Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

How to choose master integrals

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.08042 v4 pith:YP426K36 submitted 2020-02-19 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords integralsmasteralgorithmcodesfeynmangivenalwaysbasis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The standard procedure when evaluating integrals of a given family of Feynman integrals, corresponding to some Feynman graph, is to construct an algorithm which provides the possibility to write any particular integral as a linear combination of so-called master integrals. To do this, public (AIR, FIRE, REDUZE, LiteRed, KIRA) and private codes based on solving integration by parts relations are used. However, the choice of the master integrals provided by these codes is not always optimal. We present an algorithm to improve a given basis of the master integrals, as well as its computer implementation; see also a competitive variant [1].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Planar Six-Point Feynman Integrals for Four-Dimensional Gauge Theories

    hep-ph 2024-12 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    All planar two-loop six-point master integrals for four-dimensional gauge theories are computed, and nine-propagator topologies are shown to decouple in the four-dimensional limit.

  2. Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and Second Self-Force Order

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The conservative black-hole scattering angle at fifth post-Minkowskian and second self-force order is computed in terms of K3 periods, but contains a coefficient fixed only by an ad hoc 'γ-3' prescription.

  3. First Look at Quartic-in-Spin Binary Dynamics at Third Post-Minkowskian Order

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The O(G^3) conservative and radiation-reaction classical observables for spinning black-hole scattering are extended to quartic order in spin, with all-order-in-spin radiation reaction beyond the aligned-spin limit.

  4. Current-current operator contribution to the decay matrix in $B$-meson mixing at next-to-next-to-leading order of QCD

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The full charm-mass dependence of the three-loop current-current contribution to the B-meson decay matrix is computed, yielding Delta_Gamma_s = (0.077 +/- 0.016) ps^-1 with the leading-term perturbative error reduced ...

  5. AMFlow 2.0: significant algorithmic and software improvements for Feynman integral evaluation

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    AMFlow 2.0 cuts symbolic and numerical cost of multi-loop Feynman integral evaluation via an FT recursion mode, a C++ DE solver, and modern IBP reducers, demonstrated on a three-loop five-point family.

  6. Direct Expression for One-Loop Tensor Reduction with Lorentz Indices via Generating Function

    hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A rational, recursion-free expression for one-loop tensor reduction coefficients with Lorentz indices is given, built from a small set of tensor building blocks.

Pith tools