Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Coherent phonon motions and ordered vacancy compound mediated quantum path interference in Cu-poor CuIn$_{x}$Ga$_{(1-x)}$Se$_2$ (CIGS) with attosecond transient absorption

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Attosecond XUV absorption sees an 18.6-femtosecond quantum beat between two crystal phases in a solar-cell material, and the beat period measures the conduction-band offset between them.

desk verdict Solid new ATAS data on CIGS, but the headline quantum-path-interference claim is a plausible hypothesis awaiting a matrix-element calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05621 v2 pith:YJEFY3T2 submitted 2025-06-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Hugo Laurell , Jonah R. Adelman , Elizaveta Yakovleva , Carl Hägglund , Kostiantyn Sopiha , Axel Stenquist , Han K. D. Le , Peidong Yang
show 2 more authors
Marika Edoff Stephen R. Leone
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords attosecondtransientabsorptionCIGSorderedvacancycompoundquantumpathinterferencecoherentphononsconductionbandoffsethotcarriercoolingtype-IIheterojunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports attosecond transient absorption measurements on Cu-poor CIGS thin films across the selenium M4,5 edge, and claims to resolve two types of coherent motion after bandgap excitation: A1g phonons of both the chalcopyrite and the Cu-deficient ordered vacancy compound phases, and a much faster oscillation with a period of 18.6(3) fs. The fast oscillation is interpreted as quantum path interference between the conduction bands of the two phases, created by the infrared pump and read out by the XUV probe as a quantum beat. If that interpretation is right, the beat period directly gives the conduction band offset $\Delta E_{CB} = 0.222(7)$ eV at the buried type-II heterojunctions, a parameter that is normally hard to access and is central to CIGS device performance. The same data separate hot-hole cooling (1.7(2) ps) from hot-electron cooling (2.6(5) ps) and attribute the faster hole cooling to the larger density of valence states.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electronic coherence $\rho_{CB1,CB2}(\tau)$ between the two conduction-band minima of the chalcopyrite and OVC phases, created by an IR pump across distributed type-II heterojunctions and read out by an attosecond XUV probe from the Se 3d5/2 core level. A four-level Lindblad model yields the state-blocking contribution $\Delta A \propto -\rho_{CB1,CB1} - \rho_{CB2,CB2} - 2|\rho_{CB1,CB2}|e^{-\Gamma\tau}\cos(\Delta E_{CB}\tau/\hbar + \phi)$, so the beat frequency measures the band offset and the decay envelope measures the coherence lifetime. The iterative decomposition of the differential absorption into edge shift, carrier blocking, and broadening isolates this beat from the coherent phonon signals, whose frequencies and amplitudes are anchored by Raman measurements.

