Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Detailed Microwave Continuum Spectra from Bright Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Densely sampled microwave spectra of eight bright Taurus disks curve strongly with frequency, implying their submillimeter emission is largely optically thick and that conventional dust-mass estimates understate true masses by about an…

desk verdict The spectral curvature result is real and carefully measured, but the factor-of-ten mass claim rests on a kappa_43 posterior that likely reflects prior volume, not data. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21268 v2 pith:YCVGKQMV submitted 2025-07-28 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EP
keywords protoplanetarydisksdustcontinuumspectralindexopticaldepthmassfree-freeemissionTaurusstar-formingregionmicrowaveobservations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the microwave continuum spectra of bright protoplanetary disks bend in a way that undermines the standard way astronomers weigh disk dust. After separating out free-free emission from jets and winds, the authors find that the dust emission in all eight Taurus disks has a spectral index that falls from roughly 2.8-4.0 at 43 GHz to about 1.7-2.1 at 340 GHz. That curvature is the signature of optically thick emission at the millimeter frequencies normally used for dust-mass measurements, so the usual flux-to-mass conversion is flawed. Taking the 43 GHz emission to be optically thin instead, and using inferred opacities, they estimate dust masses near 1000 Earth masses, about ten times higher than the traditional (sub)millimeter estimates. If right, the apparent shortage of solid material for planet formation may largely vanish.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is an empirical multi-component spectral decomposition of the form $S_\nu = S^c_\nu + S^d_\nu$. The contamination is modeled as free-free emission with an optical depth that turns over smoothly between optically thick ($\alpha \approx 2$) and thin ($\alpha \approx -0.1$) regimes (Eq. 8), while the dust emission is modeled as a generalized power law whose local spectral index is a logistic function of frequency, $\eta(\nu) = \eta_- + (\eta_+ - \eta_-)[1 + e^{-\gamma(\nu - \nu_d)}]^{-1}$ (Eqs. 13–14). A forward-modeling calculation with eleven shared calibration nuisance parameters propagates the correlated flux-calibration uncertainties. The key product is the curvature curve $\alpha_d(\nu)$, which converts directly into an opacity index $\beta(\nu) = \alpha_d(\nu) - 2$ at optically thin frequencies; a precomputed opacity grid over grain-size distribution, porosity, and composition then translates the 43 GHz flux and index into a dust mass.

What would settle it

Take one of the targets, for example RY Tau, and image its 43 GHz continuum at sub-arcsecond resolution: if most of the centimeter flux comes from a compact jet or wind rather than from the disk, the steep dust spectrum inferred here is an artifact of the decomposition; if the centimeter emission traces the disk with low brightness temperatures, the optically thin dust interpretation and the tenfold mass correction stand.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the eight disks observed here all exhibit substantial spectral curvature in their dust continuum, with local spectral indices $\alpha_{\rm d} \approx 2.8$–$4.0$ near 43 GHz declining to $\alpha_{\rm d} \approx 1.7$–$2.1$ near 340 GHz. With the low-frequency emission attributed to a single free-free component (spectral index $\alpha_{\rm c} \approx 1$ at 10 GHz, contributing 5–50% of the 43 GHz flux), the dust component is cleanly separated across the 4–360 GHz range, and no synchrotron or spinning-dust contribution is required. The declining index means the (sub)millimeter dust emission is partially optically thick, so the standard assumption of optically thin 230/340 GHz fluxes underestimates disk masses. Instead, adopting 43 GHz as optically thin and matching the inferred local indices to model absorption opacities yields dust masses of order 1000 Earth masses, roughly ten times the conventional estimates. The paper's concrete corollary is that centimeter-wavelength observations are a more faithful probe of disk solid mass than the millimeter bands currently used for demographic surveys.

Load-bearing premise

The decomposition assumes that all non-dust low-frequency emission can be described by one free-free component with a single turnover; if the cm-band emission is a blend of several mechanisms, or if cold dust contributes at cm wavelengths, the inferred 43 GHz dust spectral indices and the masses built from them would be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dust masses derived from 230 or 340 GHz fluxes understate the true solid mass of these disks by roughly an order of magnitude.
  • Disk demographic studies that use millimeter fluxes as mass proxies are mixing optically thick emission with mass, so their inferred scaling relations and scatter need re-examination.
  • Centimeter-band emission around 43 GHz is a more reliable tracer of optically thin dust and therefore of disk mass.
  • The 340-to-43 GHz dust flux ratio varies by about a factor of five across the targets, so any single-frequency flux ratio is an unreliable universal mass proxy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the optically thin 43 GHz assumption holds for the broader population, similar broadband observations of an unbiased sample could revise the census of disk masses and remove the apparent shortage of solids for planet formation.
  • The steep low-frequency indices imply opacity spectra steeper than the canonical $\beta \approx 1$ extrapolation, so masses derived from a standard opacity law may be systematically low even for disks without directly observed curvature.
  • Combining this sort of spectral decomposition with spatially resolved imaging could reveal whether the optically thick fraction is concentrated in ring-like dust traps or spread evenly through the disk.
  • The absence of synchrotron and spinning-dust signatures in all eight targets suggests that future centimeter-band disk surveys may only need to model dust plus a single free-free component.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents new, densely sampled 4-360 GHz continuum spectra of eight bright protoplanetary disks in Taurus, obtained with VLA, NOEMA, and SMA, supplemented by literature data. The authors model each spectrum as a sum of a free-free contamination component and a curved dust component, using several alternative empirical prescriptions with explicit treatment of correlated flux-calibration uncertainties. The main empirical finding is that the dust spectral index decreases with frequency, from α_d ≈ 2.8–4.0 near 43 GHz to ≈ 1.7–2.1 near 340 GHz for all eight disks, which they interpret as evidence that a substantial fraction of the (sub)millimeter dust emission is optically thick. In a second step, they use the 43 GHz dust flux and a model grid of dust absorption opacities to estimate dust masses, obtaining values peaking near ≈ 1000 M⊕, about an order of magnitude higher than traditional estimates based on 340 GHz fluxes with the Beckwith et al. (1990) opacity prescription.

