Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LeGrad: An Explainability Method for Vision Transformers via Feature Formation Sensitivity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.03214 v2 pith:YJ2BMUHS submitted 2024-04-04 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords legradexplainabilityvisionvitsgradientlayersmethodsignal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision Transformers (ViTs), with their ability to model long-range dependencies through self-attention mechanisms, have become a standard architecture in computer vision. However, the interpretability of these models remains a challenge. To address this, we propose LeGrad, an explainability method specifically designed for ViTs. LeGrad computes the gradient with respect to the attention maps of ViT layers, considering the gradient itself as the explainability signal. We aggregate the signal over all layers, combining the activations of the last as well as intermediate tokens to produce the merged explainability map. This makes LeGrad a conceptually simple and an easy-to-implement tool for enhancing the transparency of ViTs. We evaluate LeGrad in challenging segmentation, perturbation, and open-vocabulary settings, showcasing its versatility compared to other SotA explainability methods demonstrating its superior spatial fidelity and robustness to perturbations. A demo and the code is available at https://github.com/WalBouss/LeGrad.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pose Matters: Evaluating Vision Transformers and CNNs for Human Action Recognition on Small COCO Subsets

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A tiny COCO benchmark reports a 90% binary ViT accuracy, but the headline comparison is confounded by task difficulty and by missing code and data.

Pith tools