Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 2 cited by

Symmetry Analysis of the Non-Hermitian Electro-Optic Effect in Crystals

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Symmetry decides which polarizations a biased crystal amplifies

desk verdict Solid symmetry classification of non-Hermitian electro-optic gain; quantitative predictions lean on an imported Boltzmann formula, but the group-theoretic core holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03399 v2 pith:YEKCFCXK submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.optics

Sylvain Lannebère , Tatiana G. Rappoport , Tiago A. Morgado , Ivo Souza , Mário G. Silveirinha This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords Berrycurvaturedipolenon-Hermitianelectro-opticeffectlineardichroicgainchiralpointgroupsymmetryWeylsemimetalsnonreciprocalopticsoptical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the non-Hermitian electro-optic effect — the optical gain or loss induced in a conductor by a static electric bias through the Berry curvature dipole — is shaped by the crystal's point-group symmetry. For the 16 non-centrosymmetric point groups that support a nonzero Berry curvature dipole, it provides a symmetry roadmap: when the bias lies along the principal axis, categories B, C, and E show linear dichroic gain, with linearly polarized eigenpolarizations and no gyrotropic component, while category D shows chiral gain and category A mixes both. In categories B, C, and E, reversing the bias direction swaps gain and dissipation for all transverse polarizations, and in category C the gain is polarization-independent. The paper also derives explicit gain criteria against an isotropic Drude background and shows that a mirror-backed slab of such material can have reflectance above or below unity depending on bias and polarization. Weyl semimetals with the relevant point groups are identified as the most promising materials for observing these effects.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Berry curvature dipole tensor $D$, whose symmetry-allowed form is fixed by the point group, together with the electro-optic conductivity formula $\sigma_{\rm EO} = \sigma_{\rm EO}^{\rm H} + \sigma_{\rm EO}^{\rm NH}(\omega)$ derived from semiclassical Boltzmann theory. The paper uses a seven-category classification of non-centrosymmetric crystals (polar versus nonpolar, optically active versus piezoelectric) to organize the allowed tensor forms, then constructs $\varepsilon''_{\rm EO}$ from Eq. (4) and reads off gain or loss from the eigenvalues of the quadratic form $E_\omega^* \cdot \varepsilon''_{\rm EO} \cdot E_\omega$. The key simplification is that for a bias along the principal axis only four elements of $D$ enter, so the entire non-Hermitian response is controlled by a handful of symmetry-constrained tensor components.

What would settle it

Measure the reflectance eigenvalues of a mirror-backed slab of a category C material such as a 4mm Weyl semimetal, with the static bias along the principal axis and $\omega_{0z}D_{xy} > \omega_p^2\tau$: the theory predicts identical reflectance for all polarizations at low frequency, with gain for one bias sign and loss for the reversed sign. Observing polarization-dependent reflectance, or a failure of gain and loss to swap under bias reversal, would contradict the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the anti-Hermitian part of the bias-induced permittivity, $\varepsilon''_{\rm EO}$, splits into a real symmetric part that governs linear dichroic gain and an imaginary antisymmetric part that governs chiral (circular-dichroic) gain, and that crystal symmetry fixes which part is allowed. For a bias along the principal axis, $\varepsilon''_{\rm EO}$ has a zero eigenvalue along the bias, and the two transverse eigenpolarizations determine gain or loss according to the signs of the eigenvalues $\lambda_i$. In point groups mm2 (category B), 3m, 4mm, 6mm (category C), and 4, 42m (category E), the response is pure linear dichroic gain: the eigenpolarizations are linearly polarized, the response is reciprocal, and reversing the bias multiplies all eigenvalues by $-1$. In category C the two nonzero eigenvalues are degenerate, so every polarization in the transverse plane experiences the same gain or loss; in category E they are opposite, so one linear polarization is amplified and the orthogonal one is attenuated. Category D point groups (32, 422, 622, 222) instead give pure or mixed chiral gain with circularly or elliptically polarized eigenstates, and category A (3, 4, 6) combines both, with linear dichroic gain dominant at low frequency and chiral gain dominant at high frequency.