Significance. The spectral-curvature measurements are a substantial new empirical contribution. The data handling is careful: the analysis propagates correlated calibration systematics through nuisance parameters, compares three independent dust prescriptions and two free-free prescriptions, and provides machine-readable data products. The finding that local dust spectral indices steepen at cm wavelengths, if confirmed, has broad implications for interpreting ALMA continuum surveys and for disk mass budgets. The derived mass estimates are more speculative: they depend on a strongly degenerate four-parameter dust model mapped from a single spectral-index measurement, and the paper does not currently demonstrate that the resulting opacity and mass distributions are driven by the data rather than by the priors. I therefore judge the core curvature claim to be solid but the headline mass numbers to require additional support.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eq. (16), Figs. 11–12] The claim that the 43 GHz absorption opacities are 'clearly peaked at 0.03–0.1 cm2 g−1' is not established as a data-driven result. The posterior p(θ | α_d) conditions four dust parameters (p_d, a_max, f_fill, f_AC) on a single scalar observable, β(43 GHz) = α_d(43 GHz) − 2. The text and Appendix Figures 16–17 report that p_d, f_AC, and f_fill are essentially unconstrained and that a_max is broad and bimodal. In this regime the marginal posterior p(κ_43 | α_d) is close to the prior predictive distribution of κ_43 along the β iso-surface, and the uniform priors in p_d, f_AC, log f_fill, and log a_max have no reason to be flat in log κ_43. Because the mass estimate in Eq. (16) is inversely proportional to κ_43, the reported ≈ 1000 M⊕ peak may be a prior mode rather than an inference from the data. The authors should compare the κ_43 posterior to the prior predictive distribution, rerun the inference with modified priors (e.g., different ranges for a_max or f_fill, or log-uniform priors), and report how the peak and width of p(log κ_43) and p(log M_d) change. Without such a test, the 'order of magnitude higher' mass claim is not yet supported.
  2. [Section 4.2 and Figure 12] The mass distributions are summarized by their peak ('most probable') values, which is the statistic most sensitive to prior volume effects in a multimodal or skewed posterior. I recommend reporting the median and 68% credible intervals, and presenting results for at least one alternative set of priors, so that the reader can see which aspects of the mass estimate are stable. The associated text should also state more explicitly that the quoted masses are conditional on the assumed opacity grid, the adopted DSHARP-based composition, and the fixed T_d = 20 K, and that the 43 GHz flux is assumed to be optically thin.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5] The abstract's phrasing 'These masses are roughly an order of magnitude higher (≈ 1000 M⊕)' would be more accurate with a qualifier such as 'in our fiducial opacity model,' given the model dependence discussed in Section 4.2 and the caveats in Section 5.
  2. [Section 3.2.2, Table 5] The free-free turnover parameters log ν_c and log τ_c are unconstrained or only upper limits for most targets. The authors note that this ambiguity is propagated into the marginalized posteriors, and the Appendix comparison of two contamination prescriptions is reassuring. A short sentence quantifying the resulting systematic shift in α_d at 43 GHz (beyond the qualitative statement in the Appendix) would help readers assess the impact on the mass estimates.
  3. [Section 4.2, Appendix Figures 16–17] In the corner plots, the one-dimensional posterior for log κ_43 is shown, but the prior predictive distribution for log κ_43 is not. Adding this curve would directly address the prior-dominance concern and would make the figures considerably more informative.
  4. [Section 3.2.1, Table 4] The adopted calibration-group uncertainties σ_g (e.g., 5% for VLA C/X/Ku and 8–10% for NOEMA/SMA) are stated to be based on 'best available estimates,' but no explicit justification or reference is given for these values. Adding a brief justification would strengthen the error analysis.
  5. [Section 3.2.3, Equation (15)] The derivation of α(ν) from the sigmoid-index model is only described in words. A one-line derivation of the dη/dν term would improve readability, since this correction contributes non-negligibly to the reported α_d values at 43 GHz.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the spectral curvature is a direct fit to the data, and the mass estimates are transparent transformations with disclosed model assumptions; only a minor co-author opacity-grid citation appears.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is empirical: from densely sampled 4-360 GHz spectra it fits multi-component models (Eqs. 6-15) and reads off the dust spectral curvature alpha_d(nu). That claim is a fit to the measured fluxes, not an output of a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and it is cross-checked across two free-free prescriptions and three dust prescriptions in the Appendix. The subsequent dust mass estimates (Eq. 16) use the inferred 43 GHz dust flux, the measured alpha_d(43), and a precomputed opacity grid derived from a modified DSHARP model. The opacity posterior p(kappa_43 | alpha_d) is an underdetermined Bayesian inversion (one scalar constrains four dust parameters), so the reported kappa_43 peak may be prior-dominated; but this is a robustness or correctness concern, not circularity, because kappa_43 is not defined as the value that produces a target mass, and the mass posterior is not fed back into the spectral fit. The paper explicitly acknowledges the broad, bimodal, partially unconstrained dust-property posteriors and frames the masses as simplified estimates. The only notable self-citation is Ueda et al. (2025), a co-author reference that supplies the f_AC-modified composition/opacity grid used for the mass estimates; this is a model input rather than a load-bearing theorem, and the curvature finding is independent of it. No equation or parameter in the paper reduces to its own output by construction, so no specific circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 13 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard observational modeling assumptions: a single free-free component, an empirical dust spectrum prescription, optically thin 43 GHz emission, and a theoretical opacity grid. These are standard but not externally benchmarked for these specific disks, and several free parameters (notably the free-free turnover and dust grain properties) are poorly constrained.

