pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22912 · v1 · pith:YF27O54Wnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ✦ hep-th

Sharpening the Supersymmetric Axion Weak Gravity Conjecture

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 05:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords axion weak gravity conjecturesupersymmetryinstantonsstring landscapeswampland conjecturesquantum gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Supersymmetric instantons in four dimensions obey the sharpened bound fS over absolute n at most sqrt(7/2) over kappa four.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper verifies a sharpened form of the axion weak gravity conjecture across multiple string theory axion sectors. It confirms that the ratio of axion decay constant times instanton action over charge stays below a specific coefficient involving pi and spacetime dimension. Three separate methods are used to check examples from the landscape and support the proposed bound. For supersymmetric instantons in four dimensions the bound tightens further to one over kappa four times the square root of seven over two. This supplies concrete limits on axion parameters that follow from quantum gravity.

Core claim

The authors verify that axion instantons across string landscape sectors satisfy fS over absolute n at most pi over two kappa d times the square root of d minus one over d minus two. They further argue that supersymmetric instantons in four dimensions obey the stronger bound fS over absolute n at most one over kappa four times the square root of seven over two.

What carries the argument

The ratio fS over absolute n, where f is the axion decay constant, S the instanton action, and n the integer charge, bounded relative to the reduced Planck scale set by kappa d.

If this is right

  • The axion weak gravity conjecture holds with a definite numerical coefficient rather than an unspecified order-one factor.
  • Supersymmetric axion models receive stronger restrictions on allowed decay constants and instanton actions.
  • The bound depends explicitly on spacetime dimension and applies uniformly to checked sectors of the string landscape.
  • Instanton contributions to axion potentials must respect the tighter supersymmetric limit in four dimensions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The sharpened bound could further restrict viable parameter ranges in axion-driven inflation models.
  • Similar tightening might appear in other swampland conjectures when supersymmetry is imposed.
  • Systematic scans of additional string compactifications could test whether the stronger four-dimensional bound holds universally.

Load-bearing premise

The three complementary approaches identify all dominant instantons in the examined axion sectors without missing any lighter ones that would violate the bound.

What would settle it

An explicit supersymmetric four-dimensional string compactification in which the lightest instanton has fS over absolute n larger than sqrt(7/2) over kappa four.

read the original abstract

The Axion Weak Gravity Conjecture provides one of the most effective quantum gravity tools for constraining particle physics and cosmology, but it has long been thought of as a slightly fuzzy statement: given an axion with decay constant $f$ there should exist an instanton of charge $n$ and action $S$ with $fS/|n|$ at most an order-one number in Planck units. Recent work related to axion wormholes motivated a specific order-one coefficient, $\frac{fS}{|n|} \leq \frac{\pi}{2 \kappa_d} \sqrt{\frac{d-1}{d-2}}$. In this work, we verify this bound in various axion sectors across the string landscape using three complementary approaches. In the process, we derive even tighter bounds on instantons in such sectors. For example, we argue that supersymmetric instantons in 4d satisfy the stronger bound of $\frac{fS}{|n|}\leq \frac 1{\kappa_4}\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the Axion Weak Gravity Conjecture can be sharpened to the specific coefficient fS/|n| ≤ (π/(2 κ_d)) sqrt((d-1)/(d-2)), verifies this bound across various axion sectors in the string landscape via three complementary approaches, and argues that supersymmetric instantons in 4d obey the tighter inequality fS/|n| ≤ (1/κ_4) sqrt(7/2).