Load-bearing premise

The gain predictions rest on the semiclassical Boltzmann electro-optic conductivity formulas of Eqs. (2a)-(2b), which assume a constant relaxation time and neglect interband coherence; if those assumptions fail quantitatively, the predicted gain eigenvalues and thresholds will shift even though the symmetry-allowed tensor structure may survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Materials in point groups mm2, 3m, 4mm, and 6mm can serve as bias-switchable, polarization-independent amplifiers or attenuators in the plane transverse to the bias, without any accompanying gyrotropic rotation.
  • In category E crystals, orthogonal linear polarizations are simultaneously amplified and attenuated, providing a way to filter or switch linear polarization by flipping the bias.
  • Category D crystals offer chiral gain whose handedness is set by the bias direction, which is relevant for chiral lasers and polarization-selective mirrors.
  • The gain criterion $\omega_{0z}D_{xy} > \omega_p^2\tau$ gives a concrete condition for net gain in a Drude-like material, and the large Berry curvature dipoles found in Weyl semimetals make the condition reachable at modest biases.
  • Mirror-backed slabs of these materials can show reflectance above unity for one bias sign and below unity for the opposite sign, demonstrating a non-Hermitian mirror controlled by symmetry and bias.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the classification rests only on the symmetry-allowed form of the Berry curvature dipole, the same A-to-E categories should apply to any second-order optical response with the same tensor structure, so other nonlinear coefficients may inherit the linear-dichroic/chiral-gain dichotomy.
  • The frequency crossover in category A materials (linear dichroic gain at low $\omega$, chiral gain at high $\omega$) suggests a tunable polarization converter: one frequency regime amplifies linear polarizations, another amplifies circular polarizations of opposite handedness.
  • The gain threshold $\omega_{0z}D_{xy} > \omega_p^2\tau$ implies that reducing the plasma frequency or increasing the relaxation time lowers the required bias, pointing to lightly doped or low-carrier-density topological semimetals as even better gain hosts.
  • For generic bias directions the eigenpolarizations become elliptical and frequency dependent; this could be exploited as a voltage-controlled waveplate with built-in amplification, though the paper only sketches that regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a symmetry-based classification of the non-Hermitian electro-optic effect in non-centrosymmetric crystals. Starting from the Berry-curvature-dipole conductivity formulas of Refs. [21,23], it decomposes the electro-optic permittivity into Hermitian/anti-Hermitian and reciprocal/non-reciprocal parts, identifies linear dichroic gain and chiral gain, and uses the Bilbao Crystallographic Server to list the allowed Berry curvature dipole tensors for the 16 relevant point groups. The paper organizes these point groups into categories A-E, derives closed-form eigenvalues and eigenpolarizations for bias along the principal axis, obtains gain criteria against an isotropic Drude background, and provides reflectance calculations for a mirror-backed slab. The central claim is that categories B, C, and E exhibit reciprocal linear dichroic gain that can be switched between gain and loss by reversing the bias, while category D exhibits chiral gain and category A has a frequency-controlled mixture of both.