free parameters (13)
  • S0 = 0.47 to 1.88 mJy per target (Table 5)
    Total 33 GHz flux normalization in the spectral model, fitted to data.
  • chi0 = 0.15 to 0.72 per target (Table 5)
    Fraction of 33 GHz flux attributed to free-free contamination; key for the dust/free-free decomposition.
  • log tau_c = Upper limits <0.2 to <1.2, otherwise unconstrained
    Free-free optical depth in Eq. 8; not constrained by the data.
  • log nu_c = Unconstrained (posteriors match priors)
    Free-free turnover frequency in Eq. 8; the data do not constrain it.
  • eta_- = 2.76 to 4.7 per target (Table 5)
    Low-frequency asymptotic dust spectral index in the sigmoid model.
  • eta_+ = 2.0 to 2.6 per target (Table 5)
    High-frequency asymptotic dust spectral index in the sigmoid model.
  • log nu_d = 1.9 to 2.2 or upper limits (Table 5)
    Dust spectral turnover frequency, not always constrained.
  • log gamma = -1.5 to -2.4 per target (Table 5)
    Sharpness of the sigmoid transition in dust spectral index.
  • p_d = Unconstrained
    Dust size distribution power-law index in the opacity grid.
  • a_max = Broad peaked posterior
    Maximum grain size in the opacity grid; correlated with f_fill.
  • f_fill = Unconstrained
    Volume filling factor (porosity) of dust particles in the opacity model.
  • f_AC = Unconstrained
    Amorphous carbon fraction controlling dust composition in the opacity model.
  • T_d = 20 K fixed
    Disk-averaged dust temperature used in the mass formula, Eq. 16.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Rayleigh-Jeans limit is appropriate at 43 GHz for disk temperatures above 20 K.
    Section 4.2 states this assumption to relate spectral index to opacity index.
  • domain assumption Emission at 43 GHz is optically thin.
    Section 4.2 says 'Assuming the emission at lower frequencies (43 GHz) is optically thin', a load-bearing premise for the mass estimates.
  • domain assumption The adopted opacity grid (modified DSHARP composition, Bruggeman mixing, distribution of hollow spheres) accurately represents real disk dust opacities.
    Section 4.2 uses this grid to convert measured spectral indices into absorption opacities.
  • ad hoc to paper The non-dust emission is dominated by a single free-free mechanism.
    Section 3.2.2 and Section 5 caveat: if multiple mechanisms are present, inferred dust indices could be biased.
  • domain assumption The disk-averaged single-temperature approximation is adequate for mass estimates.
    Eq. 16 assumes isothermal dust at T_d, a simplification acknowledged in the text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detailed Microwave Continuum Spectra from Bright Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YCVGKQMV

@misc{pith2026250721268,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detailed Microwave Continuum Spectra from Bright Protoplanetary Disks in Taurus},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YCVGKQMV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21268}
}
abstract

