REVIEW 2 cited by
On Using The Two-Way Cluster-Robust Standard Errors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Thousands of papers have reported two-way cluster-robust (TWCR) standard errors. However, the recent econometrics literature points out the potential non-gaussianity of two-way cluster sample means, and thus invalidity of the inference based on the TWCR standard errors. Fortunately, simulation studies nonetheless show that the gaussianity is rather common than exceptional. This paper provides theoretical support for this encouraging observation. Specifically, we derive a novel central limit theorem for two-way clustered triangular arrays that justifies the use of the TWCR under very mild and interpretable conditions. We, therefore, hope that this paper will provide a theoretical justification for the legitimacy of most, if not all, of the thousands of those empirical papers that have used the TWCR standard errors. We provide a guide in practice as to when a researcher can employ the TWCR standard errors.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Specification Testing for Dyadic Regression Models
A corrected Gaussian bootstrap makes KS and CvM specification tests for dyadic regression valid in both shared-node and independent-dyad regimes.
-
Clustering with Potential Multidimensionality: Inference and Practice
In finite population M-estimation, cluster-robust standard errors are justified by cluster sampling or cluster assignment, and a covariate-adjusted variance estimator can be valid and less conservative than existing t...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.