Significance. If the input formula (2) is accepted, this is a valuable systematic roadmap for engineering polarization-dependent optical gain in biased crystals. The use of external crystallographic tables and closed-form eigenvalue expressions makes the results checkable, and the bias-reversal gain/loss switching for categories B, C, and E is a concrete falsifiable prediction. The paper does not re-derive the electro-optic conductivity, but that formula is established in prior work; the symmetry deductions are internally consistent and conditional on that model. The categorization into A-E and the identification of Weyl semimetal candidates should be useful for device-oriented research on non-Hermitian optics and topological materials.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section VI] In the sentence 'some Weyl semimetals such as NbP (category C), have estimated D0 of the order of 20 [39]', the symbol D0 is misleading because for category C the Berry dipole tensor has Dxx = Dyy = Dzz = 0; the relevant off-diagonal component (e.g., Dxy) should be named instead.
  2. [Appendix B] The statement that the matrix exponential 'can be evaluated analytically (not shown here)' is insufficient for a paper whose reflectance plots depend on it; please either include the analytical expression or state clearly that the numerical evaluation was used to generate Fig. 4.
  3. [Section II] Please state explicitly that the symmetry roadmap in Tables I and II is a consequence of the semiclassical constant-tau formulas of Refs. [21,23]; a brief sentence noting that corrections beyond the relaxation-time approximation (e.g., interband coherence) could modify the eigenvalues and gain criteria would make the scope of the classification precise.
  4. [Figure 1] The diagram labels 'optical activity' in a broad way that includes non-enantiomorphic point groups such as 4 and 42m; a caption sentence clarifying this usage would avoid confusion for readers familiar with the narrower chiral-only nomenclature.
  5. [Section V] The gain criteria are derived for an isotropic Drude background; since the candidate materials are low-symmetry conductors, the authors should state that this is an illustrative model rather than a quantitative prediction for the listed Weyl semimetals.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the symmetry roadmap follows by explicit algebra from an established input formula and external crystallographic tables, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The input electro-optic conductivity, Eq. (2), is imported from the authors' earlier PRL/PRB work (Refs. [21,23]), but that formula is a parameter-free semiclassical Boltzmann result that does not presuppose any of the paper's new symmetry conclusions; it is a fixed starting point rather than a fitted or renamed version of the output. The point-group constraints on the Berry-curvature dipole tensor are obtained from the external Bilbao Crystallographic Server (Refs. [28,29,31]), not from the paper's own classification. All subsequent claims, including the structure of epsilon''_EO in Eq. (12), the eigenvalue formulas in Sections IV.A-IV.C, the gain criteria in Section V, and the reflectance calculations in Section VII, are explicit algebraic consequences of these two inputs. No parameter is fitted to the predicted data, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own work is used to exclude alternatives. The only self-citations to prior work (Refs. [21,23,26]) are for the input conductivity formula, the chiral-gain power expression, and a transfer-matrix method; these are independent prior results with stated assumptions (constant relaxation time, semiclassical Boltzmann, standard impedance-matrix scattering) and they do not contain the linear-dichroic-gain classification being derived. The appendix statement that the 4x4 matrix exponential can be evaluated analytically but is 'not shown here' is an omitted computational detail, not a circular step. Thus no load-bearing step reduces to its own output.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; its inputs are material parameters (Berry dipole components, relaxation time, plasma frequency) and symmetry-allowed tensor forms. The main modeling choices are the semiclassical Boltzmann formula and the isotropic Drude background, both imported from prior work and standard approximations.