Significance. If the stronger bound and its verification hold, the result would supply a more precise quantum-gravity constraint on axion decay constants and instanton actions, with direct utility for model-building in particle physics and cosmology. The multi-method checks performed in concrete string examples constitute a concrete strength of the work.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the section describing the three complementary approaches] The central verification claim rests on the three complementary approaches correctly identifying all dominant (lightest) instantons without omission. The manuscript provides no general argument that these methods are exhaustive across all relevant 4d axion sectors or that post-hoc selection of examples was avoided; any missed lighter instanton would falsify the reported inequality. This is load-bearing for the claim that the bound is verified in the string landscape.
  2. [Section deriving the stronger supersymmetric bound] The derivation of the stronger 4d supersymmetric bound fS/|n| ≤ (1/κ_4) sqrt(7/2) is presented as an argument internal to the paper; however, the text does not clarify whether this follows from a parameter-free derivation or relies on assumptions about the instanton spectrum that are only checked in the selected examples.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the Planck mass and the constant κ_4 should be defined explicitly on first use and kept uniform throughout.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should state the precise string compactifications and axion sectors shown, rather than generic labels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our results and for their detailed comments on the verification methods and the supersymmetric bound. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and the section describing the three complementary approaches] The central verification claim rests on the three complementary approaches correctly identifying all dominant (lightest) instantons without omission. The manuscript provides no general argument that these methods are exhaustive across all relevant 4d axion sectors or that post-hoc selection of examples was avoided; any missed lighter instanton would falsify the reported inequality. This is load-bearing for the claim that the bound is verified in the string landscape.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain a general theorem establishing that the three approaches are exhaustive in every conceivable 4d axion sector of the string landscape; such a result would require a complete classification of all compactifications, which lies beyond present capabilities. The three methods are instead applied as complementary tools to representative classes of axion sectors arising in explicit string constructions, with cross-consistency among the methods serving as an internal check that the lightest instantons have been identified. The examples were chosen for their direct relevance to the axion weak gravity conjecture rather than to fit the bound after the fact. We will add a clarifying paragraph in the relevant section that explicitly states the scope of the verification and notes this limitation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Section deriving the stronger supersymmetric bound] The derivation of the stronger 4d supersymmetric bound fS/|n| ≤ (1/κ_4) sqrt(7/2) is presented as an argument internal to the paper; however, the text does not clarify whether this follows from a parameter-free derivation or relies on assumptions about the instanton spectrum that are only checked in the selected examples.

    Authors: The stronger bound is obtained from the BPS saturation condition for supersymmetric instantons together with the general form of the superpotential in 4d N=1 supergravity; the derivation is therefore parameter-free and does not invoke any assumptions about the detailed instanton spectrum beyond the existence of supersymmetric solutions. The concrete string examples are used solely to verify that the general bound is realized and not to derive it. We will insert a short clarifying statement in the section to make this independence explicit. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; sharpened bound derived from independent string example checks

full rationale

The paper verifies the original Axion WGC bound (motivated by prior wormhole work) via three complementary approaches applied to explicit string landscape axion sectors, then derives a tighter supersymmetric bound in 4d as a byproduct. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-defined quantity, fitted input renamed as prediction, or unverified self-citation chain; the verification relies on external string constructions rather than tautological redefinition of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of string theory compactifications and supersymmetry preservation; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract. The bound itself is taken from recent work and verified rather than derived from scratch.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption String theory provides consistent UV completions of quantum gravity with axion sectors that can be explicitly constructed.
    Invoked when the authors state they verify the bound across the string landscape.
  • domain assumption The instantons identified in the constructions are the ones that control the Weak Gravity Conjecture bound.
    Implicit in the verification claim; if lighter instantons exist the bound could be violated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5716 in / 1402 out tokens · 19321 ms · 2026-05-25T05:46:06.681349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · 46 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The String Landscape, Black Holes and Gravity as the Weakest Force

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa,The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,JHEP0706(2007) 060, [hep-th/0601001]

  2. [2]

    A. R. Liddle, A. Mazumdar and F. E. Schunck,Assisted inflation,Phys. Rev.D58 (1998) 061301, [astro-ph/9804177]

  3. [3]

    N-flation

    S. Dimopoulos, S. Kachru, J. McGreevy and J. G. Wacker,N-flation,JCAP0808 (2008) 003, [hep-th/0507205]

  4. [4]

    J. E. Kim, H. P. Nilles and M. Peloso,Completing natural inflation,JCAP01(2005) 005, [hep-ph/0409138]

  5. [5]

    On the Possibility of Large Axion Moduli Spaces

    T. Rudelius,On the Possibility of Large Axion Moduli Spaces,JCAP1504(2015) 049, [1409.5793]

  6. [6]

    Constraints on Axion Inflation from the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    T. Rudelius,Constraints on Axion Inflation from the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JCAP09(2015) 020, [1503.00795]

  7. [7]

    Transplanckian axions !?