What would settle it

Compute the IR and XUV transition matrix elements for the chalcopyrite/OVC interface: if the wavefunction overlap is too small, the beat should not appear. Experimentally, prepare CIGS films with Cu/(Ga+In) close to 1 (larger defect spacing): the 55 THz oscillation should weaken and vanish if it is inter-phase quantum-path interference, while the two phonon beats at 4.8 and 5.3 THz should remain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the 55 THz oscillation observed across the Se absorption edge is an electronic coherence between the OVC and chalcopyrite conduction bands, not a lattice artifact. Under that interpretation, the pump creates a coherent superposition of the two conduction-band states, and the XUV probe transitions from the Se 3d5/2 core level read out its phase evolution; the state-blocking contribution to the differential absorption contains a term $-2|\rho|e^{-\Gamma\tau}\cos(\Delta E_{CB}\tau/\hbar + \phi)$. The fitted period gives $\Delta E_{CB} = 0.222(7)$ eV, in line with the paper's DFT-extrapolated value of 0.25 eV, the coherence decays with $T_2^e = 0.8(4)$ ps, the degree of coherence at the second phonon maximum is about 0.19, and the fitted phase corresponds to a 12.1(8) fs delay attributed to electron traversal of the junction. The paper also claims first observation of coherent phonon dynamics in CIGS, with the two A1g modes at 176.2(7) cm$^{-1}$ and 159(4) cm$^{-1}$ assigned to chalcopyrite and OVC.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum-path-interference claim rests on the assumption that the chalcopyrite and OVC conduction-band wavefunctions overlap strongly enough at the about 3 nm-spaced interfaces for the IR pulse to create and the XUV pulse to read out an inter-phase electronic coherence; the paper states that the transition strength depends on the interface symmetry match, which it does not calculate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The conduction band offset between CIGS and its ordered vacancy compound, a key quantity for interface design, becomes directly readable from the period of an optical beat.
  • The two A1g phonon modes provide a time-resolved view of lattice motion in both phases, opening the way to study hot-phonon bottlenecks and phonon engineering in CIGS.
  • Separate hole and electron cooling times (1.7 vs 2.6 ps) allow recombination and thermalization models to be tested against carrier-specific data.
  • An electronic coherence surviving about 0.8 ps in a room-temperature solar-cell material suggests that spatially separated conduction bands can protect coherence, a useful property for quantum-coherent metrology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the quantum-path-interference reading is correct, the same beat measurement should work as a contact-free probe of band offsets in other phase-separated or junction-bearing photovoltaic materials.
  • Varying the Cu/(Ga+In) ratio should shift both the spacing of the planar defects and the predicted offset, so tracking the beat frequency across compositions would test the assignment.
  • The measured degree of coherence (about 0.19) could serve as an interface-quality metric, since it is suppressed wherever pure-phase regions contribute incoherent state blocking.
  • The 12 fs junction-traversal time is an inference from a phase fit; it could be independently checked by time-resolved photoemission or by pump-energy dependence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports attosecond XUV transient absorption measurements on Cu-poor CIGS across the Se M4,5 edge. It decomposes the differential absorption into edge shift, carrier state-blocking, and broadening; identifies two coherent A1g phonon modes attributed to the chalcopyrite and OVC phases; extracts electron and hole cooling times; and reports fast oscillations with a fitted period of 18.6(3) fs that are interpreted as quantum path interference between the conduction bands of the two phases. From those oscillations the authors derive a conduction band offset Delta_ECB = 0.222(7) eV, a coherence time Te2 = 0.8(4) ps, and an estimated degree of coherence of about 0.19. The beat period itself is a direct measurement and is compared with an independent DFT extrapolation of 0.25 eV, so the central frequency claim is not circular. However, the interpretation of the oscillation as inter-phase electronic coherence relies on wavefunction-overlap assumptions that the manuscript explicitly leaves to future work.