We present new observations that densely sample the microwave (4-360 GHz) continuum spectra from eight young systems in the Taurus region. Multi-component, empirical model prescriptions were used to disentangle the contributions from their dust disks and other emission mechanisms. We found partially optically thick, free-free emission in all these systems, with positive spectral indices (median $\alpha_{\rm c} \approx 1$ at 10 GHz) and contributing 5-50% of the 43 GHz fluxes. There is no evidence for synchrotron or spinning dust grain emission contributions for these targets. The inferred dust disk spectra all show substantial curvature: their spectral indices decrease with frequency, from $\alpha_{\rm d} \approx 2.8$-4.0 around 43 GHz to 1.7-2.1 around 340 GHz. This curvature suggests that a substantial fraction of the (sub)millimeter ($\gtrsim$ 200 GHz) dust emission may be optically thick, and therefore the traditional metrics for estimating dust masses are flawed. Assuming the emission at lower frequencies (43 GHz) is optically thin, the local spectral indices and fluxes were used to constrain the disk-averaged dust properties and estimate corresponding dust masses. These masses are roughly an order of magnitude higher ($\approx 1000 \, M_\oplus$) than those found from the traditional approach based on (sub)millimeter fluxes. These findings emphasize the value of broad spectral coverage - particularly extending to lower frequencies ($\sim$cm-band) - for accurately interpreting dust disk emission; such observations may help reshape our perspective on the available mass budgets for planet formation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21268 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. — A visualization of the spectral coverage and (cumulative) on-target integration times. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. — The measured VLA spectrum for 3C 138, bootstrapped from joint observations with 3C 286 on two occasions, compared to the Perley & Butler (2017) model. The flaring 3C 138 spectrum does not substantially change during the ∼3 week observing time￾frame. We adopted the 2022/08/28 measurement to correct the flux calibration scale from the standard VLA pipeline outputs. of bright background sources in the fields. We foll… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. — [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: — The inferred δg (68% confidence intervals) as a function of group frequency (each target is offset by a small amount around the central group frequency for clarity): see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: — Comparisons of the observed spectra (as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: — The marginalized posterior distributions of χν, the fraction of the total flux contributed by the (free-free) contamination, as a function of frequency (i.e., χν ≡ S c ν/(S c ν + S d ν )). The dark to light color shadings correspond to the 68, 95, and 99% confidence …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: — The inferred frequency variations of the contamination (free-free) spectral index for each target. The shaded regions trace the posterior distributions at 68, 95, and 99% confidence intervals (∼1, 2, and 3σ) from darker to lighter. with the mean spectral index at the…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: — The inferred 15 GHz fluxes (scaled for distance) con￾tributed by contamination compared to the stellar accretion rates derived by Gangi et al. (2022). These measurements are consistent with the correlation derived by Rota et al. (2025) for a different (but partially …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: — The inferred frequency variations of the dust spectral index – the spectral curvature – for each target. The shaded regions trace the posterior distributions at 68, 95, and 99% confidence intervals (∼1, 2, and 3σ) from darker to lighter. CI Tau DL Tau DR Tau FT Tau G…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: — The ratios of the inferred dust fluxes at 340 and 43 GHz (error bars mark the 68% uncertainties). The colors are matched to the previous plots for target identification. The dotted lines show the ratios that correspond to spectral index values of 3 and 2.2, the latt…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: — Posterior distributions for the 43 GHz absorption opacities, marginalized over the parameters that described the disk-averaged dust properties, and based on the constraints from the measured local dust spectral indices (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: — Constraints on the dust masses for the target disks, based on the opacities in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: — (top rows) The decomposition of the dust and contamination spectra model posteriors for the fiducial prescriptions used in the main text, with annotations as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: — Direct comparisons of the inferred dust spectral curvatures (the αd(ν) profiles) for the same dust model prescription (Eq. 13) and two different assumptions about the contamination prescription (Eq. 7 and 8 in purple and blue, respectively). The shaded regions mark …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: — Analogous comparisons (as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: — The inferred pairwise marginalized posterior distributions for the dust properties and opacities determined in Sect. 4.2. Contours are drawn at 1, 2, and 3-σ confidence intervals from dark to light shadings. The adopted prior distributions are marked as dashed gray …
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: — As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. A JWST, ALMA and VLA survey of the Ophiuchus-A star-forming region: Unveiling hidden dust mass and connecting infrared outflows to their radio origins

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-wavelength survey of 20 Ophiuchus protostars finds dust masses tens to hundreds of times larger than millimetre-only estimates, if the adopted dust-opacity model is correct.

