pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18233 · v1 · pith:YDAS5RKQnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ✦ hep-ph

Twist-3 contributions to γγtoπ⁰π⁰,\,K_S⁰K_S⁰ in k_T factorization

Jun-Kang He , Cong Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 23:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords twist-3 contributionsk_T factorizationtwo-photon processesneutral meson pairslight-cone distribution amplitudesBelle datacross sectionsenergy dependence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Twist-3 terms raise cross sections for neutral pion and kaon pair production from two photons by nearly an order of magnitude at intermediate energies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the cross sections for γγ → π⁰π⁰ and γγ → K_S⁰K_S⁰ in k_T factorization, adding the chirally enhanced two-parton twist-3 light-cone distribution amplitudes to the usual twist-2 terms. For these charge-suppressed neutral channels the twist-3 pieces turn out to be larger than the twist-2 pieces by almost a factor of ten in the few-GeV region. The enlarged predictions move substantially closer to the Belle measurements, although a remaining gap is ascribed to higher-order QCD corrections. The same framework reproduces the angular distributions and energy dependence seen in charged channels and the neutral-pion channel, while the neutral-kaon channel shows a steeper fall-off than predicted.

Core claim

In the k_T factorization framework the twist-3 contributions to the cross sections of γγ→π⁰π⁰ and γγ→K_S⁰K_S⁰ exceed the twist-2 contributions by close to an order of magnitude in the intermediate-energy region, bringing the theoretical results much closer to the Belle data for these charge-suppressed neutral channels.

What carries the argument

Chirally enhanced two-parton twist-3 light-cone distribution amplitudes inserted into the k_T factorization hard-scattering kernels for neutral meson-pair production.

If this is right

  • The neutral-to-charged ratios remain nearly constant with energy in the calculation while the data show strong energy dependence.
  • Higher-order QCD corrections are expected to close the remaining gap between theory and Belle data for the neutral channels.
  • The hard twist-3 contribution and the soft handbag contribution are of comparable size in the few-GeV region.
  • The calculation matches the measured angular distributions for both charged and neutral-pion channels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The persistent mismatch in the energy slope of the neutral-kaon channel suggests that additional mechanisms beyond the current twist-3 set may be required for kaons specifically.
  • If the flat theoretical ratio persists at higher energies, future collider data on the ratio could distinguish between hard-scattering models and soft-overlap pictures.
  • The same twist-3 enhancement pattern could be tested in related neutral channels such as γγ → ηη or γγ → ηπ⁰ once sufficient luminosity is available.

Load-bearing premise

The specific models chosen for the twist-3 light-cone distribution amplitudes are accurate and k_T factorization remains valid and dominant without large non-factorizable contributions in the few-GeV region.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the neutral-to-charged cross-section ratio continues to fall steeply with energy beyond 4 GeV, rather than flattening as the calculation predicts, would contradict the dominance of the included twist-3 terms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18233 by Cong Wang, Jun-Kang He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The four basic Feynman diagrams contributing to the partonic amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Partial cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Normalized differential cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Cross-section ratios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Cross-section ratios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We compute the cross sections for the two-photon processes $\gamma\gamma\to\pi^0\pi^0$ and $\gamma\gamma\to K_S^0K_S^0$ in $k_T$ factorization, including the chirally enhanced two-parton twist-3 light-cone distribution amplitudes. For these charge-suppressed neutral channels the twist-3 cross sections exceed the twist-2 ones by close to an order of magnitude in the intermediate-energy region, bringing the predictions much closer to the Belle data, the residual underestimate being plausibly attributable to higher-order QCD corrections. The calculation reproduces the measured angular distributions and the energy dependence of the charged channels and the neutral pion, though not the steeper fall of the neutral kaon. The neutral-to-charged ratios are the most discriminating observables. They depend strongly on energy in the data, whereas our calculation, like other approaches in the literature, yields a nearly flat ratio. Finally, in a phenomenological discussion, we combine our contribution with the soft handbag contribution and largely reproduce the observed energy dependence, suggesting that the hard and soft contributions are comparably important in the few-GeV region.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes cross sections for γγ→π⁰π⁰ and γγ→K_S⁰K_S⁰ in k_T factorization, incorporating chirally enhanced two-parton twist-3 light-cone distribution amplitudes. It reports that for these neutral channels the twist-3 contributions exceed twist-2 by nearly an order of magnitude at intermediate energies, improving agreement with Belle data (with residuals ascribed to higher-order QCD). The calculation reproduces angular distributions and energy dependence for charged channels and neutral pions but not the steeper fall-off for neutral kaons; neutral-to-charged ratios remain nearly flat in the theory while data show strong energy dependence. A phenomenological combination with soft handbag contributions is shown to largely reproduce the observed energy dependence.