Significance. If substantiated, this would be the first attosecond transient absorption study of CIGS and would introduce a potentially general method for measuring conduction band offsets and electronic coherence at distributed heterojunctions. The phonon frequencies and carrier cooling times are supported by Raman measurements and by consistency with prior pump-probe work, and the authors are commendably transparent about uncertainties, reproducing the fast oscillation in three separate scans. The central quantum-path-interference claim is, however, not yet quantitatively established: it depends on uncalculated inter-phase dipole matrix elements, and the reported electronic decoherence time is fit to only three amplitude points. The paper still makes a valuable experimental contribution and lays out a clear falsifiable prediction that connects the beat period to Delta_ECB, so the remaining issues are addressable in revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IIIC and SM VIB, Eqs. (4)-(5)] The quantum-path-interference assignment requires that both mu_VB,CB1 mu*_VB,CB2 and mu_3d,CB1 mu*_3d,CB2 be non-negligible. The manuscript states in Sec. IIIC that the strength and feasibility of such transitions "critically rely upon the symmetry match of wavefunctions at the interface, an important aspect requiring detailed theoretical studies beyond the scope of this work," and SM VIB assumes "similar dipole couplings" in passing from Eq. (35) to Eq. (36). Because the beat amplitude is proportional to these products, a small or symmetry-forbidden overlap would make the 18.6 fs oscillation unrelated to inter-phase electronic coherence, and the inferred Delta_ECB and Te2 would lose their foundation. The concern is concrete because CB1 and CB2 lie at different k-points (Z vs Gamma) and in phases separated by about 3 nm. Please provide at least a numerical estimate of these matrix elements from the DFT supercell wavefunctions already used in the paper, or alternatively present the beat as an observed but unassigned oscillation and test it explicitly against non-coherence mechanisms such as a phonon-modulated superposition of two edge shifts.
  2. [Fig. 5(c) and SM E] The electronic decoherence time 1/Gamma = 0.8(4) ps is obtained from an exponential fit to only three bandpass-filtered oscillation-amplitude points, each extracted from roughly 100 fs intervals. A three-point fit cannot distinguish an exponential decay from a Gaussian decay or from a slow modulation of the phonon background, and the 50% relative uncertainty already signals weak constraint. The claim of long-lived electronic coherence would be much more convincing if Eq. (5) were fitted globally to the raw Delta_A(tau) with the coherent phonon contributions modeled simultaneously, rather than extracted from a small number of filtered amplitudes.
  3. [SM VIB Eq. (9) vs main text Sec. IIIC] There is an internal inconsistency in the labeling of the conduction band populations. The main text defines CB1 as OVC and CB2 as chalcopyrite, and Raman gives alpha_OVC = 35% and alpha_CIGS = 65%, so one expects rho_CB1,CB1(0) = 0.35 and rho_CB2,CB2(0) = 0.65. Eq. (9) of SM VIB instead lists rho_CB1,CB1(0) = 0.65 and rho_CB2,CB2(0) = 0.35. This does not change the degree-of-coherence estimate in Eq. (6) because the denominator is symmetric, but it affects the assignment of state-blocking weights and should be corrected in revision.
  4. [SM VIC and Eq. (6)] The estimated degree of coherence C approx 0.19 relies on two unvalidated assumptions: that Raman intensities are proportional to the conduction band populations, and that the ratio Delta_A_carriers/Delta_A_shift is conserved between the 1 ps scan and the shorter 3.3 fs scans. No uncertainty is propagated through this estimate. Please present this value explicitly as an order-of-magnitude estimate, list the assumptions and their possible impact, and, if possible, test the population proxy against the independent carrier contribution obtained from the iterative decomposition.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. I] There are several typographical errors: "minima occuring" should read "minimum occurring", "Schockley-Queisser" should be "Shockley-Queisser", and "Beer-Labert" should be "Beer-Lambert".
  2. [SM I, Figs. 11 and 12] The cross-reference "Fig.??" appears unresolved in the captions and text of SM I; please replace it with the correct figure numbers.
  3. [Fig. 5(d) and Sec. IIIC] The statement that the average spacing between Cu-poor planar defects is about 3 nm is not substantiated with a derivation or a reference to the SM; a short explanation of how this number follows from the Cu/(Ga+In) ratio would improve reproducibility.
  4. [SM VIB, Eq. (36)] Even if the dipole couplings are assumed equal in magnitude, their relative phases could affect the argument of the coherence term; the step from Eq. (35) to Eq. (36) should state this phase assumption explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 18.6 fs beat is a direct measurement converted via the standard quantum-beat relation and checked against independent DFT; the uncalculated interface dipole matrix elements are an explicitly admitted underdetermination, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central frequency claim is a direct measurement, not a circular reduction. The 18.6(3) fs period is extracted from the delay scan (Fig. 5), and the paper converts it to ΔECB = h/Δτ = 0.222(7) eV (Sec. IIIC), which is the standard quantum-beat relation; although the same quantity appears both as the beat frequency and as the extracted offset, this is a defined physical conversion, not a fit of the target to itself. The comparison value ΔEth_CB = 0.25 eV comes from independent DFT supercell calculations (SM II), so the agreement is an external check rather than a restatement of the input. The 4-level Lindblad model (SM VIB) is a derivation, not an ansatz imported from prior work, and the later degree-of-coherence estimate (SM VIC) is explicitly a calibrated inversion of the measured beat amplitude, not a prediction renamed from an input. The main caveat is the paper's own admission (Sec. IIIC) that "the strength and feasibility of such direct transitions critically rely upon the symmetry match of wavefunctions at the interface, an important aspect requiring detailed theoretical studies beyond the scope of this work"; this means the quantum-path-interference interpretation is underdetermined without inter-phase dipole matrix elements, but underdetermination is not circularity. Self-citations (e.g., Zuerch et al. for the iterative decomposition, Adelman et al. for DECP driving forces, Sopiha et al. for OVC inclusions) are methodological or external structural/theory supports and are not used to define the measured quantities. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction; the score of 1 reflects minor caveats only, with no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, dimensions, or phases are introduced; the OVC and chalcopyrite phases are established in the prior literature. The central claim rests on DFT band structures, the assumed wavefunction overlap at interfaces, the mapping from Raman amplitudes to electronic populations, and the 4-level Lindblad model, all of which are modeling assumptions rather than externally verified inputs.

