REVIEW 1 cited by
On how to avoid exacerbating spurious correlations when models are overparameterized
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Overparameterized models fail to generalize well in the presence of data imbalance even when combined with traditional techniques for mitigating imbalances. This paper focuses on imbalanced classification datasets, in which a small subset of the population -- a minority -- may contain features that correlate spuriously with the class label. For a parametric family of cross-entropy loss modifications and a representative Gaussian mixture model, we derive non-asymptotic generalization bounds on the worst-group error that shed light on the role of different hyper-parameters. Specifically, we prove that, when appropriately tuned, the recently proposed VS-loss learns a model that is fair towards minorities even when spurious features are strong. On the other hand, alternative heuristics, such as the weighted CE and the LA-loss, can fail dramatically. Compared to previous works, our bounds hold for more general models, they are non-asymptotic, and, they apply even at scenarios of extreme imbalance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Thumb on the Scale: Optimal Loss Weighting in Last Layer Retraining
For square-loss weighted ERM in the proportional asymptotic regime, the class weight that equalizes per-class errors is ρ̃ = π−/π+ + (π−/π+ − 1) δ/(2π+ − δ), exceeding the ratio of priors and growing with δ.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.