Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Spatially patterned phases in a reaction-time-symmetry-broken model of flocking

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Time-delayed alignment splits an ordered flock into counter-moving bands.

desk verdict A genuinely new computational observation of a second, spatially modulated phase deep in the polar flocking state, driven by an index-ordered time-asymmetric update; the main weakness is the lack of thermodynamic-limit evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10657 v1 pith:YJZKMJPM submitted 2025-05-15 cond-mat.soft

Charles R. Packard , Daniel M. Sussman This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords flockingVicsekmodeltimedelayreaction-timesymmetrynon-reciprocalinteractionsactivematterbandedphaseBindercumulant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a minimal flocking model in which equal-time alignment is replaced by an index-ordered update rule: lower-index particles react to higher-index neighbors with a one-timestep delay. The model keeps the standard disorder-to-order transition of Vicsek-like flocks, but deep inside the ordered phase it finds a second transition to a spatially patterned state—two high-density bands travel together along the global flocking direction while moving in opposite transverse directions. The authors argue that this phase is stabilized by a slowly relaxing spatial organization of the particle index field, and they support that claim by showing the pattern is destroyed when indices are randomly permuted and that the non-reciprocal torque field has a sinusoidal longitudinal profile. The wider message is that even a tiny asymmetry in reaction time, occurring entirely within one numerical timestep, can change the collective state of active matter.

What carries the argument

The central object is the index-ordered update rule (Eq. 4): within each timestep, particle i receives time-local information from lower-index neighbors and one-timestep-delayed information from higher-index neighbors. This creates a non-reciprocal, reaction-time-asymmetric interaction. The load-bearing quantity is the spatial organization of the particle index field—the relative index differences between neighboring particles—which the paper argues organizes along the flocking direction and relaxes slowly, although it cannot be measured directly beyond noise. Its effect is captured by Ψ, the difference between the torques actually applied and the torques a time-local Hamiltonian would produce; the sinusoidal longitudinal profile of Ψ supplies the persistent torque that keeps the two bands from aligning into one homogeneous flock.

What would settle it

Simulate the model with the same parameters but replace the full index-ordered update with a two-species rule (half the particles react instantly, half with a one-timestep delay) and measure the transverse-velocity order parameter; if no bimodal banded phase appears in that simpler rule, the slow-relaxing index-order mechanism—not mere time delay—is what the phase depends on. Alternatively, directly measure the autocorrelation time of a local index-gradient observable; if it decays on a timescale much shorter than the lifetime of the bands, the proposed mechanism fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a Vicsek-like flocking model with torques derived from a ferromagnetic Hamiltonian and Voronoi neighbor lists, the authors replace the simultaneous update rule with an index-ordered rule in which particle i aligns to lower-index neighbors using their updated orientations and to higher-index neighbors using their old orientations. This breaks reaction-time symmetry within a single timestep. Below the usual flocking transition, at low noise, the system develops a new phase in which the flock remains globally polarized but separates into two dense bands with opposite transverse velocities. The Binder cumulant of angles relative to the flocking direction becomes positive for large systems (N ≳ $2^{16}$), indicating a genuinely bimodal distribution rather than long tails, and giant number fluctuations persist. The authors show the phase is unstable to random permutation of particle indices and that the longitudinal profile of Ψ—the difference between the index-ordered torques and the time-local Hamiltonian torques—is sinusoidal and out of phase with the transverse-velocity profile. They conclude that a slowly relaxing spatial organization of the index-order field sustains the counter-propagating bands.