free parameters (7)
  • Coherent phonon amplitude C (Eq. 3) = not reported
    Overall amplitude of the two-phonon oscillation fit; fitted to the spectral average of the conduction band region.
  • Phonon decoherence time T_ph^2 = 2.27(8) ps
    Shared decoherence time for both A1g modes, fitted with Eq. (3); assumes the chalcopyrite and OVC phonons decohere identically.
  • Phonon phases phi_OVC, phi_CIGS = 0.73(4) rad and 0.75(2) rad
    Phases in Eq. (3), used to argue for a mixed DECP/ISRS excitation mechanism.
  • Raman relative amplitudes alpha_CIGS, alpha_OVC = 0.65 and 0.35
    Fitted to the Raman spectrum and reused as phase concentrations, phonon weights in Eq. (3), and initial conduction band populations in SM Eq. (9).
  • Electronic decoherence rate 1/Gamma = T_e2 = 0.8(4) ps
    Extracted from an exponential fit to only three oscillation-amplitude points in Fig. 5(c); this supports the long-lived coherence claim.
  • Quantum beat phase phi = 4.1(3) rad
    Fitted phase used to infer the electron traversal time t_W = 12.1(8) fs across the junction.
  • Carrier-to-lattice ratio DeltaA_carriers/DeltaA_shift = -2/5
    Taken from the 1 ps decomposition and used in SM C to convert the fast oscillation amplitude into |rho_12| for the degree of coherence C = 0.19.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption PBE+U DFT with U=5 eV on Cu 3d, scissor-shifted to the measured band gap, gives reliable band structures for chalcopyrite and OVC phases.
    Used for Fig. 1 band structures, orbital character assignments, and the DFT estimate of the conduction band offset (0.25 eV).
  • domain assumption The Se 3d core hole is well screened and its broadening is Lorentzian with FWHM 0.8 eV.
    Assumed in Eq. (2) and in the iterative decomposition, following the analogy with Ge.
  • ad hoc to paper The chalcopyrite and OVC phases experience identical transient edge shifts.
    Explicitly stated in Section III A as 'assuming identical edge shifts for the chalcopyrite and OVC phases'; not derived or tested.
  • ad hoc to paper Raman intensities are proportional to phase concentrations and to the initial conduction band populations in the 4-level model.
    Used to fix alpha_j in Eq. (3) and rho_CB1,CB1, rho_CB2,CB2 in SM Eq. (9); the mapping from Raman cross-section to electronic population is unverified.
  • ad hoc to paper The IR pump creates a coherent superposition of the OVC and chalcopyrite conduction band states with sufficient wavefunction overlap.
    This is the central hypothesis behind the quantum path interference interpretation; the paper acknowledges the overlap requirement and leaves the calculation of transition strengths to future work.
  • domain assumption The 4-level Lindblad model with pure dephasing and a weak impulsive XUV probe describes the transient absorption signal.
    Standard open-quantum-system treatment in SM Section B; it assumes the signal is proportional to Im P(E_f, tau).
  • ad hoc to paper Both coherent phonon modes decohere with the same time constant T_ph^2.
    Stated as a reasonable assumption because the chalcopyrite and OVC lattices are very similar, in Section III B.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherent phonon motions and ordered vacancy compound mediated quantum path interference in Cu-poor CuIn$_{x}$Ga$_{(1-x)}$Se$_2$ (CIGS) with attosecond transient absorption." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YJEFY3T2

@misc{pith2026250605621,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherent phonon motions and ordered vacancy compound mediated quantum path interference in Cu-poor CuIn$_x$Ga$_(1-x)$Se$_2$ (CIGS) with attosecond transient absorption},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YJEFY3T2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05621}
}
abstract

In this study, coherent phonon motion is observed in bandgap excited CuIn$_{x}$Ga$_{(1-x)}$Se$_2$ (CIGS) utilizing extreme ultraviolet (XUV) attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy across the Se M$_{4,5}$ absorption edge. Two frequencies of coherent phonon motion are resolved, a low frequency mode attributed through Raman measurements to the $A_{1g}$ phonon motion of a Cu-deficient ordered vacancy compound (OVC), while the high frequency mode originates from the $A_{1g}$ phonon motion in the chalcopyrite phase. The two oscillations lead to modulations in the XUV differential absorption $\Delta A(\epsilon,\tau)$ due to energy shifts of the Se M$_{4,5}$ edge, with a minima occuring approximately 1 ps after the band gap excitation. The hot carrier cooling time of holes and electrons are disentangled and the observed slower cooling of holes is attributed to the higher density of hole states in the valence band. We also observe fast oscillations (18.6(3) fs period) across the Se absorption edge, which are interpreted to originate from quantum path interference between the electronic conduction bands of the chalcopyrite CIGS and OVC phases, opening the possibility towards quantum coherent metrology in photovoltaics on the femtosecond timescale. The complex interplay between the chalcopyrite and OVC phases are revealed in this investigation through both coherent vibrational and electronic motions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05621 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. In (a,b) the chalcopyrite and OVC band structures calculated using DFT are shown, respectively. Here Cu(In/Ga)Se [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. XUV absorption spectrum (a), spectral averages of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Iterative decomposition of transient absorption scan. (a) Raw transient absorption scan. The raw scan is separated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. In (a) the spectral average of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Attosecond transient absorption scans of CIGS where the delay is scanned from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Raman spectra of the CuIn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Off-resonance Raman spectra simulated for three selected structures representing stoichiometric chalcopyrite CIGS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Amplitude of Fourier transform of ATAS scan shown in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. XUV Absorbtion spectrum of CIGS measured as a function of XUV photon energy. The spectrum shows a broad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. XRD measurements on the CIGS sample studied in this work. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Element-projected band structures for a series of (a) Cu-In-Se and (b) Cu-Ga-Se structures with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Computed energy difference of the lowest unoccupied band at the high-symmetry Z and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    McPherson, G