    M. Montero, A. M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,Transplanckian axions!?,JHEP08 (2015) 032, [1503.03886]

  8. [8]

    Fencing in the Swampland: Quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation

    J. Brown, W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler,Fencing in the Swampland: Quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation,JHEP10(2015) 023, [1503.04783]

  9. [9]

    Weak Gravity Strongly Constrains Large-Field Axion Inflation

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Weak Gravity Strongly Constrains Large-Field Axion Inflation,JHEP12(2015) 108, [1506.03447]

  10. [10]

    K. Choi, E. J. Chun, S. H. Im and K. S. Jeong,Diluting the inflationary axion fluctuation by a stronger QCD in the early Universe,Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 26–30, [1505.00306]

  11. [11]

    Axion Experiments to Algebraic Geometry: Testing Quantum Gravity via the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Axion Experiments to Algebraic Geometry: Testing Quantum Gravity via the Weak Gravity Conjecture,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25(2016) 1643005, [1605.05311]

  12. [12]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,The Weak Gravity Conjecture and axion strings,JHEP11(2021) 004, [2108.11383]

  13. [13]

    Reece, TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics , PoS TASI2022 (2024) 008, [2304.08512]

    M. Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics,PoST ASI2022 (2024) 008, [2304.08512]

  14. [14]

    Seo,Axion species scale and axion weak gravity conjecture-like bound,JHEP11 (2024) 082, [2407.16156]

    M.-S. Seo,Axion species scale and axion weak gravity conjecture-like bound,JHEP11 (2024) 082, [2407.16156]

  15. [15]

    Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology

    A. Hebecker, T. Mikhail and P. Soler,Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology,Front. Astron. Space Sci.5(2018) 35, [1807.00824]. – 36 –

  16. [16]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, N. Righi and A. Westphal,Fuzzy Dark Matter candidates from string theory,JHEP05(2022) 107, [2110.02964]

  17. [17]

    Sheridan, F

    E. Sheridan, F. Carta, N. Gendler, M. Jain, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister et al., Fuzzy axions and associated relics,JHEP09(2025) 016, [2412.12012]

  18. [18]

    M. Ibe, M. Yamazaki and T. T. Yanagida,Quintessence Axion Revisited in Light of Swampland Conjectures,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 235020, [1811.04664]

  19. [19]

    G. Shiu, F. Tonioni and H. V. Tran,Bounding axion dark energy,2604.09141

  20. [20]

    Cosmological implications of ultra-light axion-like fields

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, D. Grin, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmological implications of ultralight axionlike fields,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 083525, [1806.10608]

  21. [21]

    Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 221301, [1811.04083]

  22. [22]

    Rudelius,Constraints on early dark energy from the axion weak gravity conjecture, JCAP01(2023) 014, [2203.05575]

    T. Rudelius,Constraints on early dark energy from the axion weak gravity conjecture, JCAP01(2023) 014, [2203.05575]

  23. [23]

    Harlow, B

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Weak gravity conjecture,Rev. Mod. Phys.95(2023) 035003, [2201.08380]

  24. [24]

    Rudelius,An Introduction to the Weak Gravity Conjecture,Contemp

    T. Rudelius,An Introduction to the Weak Gravity Conjecture,Contemp. Phys.1 (2024) 14, [2409.02161]

  25. [25]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037, [1903.06239]

  26. [26]

    Positivity of the gravitational path integral implies the axionic weak gravity conjecture

    G. Di Ubaldo, L. V. Iliesiu, H. W. Lin and C. Yan,Positivity of the gravitational path integral implies the axionic weak gravity conjecture,2605.05305

  27. [27]