Significance. If the central numerical result holds, the work establishes that twist-3 effects can dominate over twist-2 in charge-suppressed neutral two-photon channels at few-GeV scales, providing a concrete illustration of the importance of higher-twist contributions within k_T factorization and of the interplay between hard and soft mechanisms in the transition region.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, §4] §4 (numerical results) and the LCDA parametrization in §2: the reported order-of-magnitude enhancement of twist-3 over twist-2 is obtained with specific functional forms and parameters for the two-parton twist-3 LCDAs; no variation or uncertainty band is shown, so it is unclear whether the dominance survives reasonable changes in those models.
  2. [§3] §3 (factorization framework): the validity of k_T factorization at the few-GeV scales of the Belle data is assumed without quantitative assessment of higher-order corrections or power-suppressed non-factorizable terms; the residual data-theory discrepancy is attributed to higher-order QCD but no estimate of its size is provided.
  3. [final section] Phenomenological discussion (final section): the soft handbag term is added by hand to restore the observed energy dependence; the paper does not demonstrate that this term is independent of the hard-scattering calculation or that double-counting is avoided.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states that the neutral-to-charged ratios are the most discriminating observables, yet the calculation yields a flat ratio; a brief remark on the kinematic range where this flatness is expected would help.
  2. [§2, §4] Notation for the twist-3 LCDAs (e.g., the precise definition of the chirally enhanced terms) should be cross-referenced to the equations in §2 when first used in the numerical discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below in a point-by-point manner.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2, §4] §4 (numerical results) and the LCDA parametrization in §2: the reported order-of-magnitude enhancement of twist-3 over twist-2 is obtained with specific functional forms and parameters for the two-parton twist-3 LCDAs; no variation or uncertainty band is shown, so it is unclear whether the dominance survives reasonable changes in those models.

    Authors: We agree that the robustness of the twist-3 dominance would be better demonstrated by including parameter variations. In the revised manuscript we will vary the key parameters of the two-parton twist-3 LCDAs within their accepted ranges, recompute the cross sections, and display uncertainty bands in the relevant figures of §4. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (factorization framework): the validity of k_T factorization at the few-GeV scales of the Belle data is assumed without quantitative assessment of higher-order corrections or power-suppressed non-factorizable terms; the residual data-theory discrepancy is attributed to higher-order QCD but no estimate of its size is provided.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a more quantitative discussion of the applicability of k_T factorization is warranted. We will expand §3 to include an estimate of higher-order corrections based on the observed renormalization-scale dependence of our leading-order results and comparisons with existing NLO studies in the literature, while noting that a complete NLO calculation lies beyond the scope of the present work. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [final section] Phenomenological discussion (final section): the soft handbag term is added by hand to restore the observed energy dependence; the paper does not demonstrate that this term is independent of the hard-scattering calculation or that double-counting is avoided.

    Authors: The soft handbag contribution is introduced purely phenomenologically to illustrate the possible importance of soft mechanisms. We will revise the final section to state explicitly that this term is added by hand as a model-dependent supplement and is not derived from the same k_T factorization framework, thereby clarifying that it is not intended as a combined theoretical prediction. A rigorous demonstration of independence is not possible within the present approach, as the handbag term parametrizes non-perturbative effects outside the hard-scattering regime. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is a standard perturbative calculation