  2. Ionized gas emission in protoplanetary disks with the SKAO

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Synthetic SKA-Mid observations of simulated MHD and photoevaporative disk winds show that free-free emission is detectable in hours and stacked hydrogen recombination lines are spectrally resolvable in ~10 hours.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    P., & Fuller , G

    Adams , F., Emerson , J. P., & Fuller , G. A. 1990, , 357, 606, 10.1086/168949

  4. [4]

    Altenhoff , W., Thum , C., & Wendker , H. J. 1994, , 281, 161

  5. [5]

    P., Huang , J., & Zhu , Z

    Andrews , S., Teague , R., Wirth , C. P., Huang , J., & Zhu , Z. 2024, , 970, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5285

  6. [6]

    2005, , 631, 1134, 10.1086/432712

    Andrews , S., & Williams , J. 2005, , 631, 1134, 10.1086/432712

  7. [7]

    2007, , 659, 705, 10.1086/511741

    ---. 2007, , 659, 705, 10.1086/511741

  8. [8]

    J., Espaillat , C., et al

    Andrews , S., Wilner , D. J., Espaillat , C., et al. 2011, , 732, 42, 10.1088/0004-637X/732/1/42

Show all 137 references
  1. [9]

    Andrews , S. M. 2020, , 58, 483, 10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302

  2. [10]

    F., & Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C

    Anglada , G., Rodr \' guez , L. F., & Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C. 2018, , 26, 3, 10.1007/s00159-018-0107-z

  3. [11]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

  4. [12]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

  5. [13]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

  6. [14]

    1991, , 381, 250, 10.1086/170646

    Beckwith , S., & Sargent , A. 1991, , 381, 250, 10.1086/170646

  7. [15]

    I., Chini , R

    Beckwith , S., Sargent , A. I., Chini , R. S., & Guesten , R. 1990, , 99, 924, 10.1086/115385

  8. [16]

    J., Clegg , P

    Beichman , C., Neugebauer , G., Habing , H. J., Clegg , P. E., & Chester , T. J., eds. 1988, Infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS) catalogs and atlases. Volume 1: Explanatory supplement , Vol. 1

  9. [17]

    P., Zhu , Z., et al

    Birnstiel , T., Dullemond , C. P., Zhu , Z., et al. 2018, , 869, L45, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf743

  10. [18]

    Bruggeman , D. A. G. 1935, Annalen der Physik, 416, 636, 10.1002/andp.19354160705

  11. [19]

    2019, , 883, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3d33

    Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., Sierra , A., Flock , M., et al. 2019, , 883, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3d33

  12. [20]

    2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

  13. [21]

    B., & Lonsdale , C

    Chiang , E., Phillips , R. B., & Lonsdale , C. J. 1996, , 111, 355, 10.1086/117788

  14. [22]

    M., Gurwell , M

    Chung , C.-Y., Andrews , S. M., Gurwell , M. A., et al. 2024, , 273, 29, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad528b

  15. [23]

    2025, , 277, 45, 10.3847/1538-4365/adb717

    Chung , C.-Y., Tsai , A.-L., Wright , M., et al. 2025, , 277, 45, 10.3847/1538-4365/adb717

  16. [24]

    2018, , 866, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/aae36b

    Clarke , C., Tazzari , M., Juhasz , A., et al. 2018, , 866, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/aae36b

  17. [25]

    P., Ainsworth , R

    Coughlan , C. P., Ainsworth , R. E., Eisl \"o ffel , J., et al. 2017, , 834, 206, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/206

  18. [26]

    2006, , 638, 314, 10.1086/498861

    D'Alessio , P., Calvet , N., Hartmann , L., Franco-Hern \'a ndez , R., & Serv \' n , H. 2006, , 638, 314, 10.1086/498861

  19. [27]

    2021, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl

    Dominik, C., Min, M., & Tazaki, R. 2021, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl

  20. [28]

    Draine , B. T. 2006, , 636, 1114, 10.1086/498130

  21. [29]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Dr a \.z kowska , J., Bitsch , B., Lambrechts , M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 717, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09759

  22. [30]

    1996, , 309, 493

    Dutrey , A., Guilloteau , S., Duvert , G., et al. 1996, , 309, 493

  23. [31]

    2000, , 355, 165

    Duvert , G., Guilloteau , S., M \'e nard , F., Simon , M., & Dutrey , A. 2000, , 355, 165

  24. [32]

    F., et al

    Dzib , S., Loinard , L., Rodr \' guez , L. F., et al. 2015, , 801, 91, 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/91

  25. [33]

    2019, , 877, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2193

    Espaillat , C., Mac \' as , E., Hern \'a ndez , J., & Robinson , C. 2019, , 877, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2193

  26. [34]

    2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, 24, 10.21105/joss.00024

    Foreman-Mackey, D. 2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, 24, 10.21105/joss.00024

  27. [35]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306, 10.1086/670067

  28. [36]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

  29. [37]

    2022, , 667, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244042

    Gangi , M., Antoniucci , S., Biazzo , K., et al. 2022, , 667, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244042

  30. [38]

    2025, , 694, A290, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452496

    Garufi , A., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., Mac \' as , E., et al. 2025, , 694, A290, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452496

  31. [39]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.10435, 10.48550/arXiv.2506.10435

    Godines , D., Lyra , W., Ricci , L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.10435, 10.48550/arXiv.2506.10435

  32. [40]

    2010, Comm

    Goodman , J., & Weare , J. 2010, Comm. App. Math. Comp. Sci., 5, 65

  33. [41]

    2022, , 513, 3180, 10.1093/mnras/stac856

    Greaves , J., & Mason , B. 2022, , 513, 3180, 10.1093/mnras/stac856

  34. [42]

