
[82]

Belich, K

H. Belich, K. Bakke, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, 1650026 (2016)

2016
[83]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, H. Belich, K. Bakke, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 6893084 (2017) 13

2017
[84]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, K. Bakke, H. Belich, Ann. Phys. 399, 117 (2018)

2018
[85]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, H. Belich, K. Bakke, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 25 (2017)

2017
[86]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, H. Belich, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 999 (2018)

2018
[87]

Belich, T

H. Belich, T. Costa-Soares, M. M. Ferreira Jr., J. A. Helay¨ el-N eto, Eur. Phys. J. C 41, 421 (2005)

2005
[88]

Belich, L

H. Belich, L. P. Colatto, T. Costa-Soares, J. A. Helay¨ el-Neto , M. T. D. Orlando, Eur. Phys. J. C 62, 425 (2009)

2009
[89]

G. B. Arfken, H. J. Weber, Mathematical Methods for Physicists , sixth edition (Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2005)

2005
[90]

Abramowitz, I

M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegum, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1965)

1965
[91]

Greiner, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: Wave Equations , 3rd edition (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

W. Greiner, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: Wave Equations , 3rd edition (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

2000
[92]

M. J. Bueno, C. Furtado, K. Bakke, Physica. B, Condensed Ma tter (Print), 496, 45 (2016)

2016
[93]

I. C. Fonseca, K. Bakke, Proc. R. Soc. A 471, 20150362 (2015)

2015
[94]

E. J. Austin, Mol. Phys. 40, 893 (1980)

1980
[95]

E. R. Vrscay, Phys. Rev. A 31, 2054 (1985)

1985
[96]

Killingbeck, Rep

K. Killingbeck, Rep. Prog. Phys. 40, 963 (1977)

1977
[97]

Killingbeck, Phys

K. Killingbeck, Phys. Lett. A 65, 87 (1978)

1978
[98]

R. P. Saxena, V. S. Varma, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 15, L149 (1982)

1982
[99]

Castro, P

E. Castro, P. Mart´n, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, 5321 (2000)

2000
[100]

L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, the Nonrelativistic Theory , 3rd edition (Pergamon, Oxford, 1977)

1977
[101]

L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics, a Modern Development (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1998)

1998
[102]

G. Soﬀ, B. M¨ uller, J. Rafelski, W. Greiner, Z. Naturforsch. A 28, 1389 (1973)

1973
[103]

A. L. Cavalcanti de Oliveira, E. R. Bezerra de Mello, Class. Quan tum Grav. 23, 5249 (2006)

2006
[104]

E. R. Figueiredo Medeiros, E. R. Bezerra de Mello, Eur. Phys. J . C 72, 2051 (2012)

2012
[105]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, K. Bakke, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 36 (2016)

2016
[106]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, C. Furtado, K. Bakke, Ann. Phys. 370, 128 (2016)

2016
[107]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, K. Bakke, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 48, 161 (2016)

2016
[108]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, K. Bakke, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1850005 (2018)

2018
[109]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, K. Bakke, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 490 (2018)

2018
[110]

R. F. Ribeiro, K. Bakke, Ann. Phys. 385, 36 (2017)

2017
[111]

M. S. Cunha, C. R. Muniz, H. R. Christiansen, V. B. Bezerra, E ur. Phys. J. C 76, 512 (2016)

2016
[112]

Z. Wang, Z. Long, C. Long, B. Wang, Can. J. Phys. 95(4), 331 (2017)

2017
[113]

Z. Wang, Z. Long, C. Long, M. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 36 (2015)

2015
[114]

R. L. L. Vit´ oria, C. Furtado, K. Bakke, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 44 (2018)

2018
[115]

Ronveaux, Heuns Diﬀerential Equations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995)

A. Ronveaux, Heuns Diﬀerential Equations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995)

1995
[116]

Furtado, B

C. Furtado, B. G. C. da Cunha, F. Moraes, E. R. Bezerra de M ello, V. B. Bezerra, Phys. Lett. A 195, 14 90 (1994) 15

1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

P. W. Gorham, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 161102 (2018)

2018

[2] [2]

Fox, et al., arXiv:1809.09615[astro-ph.HE]

Derek B. Fox, et al., arXiv:1809.09615[astro-ph.HE]

arXiv

[3] [3]

Pohl et al., Science 353, 669 (2016)

R. Pohl et al., Science 353, 669 (2016)

2016

[4] [4]

Fukuda, et al., Phys

Y. Fukuda, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 8 (1998)

1998

[5] [5]

Songaila, L

A. Songaila, L. L. Cowie, Nature 398, 667 (1999)

1999

[6] [6]

Songaila, L

A. Songaila, L. L. Cowie, Nature 428, 132 (2004)

2004

[7] [7]

Colladay, V

D. Colladay, V. A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997)

1997

[8] [8]

Colladay, V

D. Colladay, V. A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998)

1998