Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Concept Gradient: Concept-based Interpretation Without Linear Assumption

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.14966 v2 pith:YJDN6BHO submitted 2022-08-31 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords conceptconcept-basedinterpretationlineargeneralgradientmodelactivation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Concept-based interpretations of black-box models are often more intuitive for humans to understand. The most widely adopted approach for concept-based interpretation is Concept Activation Vector (CAV). CAV relies on learning a linear relation between some latent representation of a given model and concepts. The linear separability is usually implicitly assumed but does not hold true in general. In this work, we started from the original intent of concept-based interpretation and proposed Concept Gradient (CG), extending concept-based interpretation beyond linear concept functions. We showed that for a general (potentially non-linear) concept, we can mathematically evaluate how a small change of concept affecting the model's prediction, which leads to an extension of gradient-based interpretation to the concept space. We demonstrated empirically that CG outperforms CAV in both toy examples and real world datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Concept-Based Mechanistic Interpretability Using Structured Knowledge Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    BAGEL trains per-layer logistic-regression probes on CLIP-defined concepts and compares per-class concept probabilities with dataset-level concept frequencies, visualizing the alignment in a knowledge graph.

Pith tools