Load-bearing premise

The patterned phase survives only if the spatial ordering of particle indices persists over long times; the paper states this index-order field is prohibitively difficult to measure beyond noise, so its stability is inferred indirectly from the destruction of the pattern under index permutation and from the sinusoidal torque field Ψ.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The standard disorder-to-order transition survives the reaction-time asymmetry, so the patterned phase is an additional ordering transition nested inside the polar flocking phase rather than a replacement for it.
  • The pattern requires large systems: Binder cumulants show bimodality only for N ≳ 2^16, so smaller simulations would miss the phase entirely.
  • Because random permutation of indices destroys the bands, any model that labels particles symmetrically cannot produce this phase; the index ordering is a genuine degree of freedom.
  • A metric version of the model shows similar but spatially more complex banded phases, suggesting the mechanism is not an artifact of Voronoi neighbor lists.
  • The sinusoidal, out-of-phase relationship between Ψ and the transverse velocity provides a coarse-grained signature that could be measured in other time-delayed flocking models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension: a two-species version of the model (one species delayed by one timestep, the other reacting instantly) should reproduce the patterned phase if reaction-time asymmetry is the operative ingredient; the paper flags this as future work.
  • The Ψ measurement implies that time-delayed alignment is equivalent, at a coarse-grained level, to time-local non-reciprocal torques; if so, other models with explicit non-reciprocal alignment should exhibit analogous banded phases, and an analytic mapping might be derivable via Markovian embedding.
  • Because the index-order field is slow-relaxing yet unmeasurable, the patterned phase could represent a genuinely new universality class whose hydrodynamic description couples to an index-gradient field rather than standard polar-flock fields; a continuum derivation would be the next step.
  • The finite-size requirement (N ≳ 2^16) suggests the phase may be hard to observe in small experimental groups; detecting it would require large flocks with measurable reaction-time distributions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a Vicsek-like model with an index-ordered update rule (Eq. 4) that breaks reaction-time symmetry within a single timestep, mimicking a distribution of reaction times. The authors report that, in addition to the usual disorder-to-order transition, the model exhibits a second transition deep inside the polar flocking phase to a spatially patterned state: two high-density bands propagate together in the global flocking direction with opposite transverse velocities. The transition is characterized with a Binder cumulant of angles relative to the flocking direction (Fig. 3), number fluctuations (Fig. 2), sinusoidal longitudinal profiles of transverse velocity and of the non-reciprocal torque field Ψ (Fig. 4), and a susceptibility to random permutations of particle indices (Supplemental Fig. 5). The paper argues that the patterned phase is stabilized by a slow-relaxing spatial organization of the particle-index field.