full rationale

The paper computes cross sections via kT factorization using chosen models for twist-3 LCDAs; the reported order-of-magnitude enhancement and comparison to Belle data follow directly from that computation and the stated assumptions about factorization validity. The final phenomenological combination with a soft handbag term is explicitly labeled as a separate discussion to illustrate energy dependence and is not presented as a derived prediction. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central result to its inputs are present in the provided text. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks once the LCDA models and factorization assumptions are granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The calculation necessarily relies on standard QCD factorization assumptions and chosen LCDA models whose parameters are not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5742 in / 1292 out tokens · 25535 ms · 2026-06-26T23:47:41.218922+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 36 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The two-parton twist-3 LCDAs of the pion, including the meson-mass corrections of Refs. [39, 40], are ϕp π(x, µ) = 1 + 30η 3π(µ)− 5 2 ρ2 π(µ) C1/2 2 (2x−1) (9) − 3η 3π(µ)ω3π(µ) + 27 20 ρ2 π(µ) + 81 10 ρ2 π(µ)aπ 2(µ) C1/2 4 (2x−1), ϕσ π(x, µ) = 6x¯x n 1 + 5η3π(µ)− 1 2 η3π(µ)ω3π(µ)− 7 20 ρ2 π(µ)− 3 5 ρ2 π(µ)aπ 2(µ) C3/2 2 (2x−1) o , (10) where the Legendre ...

  2. [2]

    The factorκ 2/κ1 =µ 2 π/ω2 = 4µ2 π/Q2 is the chiral-enhancement parameter discussed in Sec. I. In the Belle windowQ∼2–4 GeV this ratio is of order 0.4–1.8, so the twist-3 corrections are not parametrically suppressed. In particular, the chiral masses µπ andµ K are of order the hard scale in this window, which is the physical reason why the two-parton twis...

  3. [3]

    Two features distinguish the kaon prefactor from the pion one. First,f K is here the physical neutral-kaon decay constant (and not fK/ √ 2), sinceK 0 =d¯sis a flavor eigenstate rather than a flavor superposition, so that no (1/ √ 2)2 projection weight appears. Second, becausee d =e s =− 1 3, the photon couples with equal strength to the two valence flavor...

    2024

  4. [4]

    S. J. Brodsky and G. P. Lepage, Large-angle two-photon exclusive channels in quantum chro- modynamics, Phys. Rev. D24, 1808 (1981)

    1981

  5. [5]

    G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Exclusive processes in perturbative quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D22, 2157 (1980)

    1980

  6. [6]

    V. L. Chernyak,γγ→ππ, KK: leading term QCD versus handbag model, Phys. Lett. B 640, 246 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0605072

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Chenet al.(Belle), A study ofγγ→K 0 SK0 S production at energies of 2.4–4.0 GeV at Belle, Phys

    W.-T. Chenet al.(Belle), A study ofγγ→K 0 SK0 S production at energies of 2.4–4.0 GeV at Belle, Phys. Lett. B651, 15 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0609042

    arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    V. L. Chernyak and S. I. Eidelman, Hard exclusive two-photon processes in QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.80, 1 (2015), arXiv:1409.3348

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Ueharaet al.(Belle), High-statistics study of neutral-pion pair production in two-photon collisions, Phys

    S. Ueharaet al.(Belle), High-statistics study of neutral-pion pair production in two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D79, 052009 (2009), arXiv:0903.3697

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    Aiharaet al.(TPC/Two Gamma), Pion and kaon pair production in photon-photon colli- sions, Phys

    H. Aiharaet al.(TPC/Two Gamma), Pion and kaon pair production in photon-photon colli- sions, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 404 (1986)

    1986

  11. [11]

    Heisteret al.(ALEPH), Exclusive production of pion and kaon meson pairs in two photon collisions at LEP, Phys

    A. Heisteret al.(ALEPH), Exclusive production of pion and kaon meson pairs in two photon collisions at LEP, Phys. Lett. B569, 140 (2003)

    2003

  12. [12]

    Nakazawaet al.(Belle), Measurement of theγγ→π +π− andγγ→K +K− processes at energies of 2.4–4.1 GeV, Phys

    H. Nakazawaet al.(Belle), Measurement of theγγ→π +π− andγγ→K +K− processes at energies of 2.4–4.1 GeV, Phys. Lett. B615, 39 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0412058

    arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Moriet al.(Belle), High statistics measurement of the cross sections ofγγ→π +π− production, J