    S., & Rice , W

    Greaves , J. S., & Rice , W. K. M. 2010, , 407, 1981, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17043.x

  35. [43]

    2002, , 40, 217, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806

    G \"u del , M. 2002, , 40, 217, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806

  36. [44]

    2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 664, A137

    Guidi, G., Isella, A., Testi, L., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 664, A137

  37. [45]

    2011, , 529, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015209

    Guilloteau , S., Dutrey , A., Pi \'e tu , V., & Boehler , Y. 2011, , 529, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015209

  38. [46]

    W., & Mundy , L

    Hamidouche , M., Looney , L. W., & Mundy , L. G. 2006, , 651, 321, 10.1086/507693

  39. [47]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

  40. [48]

    D., Looney , L

    Harrison , R., Lin , Z.-Y. D., Looney , L. W., et al. 2024, , 967, 40, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad39ec

  41. [49]

    W., Stephens , I

    Harrison , R., Looney , L. W., Stephens , I. W., et al. 2019, , 877, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1e46

  42. [50]

    1995, , 452, 736, 10.1086/176344

    Hartigan , P., Edwards , S., & Ghandour , L. 1995, , 452, 736, 10.1086/176344

  43. [51]

    B., Dong , R., Liu , B., & Muto , T

    Hashimoto , J., Liu , H. B., Dong , R., Liu , B., & Muto , T. 2022, , 941, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca01d

  44. [52]

    1996, , 311, 291

    Henning , T., & Stognienko , R. 1996, , 311, 291

  45. [53]

    Hildebrand , R. H. 1983, , 24, 267

  46. [54]

    M., & Lo , K

    Ho , P., Moran , J. M., & Lo , K. Y. 2004, , 616, L1, 10.1086/423245

  47. [55]

    2018, , 862, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaccf0

    Hoang , T., Lan , N.-Q., Vinh , N.-A., & Kim , Y.-J. 2018, , 862, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaccf0

  48. [56]

    D., et al

    Howard , C., Sandell , G., Vacca , W. D., et al. 2013, , 776, 21, 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/21

  49. [57]

    A., Bae , J., Benisty , M., & Andrews , S

    Huang , J., Bergin , E. A., Bae , J., Benisty , M., & Andrews , S. M. 2023, , 943, 107, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca89c

  50. [58]

    I., Qi , C., et al

    Huang , J., \"O berg , K. I., Qi , C., et al. 2017, , 835, 231, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/231

  51. [59]

    M., Dullemond , C

    Huang , J., Andrews , S. M., Dullemond , C. P., et al. 2018 a , , 869, L42, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf740

  52. [60]

    M., Cleeves , L

    Huang , J., Andrews , S. M., Cleeves , L. I., et al. 2018 b , , 852, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa1e7

  53. [61]

    M., Dullemond , C

    Huang , J., Andrews , S. M., Dullemond , C. P., et al. 2020, , 891, 48, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab711e

  54. [62]

    J., Qi , C., & Hogerheijde , M

    Hughes , A., Wilner , D. J., Qi , C., & Hogerheijde , M. R. 2008, , 678, 1119, 10.1086/586730

  55. [63]

    M., Espaillat , C., et al

    Hughes , A., Andrews , S. M., Espaillat , C., et al. 2009, , 698, 131, 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/131

  56. [64]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90

  57. [65]

    M., & Sargent , A

    Isella , A., Carpenter , J. M., & Sargent , A. I. 2009, , 701, 260, 10.1088/0004-637X/701/1/260

  58. [66]

    J., Carpenter , J

    Isella , A., Chandler , C. J., Carpenter , J. M., P \'e rez , L. M., & Ricci , L. 2014, , 788, 129, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/129

  59. [67]

    M., & Carpenter , J

    Isella , A., P \'e rez , L. M., & Carpenter , J. M. 2012, , 747, 136, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/136

  60. [68]

    2010, , 514, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913811

    Ishihara , D., Onaka , T., Kataza , H., et al. 2010, , 514, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913811

  61. [69]

    J., Booth , R

    Jennings , J., Tazzari , M., Clarke , C. J., Booth , R. A., & Rosotti , G. P. 2022, , 514, 6053, 10.1093/mnras/stac1770

  62. [70]

    2014, , 568, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323199

    Kataoka , A., Okuzumi , S., Tanaka , H., & Nomura , H. 2014, , 568, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323199

  63. [71]

    2002, , 581, 357, 10.1086/344223

    Kitamura , Y., Momose , M., Yokogawa , S., et al. 2002, , 581, 357, 10.1086/344223

  64. [72]

    W., Mundy , L

    Kwon , W., Looney , L. W., Mundy , L. G., & Welch , W. J. 2015, , 808, 102, 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/102

  65. [73]

    Liu , H. B. 2019, , 877, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8e

  66. [74]

    B., Casassus , S., Dong , R., et al

    Liu , H. B., Casassus , S., Dong , R., et al. 2024 a , , 972, 163, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5dab