free parameters (6)
  • D_xy = not fitted; set to 1 in figures (e.g., Fig. 2 caption)
    Material-dependent Berry curvature dipole component. Its sign controls whether gain or loss occurs for a given bias direction. The symmetry analysis treats it as an arbitrary input, and the numerical examples choose illustrative values.
  • D_0 = 1.5 (Fig. 2) and 2/3 (Fig. 4)
    Diagonal BD component for axial point groups. The classification itself does not depend on its value, but the eigenvalue magnitudes and gain criteria do.
  • tau (relaxation time) = 1 ps in all figures
    Controls the magnitude and frequency scaling of the electro-optic response and Drude losses. A shorter tau would raise the gain threshold; the paper uses an optimistic value.
  • omega_p (plasma frequency) = 2 pi times 1.59 THz in Fig. 4
    Drude plasma frequency used to set the baseline absorption. Not derived in this paper; affects the gain threshold.
  • E_0 (bias field) = 2873.1 V/m (Fig. 4 left), 10^4 V/m (Figs. 2 and 4 right)
    The static electric bias that drives the effect. The response is proportional to E_0; values are chosen for illustration.
  • d (slab thickness) = 300 microns in Fig. 4
    Thickness of the material slab in the reflectance setup; chosen to show gain and loss features.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The electro-optic conductivity is given by sigma_EO = sigma_H_EO + sigma_NH_EO as in Eqs. (2a)-(2b), from the semiclassical Boltzmann transport theory.
    This is the foundation of the entire analysis, taken from the authors' previous works (Refs. 20, 21, 23). If this formula is invalid or incomplete, the symmetry classification and gain predictions do not follow.
  • domain assumption The Berry curvature dipole tensor D is traceless and its symmetry-allowed form for each point group is correctly captured by the Bilbao Crystallographic Server tensor conventions used in Appendix A.
    The tracelessness follows from its definition in Eq. (1); the tensors are external group-theoretic inputs. Errors here would propagate to Table II.
  • domain assumption The unbiased material response is modeled as an isotropic Drude model with a single relaxation time tau and plasma frequency omega_p (Eq. 21).
    Establishes the baseline loss in Section V and the reflectance simulations. Real low-symmetry crystals are anisotropic, so this is an uncontrolled approximation for quantitative predictions.
  • domain assumption The relaxation-time approximation with a single tau applies to both the Berry-dipole response and the Drude response.
    Used implicitly in Eqs. (2) and (21); the same tau is used in numerical examples. Energy-dependent or momentum-dependent scattering would alter gain thresholds.
  • domain assumption For the reflectance setup, the material is homogeneous, the z-direction is a symmetry axis with epsilon_xz = epsilon_yz = epsilon_zx = epsilon_zy = 0, and the mirror is a perfect electric conductor.
    These idealizations in Appendices B and C restrict the results to normal incidence on a principal-axis symmetry class.
  • standard math The conventions for the Fourier transform and power dissipation in Eqs. (3)-(7) are standard time-harmonic conventions.
    Defines the sign of gain versus loss; no controversial content.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry Analysis of the Non-Hermitian Electro-Optic Effect in Crystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YEKCFCXK

@misc{pith2026250203399,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry Analysis of the Non-Hermitian Electro-Optic Effect in Crystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YEKCFCXK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03399}
}
read the original abstract

Here, we investigate how crystal symmetry tailors the non-Hermitian electro-optic effect arising from the Berry curvature dipole. Specifically, we demonstrate the critical influence of the material's point group symmetry and external electric biases in shaping this effect, leading to current-induced optical gain and non-reciprocal optical responses. Through a symmetry-based analysis of the crystallographic point groups, we identify how different symmetries affect the electro-optic response, enabling the engineering of polarization-dependent optical gain without the need for gyrotropic effects. In particular, we demonstrate that the non-Hermitian electro-optic response in a broad class of crystals is characterized by linear dichroic gain. In this type of response, the eigenpolarizations that activate the gain or dissipation are linearly polarized. Depending on the point group symmetry, it is possible to achieve gain (or dissipation) for all eigenpolarizations or to observe polarization-dependent gain and dissipation. Weyl semimetals emerge as promising candidates for realizing significant non-Hermitian electro-optic effects and linear dichroic gain. We further examine practical applications by studying the reflectance of biased materials in setups involving mirrors, demonstrating how optical gain and attenuation can be controlled via symmetry and bias configurations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03399 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Classification diagram based on the work [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Eigenvalues λ1 and λ2 of the non-Hermitian part of the electro-optic permittivity tensor ε ′′ EO for an electric bias along the principal axis and different point group sym￾metries belonging to the different categories (the category is indicated by a letter in parentheses). Negative eigenvalues indicate gain whereas positive eigenvalues correspond to loss. The insets illustrate the eigenpolarizations of ε ′′ EO. The… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Eigenvalues λ1 and λ2 of the non-Hermitian part of the electro-optic permittivity tensor ε ′′ EO for an electric bias along the x-axis and different categories of crystallographic point group symmetries. The numerical parameters are the same used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Eigenvalues of the reflectance matrix as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Symmetry-isolated magnetoelectric electro-optic effects in noncentrosymmetric metals

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Eleven noncentrosymmetric space groups are shown to give zero Berry-curvature-dipole and gyrotropic-magnetic responses by symmetry while keeping the magnetoelectric electro-optic tensor allowed, giving clean platforms...