    T. Moriet al.(Belle), High statistics measurement of the cross sections ofγγ→π +π− production, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.76, 074102 (2007), arXiv:0704.3538. 30

    arXiv 2007

  14. [14]

    Ueharaet al.(Belle), High-statistics measurement of neutral-pion pair production in two- photon collisions, Phys

    S. Ueharaet al.(Belle), High-statistics measurement of neutral-pion pair production in two- photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D78, 052004 (2008), arXiv:0805.3387

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    Ueharaet al.(Belle), High-statistics study ofηπ 0 production in two-photon collisions, Phys

    S. Ueharaet al.(Belle), High-statistics study ofηπ 0 production in two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D80, 032001 (2009), arXiv:0906.1464

    arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    Ueharaet al.(Belle), Measurement ofηηproduction in two-photon collisions, Phys

    S. Ueharaet al.(Belle), Measurement ofηηproduction in two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D82, 114031 (2010), arXiv:1007.3779

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    Ueharaet al.(Belle), High-statistics study ofK 0 S pair production in two-photon collisions, PTEP2013, 123C01 (2013), arXiv:1307.7457

    S. Ueharaet al.(Belle), High-statistics study ofK 0 S pair production in two-photon collisions, PTEP2013, 123C01 (2013), arXiv:1307.7457

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Masudaet al.(Belle), Study ofπ 0 pair production in single-tag two-photon collisions, Phys

    M. Masudaet al.(Belle), Study ofπ 0 pair production in single-tag two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D93, 032003 (2016), arXiv:1508.06757

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Masudaet al.(Belle), Study ofK 0 S pair production in single-tag two-photon collisions, Phys

    M. Masudaet al.(Belle), Study ofK 0 S pair production in single-tag two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D97, 052003 (2018), arXiv:1712.02145

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Corian` o, H.-n

    C. Corian` o, H.-n. Li, and C. Savkli, Exclusive processes at intermediate energy, quark–hadron duality and the transition to perturbative QCD, JHEP07, 008, arXiv:hep-ph/9805406

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Hsieh and H.-n

    R.-C. Hsieh and H.-n. Li, Transition to perturbative QCD in two photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D70, 056002 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0404109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  22. [22]

    Wang, M.-Z

    C. Wang, M.-Z. Zhou, and H. Chen,γγ→M +M − (M=π, K) processes with twist-3 correc- tions in QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 219 (2017), arXiv:1512.04381

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Duplanˇ ci´ c and B

    G. Duplanˇ ci´ c and B. Niˇ zi´ c, NLO perturbative QCD predictions forγγ→M+M − (M=π, K), Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 142003 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0607069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Diehl, P

    M. Diehl, P. Kroll, and C. Vogt, The handbag contribution toγγ→ππandKK, Phys. Lett. B532, 99 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0112274

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  25. [25]

    Diehl and P

    M. Diehl and P. Kroll, Two-photon annihilation into octet meson pairs: symmetry relations in the handbag approach, Phys. Lett. B683, 165 (2010), arXiv:0911.3317

    arXiv 2010

  26. [26]

    Kroll, Hard exclusive wide-angle processes, EPJ Web Conf.37, 01019 (2012), arXiv:1209.1230

    P. Kroll, Hard exclusive wide-angle processes, EPJ Web Conf.37, 01019 (2012), arXiv:1209.1230

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Hoferichter, D

    M. Hoferichter, D. R. Phillips, and C. Schat, Roy–Steiner equations forγγ→ππ, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1743 (2011), arXiv:1106.4147

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ın and B

    R. Garc´ ıa-Mart´ ın and B. Moussallam, MO analysis of the high statistics Belle results on γγ→π +π−, π0π0 with chiral constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C70, 155 (2010), arXiv:1006.5373

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    Dai and M

    L.-Y. Dai and M. R. Pennington, Comprehensive amplitude analysis ofγγ→π +π−, π0π0 and ¯KKbelow 1.5 GeV, Phys. Rev. D90, 036004 (2014), arXiv:1404.7524