  67. [75]

    B., Muto , T., Konishi , M., et al

    Liu , H. B., Muto , T., Konishi , M., et al. 2024 b , , 685, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348896

  68. [76]

    J., et al

    Long , F., Pinilla , P., Herczeg , G. J., et al. 2018, , 869, 17, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1

  69. [77]

    J., Harsono , D., et al

    Long , F., Herczeg , G. J., Harsono , D., et al. 2019, , 882, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2d2d

  70. [78]

    J., et al

    Long , F., Pinilla , P., Herczeg , G. J., et al. 2020, , 898, 36, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9a54

  71. [79]

    G., & Welch , W

    Looney , L., Mundy , L. G., & Welch , W. J. 2000, , 529, 477, 10.1086/308239

  72. [80]

    2021, , 648, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039812

    Mac \' as , E., Guerra-Alvarado , O., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., et al. 2021, , 648, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039812

  73. [81]

    2016, , 829, 1, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/1

    Mac \' as , E., Anglada , G., Osorio , M., et al. 2016, , 829, 1, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/1

  74. [82]

    F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G

    Manara , C. F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G. P., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 539, 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09930

  75. [83]

    F., Morbidelli , A., & Guillot , T

    Manara , C. F., Morbidelli , A., & Guillot , T. 2018, , 618, L3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834076

  76. [84]

    1994, , 267, 361

    Mannings , V., & Emerson , J. 1994, , 267, 361

  77. [85]

    1997, , 490, 792, 10.1086/304897

    Mannings , V., & Sargent , A. 1997, , 490, 792, 10.1086/304897

  78. [86]

    1967, , 147, 471, 10.1086/149030

    Mezger , P., & Henderson , A. 1967, , 147, 471, 10.1086/149030

  79. [87]

    W., & de Koter , A

    Min , M., Hovenier , J. W., & de Koter , A. 2005, , 432, 909, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041920

  80. [88]

    1993, Icarus, 106, 20, 10.1006/icar.1993.1156

    Miyake , K., & Nakagawa , Y. 1993, Icarus, 106, 20, 10.1006/icar.1993.1156

  81. [89]

    1993, icarus, 106, 20

    Miyake, K., & Nakagawa, Y. 1993, icarus, 106, 20

  82. [90]

    R., & Kenyon , S

    Najita , J. R., & Kenyon , S. J. 2014, , 445, 3315, 10.1093/mnras/stu1994

  83. [91]

    \"O berg , K., Qi , C., Fogel , J. K. J., et al. 2010, , 720, 480, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/480

  84. [92]

    1996, , 466, 317, 10.1086/177512

    Ohashi , N., Hayashi , M., Kawabe , R., & Ishiguro , M. 1996, , 466, 317, 10.1086/177512

  85. [93]

    1995, , 439, 288, 10.1086/175172

    Osterloh , M., & Beckwith , S. 1995, , 439, 288, 10.1086/175172

  86. [94]

    2024, The am atmospheric model, 14.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.13748391

    Paine, S. 2024, The am atmospheric model, 14.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.13748391

  87. [95]

    2012, , 751, L42, 10.1088/2041-8205/751/2/L42

    Pascucci , I., Gorti , U., & Hollenbach , D. 2012, , 751, L42, 10.1088/2041-8205/751/2/L42

  88. [96]

    2014, , 795, 1, 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/1

    Pascucci , I., Ricci , L., Gorti , U., et al. 2014, , 795, 1, 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/1

  89. [97]

    2017, , 230, 7, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6df9

    Perley , R., & Butler , B. 2017, , 230, 7, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6df9

  90. [98]

    2006, , 460, L43, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065968

    Pi \'e tu , V., Dutrey , A., Guilloteau , S., Chapillon , E., & Pety , J. 2006, , 460, L43, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065968

  91. [99]

    B., Hubickyj , O., Bodenheimer , P., et al

    Pollack , J. B., Hubickyj , O., Bodenheimer , P., et al. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62, 10.1006/icar.1996.0190

  92. [100]

    Rafikov , R. R. 2006, , 646, 288, 10.1086/504793

  93. [101]

    2011, , 532, A71, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117104

    Rau , U., & Cornwell , T. 2011, , 532, A71, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117104

  94. [102]

    L., McCabe , C.-E., et al

    Rebull , L., Padgett , D. L., McCabe , C.-E., et al. 2010, , 186, 259, 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/259

  95. [103]

    Reynolds , S. P. 1986, , 304, 713, 10.1086/164209

  96. [104]

    C., Mac \' as, E., & Sarro, L

    Ribas, \'A ., Espaillat, C. C., Mac \' as, E., & Sarro, L. M. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 642, A171

  97. [105]

    C., Mac \' as , E., et al

    Ribas , \'A ., Espaillat , C. C., Mac \' as , E., et al. 2017, , 849, 63, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8e99

  98. [106]

    Ricci , L., Testi , L., Natta , A., & Brooks , K. J. 2010 a , , 521, A66, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015039

