REVIEW 2 cited by
CLAPNQ: Cohesive Long-form Answers from Passages in Natural Questions for RAG systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a popular application for large language models. It is preferable that successful RAG systems provide accurate answers that are supported by being grounded in a passage without any hallucinations. While considerable work is required for building a full RAG pipeline, being able to benchmark performance is also necessary. We present ClapNQ, a benchmark Long-form Question Answering dataset for the full RAG pipeline. ClapNQ includes long answers with grounded gold passages from Natural Questions (NQ) and a corpus to perform either retrieval, generation, or the full RAG pipeline. The ClapNQ answers are concise, 3x smaller than the full passage, and cohesive, meaning that the answer is composed fluently, often by integrating multiple pieces of the passage that are not contiguous. RAG models must adapt to these properties to be successful at ClapNQ. We present baseline experiments and analysis for ClapNQ that highlight areas where there is still significant room for improvement in grounded RAG. CLAPNQ is publicly available at https://github.com/primeqa/clapnq
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Improving Contextual Faithfulness of Large Language Models via Retrieval Heads-Induced Optimization
RHIO improves long-form QA faithfulness by training models with negative samples created by masking retrieval heads, then contrasting faithful and unfaithful decoding.
-
MTRAG: A Multi-Turn Conversational Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
MTRAG is a human-generated multi-turn RAG benchmark (110 conversations, 842 tasks, four domains) on which state-of-the-art LLM RAG systems perform poorly.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.