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Danilkin and M

    I. Danilkin and M. Vanderhaeghen, Dispersive analysis of theγγ ∗ →ππprocess, Phys. Lett. B789, 366 (2019), arXiv:1810.03669

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Y. S. Surovtsev, P. Bydˇ zovsk´ y, T. Gutsche, R. Kami´ nski, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and M. Nagy, Coupled-channel analysis of the processγγ→π 0π0, Particles5, 210 (2022), arXiv:2112.15435

    arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    S. P. Klevansky, R. H. Lemmer, and A. Beygi, Amplitude determination forM M→ 31 M M, M=π, Kand cross-sections forγγ→π +π−, π0π0, π0ηin a chiral model, Eur. Phys. J. A61, 49 (2025), arXiv:1607.08349

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Botts and G

    J. Botts and G. F. Sterman, Hard elastic scattering in QCD: leading behavior, Nucl. Phys. B 325, 62 (1989)

    1989

  34. [34]

    Li and G

    H.-n. Li and G. F. Sterman, The perturbative pion form factor with Sudakov suppression, Nucl. Phys. B381, 129 (1992)

    1992

  35. [35]

    Jakob and P

    R. Jakob and P. Kroll, The pion form factor: Sudakov suppressions and intrinsic transverse momentum, Phys. Lett. B315, 463 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9306259

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  36. [36]

    Wang, J.-K

    C. Wang, J.-K. He, and M.-Z. Zhou, Twist-3 contributions toγγ→π +π−, K +K− processes in perturbative QCD approach, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 765 (2019), arXiv:1905.07008

    arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Li, Unification of thek T and threshold resummations, Phys

    H.-n. Li, Unification of thek T and threshold resummations, Phys. Lett. B454, 328 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9812363

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  38. [38]

    Kurimoto, H.-n

    T. Kurimoto, H.-n. Li, and A. I. Sanda, Leading-power contributions toB→π, ρtransition form factors, Phys. Rev. D65, 014007 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0105003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  39. [39]

    Li, Threshold resummation for exclusiveBmeson decays, Phys

    H.-n. Li, Threshold resummation for exclusiveBmeson decays, Phys. Rev. D66, 094010 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0102013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  40. [40]

    Gell-Mann, R

    M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes, and B. Renner, Behavior of current divergences under SU(3) x SU(3), Phys. Rev.175, 2195 (1968)

    1968

  41. [41]

    Leutwyler, The ratios of the light quark masses, Phys

    H. Leutwyler, The ratios of the light quark masses, Phys. Lett. B378, 313 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9602366

    arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    Ball, Theoretical update of pseudoscalar meson distribution amplitudes of higher twist: the nonsinglet case, JHEP01, 010, arXiv:hep-ph/9812375

    P. Ball, Theoretical update of pseudoscalar meson distribution amplitudes of higher twist: the nonsinglet case, JHEP01, 010, arXiv:hep-ph/9812375

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    P. Ball, V. M. Braun, and A. Lenz, Higher-twist distribution amplitudes of the K meson in QCD, JHEP05, 004, arXiv:hep-ph/0603063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Beneke and T

    M. Beneke and T. Feldmann, Symmetry-breaking corrections to heavy-to-light B meson form factors at large recoil, Nucl. Phys. B592, 3 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0008255

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    Aokiet al.(Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), FLAG review 2024, Phys

    Y. Aokiet al.(Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), FLAG review 2024, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014508 (2026), arXiv:2411.04268 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    J. Bolz, P. Kroll, and G. A. Schuler, Color octet contributions to exclusive charmonium decays, Phys. Lett. B392, 198 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9610265

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  47. [47]

    V. M. Braun and I. E. Filyanov, QCD sum rules in exclusive kinematics and pion wave function, Z. Phys. C44, 157 (1989)

    1989

  48. [48]

    V. M. Braun and I. E. Filyanov, Conformal invariance and pion wave functions of nonleading twist, Z. Phys. C48, 239 (1990)

    1990

  49. [49]