  2. Can crystal symmetry reshape ENZ photonics?: Opinion

    physics.optics 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Proposes that Berry-dipole conductors can give ENZ photonics chi(2) nonlinearities, chiral gain, and ultrafast modulation beyond standard ENZ oxides.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.115.216806

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Furthermore, the presence of a chiral-gain response inherently implies that ε′ EO induces a nonreciprocal gyrotropic response

    The justification for this property is that the linear dichroic gain compo- nent ε′′ EO,R is a scalar in thexoy plane. Furthermore, the presence of a chiral-gain response inherently implies that ε′ EO induces a nonreciprocal gyrotropic response. D. Biases along other crystallographic directions Up to this point, we have focused exclusively on an electric ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The values of Dxy and D0 are consistent with the literature. Still, some Weyl semimetals such as NbP (category C), have estimatedD0 of the order of 20 [39], which could make it possible to have equivalent op- tical gains with electric biases of the order ofE0 = 10 2 V/m. As seen in Figure 4, for category C, the two eigenval- ues ofR result in identical re...

    work page arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    S.-Y. Xu, Q. Ma, H. Shen, V. Fatemi, S. Wu, T.-R. Chang, G. Chang, A. M. M. Valdivia, C.-K. Chan, Q. D. Gibson, et al., Nature Physics 14, 900 (2018), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0189-6

    doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0189-6 2018

  5. [5]

    X.-G. Ye, H. Liu, P.-F. Zhu, W.-Z. Xu, S. A. Yang, N. Shang, K. Liu, and Z.-M. Liao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 016301 (2023), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.016301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.016301 2023

  6. [6]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.- R. Chang, A. M. M. Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, et al., Nature565, 337 (2019), URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-018-0807-6

    doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0807-6 2019

  7. [7]

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Na- ture Materials 18, 324 (2019), URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41563-019-0294-7

    doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0294-7 2019

  8. [8]

    Z. Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 744–752 (2021), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s42254-021-00359-6

    work page 2021

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang and L

    Y. Zhang and L. Fu, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118 (2021), ISSN 1091-6490, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100736118

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Suárez-Rodríguez, B

    M. Suárez-Rodríguez, B. Martín-García, W. Skowroński, F. Calavalle, S. S. Tsirkin, I. Souza, F. De Juan, A. Chuvilin, A. Fert, M. Gobbi, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 046303 (2024), publisher: American Physi- cal Society, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.132.046303

    2024

  3. [11]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.82.1959

    2010

  4. [12]

    E. Deyo, L. E. Golub, E. L. Ivchenko, and B. Spivak, Semiclassical theory of the photogalvanic effect in non- centrosymmetric systems (2009), URL https://arxiv. org/abs/0904.1917

    2009 arXiv

  5. [13]

    V. A. Shalygin, A. N. Sofronov, E. L. Vorob’ev, and I. I. Farb-shtein, Phys. Solid State54, 2362 (2012), URL https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783412120281

    2012 doi

  6. [14]

    Furukawa, Y

    T. Furukawa, Y. Shimokawa, K. Kobayashi, and T. Itou, Nature Communications 8 (2017), URL https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-017-01093-3

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    Calavalle, M

    F. Calavalle, M. Suárez-Rodríguez, B. Martín-García, 13 A. Johansson, D. C. Vaz, H. Yang, I. V. Maznichenko, S. Ostanin, A. Mateo-Alonso, A. Chuvilin, et al., Na- ture Materials 21, 526 (2022), URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41563-022-01211-7