    A. McPherson, G. Gibson, H. Jara, U. Johann, T. S. Luk, I. A. McIntyre, K. Boyer, and C. K. Rhodes, Studies of multiphoton production of vacuum-ultraviolet radiation in the rare gases, Journal of the Optical Society of Amer- 11 ica B4, 595 (1987)

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    Ferray, A

    M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. Li, L. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics21, L31 (1988)

    work page 1988

  3. [3]

    C. Ott, A. Kaldun, P. Raith, K. Meyer, M. Laux, J. Ev- ers, C. H. Keitel, C. H. Greene, and T. Pfeifer, Lorentz meets fano in spectral line shapes: A universal phase and its laser control, Science340, 716 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Nandi, E

    S. Nandi, E. Plésiat, S. Zhong, A. Palacios, D. Busto, M. Isinger, L. Neoričić, C. L. Arnold, R. J. Squibb, R. Feifel, P. Decleva, A. L’Huillier, F. Martín, and M. Gisselbrecht, Attosecond timing of electron emission from a molecular shape resonance, Science Advances6, eaba7762

    work page

  5. [5]

    H. Liu, Y. Li, Y. S. You, S. Ghimire, T. F. Heinz, and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from an atomically thin semiconductor, Nature Physics13, 262 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Wirth, M

    A. Wirth, M. T. Hassan, I. GrguraÅ!’, J. Gagnon, A. Moulet, T. T. Luu, S. Pabst, R. Santra, Z. A. Alahmed, A. M. Azzeer, V. S. Yakovlev, V. Pervak, F. Krausz, and E. Goulielmakis, Synthesized light tran- sients, Science334, 195 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    A. R. Attar, H.-T. Chang, A. Britz, X. Zhang, M.-F. Lin, A. Krishnamoorthy, T. Linker, D. Fritz, D. M. Neu- mark, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, P. Ajayan, P. Vashishta, U. Bergmann, and S. R. Leone, Simultaneous observa- tion of carrier-specific redistribution and coherent lattice dynamics in 2h-mote2 with femtosecond core-level spec- troscopy, ACS Nano14, 15829 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Di Palo, G

    N. Di Palo, G. Inzani, G. L. Dolso, M. Talarico, S. Bonetti, and M. Lucchini, Attosecond absorption and reflection spectroscopy of solids, APL Photonics 9, 020901 (2024), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/app/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0176656/19333851/020901_1_5.0176656.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0176656/19333851/020901_1_5.0176656.pdf 2024

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Zürch, H.-T

    M. Zürch, H.-T. Chang, L. J. Borja, P. M. Kraus, S. K. Cushing, A. Gandman, C. J. Kaplan, M. H. Oh, J. S. Prell, D. Prendergast, C. D. Pemmaraju, D. M. Neu- mark, and S. R. Leone, Direct and simultaneous obser- vation of ultrafast electron and hole dynamics in germa- nium, Nat...

    2017

  2. [10]

    Géneaux, I

    R. Géneaux, I. Timrov, C. J. Kaplan, A. D. Ross, P. M. Kraus, and S. R. Leone, Coherent energy exchange be- tween carriers and phonons in peierls-distorted bismuth unveiled by broadband xuv pulses, Physical Review Re- search 3, 033210 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Drescher, B

    L. Drescher, B. R. de Roulet, Y. S. Phang, and S. R. Leone, On the onset of coherent phonon motion in peierls-distorted antimony by attosecond transient ab- sorption, arXiv2309.00734 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Victoria, N

    M. Victoria, N. Haegel, I. M. Peters, R. Sinton, A. Jäger- Waldau, C. del Cañizo, C. Breyer, M. Stocks, A. Blak- ers, I. Kaizuka, K. Komoto, and A. Smets, Solar photo- voltaics is ready to power a sustainable future, Joule5, 1041 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Abdelilah, A