    Wormholes and the imaginary distance bound

    J. Maldacena, A. Maloney and B. McPeak,Wormholes and the imaginary distance bound,2605.05336

  28. [28]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger,Axion Induced Topology Change in Quantum Gravity and String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 890–907

  29. [29]

    Stout,Instanton expansions and phase transitions,JHEP05(2022) 168, [2012.11605]

    J. Stout,Instanton expansions and phase transitions,JHEP05(2022) 168, [2012.11605]

  30. [30]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Scalar Fields

    E. Palti,The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Scalar Fields,JHEP08(2017) 034, [1705.04328]

  31. [31]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture,Nucl. Phys. B938(2019) 321–350, [1810.05169]

  32. [32]

    Gonzalo and L

    E. Gonzalo and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,A Strong Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture and Some Implications,JHEP08(2019) 118, [1903.08878]. – 37 –

  33. [33]

    Andriot, N

    D. Andriot, N. Cribiori and D. Erkinger,The web of swampland conjectures and the TCC bound,JHEP07(2020) 162, [2004.00030]

  34. [34]

    Benakli, C

    K. Benakli, C. Branchina and G. Lafforgue-Marmet,Revisiting the scalar weak gravity conjecture,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 742, [2004.12476]

  35. [35]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,The Convex Hull Swampland Distance Conjecture and Bounds on Non-geodesics,JHEP03(2021) 299, [2012.00034]

  36. [36]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,JHEP12(2022) 114, [2206.04063]

  37. [37]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela, Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture,JHEP12 (2023) 182, [2306.16440]

  38. [38]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Stringy evidence for a universal pattern at infinite distance,JHEP06(2024) 037, [2311.01536]

  39. [39]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Universal Pattern in Quantum Gravity at Infinite Distance,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 181601, [2311.01501]

  40. [40]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,Swampland Conjectures for Strings and Membranes,JHEP02(2021) 006, [2006.15154]

  41. [41]

    Etheredge,Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture,JHEP01(2024) 122, [2308.01331]

    M. Etheredge,Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture,JHEP01(2024) 122, [2308.01331]

  42. [42]

    Etheredge and B

    M. Etheredge and B. Heidenreich,Geodesic gradient flows in moduli space,JHEP03 (2025) 035, [2311.18693]

  43. [43]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich and T. Rudelius,A Distance Conjecture for branes, JHEP09(2025) 155, [2407.20316]

  44. [44]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Taxonomy of infinite distance limits,JHEP03(2025) 213, [2405.20332]

  45. [45]

    Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,JHEP10(2025) 200, [2505.10615]

    M. Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,JHEP10(2025) 200, [2505.10615]

  46. [46]

    Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 051601, [1402.2287]

  47. [47]

    Heidenreich,Black Holes, Moduli, and Long-Range Forces,JHEP11(2020) 029, [2006.09378]

    B. Heidenreich,Black Holes, Moduli, and Long-Range Forces,JHEP11(2020) 029, [2006.09378]

  48. [48]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Repulsive Forces and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP10(2019) 055, [1906.02206]

  49. [49]

    Instantons and Wormholes In Minkowski and (A)dS Spaces

    M. Gutperle and W. Sabra,Instantons and wormholes in Minkowski and (A)dS – 38 – spaces,Nucl. Phys. B647(2002) 344–356, [hep-th/0206153]

  50. [50]

    Non-extremal D-instantons

    E. Bergshoeff, A. Collinucci, U. Gran, D. Roest and S. Vandoren,Non-extremal D-instantons,JHEP10(2004) 031, [hep-th/0406038]

  51. [51]

    Non-extremal instantons and wormholes in string theory

    E. Bergshoeff, A. Collinucci, U. Gran, D. Roest and S. Vandoren,Non-extremal instantons and wormholes in string theory,Fortsch. Phys.53(2005) 990–996, [hep-th/0412183]

  52. [52]

    Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction,JHEP02(2016) 140, [1509.06374]

  53. [53]

    Can Gravitational Instantons Really Constrain Axion Inflation?