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    E. L. Vorob’ev, E. L. Ivchenko, G. E. Pikus, I. I. Farb- shtein, V. A. Shalygin, and A. V. Shturbin, JETP Lett. 29, 441 (1979)

    1979

  9. [17]

    S. S. Tsirkin, P. A. Puente, and I. Souza, Phys. Rev. B97, 035158 (2018), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.035158

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    E. J. König, M. Dzero, A. Levchenko, and D. A. Pesin, Phys. Rev. B 99, 155404 (2019), URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.155404

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    E. L. Ivchenko and G. E. Pikus, JETP Lett.27, 604 (1978)

    1978

  12. [20]

    V. M. Asnin, A. A. Bakun, A. M. Danishevskii, E. L. Ivchenko, G. E. Pikus, and A. A. Rogachev, JETP Lett. 28, 74 (1978)

    1978

  13. [21]

    Bhalla, K

    P. Bhalla, K. Das, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 227401 (2022), publisher: American Physi- cal Society, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.129.227401

    2022

  14. [22]

    Lannebère, D

    S. Lannebère, D. E. Fernandes, T. A. Morgado, and M. G. Silveirinha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 013902 (2022), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.128.013902

    2022

  15. [23]

    T. G. Rappoport, T. A. Morgado, S. Lannebère, and M. G. Silveirinha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 076901 (2023), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.130.076901

    2023

  16. [24]

    L.-k. Shi, O. Matsyshyn, J. C. W. Song, and I. S. Vil- ladiego, The berry dipole photovoltaic demon and the thermodynamics of photo-current generation within the optical gap of metals(2022), URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2207.03496

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    T. A. Morgado, T. G. Rappoport, S. S. Tsirkin, S. Lan- nebère, I. Souza, and M. G. Silveirinha, Phys. Rev. B 109, 245126 (2024), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.245126

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Hakimi, K

    A. Hakimi, K. Rouhi, T. G. Rappoport, M. G. Sil- veirinha, and F. Capolino, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, L041003 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevApplied.22.L041003

    2024

  19. [27]

    D. J. P. de Sousa, C. O. Ascencio, and T. Low,Linear magnetoelectric electro-optic effect (2024), 2408.02827, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02827

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Lannebère, D

    S. Lannebère, D. E. Fernandes, T. A. Morgado, and M. G. Silveirinha, Laser & Photonics Reviews p. 2400881 (2025), ISSN 1863-8899, URLhttps://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lpor.202400881

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    D. Ma, Y. Xiong, and J. C. W. Song, Nano Letters 25, 1260–1265 (2025), ISSN 1530-6992, URL http:// dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03771

    2025 doi

  22. [30]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S. Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Wondratschek, Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials 221, 15–27 (2006), ISSN 2194- 4946, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/zkri.2006. 221.1.15

    2006 doi

  23. [31]

    M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. M. Perez- Mato, and H. Wondratschek, Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography62, 115–128 (2006), ISSN 0108-7673, URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1107/S0108767305040286

    2006

  24. [32]

    P. S. Halasyamani and K. R. Poeppelmeier, Chemistry of Materials 10, 2753–2769 (1998), ISSN 1520-5002, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm980140w

    1998 doi

  25. [33]

    S. V. Gallego, J. Etxebarria, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, and J. M. Perez-Mato, Acta Crystallographica Sec- tion A Foundations and Advances75, 438–447 (2019), ISSN 2053-2733, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/ S2053273319001748

    2019

  26. [34]

    J. C. Serra, N. Engheta, and M. G. Silveirinha,Gain- momentum locking in a chiral-gain medium (2024), 2410.08962, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08962

    2024

  27. [35]

    F.R.PrudêncioandM.G.Silveirinha, Topological chiral- gain in a berry dipole material(2024), 2411.07766, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07766