  99. [107]

    2010 b , , 512, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913403

    Ricci , L., Testi , L., Natta , A., et al. 2010 b , , 512, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913403

  100. [108]

    2012, , 540, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118296

    Ricci , L., Trotta , F., Testi , L., et al. 2012, , 540, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118296

  101. [109]

    J., Mundy , L

    Rodmann , J., Henning , T., Chandler , C. J., Mundy , L. G., & Wilner , D. J. 2006, , 446, 211, 10.1051/0004-6361:20054038

  102. [110]

    A., van der Marel , N., Garufi , A., et al

    Rota , A. A., van der Marel , N., Garufi , A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.16586, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.16586

  103. [111]

    A., & Hamidouche , M

    Sandell , G., Weintraub , D. A., & Hamidouche , M. 2011, , 727, 26, 10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/26

  104. [112]

    M., Zhang , K., et al

    Sierra , A., P \'e rez , L. M., Zhang , K., et al. 2021, , 257, 14, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1431

  105. [113]

    K., Harsono , D., et al

    Sturm , J., McClure , M. K., Harsono , D., et al. 2022, , 660, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141860

  106. [114]

    2016, , 588, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527423

    Tazzari , M., Testi , L., Ercolano , B., et al. 2016, , 588, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527423

  107. [115]

    2021, , 506, 5117, 10.1093/mnras/stab1912

    Tazzari , M., Testi , L., Natta , A., et al. 2021, , 506, 5117, 10.1093/mnras/stab1912

  108. [116]

    2025, , 984, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/adc43b

    Teague , R., Benisty , M., Facchini , S., et al. 2025, , 984, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/adc43b

  109. [117]

    B., & Bally , J

    Throop , H. B., & Bally , J. 2008, , 135, 2380, 10.1088/0004-6256/135/6/2380

  110. [118]

    2002, , 574, 740, 10.1086/341002

    Tremaine , S., Gebhardt , K., Bender , R., et al. 2002, , 574, 740, 10.1086/341002

  111. [119]

    M., Birnstiel , T., & Wilner , D

    Tripathi , A., Andrews , S. M., Birnstiel , T., & Wilner , D. J. 2017, , 845, 44, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7c62

  112. [120]

    2016, , 829, L35, 10.3847/2041-8205/829/2/L35

    Tsukagoshi , T., Nomura , H., Muto , T., et al. 2016, , 829, L35, 10.3847/2041-8205/829/2/L35

  113. [121]

    F., Rosotti , G

    Tychoniec , ., Manara , C. F., Rosotti , G. P., et al. 2020, , 640, A19, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037851

  114. [122]

    T., Wright , C

    Ubach , C., Maddison , S. T., Wright , C. M., et al. 2012, , 425, 3137, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21603.x

  115. [123]

    2017, , 466, 4083, 10.1093/mnras/stx012

    ---. 2017, , 466, 4083, 10.1093/mnras/stx012

  116. [124]

    M., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., et al

    Ueda , T., Andrews , S. M., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez , C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.14443. 2507.14443

  117. [125]

    2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2004, 10.21105/joss.02004

    van der Velden , E. 2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2004, 10.21105/joss.02004

  118. [126]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

  119. [127]

    M., Mac \' as, E., Zagaria, F., et al

    Viscardi, E. M., Mac \' as, E., Zagaria, F., et al. 2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 695, A147

  120. [128]

    Waskom, M. L. 2021, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3021, 10.21105/joss.03021

  121. [129]

    Weintraub , D., Sandell , G., & Duncan , W. D. 1989, , 340, L69, 10.1086/185441

  122. [130]

    Wilner, D. J. 2004, New Astronomy Reviews, 48, 1363

  123. [131]

    J., D'Alessio , P., Calvet , N., Claussen , M

    Wilner , D. J., D'Alessio , P., Calvet , N., Claussen , M. J., & Hartmann , L. 2005, , 626, L109, 10.1086/431757

  124. [132]

    J., Benisty , M., & Andrews , S

    Winter , A. J., Benisty , M., & Andrews , S. M. 2024, , 972, L9, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6d5d

  125. [133]

    2016, , 586, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526538

    Woitke , P., Min , M., Pinte , C., et al. 2016, , 586, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526538

  126. [134]

    C., Rilinger , A

    Xin , Z., Espaillat , C. C., Rilinger , A. M., Ribas , \'A ., & Mac \' as , E. 2023, , 942, 4, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca52b

  127. [135]

    F., & Palau , A

    Zapata , L., Rodr \' guez , L. F., & Palau , A. 2017, , 834, 138, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/138

  128. [136]

    2019, , 877, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8c

    Zhu , Z., Zhang , S., Jiang , Y.-F., et al. 2019, , 877, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8c

  129. [137]

    G., Mennella , V., Colangeli , L., & Bussoletti , E

    Zubko , V. G., Mennella , V., Colangeli , L., & Bussoletti , E. 1996, , 282, 1321

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.