Significance. If the second transition survives the thermodynamic limit, this is a genuinely interesting result: it shows that a minimal, seemingly innocuous temporal asymmetry in agent updates can produce a new collective phase beyond the standard Vicsek phenomenology, with potential implications for hydrodynamic descriptions of time-delayed active matter. The work uses large-scale GPU simulations (up to N=2^17, and N=8e5 for the metric model) and includes an independent permutation-based control that ties the patterned phase to index ordering. These are real strengths. However, the central claim of a thermodynamic transition currently rests on finite-size evidence that is not yet quantitatively established, and the proposed index-field mechanism is explicitly acknowledged in the text to be difficult to measure and not analytically mapped. The paper is therefore a promising candidate for publication after substantial revision, but the evidence as presented is not yet conclusive.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 and 'Order parameters for the spatially patterned flocking phase'] The central claim of a second thermodynamic transition is not yet established. The Binder cumulant U_L changes sign only for N >= 2^16, no error bars are shown, and there is no finite-size scaling or crossing analysis that would extrapolate the behavior to L -> infinity. Given the authors' own statement that Vicsek-like models are notoriously sensitive to finite-size effects, a sign change at the largest sizes could be a finite-size crossover rather than a bulk phase transition. Please provide U_L vs. noise for several sizes with statistical uncertainties, and either a finite-size collapse or an explicit discussion of how the transition point and order-parameter distribution behave as L grows.
  2. [Figs. 1 and 4] The order parameter used in Fig. 3 is a Binder cumulant of scalar relative angles, which does not directly probe the spatial modulation that defines the patterned phase. The manuscript never reports the wavelength or dominant Fourier mode of the transverse-velocity pattern as a function of system size L. In Fig. 1 and Fig. 4 the pattern appears as a single sinusoidal mode across the box; if the dominant mode scales as k_max ~ 1/L, the state is better described as macroscopic two-domain coexistence (a bulk phase separation into two oppositely moving bands) rather than a finite-wavelength spatially patterned phase. Please report the L-dependence of the pattern wavelength and, if possible, the number of bands in larger systems.
  3. [Discussion of the index field and Supplemental Fig. 5] The mechanistic explanation in the abstract and main text is stronger than the evidence. The text states that the relative index field is 'prohibitively difficult to measure at levels beyond the noise' and that there is 'no clear mechanism' by which negative damping would create spatial structure in the index field. The permutation susceptibility in Supplemental Fig. 5 demonstrates only that the patterned phase requires fixed index labels; it does not directly establish the existence of a persistent, slowly relaxing spatial index-order field. The claim that stability is 'directly tied to a subtle spatial organization' of an index-order field therefore needs either a direct measurement of a coarse-grained index gradient (or a proxy that tracks index-order persistence over time), or a more cautious statement that the mechanism is a plausible but unverified hypothesis.
  4. [Figs. 2 and 3] The paper does not report statistical uncertainties for any of the key order parameters: the Binder cumulant U_L, the sinusoidal amplitude A in the Fig. 2 inset, and the profiles in Fig. 4. Because the sign of U_L at large N is the primary quantitative evidence for the transition, error bars or block-averaged standard errors are necessary to determine whether the sign change is robust and to support any subsequent finite-size analysis. Please add error bars and specify how many independent runs or blocks were used.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (2)] Equation (2) appears to be missing the current angle theta_i(t) on the right-hand side; the orientation update should read theta_i(t + dt) = theta_i(t) + dt * tau_i + eta sqrt(dt) * zeta_i(t), or the definitions should be clarified.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption reads 'N = 217 particles'; this should be 'N = 2^17 particles' (or the equivalent superscript notation) to match the text.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption of Fig. 5 does not define whether the plotted change in the global order parameter is the absolute value, the signed difference, or an ensemble-averaged magnitude, nor over what time window it is measured. Please clarify.
  4. [Fig. 2 top panel] The definition 'theta_i = arcsin(n_i . v_perp)' gives only the transverse component of the unit director, not a signed angle about v_parallel; using atan2 of the transverse and parallel components would be more transparent and would make the bimodal distributions easier to interpret.
  5. [References] Reference [43] is listed as '[url to be inserted by publisher]'; in the current preprint this should point to the actual Supplemental Material or be replaced by a stable identifier.
  6. [Eq. (4)] The text should state explicitly that the update in Eq. (4) is performed sequentially in increasing index order, so that the theta_j(t + dt) term for i > j refers to neighbors updated earlier in the same timestep; this is clear from context but would benefit from being stated directly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the patterned phase is discovered by direct simulation and independent diagnostics; self-citations are background and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central finding — a second transition into a spatially patterned flocking phase — is obtained by direct agent-based simulation of Eq. (4), a model defined in the paper, and is characterized by standard, independently computed diagnostics (angle distributions, Binder cumulants, number fluctuations, and a permutation susceptibility). No step in the derivation chain fits a parameter to the target observable and then presents that fit as a prediction. The sinusoidal profiles for v⊥ and Ψ in Fig. 4 are descriptive characterizations of the steady state, not inputs that force the transition. The unmeasured 'index-order field' is openly acknowledged as prohibitively difficult to measure, and no analytical mapping is claimed; these are stated limitations rather than circular reductions. Prior self-citations (refs. 8, 26, 41, 42) are used for background, modeling choices, and GPU code, and none carries the load of the central claim. Finite-size concerns (Binder cumulant sign change only at large N, lack of wavelength-vs-L analysis) are legitimate correctness risks, but they are not circularity. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim sits on four modeling choices treated as input: the XY-torque alignment, the Voronoi neighbor criterion, the index-ordered update as a proxy for time delays, and the fixed simulation parameters (v0, alpha, rho, delta t). It also relies on standard order-parameter analysis (Binder cumulant) and on the unverified existence of a persistent index-order field. No data or code is provided to remove these choices.