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mutailipu, K

    M. Mutailipu, K. R. Poeppelmeier, and S. Pan, Chem. Rev. 121, 1130 (2021), ISSN 0009-2665, publisher: American Chemical Society, URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1021/acs.chemrev.0c00796

    2021

  29. [37]

    G. Long, R. Sabatini, M. I. Saidaminov, G. Lakhwani, A. Rasmita, X. Liu, E. H. Sargent, and W. Gao, Nat Rev Mater 5, 423 (2020), ISSN 2058-8437, publisher: Na- ture Publishing Group, URLhttps://www.nature.com/ articles/s41578-020-0181-5

    2020

  30. [38]

    Ruan, S.-K

    J. Ruan, S.-K. Jian, D. Zhang, H. Yao, H. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, and D. Xing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 226801 (2016), publisher: American Physical Society, URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 116.226801

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    Y. Qian, J. Gao, Z. Song, S. Nie, Z. Wang, H. Weng, and Z. Fang, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155143 (2020), pub- lisher: American Physical Society, URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.155143

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    J. I. Facio, D. Efremov, K. Koepernik, J.-S. You, I. Sodemann, and J. van den Brink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 246403 (2018), publisher: American Physi- cal Society, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.246403

    2018

  33. [41]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. B 97, 041101 (2018), publisher: American Physical Society, URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 97.041101

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    Zhang, T

    C.-L. Zhang, T. Liang, Y. Kaneko, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, npj Quantum Mater.7, 1 (2022), ISSN 2397- 4648, publisher: Nature Publishing Group, URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/s41535-022-00512-z

    2022

  35. [43]

    Sharma, F.-X

    P. Sharma, F.-X. Xiang, D.-F. Shao, D. Zhang, E. Y. Tsymbal, A. R. Hamilton, and J. Seidel, Science Ad- vances 5, eaax5080 (2019), publisher: American Asso- ciation for the Advancement of Science, URLhttps:// www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.aax5080

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    T. Ma, H. Chen, K. Yananose, X. Zhou, L. Wang, R. Li, Z. Zhu, Z. Wu, Q.-H. Xu, J. Yu, et al., Nat Commun13, 5465 (2022), ISSN 2041-1723, publisher: Nature Publish- ing Group, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41467-022-33201-3

    2022

  37. [45]

    Nishijima, T

    T. Nishijima, T. Watanabe, H. Sekiguchi, Y. Ando, E. Shigematsu, R. Ohshima, S. Kuroda, and M. Shi- raishi, Nano Lett.23, 2247 (2023), ISSN 1530-6984, pub- lisher: American Chemical Society, URLhttps://doi. org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04900

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    J.-E. Lee, A. Wang, S. Chen, M. Kwon, J. Hwang, M. Cho, K.-H. Son, D.-S. Han, J. W. Choi, Y. D. Kim, et al., Nat Commun15, 3971 (2024), ISSN 2041- 1723, publisher: Nature Publishing Group, URLhttps: 14 //www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47643-4

    2024

  39. [47]

    J. Gao, Y. Qian, S. Nie, Z. Fang, H. Weng, and Z. Wang, Science Bulletin 66, 667–675 (2021), ISSN 2095-9273, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scib. 2020.12.028

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    X. Jin, Q. Ou, H. Wei, X. Ding, F. Zhan, R. Wang, X. Yang, X. Lv, and P. Yu, Applied Physics Letters124, 172203 (2024), ISSN 0003-6951, URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0199416

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    T. A. Morgado and M. G. Silveirinha, New J. Phys. 18, 103030 (2016), URL https://doi.org/10.1088% 2F1367-2630%2F18%2F10%2F103030

    2016

  42. [50]

    M. G. Silveirinha, S. A. H. Gangaraj, G. W. Han- son, and M. Antezza, Phys. Rev. A97, 022509 (2018), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 97.022509

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    Latioui and M

    H. Latioui and M. G. Silveirinha, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053848 (2019), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.100.053848

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.