    Wei and M.-Z

    Z.-T. Wei and M.-Z. Yang, Systematic study ofB→πform factors in the pQCD approach and its reliability, Nucl. Phys. B642, 263 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0202018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  50. [50]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 32 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    A. V. Efremov and A. V. Radyushkin, Factorization and asymptotic behaviour of pion form factor in QCD, Phys. Lett. B94, 245 (1980)

    1980

  52. [52]

    V. M. Braun, A. N. Manashov, and J. Rohrwild, Baryon operators of higher twist in QCD and nucleon distribution amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B807, 89 (2009), arXiv:0806.2531

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  53. [53]

    Kroll and K

    P. Kroll and K. Passek-Kumeriˇ cki, Twist-3 contributions to wide-angle photoproduction of pions, Phys. Rev. D97, 074023 (2018), arXiv:1802.06597

    arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    S. J. Brodsky, T. Huang, and G. P. Lepage, The intrinsic transverse momentum and the in- trinsic heavy quark probability distributions in QCD, inParticles and Fields 2, Banff Summer Institute(1981) p. 143

    1981

  55. [55]

    G. P. Lepage, S. J. Brodsky, T. Huang, and P. B. Mackenzie, Hadronic wave functions in QCD, inParticles and Fields 2, Proc. Banff Summer Institute(1982) p. 83

    1982

  56. [56]

    Nagashima and H.-n

    M. Nagashima and H.-n. Li,k T factorization of exclusive processes, Phys. Rev. D67, 034001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0210173

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  57. [57]

    Li and S

    H.-n. Li and S. Mishima, Pion transition form factor ink T factorization, Phys. Rev. D80, 074024 (2009), arXiv:0907.0166

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    Li, Y.-L

    H.-n. Li, Y.-L. Shen, Y.-M. Wang, and H. Zou, Next-to-leading-order correction to pion form factor ink T factorization, Phys. Rev. D83, 054029 (2011), arXiv:1012.4098

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Hu and H.-n

    H.-C. Hu and H.-n. Li, Next-to-leading-order time-like pion form factors ink T factorization, Phys. Lett. B718, 1351 (2013), arXiv:1204.6708

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  60. [60]

    A. S. Gorsky, The power correction to the asymptotics of the cross section for the process γγ→π +π− in QCD, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.50, 708 (1989)

    1989

  61. [61]

    Faiman, H

    D. Faiman, H. J. Lipkin, and H. R. Rubinstein, Resonance physics withγγevents, Phys. Lett. B59, 269 (1975)

    1975

  62. [62]

    N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, Lightest scalar and tensor resonances inγγ→ππafter the Belle experiment, Phys. Rev. D77, 074020 (2008), arXiv:0712.0885

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  63. [63]

    C. N. Yang, Selection rules for the dematerialization of a particle into two photons, Phys. Rev. 77, 242 (1950)

    1950

  64. [64]

    G. S. Baliet al.(RQCD), Light-cone distribution amplitudes of pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD, JHEP08, 065, addendum: JHEP 11 (2020) 037, arXiv:1903.08038

    arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Khodjamirian, T

    A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. A. Pivovarov, and Y.-M. Wang, Charm-loop effect inB→ K(∗)ℓ+ℓ− andB→K ∗γ, JHEP09, 089, arXiv:1006.4945

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Khodjamirian and A

    A. Khodjamirian and A. V. Rusov,B s →Kℓν ℓ andB (s) →π(K)ℓ +ℓ− decays at large recoil and CKM matrix elements, JHEP08, 112, arXiv:1703.04765

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Cheng, A

    S. Cheng, A. Khodjamirian, and A. V. Rusov, Pion light-cone distribution amplitude from the pion electromagnetic form factor, Phys. Rev. D102, 074022 (2020), arXiv:2007.05550

    arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Chai and S

    J. Chai and S. Cheng, Shedding light on the intrinsic transversal momentum distributions of 33 pions and kaons, Phys. Rev. D111, L071902 (2025), arXiv:2412.05941 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Chai and S

    J. Chai and S. Cheng, Form factors of light pseudoscalar mesons from the perturbative QCD approach, JHEP06, 229, arXiv:2501.08783 [hep-ph]

    arXiv