Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sprinkling Selections over Join DAGs for Efficient Query Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cs/0202035 v1 pith:YOQLCL6A submitted 2002-02-21 cs.DB

Sprinkling Selections over Join DAGs for Efficient Query Optimization

classification cs.DB
keywords joinqueryoptimizationqueriesgenerateoptimalstrategyconditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In optimizing queries, solutions based on AND/OR DAG can generate all possible join orderings and select placements before searching for optimal query execution strategy. But as the number of joins and selection conditions increase, the space and time complexity to generate optimal query plan increases exponentially. In this paper, we use join graph for a relational database schema to either pre-compute all possible join orderings that can be executed and store it as a join DAG or, extract joins in the queries to incrementally build a history join DAG as and when the queries are executed. The select conditions in the queries are appropriately placed in the retrieved join DAG (or, history join DAG) to generate optimal query execution strategy. We experimentally evaluate our query optimization technique on TPC-D/H query sets to show their effectiveness over AND/OR DAG query optimization strategy. Finally, we illustrate how our technique can be used for efficient multiple query optimization and selection of materialized views in data warehousing environments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Benchmarking the Full Pipeline of Materialized-View-Based Query Rewriting

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    No single materialized-view pipeline stage or engine dominates across workloads; end-to-end time savings depend on strong interactions between enumeration, selection, and rewriting.