    A. Hebecker, P. Mangat, S. Theisen and L. T. Witkowski,Can Gravitational Instantons Really Constrain Axion Inflation?,JHEP02(2017) 097, [1607.06814]

  54. [54]

    Marchesano and M

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner,Instantons and infinite distances,JHEP08(2019) 088, [1904.04848]

  55. [55]

    T. W. Grimm and D. Van De Heisteeg,Infinite Distances and the Axion Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP03(2020) 020, [1905.00901]

  56. [56]

    Hamada, E

    Y. Hamada, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski,Axion RG flows and the holographic dynamics of instanton densities,J. Phys. A52(2019) 454003, [1905.03663]

  57. [57]

    Hamada, E

    Y. Hamada, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti,Holographic Theories at Finiteθ-Angle, CP-Violation, Glueball Spectra and Strong-Coupling Instabilities,Fortsch. Phys.69 (2021) 2000111, [2007.13535]

  58. [58]

    R. F. Dashen,Some features of chiral symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. D3(1971) 1879–1889

  59. [59]

    Witten,Large N Chiral Dynamics,Annals Phys.128(1980) 363

    E. Witten,Large N Chiral Dynamics,Annals Phys.128(1980) 363

  60. [60]

    Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg,Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,JHEP05(2017) 091, [1703.00501]

  61. [61]

    Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings,Phys

    E. Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings,Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 351–356

  62. [62]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory,JHEP06(2006) 051, [hep-th/0605206]

  63. [63]

    J. P. Conlon,The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation,JHEP05(2006) 078, [hep-th/0602233]

  64. [64]

    Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP07(2025) 130, [2406.08543]

    M. Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP07(2025) 130, [2406.08543]

  65. [65]

    Axion Monodromy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    A. Hebecker, F. Rompineve and A. Westphal,Axion Monodromy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP04(2016) 157, [1512.03768]

  66. [66]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,The EFT stringy viewpoint – 39 – on large distances,JHEP09(2021) 197, [2104.05726]

  67. [67]

    Grieco, I

    A. Grieco, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,EFT strings and dualities in 4dN= 1, 2504.16984

  68. [68]

    T. W. Grimm and J. Louis,The Effective action of N = 1 Calabi-Yau orientifolds, Nucl. Phys. B699(2004) 387–426, [hep-th/0403067]

  69. [69]

    Axion bitowers in quantum gravity

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, “Axion bitowers in quantum gravity.”

  70. [70]

    T. W. Grimm and J. Louis,The Effective action of type IIA Calabi-Yau orientifolds, Nucl. Phys. B718(2005) 153–202, [hep-th/0412277]

  71. [71]

    Martucci, N

    L. Martucci, N. Risso, A. Valenti and L. Vecchi,Wormholes in the axiverse, and the species scale,JHEP07(2024) 240, [2404.14489]

  72. [72]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Emergent strings from infinite distance limits, JHEP02(2022) 190, [1910.01135]

  73. [73]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa and M. Wiesner,Bounds on Species Scale and the Distance Conjecture,Fortsch. Phys.71(2023) 2300143, [2303.13580]

  74. [74]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D. H. Wu,Bounds on field range for slowly varying positive potentials,JHEP02(2024) 175, [2305.07701]

  75. [75]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner and D. H. Wu,Species scale in diverse dimensions,JHEP05(2024) 112, [2310.07213]

  76. [76]

    Marchesano, L

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti and L. Paoloni,On the moduli space curvature at infinity, JHEP02(2024) 103, [2311.07979]

  77. [77]

    Reece, T

    M. Reece, T. Rudelius and C. Tudball,Co-scaling and alignment of electric and magnetic towers,JHEP09(2025) 146, [2505.22713]

  78. [78]

    Etheredge, A

    M. Etheredge, A. Herraez, L. Melotti and D. Luest,Proving the integral scaling conjecture with brane taxonomy, 2026

  79. [79]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21–33, [hep-th/0605264]

  80. [80]

    T. W. Grimm, E. Palti and I. Valenzuela,Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,JHEP08(2018) 143, [1802.08264]

Showing first 80 references.