free parameters (4)
  • alignment strength alpha = 4
    Chosen for all main simulations; not scanned. The reported phase and its transition location may depend on this value.
  • self-propulsion speed v0 = 0.5
    Fixed in all main simulations; no parameter scan is shown.
  • number density rho = 1.0
    Fixed density for the main model; the metric model uses rho=2.0. Not varied.
  • time step delta t = 1
    Chosen so that the time delays occur within a single timestep; the separation of timescales relies on this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The XY-Hamiltonian torque in Eq. (3) together with Voronoi neighbor lists captures the standard Vicsek alignment and its disorder-to-order transition.
    The model is presented as a Vicsek-like flocking model; the use of Voronoi rather than metric neighbors is a modeling choice, not validated against a derivation in this paper.
  • domain assumption The index-ordered update rule in Eq. (4) faithfully represents a distribution of reaction-time delays with time-scale separation.
    The paper asserts this equivalence in the abstract and intro, but does not prove it; it is the core modeling premise.
  • standard math The Binder cumulant U_L = 1 - (theta^4)/(3(theta^2)^2) is a valid order parameter for locating the transition to the patterned phase.
    Standard cumulant analysis, but its interpretation assumes the mean flocking direction provides the correct reference frame and that the distribution becomes bimodal in the patterned phase.
  • domain assumption The torques from Eq. (4) can be meaningfully compared to time-local torques from Eq. (3) to define the non-reciprocal field Psi.
    Psi is defined as their difference; the assumption is that this field captures the relevant physics rather than merely a gauge choice.
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary conditions and finite system sizes up to N=2^17 are sufficient to access the thermodynamic limit behavior of the phase.
    System sizes are varied, but no finite-size scaling extrapolation is provided, so the persistence of the phase in the infinite-system limit remains an assumption.
invented entities (1)
  • Hydrodynamic index-order field (index field)
    purpose: Proposed to explain the spatial organization of non-reciprocal torques that stabilize the counter-propagating bands.
    The paper states it is 'prohibitively difficult to measure at levels beyond the noise' and it is only inferred indirectly from index-permutation susceptibility and the sinusoidal Psi profile. No direct measurement or independent falsifiable prediction is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatially patterned phases in a reaction-time-symmetry-broken model of flocking." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YJZKMJPM

@misc{pith2026250510657,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatially patterned phases in a reaction-time-symmetry-broken model of flocking},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YJZKMJPM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10657}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a Vicsek-like flocking model with a minimal form of time-delayed orientational interactions, in which the delays occur on a time scale that is well-separated from other time scales in the model. We achieve this by implementing an ``index-ordered'' update rule, mimicking a scenario in which agents have a distribution of times with which they react to information. This model retains the usual disorder-to-order transition common in flocking models, but we show that it also possesses a second transition, deep in the polar flocking phase, to a state with spatially patterned transverse velocities. We characterize this transition and its sensitivity to finite-size effects using the Binder cumulant, and demonstrate -- via direct measurements and by measuring a susceptibility of the phase to particle index permutations -- that the stability of this phase is directly tied to a subtle spatial organization of a slow-relaxing index-order field. These results highlight the potential for even seemingly insignificant temporal asymmetries to fundamentally alter the collective behavior of active matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10657 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: , the longitudinal profile of Ψ is well-described by a sinusoidal profile, and which is out of phase with the longitudinal profile of the transverse velocities. In the absence of this coarse-grained non-reciprocal field, parti￾cles at the interface of the two counter-p…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gigantic dynamical spreading and anomalous diffusion of jerky active particles

    cond-mat.soft 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A linear third-order 'jerk' equation driven by active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise yields mean-square displacement scaling with time exponents 6, 5, 4, or 3, and can destabilize harmonic confinement.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Reviews of modern physics 85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    C. W. Reynolds, Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model, in Proceedings of the 14th annual con- ference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (1987) pp. 25–34

    work page 1987

  3. [3]

    Vicsek, A

    T. Vicsek, A. Czir´ ok, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel Type of Phase Transition in a Sys- tem of Self-Driven Particles, Physical Review Letters 75, 1226 (1995)

    1995

  4. [4]

    Jentsch and C

    P. Jentsch and C. F. Lee, New Universality Class De- scribes Vicsek’s Flocking Phase in Physical Dimensions, Physical Review Letters 133, 128301 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Mahault, F