    Y. Abdelilah, A. A. Báscones, H. Bahar, P. Bojek, F. Briens, T. Criswell, J. Moorhouse, and L. Mari Mar- tinez, Renewables 2023 Analysis and forecast to 2028 , Tech. Rep. (International Energy Agency, France, 2024)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Ramanujam and U

    J. Ramanujam and U. P. Singh, Copper indium gallium selenide based solar cells – a review, Energy & Environ- mental Science 10, 1306 (2017), publisher: The Royal Society of Chemistry

    2017

  7. [15]

    Keller, K

    J. Keller, K. Kiselman, O. Donzel-Gargand, N. M. Mar- tin, M. Babucci, O. Lundberg, E. Wallin, L. Stolt, and M. Edoff, High-concentration silver alloying and steep back-contact gallium grading enabling copper indium gallium selenide solar cell with 23.6% efficiency, Nature Ene...

    2024

  8. [16]

    Keller, K

    J. Keller, K. V. Sopiha, O. Stolt, L. Stolt, C. Persson, J. J. Scragg, T. Törndahl, and M. Edoff, Wide-gap (ag,cu)(in,ga)se2 solar cells with different buffer materials—a path to a bet- ter heterojunction, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 28, 237 (2020), ht...

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    Yang, T.-Y

    S.-C. Yang, T.-Y. Lin, M. Ochoa, H. Lai, R. Kothandara- man, F. Fu, A. N. Tiwari, and R. Carron, Efficiency boost of bifacial Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells for flexible and tandem applications with silver-assisted low- temperature process, Nature Energy8, 40 (2023), num- ...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Keller, L

    J. Keller, L. Stolt, K. V. Sopiha, J. K. Larsen, L. Riekehr, and M. Edoff, On the paramount role of absorber stoichiometry in (ag,cu)(in,ga)se2 wide-gap solar cells, Solar RRL 4, 2000508 (2020), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/solr.202000508

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    C. C. S. Chan, K. Fan, H. Wang, Z. Huang, D. Novko, K. Yan, J. Xu, W. C. H. Choy, I. Lončarić, and K. S. Wong, Uncovering the electron-phonon inter- play and dynamical energy-dissipation mechanisms of hot carriers in hybrid lead halide perovskites, Advanced Energy Materials 11...

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    Goulielmakis, Z

    E. Goulielmakis, Z. Loh, A. Wirth, R. Santra, N. Rohringer, V. S. Yakovlev, S. Zherebtsov, T. Pfeifer, A. M. Azzeer, M. F. Kling, S. R. Leone, and F. Krausz, Real-time observation of valence electron motion, Nature 466, 739 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    S. K. Cushing, A. Lee, I. J. Porter, L. M. Carneiro, H.- T. Chang, M. Zürch, and S. R. Leone, Differentiating photoexcited carrier and phonon dynamics in the∆, l, and Γvalleys of si(100) with transient extreme ultraviolet spectroscopy, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C123, 3...

    2019

  14. [22]

    I. J. P. Molesky, A. Lee, S. K. Cushing, H.-T. Chang, J. C. Ondry, A. P. Alivisatos, and S. R. Leone, Charac- terization of carrier cooling bottleneck in silicon nanopar- ticles by extreme ultraviolet (xuv) transient absorption spectroscopy, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C...

    2021

  15. [23]

    Chen, Y.-K

    S.-C. Chen, Y.-K. Liao, H.-J. Chen, C.-H. Chen, C.-H. Lai, Y.-L. Chueh, H.-C. Kuo, K.-H. Wu, J.-Y. Juang, S.- J. Cheng, T.-P. Hsieh, and T. Kobayashi, Ultrafast car- rier dynamics in cu(in,ga)se2 thin films probed by fem- tosecond pump-probe spectroscopy, Optics Express20, 126...

    2012

  16. [24]

    S. B. Zhang, S.-H. Wei, A. Zunger, and H. Katayama- Yoshida, Defect physics of thecuinse2 chalcopyrite semi- conductor, Phys. Rev. B57, 9642 (1998)

    1998

  17. [25]

    Y. Zhao, S. Yuan, Q. Chang, Z. Zhou, D. Kou, W. Zhou, Y. Qi, and S. Wu, Controllable forma- tion of ordered vacancy compound for high effi- ciency solution processed cu(in,ga)se2 solar cells, Advanced Functional Materials 31, 2007928 (2021), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi...

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    Caballero, V

    R. Caballero, V. Izquierdo-Roca, X. Fontané, C. Kauf- mann, J. Álvarez-García, A. Eicke, L. Calvo-Barrio, A. Pérez-Rodríguez, H. Schock, and J. Morante, Cu defi- ciency in multi-stage co-evaporated cu(in,ga)se2 for solar cells applications: Microstructure and ga in-depth alloy...

    2010

  19. [27]

    Schmid, M

    D. Schmid, M. Ruckh, and H. W. Schock, A comprehen- sive characterization of the interfaces in mo/cis/cds/zno solar cell structures, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 41-42, 281 (1996)

    1996

  20. [28]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- traandthestructuralstabilityofnickeloxide: Anlsda+u study, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  21. [29]

    Maeda, W

    T. Maeda, W. Gong, and T. Wada, Crystallographic and optical properties and band structures of cuinse2, cuin3se5, and cuin5se8 phases in cu-poor cu2se–in2se3 pseudo-binary system, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 55, 04ES15 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Schmid, M

    D. Schmid, M. Ruckh, F. Grunwald, and H. W. Schock,Chalcopyrite/defectchalcopyriteheterojunctions on the basis of cuinse2, Journal of Applied Physics 73, 2902 (1993), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/73/6/2902/18655402/2902_1_online.pdf

    1993

  23. [31]

    J. H. Boyle, B. E. McCandless, W. N. Shafar- man, and R. W. Birkmire, Structural and opti- cal properties of (ag,cu)(in,ga)se2 polycrystalline thin film alloys, Journal of Applied Physics 115, 223504 (2014), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4880243/13253...

    2014 doi

  24. [32]

    A. J. Nelson, G. Berry, A. Rockett, D. K. Shuh, J. A. Carlisle, D. G. J. Sutherland, and L. J. Terminello, Observation of core-level binding en- ergy shifts between (100) surface and bulk atoms of epitaxial CuInSe2, Applied Physics Letters 70, 1873 (1997), https://pubs.aip.org...

    1997

  25. [33]

    Géneaux, H.-T

    R. Géneaux, H.-T. Chang, A. M. Schwartzberg, and H. J. B. Marroux, Source noise suppression in attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy by edge-pixel referenc- ing, Opt. Express29, 951 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Ghosh, P

    S. Ghosh, P. L. Leath, and M. H. Cohen, Phonons in random alloys: The itinerant coherent-potential approx- imation, Physical Review B66, 214206 (2002)

    2002

  27. [35]

    S. K. Cushing, M. Zürch, P. M. Kraus, L. M. Carneiro, A. Lee, H.-T. Chang, C. J. Kaplan, and S. R. Leone, Hot phonon and carrier relax- ation in Si(100) determined by transient extreme ultraviolet spectroscopy, Structural Dynamics 5, 054302 (2018), https://pubs.aip.org/aca/sdy...

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    M. K. Bahl, R. L. Watson, and K. J. Irgolic, LMM Auger spectra of selenium and some of its compounds, The Journal of Chemical Physics 72, 4069 (1980), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/72/7/4069/18922120/4069_1_online.pdf

    1980

  29. [37]

    A. Othonos, Probing ultrafast carrier and phonon dy- namics in semiconductors, Journal of Applied Physics 83, 1789 (1998), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/83/4/1789/18698506/1789_1_online.pdf

    1998

  30. [38]

    Sheu, Y.-T

    H.-H. Sheu, Y.-T. Hsu, S.-Y. Jian, and S.-C. Liang, The effect of cu concentration in the photovoltaic efficiency of cigs solar cells prepared by co-evaporation technique, Vacuum131, 278 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    P. G. Klemens, Anharmonic decay of optical phonons, Phys. Rev.148, 845 (1966)

    1966

  32. [40]

    H. J. Zeiger, J. Vidal, T. K. Cheng, E. P. Ippen, G. Dres- selhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Theory for displacive excitation of coherent phonons, Phys. Rev. B 45, 768 (1992)

    1992

  33. [41]

    J. R. Adelman, H. Laurell, L. B. Drescher, H. K. D. Le, P. Yang, and S. R. Leone, Coherently coupled carrier and phonon dynamics in elemental tellurium probed by extreme ultraviolet transient absorption, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184315 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    K. V. Sopiha, J. K. Larsen, J. Keller, M. Ed- off, C. Platzer-Björkman, and J. J. S. Scragg, Off- stoichiometry in i–iii–vi2 chalcopyrite absorbers: a com- parative analysis of structures and stabilities, Faraday Discuss. 239, 357 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Zhang, Y.-T

    Y.-J. Zhang, Y.-T. Ren, X.-H. Lv, X.-L. Zhao, R. Yang, N.-W. Wang, C.-D. Jin, H. Zhang, R.-Q. Lian, P.-L. Gong, R.-N. Wang, J.-L. Wang, and X.-Q. Shi, Momen- tum matching and band-alignment type in van der waals heterostructures: Interfacial effects and materials screen- ing, ...