    B. Mahault, F. Ginelli, and H. Chat´ e, Quantitative As- sessment of the Toner and Tu Theory of Polar Flocks, Physical Review Letters 123, 218001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Martin, H

    D. Martin, H. Chat´ e, C. Nardini, A. Solon, J. Tailleur, and F. Van Wijland, Fluctuation-Induced Phase Sepa- ration in Metric and Topological Models of Collective Motion, Physical Review Letters 126, 148001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Ginelli and H

    F. Ginelli and H. Chat´ e, Relevance of Metric-Free Inter- actions in Flocking Phenomena, Physical Review Letters 105, 168103 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    C. R. Packard and D. M. Sussman, Banded phases in topological flocks (2024), arXiv:2409.05198 [cond-mat]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Toner and Y

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, Long-Range Order in a Two- Dimensional Dynamical $\mathrm{XY}$ Model: How Birds Fly Together, Physical Review Letters 75, 4326 (1995)

    1995

  2. [10]

    Toner and Y

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, Flocks, herds, and schools: A quan- titative theory of flocking, Physical Review E 58, 4828 (1998)

    1998

  3. [11]

    Toner, The physics of flocking: birth, death, and flight in active matter (Cambridge University Press, 2024)

    J. Toner, The physics of flocking: birth, death, and flight in active matter (Cambridge University Press, 2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Toner, Why walking is easier than pointing: Hydro- dynamics of dry active matter (2018), arXiv:1812.00310 [cond-mat]

    J. Toner, Why walking is easier than pointing: Hydro- dynamics of dry active matter (2018), arXiv:1812.00310 [cond-mat]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bertin, M

    E. Bertin, M. Droz, and G. Gr´ egoire, Boltzmann and hy- drodynamic description for self-propelled particles, Phys- ical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 74, 022101 (2006)

    2006

  6. [14]

    Ihle, Kinetic theory of flocking: Derivation of hydro- dynamic equations, Physical Review E—Statistical, Non- linear, and Soft Matter Physics 83, 030901 (2011)

    T. Ihle, Kinetic theory of flocking: Derivation of hydro- dynamic equations, Physical Review E—Statistical, Non- linear, and Soft Matter Physics 83, 030901 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Geyer, A

    D. Geyer, A. Morin, and D. Bartolo, Sounds and hydro- dynamics of polar active fluids, Nature materials 17, 789 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Maitra, P

    A. Maitra, P. Jentsch, L. Chen, C. F. Lee, J. Toner, and S. Ramaswamy, The inconvenient truth about flocks (2025), arXiv:2503.17064 [cond-mat.soft]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Chepizhko, D

    O. Chepizhko, D. Saintillan, and F. Peruani, Revisiting the emergence of order in active matter, Soft Matter 17, 3113 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Toner, Birth, Death, and Flight: A Theory of Malthu- sian Flocks, Physical Review Letters 108, 088102 (2012)

    J. Toner, Birth, Death, and Flight: A Theory of Malthu- sian Flocks, Physical Review Letters 108, 088102 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Cavagna, L

    A. Cavagna, L. Di Carlo, I. Giardina, T. S. Grigera, S. Melillo, L. Parisi, G. Pisegna, and M. Scandolo, Natu- ral swarms in 3.99 dimensions, Nature Physics 19, 1043 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    L. P. Dadhichi, J. Kethapelli, R. Chajwa, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Maitra, Nonmutual torques and the unimportance of motility for long-range order in two-dimensional flocks, Physical Review E 101, 052601 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Q.-s. Chen, A. Patelli, H. Chat´ e, Y.-q. Ma, and X.-q. Shi, Fore-aft asymmetric flocking, Physical Review E 96, 020601 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Mangeat, S

    M. Mangeat, S. Chatterjee, J. D. Noh, and H. Rieger, Emergent complex phases in a discrete flocking model with reciprocal and non-reciprocal interactions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02501 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Sinha and D

    A. Sinha and D. Chaudhuri, How reciprocity impacts ordering and phase separation in active nematics?, Soft Matter 20, 788 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature 592, 363 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Ballerini, N

    M. Ballerini, N. Cabibbo, R. Candelier, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, I. Giardina, V. Lecomte, A. Orlandi, G. Parisi, A. Procaccini, et al. , Interaction ruling an- imal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study, Pro- ceeding...

    2008

  18. [26]

    D. M. Sussman, Non-metric interaction rules in models of active matter (2021), arXiv:2103.10239 [cond-mat]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. Nagy, Z. ´Akos, D. Biro, and T. Vicsek, Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks, Nature 464, 890 (2010). 7

    2010

  20. [28]

    G´ omez-Nava, R

    L. G´ omez-Nava, R. Bon, and F. Peruani, Intermittent collective motion in sheep results from alternating the role of leader and follower, Nature Physics 18, 1494 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Y. Sun, W. Lin, and R. Erban, Time delay can facili- tate coherence in self-driven interacting-particle systems, Physical Review E 90, 062708 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    Erban, J

    R. Erban, J. Haskovec, and Y. Sun, A cucker–smale model with noise and delay, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 76, 1535 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Durve, A

    M. Durve, A. Saha, and A. Sayeed, Active particle con- densation by non-reciprocal and time-delayed interac- tions, The European Physical Journal E 41, 49 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Choi and J

    Y.-P. Choi and J. Haskovec, Hydrodynamic cucker–smale model with normalized communication weights and time delay, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 51, 2660 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    D. Chen, M. Kang, and W. Yu, Probabilistic causal in- ference for coordinated movement of pigeon flocks, Euro- physics Letters 130, 28004 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Chen and Y

    Z. Chen and Y. Zheng, Persistent and responsive collec- tive motion with adaptive time delay, Science Advances 10, eadk3914 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Holubec, D

    V. Holubec, D. Geiss, S. A. M. Loos, K. Kroy, and F. Ci- chos, Finite-Size Scaling at the Edge of Disorder in a Time-Delay Vicsek Model, Physical Review Letters 127, 258001 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Wang, P.-C

    X. Wang, P.-C. Chen, K. Kroy, V. Holubec, and F. Ci- chos, Spontaneous vortex formation by microswimmers with retarded attractions, Nature Communications 14, 56 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    D. Geiß, K. Kroy, and V. Holubec, Signal propagation and linear response in the delay Vicsek model, Physical Review E 106, 054612 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Pakpour and T

    F. Pakpour and T. Vicsek, Delay-induced phase transi- tions in active matter, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 634, 129453 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Giuggioli, T

    L. Giuggioli, T. J. McKetterick, and M. Holderied, De- layed response and biosonar perception explain move- ment coordination in trawling bats, PLoS computational biology 11, e1004089 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. Wang, D.-b. Pan, and G. Zhang, Stability analysis for a new lattice hydrodynamic model with time- varying delay in sensing traffic flux, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 561, 125269 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Packard and D

    C. Packard and D. M. Sussman, Non-reciprocal forces and exceptional phase transitions in metric and topolog- ical flocks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.09461 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    D. M. Sussman, cellGPU: Massively parallel simulations of dynamic vertex models, Computer Physics Communi- cations 219, 400 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    [url to be inserted by publisher] (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Ginelli, The physics of the vicsek model, The Euro- pean Physical Journal Special Topics 225, 2099 (2016)

    F. Ginelli, The physics of the vicsek model, The Euro- pean Physical Journal Special Topics 225, 2099 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Chat´ e, F

    H. Chat´ e, F. Ginelli, G. Gr´ egoire, and F. Raynaud, Col- lective motion of self-propelled particles interacting with- out cohesion, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 77, 046113 (2008)

    2008

  38. [46]

    S. A. Loos and S. H. Klapp, Fokker–planck equations for time-delayed systems via markovian embedding, Journal of Statistical Physics 177, 95 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    S. A. Loos, Stochastic systems with time delay: probabilis- tic and thermodynamic descriptions of non-Markovian processes far from equilibrium (Springer Nature, 2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Jenkins, Self-oscillation, Physics Reports Self- Oscillation, 525, 167 (2013)

    A. Jenkins, Self-oscillation, Physics Reports Self- Oscillation, 525, 167 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.