    2023

  36. [44]

    M. H. Chan, J. Y. Chen, T. Y. Lin, and Y. F. Chen, Direct evidence of type ii band align- ment in zno nanorods/poly(3-hexylthiophene) heterostructures, Applied Physics Letters 100, 021912 (2012), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3676267/13405611/021912_1...

    2012 doi

  37. [45]

    Mozume, N

    T. Mozume, N. Georgiev, H. Yoshida, A. Neogi, and T. Nishimura, Observation of direct (type- i) transitions in type-ii ingaas/alassb heterostruc- tures lattice matched to inp grown by molec- ular beam epitaxy, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B: Microelectronics and Na...

    2000

  38. [46]

    Zhang, J

    H. Zhang, J. Fu, A. Carvalho, E. T. Poh, J.-Y. Chung, M. Feng, Y. Chen, B. Wang, Q. Shang, H. Yang, Z. Zhang, S. X. Lim, W. Gao, S. Gradečak, C.-W. Qiu, J. Lu, C. He, T. C. Sum, and C. H. Sow, Programmable interfacial band configuration in ws2/bi2o2se heterojunc- tions, ACS Na...

    2024

  39. [47]

    Y. Cao, Z. Wu, J. Ni, W. A. Bhutto, J. Li, S. Li, K. Huang, and J. Kang, Type-ii core/shell nanowire het- erostructures and their photovoltaic applications, Nano- Micro Letters4, 135 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    Takagi, Y

    I. Takagi, Y. Kayanuma, and K. G. Nakamura, Ultrafast quantum path interferometry to determine the electronic decoherence time of the electron-phonon coupled system in n-type gallium arsenide, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184305 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Sato and H

    K. Sato and H. Katayama-Yoshida, Ordered de- fect compounds in cuinse2 for photovoltaic so- lar cell application, AIP Conference Proceedings 1583, 150 (2014), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article- pdf/1583/1/150/11445237/150_1_online.pdf

    2014

  42. [50]

    Ghosh, A

    A. Ghosh, A. Liu, S. C. Boehme, P. Brosseau, D. N. Dirin, M. V. Kovalenko, and P. Kambhampati, Cor- related lattice fluctuations in cspbbr3 quantum dots give rise to long-lived electronic coherence, ACS Nano 10.1021/acsnano.5c03051 (2025). 13

    2025 doi

  43. [51]

    Zhang, W

    Z. Zhang, W. Hu, E. Perfetto, and G. Stefanucci, Long-lived coherence between incoherent excitons re- vealed by time-resolved arpes: An exact solution (2025), arXiv:2502.08162 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Codling, R

    K. Codling, R. P. Madden, and D. L. Ederer, Resonances in the photo-ionization continuum of ne i (20-150 ev), Physical Review155, 26 (1967)

    1967

  45. [53]

    A. N. Pfeiffer and S. R. Leone, Transmission of an iso- lated attosecond pulse in a strong-field dressed atom, Phys. Rev. A85, 053422 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    Fonari and S

    A. Fonari and S. Stauffer, vasp_raman.py, https:// github.com/raman-sc/VASP/ (2013)

    2013

  47. [55]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gi- annozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  48. [56]

    S. R. Dhage, H.-S. Kim, and H. T. Hahn, Cu(in,ga)se2 thin film preparation from a cu(in,ga) metallic alloy and se nanoparticles by an intense pulsed light technique, Journal of Electronic Materials40, 122 (2011). 14 VI. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL A. Data analysis The analysis of th...

    2011

  49. [57]

    The edge referencing regions are chosen as[38.0, 45.1] eV and[59.2, 70.0] eV, as in these spectral regions there were no measurable differential absorptions above the noise floor

    to reduce noise induced by high-harmonic spectral drifts. The edge referencing regions are chosen as[38.0, 45.1] eV and[59.2, 70.0] eV, as in these spectral regions there were no measurable differential absorptions above the noise floor. In the scans to investigate the femtose...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.